logo
What Iranians in India think about the war and Tehran

What Iranians in India think about the war and Tehran

Scroll.in9 hours ago

For several nights this month, Nader Mohandesi stayed up till 2 am in his Bengaluru home watching television news about the war between Israel and his country, Iran. The 60-year-old surgeon was worried about his mother, who lives in the Iranian city of Shiraz.
Throughout the war, Mohandesi used to send a WhatsApp message on his family group chat every morning and wait for it to get delivered. 'We could not talk everyday because the internet connection in Iran was very weak,' he said. 'It was really stressful.'
Things were worse in Tehran, Iran's capital. An Iranian artist who lives in Delhi told Scroll that his parents and younger sister had to flee the city on the fifth day of the fighting.
'They locked up our house and went to my grandparents' home in the North-West of Iran,' said the artist who requested anonymity citing privacy concerns. Anxious and unable to sleep, the 38-year-old even considered flying to Turkey or Armenia and making his way to them by land. But his family dissuaded him.
'You go through more stress if you live outside,' he explained.
The Israel-Iran ceasefire, announced on Tuesday by United States President Donald Trump, brought relief to Mohandesi and the artist. But the two differed vastly on what had led their country to the brink. Their differences shed light on the schism in Iranian society.
'Is this karma?' asked Mohandesi as he walked to his clinic in Bengaluru on Monday. He was referring to the air strikes carried out by the US on three of Iran's nuclear sites the previous day.
Though the US has justified its attack by alleging that Iran was on the verge of producing nuclear weapons, the International Atomic Energy Agency has found nothing to support this claim.
The surgeon, however, was clear that Iran's nuclear programme and the ideology supposedly underpinning it was to blame for its current predicament. 'For 45 years, they have been saying down with this country or that,' he added. 'What else did they expect?'
Soon after the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Iran locked horns with the US, which had allowed Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, the deposed Shah, to visit America for medical treatment. While the monarch did not live for very long, the feud between the two countries has lasted ever since.
Mohandesi argued that the bitterness between Iran and the US had done no good to his homeland. He came to India in 1985 to study medicine and stayed on after falling in love with a college junior – a woman from Guwahati. The couple decided to build their lives together in Bengaluru.
Living in the Silicon Valley of India gave Mohandesi a ringside view of India's unfolding growth story even as Western sanctions were impeding the economic trajectory of his own country.
Now, he wanted Tehran to hold a referendum on continuing its nuclear programme. 'Our Constitution says that in difficult situations you must go to the people,' he reasoned.
The artist, on the other hand, dismissed all talk about nuclear weapons as eyewash. The US, in his view, was making a 'power play' in West Asia by attacking Iran. 'The world is an unfair place,' he said.
He first came to India over two decades ago with his parents, who had found work here. While they returned to Iran a few years later, he chose to stay because he was in the middle of college.
Over time, he found himself drawn to the world of Indian arts, which he likened to the environment he grew up in back home in Iran. 'If Iran is my father, India is my mother,' he joked.
He made it clear, though, that the nostalgia had not made him a regime apologist. He was critical of its economic policies, particularly the state of the Iranian Rial, its currency. Still, he appreciated the advances that his country had made in areas such as 'defence and medicine' since the revolution.
'Things don't happen overnight,' he contended. 'Sometimes, it takes one or two generations.'
In recent years, Iran has been rocked by women-led protests, most notably against compulsory veiling. In December, the country was considering the promulgation of a law which proposed death penalty for women refusing to veil themselves. But the artist held the protests as proof of democracy deepening in the country.
The one thing that the artist as well as the surgeon agreed on was the need for political reform in Iran. Both hoped that the recently concluded war would be a 'wake-up call' for the regime.
'I hope the regime sees that most people backed the country,' the artist said.
Mohandesi was less optimistic. He remembered having voted for the reformists in the elections of 1997 and 2001 only to be eventually disappointed by them.
'I thought something would happen,' he recalled. 'But the system is very rigid. It just does not give in.'
Here is a summary of the week's other top stories.
India's stance at the SCO. India did not sign a joint statement at the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation Defence Ministers' meeting as the document did not reflect New Delhi's position against terror. The Ministry of External Affairs said that New Delhi 'wanted concerns and terrorism reflected in the document, which was not acceptable to one particular country'.
The statement reportedly did not contain references to the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22 that killed 26 persons.
At the organisation's meeting in China, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh said that New Delhi had launched Operation Sindoor in response to the Pahalgam attack. India exercised its right to defend against terrorism and pre-empt as well as deter further cross-border attacks, said the minister.
Free and fair polls. Alleging that 'vote theft' took place during the Maharashtra Assembly elections in November, Congress leader Rahul Gandhi demanded the immediate release of machine-readable digital voter rolls and security camera footage.
The leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha made the statements after Newslaundry reported that Maharashtra Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis' constituency saw an 8% increase in voters between the Lok Sabha elections, held in May and June 2024, and the Assembly polls in November.
Gandhi has frequently demanded access to voter lists, polling data and election footage, alleging irregularities.
His statements on Tuesday came days after the Election Commission wrote to him saying all polls are held strictly as per laws passed by Parliament.
Former CM booked. The police in Andhra Pradesh's Guntur district filed a first information report against former Chief Minister YS Jagan Mohan Reddy and several of his aides over the death of a 65-year-old man during a YSR Congress Party rally on June 18.
Guntur District Superintendent of Police S Satish Kumar said the man Cheeli Singaiah died after being run over by a vehicle in which Jagan Mohan Reddy was travelling during the rally.
Besides Jagan Mohan Reddy, the FIR names his driver Ramana Reddy, personal assistant Nageswar Reddy, MP YV Subba Reddy and former ministers Perni Nani and Vidadala Rajini. All of them were reportedly in the vehicle that ran over Singaiah.
interim protection from arrest till July 1.
Also on Scroll this week
Follow the Scroll channel on WhatsApp for a curated selection of the news that matters throughout the day, and a round-up of major developments in India and around the world every evening. What you won't get: spam.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iron dome: How useful is Israel's shield?
Iron dome: How useful is Israel's shield?

