
Explainer: What do Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on India mean? What happens if they stay…
US President Donald Trump has hit India with a 25% tariff rate ahead of his August 1 reciprocal tariff deadline. India and the US are working on a trade deal but no interim agreement has been finalised.
With this India has become the latest addition to the list of countries subjected to higher tariffs under Trump's "Liberation Day" trade strategy, which seeks to restructure American trade partnerships through enhanced reciprocal arrangements.
The revised US tariffs will affect India's export of goods to America, projected at approximately $87 billion in 2024. This includes labour-intensive sectors including apparel, medicines, gems and jeweler, and petrochemical products.
The trade imbalance between the United States and India is at $45.7 billion, favouring India.
US Tariffs on India
: What did Trump announce?
Taking to social media platform Truth Social, Trump said, 'Remember, while India is our friend, we have, over the years, done relatively little business with them because their Tariffs are far too high, among the highest in the World, and they have the most strenuous and obnoxious non-monetary Trade Barriers of any Country.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Last Chance: 80% Off This Artisan's Retirement Jewelry Sale
The Maker's Journal
Read More
Undo
Also, they have always bought a vast majority of their military equipment from Russia, and are Russia's largest buyer of ENERGY, along with China, at a time when everyone wants Russia to STOP THE KILLING IN UKRAINE — ALL THINGS NOT GOOD! INDIA WILL THEREFORE BE PAYING A TARIFF OF 25%, PLUS A PENALTY FOR THE ABOVE, STARTING ON AUGUST FIRST.
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER. MAGA!
The additional penalty for trade with Russia remains unclear for now.
Also Read |
Donald Trump imposes 25% tariffs on India! How does India compare to other economies like China, Japan, Vietnam on the rate list? Check details
What India Has Said About the 25% tariff
In a statement, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry said, "The Government has taken note of a statement by the US President on bilateral trade. The Government is studying its implications."
"India and the US have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement over the last few months. We remain committed to that objective. The Government attaches the utmost importance to protecting and promoting the welfare of our farmers, entrepreneurs, and MSMEs.
The Government will take all steps necessary to secure our national interest, as has been the case with other trade agreements including the latest Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement with the UK," India has said.
How will the 25% tariffs hit India?
Agneshwar Sen, Trade Policy Leader, EY India says, 'The decision to raise the US tariff to 25% on Indian exports is an unfortunate development, particularly given the strong strategic partnership that has been steadily built between India and the USA in recent years.
If this tariff is sustained, this move may directly affect key sectors such as marine products, pharmaceuticals, textiles, leather, and automobiles, where bilateral trade has been especially robust. However, it's important to note that both countries remain positively engaged in active negotiations with the US team expected in India later in August to finalize a comprehensive trade agreement,' he said.
'I am confident that, considering our shared interests and history of cooperation, the two sides will be able to address these contentious issues constructively and arrive at a mutually beneficial agreement in the very near term,' he added.
Garima Kapoor, Economist and Executive Vice President at Elara Capital sees the 25% tariff as a negative development, and one that may shave off 20 basis points from India's GDP growth if the tariff rate stays at that level.
'The exact details of the tariffs on the exempted items such as pharma and the ones that were charged at a differential rate such as iron, steel and auto is unknown as of now, but inclusion of pharma into tariffs should be incremental negative for India's exports as US accounts for more than 30% of India's pharma exports.
If no deal is signed by Sept-October, we see a downside to the full year GDP growth estimate for India by 20 basis points,' she said.
Also Read |
India-US trade deal: Donald Trump announces 25% tariff on India, plus penalty for buying energy and arms from Russia
Agricultural economist Ashok Gulati is of the view that the tariff will significantly affect India's seafood exports, particularly shrimps.
The decision by US President Donald Trump to levy higher tariffs on Indian products is "very bad" and "shocking", noted Gulati, who had anticipated a more modest increase of 10-15 per cent.
"This clearly shows Trump is unpredictable and punitive," he told PTI.