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Iron dome: How useful is Israel's shield?

America's intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict has not stopped missile exchanges and defence analysts remain agog with how Israel's 'iron dome' has held up as a shield. It hasn't proven foolproof, but Israel claims it has neutralized over 80% of Iran's projectiles. Also Read: Mint Quick Edit | The US blasts in: A forever war in Iran? This dome has three layers. The first, which foiled attacks from Gaza and Lebanon, uses relatively cheap interceptors for short-range volleys. But longer-range Iranian missiles have forced the use of its David's Sling and Arrow systems to intercept cruise and ballistic missile onslaughts with interceptors that cost over $1 million a pop. Also Read: Donald Trump's war dilemma: Should America put boots on the ground in Iran or not? While Iran's fusillades have flagged, rough estimates suggest Israel's shield ran up a nightly ammunition bill that peaked at $300 million. A high strike rate may make this seem worthwhile. Notably, Arrow can stop nukes too. Also Read: Israel-Iran conflict: Echoes of history haunt West Asia Yet, let's not forget why the US shelved its 'Star Wars' plan of the 1980s for a US-wide shield against nukes. While it would've been hugely costly to set up, it could not guarantee that no nuclear warhead would ever get through; no dome could be doom-proof. This drove home the point that, ultimately, peace via diplomacy is a country's only real security.

Manu Joseph: What being in awe of Israel actually says about people
Manu Joseph: What being in awe of Israel actually says about people