The economist indicated that this development will substantially affect India's shrimp trade, whilst Ecuador stands to benefit due to its reduced tariffs and closer proximity to the United States.
The impact of increased US tariffs will extend beyond shrimps to affect India's textile sector as well.
Gulati further added that the benefits acquired through the India-UK free trade agreement would be offset by these elevated US tariffs.
Earlier this month, an SBI Research report said that even if India is unable to secure a trade deal as per its desire, the impact is likely to be limited. 'With India's service exports reaching a new high each year, a record $387.5 bn in 2024-25 driven by sectors like IT, financial and business services, our total exports are not likely to get significantly impacted,' the report said.
India's Exports Uncompetitive?
The most worrying bit about the 25% tariff is not the figure itself, but the fact that India's Asian peers have managed to secure deals with the Trump administration that have lower duties.
Japan will pay 15%, Vietnam will pay 20% and Indonesia has a tariff of 19%. This will hit India's competitive advantage for US exports.
India is actually looking to secure a trade deal that will give it preferential access to US markets compared to peers.
Talking about the India-US trade deal negotiations Commerce Minister Piyush Goyal recently said, '...what is important is to get preferential market access over our competitors, our peers.'
Garima Kapoor of Elara Capital says, 'The 25% tariff rate is certainly a negative development as it compares to lower rates for peers such as Vietnam, Indonesia and Philippines which compete with India in a similar category of labour-intensive products and electronic goods.'
But is the 25% tariff rate all bad?
Ajay Srivastava from Global Trade Research Initiative explains, 'Some sectors like our top exports to the US are pharmaceuticals, medicines, so Europe will be paying 15%, but European medicines are expensive, high-end proprietary medicines.
We are into generics. So if we are paying 25%, I don't think much of the generic market exports to India, exports to the US from India will be impacted.'
Regarding smartphone exports, particularly iPhones, he noted that with only China and India being major exporters to the US market, the 5% duty differential (China at 30% and India at 25%) would not significantly affect trade patterns.
Garima Kapoor believes a hasty deal would have not helped.
'On the positive side, it is pertinent to note that any hotchpotch deal which would have compelled India to give concessions to its agriculture and dairy sector may have had much deeper ramifications politically, socially, and eventually on livelihoods,' she says.
'A well negotiated deal that addresses all aspects of trade, investment and tariff and non- tariff barriers by September October 2025 is likely to yield long term benefits than a hurried deal.
The India-UK deal template which gave concessions to auto and opened public procurement sector has shown that India is willing to shed its protectionist tag in sectors where it doesn't impact the marginal producer, which is a huge departure from its earlier stance,' she adds.
25% Trump Tariffs temporary in nature?
As trade deal talks appeared to have hit a stalemate with the next round expected in August-end, it appears that India was already bracing for 20-25% tariffs from the Trump administration.
"Talks are progressing well," a government official had been quoted as saying by Reuters, adding Trump could issue a tariff order in a "worst-case scenario".
"But, we assume it would be a temporary measure, considering the five rounds of trade talks that have taken place. A deal will soon be worked out,' the official had said.
As US officials visit India for the sixth round of talks in August-end, there are hopes that a trade deal will be finalised in the coming months.
Stay informed with the latest
business
news, updates on
bank holidays
and
public holidays
.
Discover stories of India's leading eco-innovators at Ecopreneur Honours 2025
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
This Week in Explainers: Is Trump embracing Pakistan at the cost of India?