Mint

timean hour ago

  • Mint

Manu Joseph: What being in awe of Israel actually says about people

A few months ago, Hezbollah's operatives in Lebanon experienced something surreal—their pagers exploded. The next day, their walkie-talkies did the same. Israel, at first, said nothing officially. But later, it admitted what everyone already suspected: that its intelligence agency Mossad had orchestrated it. Israel managed to plant small explosives inside Hezbollah's pagers and walkie-talkies, possibly by creating a shell company that made these devices. A transmitted code then triggered blasts in thousands of devices, killing or maiming Hezbollah fighters and an unknown number of civilians. Israel seized this moment of chaos to launch a military air offensive, effectively decapitating the once-formidable militia that, like Iran, refused to accept Israel's right to exist. It is hard not to be impressed by Israel. But it's a complex sentiment. Awe for a nation whose survival strategies often involve morally devastating acts is also a peep into human nature. Israel elicits the admiration of outsiders for some unspoken reasons. Part of it is a masculine admiration for military genius, elegant tech and ruthless efficiency. Part of it is tangled with disdain for Muslims or the rest of West Asia. Perfectly good and sane people can claim, even to themselves, that they are moved by the plight of Gaza and also objectively dazzled by Israel. This may be because they do not consider all humans the same, even if they do not realize it. Some horrible things happen to humans. Once a population is framed as poor, the world tolerates a level of death and suffering among them. A dark algorithm seems to run, by which the perceived value of a life correlates with its wealth, or its nation's wealth. So the lives of air passengers in India are seen as more valuable than those of people on a public bus. Israeli lives appear more valuable than Iranian lives. And Iranian lives more valuable than Palestinian. There is something unsettling about awe. It is an omen that being 'neutral' is impossible. A person can resist all base human emotions to form an opinion about a faraway war. But then awe draws you in. Through awe, even objective observers pick a side. It is as though awe is human nature's way of forcing people to accept that they are primarily emotional above analytical. You can either marvel at the brilliance of Israel and submit to your hidden biases, or not be in awe at all because the oppressed remind you of your own oppressors, or maybe you are just a lovely person. If you accept there is such a thing as awe, Israel satisfies every condition to be a subject of this emotion. A tiny nation that is about 470km long and 135km at its widest, with a population of 9.5 million, has not only survived Arab nations that questioned its right to exist but also defeated their coalitions more than once, prospering all along with no oil but just people. Also consider Israel's sabotage of Iran's nuclear programme. The Natanz facility was 'air-gapped'—completely isolated from the internet to prevent cyber attacks. Yet, in 2009, Israel managed to infect it with the Stuxnet virus, probably developed in collaboration with the US. There is a theory that a Dutch engineer, reportedly recruited by Mossad, physically introduced the virus via a USB stick while servicing the facility. The malware disabled around a thousand centrifuges, setting Iran's nuclear ambitions back significantly. When Iran persisted with its uranium enrichment and, according to Israel, reached a point when it was just days away from developing a nuclear weapon, Israel struck in a spectacular way. In the opening hours of that offensive, it eliminated key figures in Iran's leadership. Israel's Iron Dome remains a modern marvel. As Iran launched waves of missiles, the system intercepted most of them with near-clinical precision. Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei had to go into hiding, much like Salman Rushdie after the leader's predecessor issued a fatwa against him. Khamenei emerged after the ceasefire to make a defiant speech. A major reason behind Israel's success is its extraordinary human intelligence network, which is based on a remarkable way of the world: Israel manages to find traitors in other nations; other nations almost never find one in Israel. So, intellectually, objectively, analytically, it is possible to acknowledge Israel's genius without endorsing its transgressions. But such objectivity is rare and most people who are not Israeli and think their awe of Israel is objective are probably deluded or unable to face their own bias. Awe for Israel has a private history for many of us. I first encountered Israel's story as a child, listening to grown men discuss world affairs. One day, the Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat went missing for many hours, and the men were saying that the amazing Israel might have picked him off. Eventually, Indians overimpressed by Israel could have ended with an imbalanced analysis of the world. India's right-wing often assumes there is a global fraternity of right-wing movements—that Netanyahu is somehow a brother-in-arms in their own politics. But this is a delusion. As this column has argued before, only the left can be a global fellowship. The right-wing everywhere is fundamentally local. If anything, right-wing governments tend to compensate for their harshness at home through exaggerated gestures of concern for foreign humanitarian causes—particularly those that do not cost them anything. The author is a journalist, novelist, and the creator of the Netflix series, 'Decoupled'.

‘Double-edged sword': Kremlin's ‘painful recoil' warning on EU's fresh sanctions on Russia
‘Double-edged sword': Kremlin's ‘painful recoil' warning on EU's fresh sanctions on Russia

Hindustan Times

timean hour ago

  • Hindustan Times

‘Double-edged sword': Kremlin's ‘painful recoil' warning on EU's fresh sanctions on Russia

The Kremlin on Sunday warned Europe against imposing fresh sanctions on Russia, cautioning that tougher measures would trigger a more painful economic recoil for EU nations. Kremlin called the sanctions 'illegal' and said that Russia had grown resistant to such actions.(via REUTERS) Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov described the proposed sanctions as 'illegal' and said Russia had developed resilience against such punitive actions. Responding to remarks by Western European leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, that stricter sanctions could pressure Moscow into peace talks, Peskov said that only 'logic and arguments' could bring Russia to the negotiating table. "The more serious the package of sanctions, which, I repeat, we consider illegal, the more serious will be the recoil from a gun to the shoulder. This is a double-edged sword," he told state television. Peskov told state television's top Kremlin correspondent, Pavel Zarubin, that he did not doubt the EU would impose further sanctions but that Russia had built up "resistance" to such sanctions. Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022 triggered a wave of Western sanctions on Russia, and it is by far the most sanctioned major economy in the world. European Commission's fresh proposal of sanctions on Russia The European Commission on June 10 proposed a new round of sanctions against Russia, targeting Moscow's energy revenues, its banks and its military industry to force the country to end the war in Ukraine. On the other hand, the United States has so far refused to toughen its own sanctions on Moscow. Europe hopes that sanctions will force President Vladimir Putin to seek peace in Ukraine. But the measures don't seem to be working. Though the Russian economy contracted in 2022, it grew in 2023 and 2024 at faster rates than the European Union. President Vladimir Putin said on Friday that any additional EU sanctions on Russia would simply hurt Europe more, and pointed out that Russia's economy grew at 4.3 per cent in 2024 compared to the eurozone's growth of 0.9 per cent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store