Donald Trump proudly announced this week that he had signed a deal to jointly develop 'massive oil reserves' with Pakistan. This move came as the US president announced a 25 per cent tariff on India along with an added penalty for trading with Russia. We discuss this and more in our weekly wrap of the news read more It's been a hectic, hectic past seven days. Donald Trump unleashed a new tsunami of tariffs on several of America's trading partners, including India whom he even referred to as a 'dead economy'. This week, also saw a further change in Trump's stance in connection to Pakistan. He has signed a new trade deal with India's neighbour, which includes developing 'massive oil reserves' in Pakistan. It's a far cry from calling it one that has 'given us nothing but lies and deceit' as Trump did back in 2018 during his first term at the White House. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Speaking of a tsunami, a powerful 8.8 earthquake in Russia's far Eastern Kamchatka Peninsula, also triggered concern as well as tsunami waves across several countries, including America's Hawaii and Japan. In the week gone by, New York has also garnered headlines — albeit for the wrong reasons. The city's controversial mayoral candidate, Zohran Mamdani faced fury for his lavish wedding celebrations in Uganda. The city was also shocked when a gunman barged into a midtown Manhattan office, killing four people – including a New York Police Department officer – before turning the gun on himself. Now, as we wind down from the busy happenings from the week, we discuss these big stories from across the world and much more. 1. Since Trump returned to power in January, he has spoken of tariffs and used them as a pressure tactic to get countries negotiate trade deals with the US. And with just hours before the August 1 deadline on trade deals, the US president announced a new set of tariffs for countries across the world, with the levies ranging from as low as 10 per cent to as high as 41 per cent. Among those on the list was India — with a 25 per cent tariff imposed. Notably, this makes India among the worst hit in Asia. Neighbouring countries such as Pakistan, Bangladesh fared much better; Trump levied a 19 per cent tariff on Islamabad whereas Dhaka saw a 20 per cent tariff. Here's more about this in our report. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 2. On the topic of trade and tariffs, this week also saw Trump announcing a new deal with Pakistan in which Washington and Islamabad would jointly 'develop massive oil reserves' in the Asian nation. Many note that this is a clear indicator that the US president is further embracing Pakistan, at the cost of India. After all, this new move comes amid the 25 per cent tariff on India as well as after Trump invited Pakistan army chief Asim Munir to the White House for a lunch in June. But the question that many are asking is does Pakistan have the oil that it claims? What does data show on Pakistan's oil reserves? Where are these sites that it claims to develop along with Trump? A woman watches the sea during an evacuation of the coast following a tsunami warning issued by local authorities after an earthquake struck the Kamchatka Peninsula in the far east of Russia, triggering warnings and evacuations across the South Pacific, in Dichato near Concepcion, Chile. Reuters 3. On Wednesday, one of the most powerful earthquakes ever recorded struck Russia's remote Kamchatka Peninsula, sending tsunami waves hurtling across the Pacific Ocean and putting nations from Japan to the United States to Chile on high alert with millions urged to evacuate. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The waves hit Russia and Japan first and then the US states of Hawaii, California, Oregon, Washington, and Alaska. The tsunami waves led many to believe that New Baba Vanga's prediction of Japan's destruction would come true. However, less than 24 hours after the quake first struck, most tsunami alerts around the world had already been lifted. But how much damage did the quake and tsunami waves cause? Our explainer has the answers for you. 4. In this week gone by, another Indian was attacked in Ireland by a gang of teenagers. This time, Santosh Yadav, an Indian-origin techie was assaulted by the teens in Dublin, leaving him with a fractured cheek bone. The shocking incident comes just a week after another gang attacked an Indian-origin man in Dublin in the evening, leaving him bloodied and without any pants by the side of the road. It was a woman, who finally helped him get the aid he required. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Interestingly, the same time the 40-year-old was beaten in Dublin, an Indian student was being assaulted in Australia's Adelaide following a parking lot dispute. These incidents in quick succession have got many asking — are Indians being targeted abroad? A police officer stands next to the glass window with a bullet hole near the scene of a deadly mass shooting in Manhattan, New York City. Reuters 5. Half of 2025 is over but somethings just don't change. For instance, gun violence in America and the latest instance emerged on Tuesday (July 29) when a gunman stormed into a high-rise office building in Midtown Manhattan, home to heavyweight firms like Blackstone, the National Football League, and KPMG, and opened fire, killing four people before turning the gun on himself. The gunman was later identified as Shane Devon Tamura, a 27-year-old from Las Vegas, acted alone, armed with an around $500 assault rifle. But who was he? We have the full story here. Hidaya, a 31-year-old Palestinian mother, carries her sick 18-month-old son Muhammad Zakariya Ayyoub al-Matouq, who is displaying signs of malnutrition, inside their tent at the Al-Shati refugee camp, west of Gaza City. This image has become symbolic of a famine in Gaza. AFP 6. They say a picture speaks a thousand words. However, a viral photo from Gaza, which has become a symbol of the hunger crisis that emanates from the ongoing Israel war, has now come under a cloud of suspicion. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD A pro-Israeli journalist has questioned the image, slamming it to be propaganda carried out by some Western media. But what's the full story behind the image? Is there more to it than meets the eye? 7. On the topic of war, we turn our focus to the Russia-Ukraine war. This week, data has emerged that HIV rates among enlisted personnel skyrocketed since the outbreak of the Ukraine war. The number of HIV cases in the military has shot up since Russia's invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, including a fivefold increase by autumn that year. By the end of 2023, there were 20 times more HIV diagnoses among Russian soldiers compared with before the war. But what's the cause for the soaring numbers? What's to blame for the rise in HIV cases among Russian soldiers? Read our full essay for the answers. That's all from us this week. Bookmark this page, if you liked what you read and seek more such reports. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Happy reading!
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
9 minutes ago
- First Post
Democracies snubbed, dictators courted: Inside Trump's embrace of Pakistan
US President Donald Trump looks on as a member of the media raises their hand, at the White House in Washington, DC, US, August 1, 2025. File Image/Reuters On July 31, 2025, Lara Loomer launched a broadside against billionaire Tom Barrack, President Donald Trump's ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria. Loomer, whose outside vetting of Trump appointees has led to waves of firings across his national security bureaucracy, pulled no punches. 'His [Barrack's] appointment to high-level diplomatic posts is alarming, given that his primary expertise lies in leveraging political connections for financial gain,' she wrote. His actions have enabled Islamists to thrive, even at the expense of US national security. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'Barrack has a history of opaque financial dealings and what many view as political influence peddling,' she continued. 'His real estate empire, intertwined with Gulf investments, has long raised concerns about conflicts of interest and whether he is truly serving America or if he is flashing his political access.' She included in her tweet a copy of Barrack's 2018 indictment for acting as an unregistered foreign agent on behalf of Middle East interests. Barrack is the rule rather than the exception in Trump's inner circle. Many of the most influential people in the Trump administration have pre-service financial entanglements with Qatar. The US magazine Newsweek reported that, in addition to Trump himself, five major Trump administration officials have financial ties to Qatar: Chief-of-Staff Susie Wiles, FBI Director Kash Patel; Attorney General Pam Bondi; Middle East Envoy Steve Witkoff; and Environmental Protection Agency administrator Lee Zeldin. Democrats remain up-in-arms over Trump's acceptance of a $400 million jet from Qatar, alleging it amounts to a bribe; given Republican concern that a desire to influence motivates the $20 billion in assistance that Qatar provides American universities, it is hard to deny that Qatari money is not altruistic. For almost a quarter century, successive American presidents have cultivated relations with India. The development of US-India ties has coincided with perhaps the most contentious period in US foreign policy since the debate between isolationists and internationalists in the 1930s. Israel, Russia, NATO, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and China each became political footballs. India, however, stood out as a rare example of bipartisanship. Every US president from George W Bush to Joe Biden worked to cultivate US-India ties. That commitment to a US-India partnership included Trump, at least in his first term. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD In his second term, Trump has staked out an opposite position. He approached Pakistani terrorism and its Indian victims with moral equivalency and even dined with Pakistan Army Chief Asim Munir, mastermind of the Pahalgam massacre, at the White House. Just as intelligence operatives recruit and compromise targets with either blackmail, bribes, or buffeting ego, so too did Islamabad handle Trump, telling him how much he deserved a Nobel Prize and entrancing Trump with notions of gas deals. The numbers do not lie. On July 31, 2025, Trump slapped 25 per cent sanctions on India, greater than Pakistan (19 per cent), Bangladesh (20 per cent), Sri Lanka (20 per cent), and Afghanistan (15 per cent). Trump treats India with disdain, belittling its economy and privileging countries like Pakistan and Sri Lanka that are Chinese satrapies and Bangladesh and Afghanistan that are hubs for Islamist terror. Each of those countries to which Trump offers better terms ranks well below India on Transparency International's annual corruption index. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD There is no proof that Pakistan, Qatar, or Turkey bribed Trump, though a commonality of Trump's two terms is the conflict of interest between public policy and personal business. Trump's reference to gas deals with Pakistan, his Qatari involvement, and his and Barrack's repeated endorsements of Turkish President Recep Erdogan are coincidences that no Indian should ignore, especially given the coincidences, Trump's policy choices, and the lack of any other logical policy-driven explanation. India must respond in the only way Trump will understand, by denying opportunities to American businesses until Trump or his successors change US policy and again ground it in a partnership of democracies and consensus against terrorism rather than a partnership with corrupt, terror-sponsoring dictatorships. Here, India's decision to abandon the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter makes sense. The US defence industry purposely spreads itself across states and Congressional districts in order to immunise itself from cutbacks by ensuring it always has several dozen, if not hundreds, of lawmakers willing to protect the corporate interest for the sake of their employees. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to the Congressional Research Service, F-35 components are produced across 250 different districts in 45 US states. The same pattern holds true with other platforms that the United States would like to sell to India. Cutting contracts makes single headlines, but sending diplomats to each Congressional district to explain why New Delhi made its decision will augment pressure on Trump, especially as midterm elections loom. Trump might even reverse course. While some politicians double down to save face, Trump knows no shame, and if the pressure is great enough, he might simply change policy and try to scrub his recent past in an Orwellian frenzy of sycophantic press and statements. This still leaves India with a problem in the short term: Given the threat China poses to India, some Indian politicians may wish to replace the F-35 with Russia's fifth-generation Sukhoi-57E; this would be a mistake, given Russia's failure to honour previous contracts. Rather, India might shift toward European aircraft until such a time that Trump departs and the United States can right its present wrongs. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Even if New Delhi abandons Lockheed Martin because Trump's antics have raised questions about American reliability, such systems represent not only a lethal combat platform but also a decades-long partnership of training and maintenance. Whatever animus New Delhi might have toward Washington, the long-term stability of Moscow remains a bad bet given the political vacuum that will develop after Putin's death. Trump treats India unfairly, but Trump is an old and, frankly, corrupt man whose time is limited. India will soon be the world's third largest economy; Trump's failure to recognise the benefits of that and the wisdom of choosing democracies over dictatorships and kleptocracies is America's loss. The current crisis, though, can be the stress test to prove the strength of US-India ties. Trump can become the exception that proves the rule. The US Congress still favours India over Pakistan, and every politician motivated more by national security than side business deals will remember which country sheltered Al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden and which country will drive the international economy through the 21st century. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Bribery can never provide a solid base for bilateral ties like democracy and mutual interests do. Pakistan, like Turkey, will ultimately fall into the dustbin of past American partners no longer worth a future administration's time and energy. India must fight back but should not go scorched earth out of animus toward a man for whom the curtain of power is already closing. Michael Rubin is director of policy analysis at the Middle East Forum and a senior fellow at the American Enterprise Institute. Views expressed in the above piece are personal and solely those of the author. They do not necessarily reflect the views of Firstpost.


The Hindu
9 minutes ago
- The Hindu
He has his reasons: Shashi Tharoor on Rahul Gandhi's 'dead economy' remark
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor on Saturday (August 2, 2025) refused to comment on party leader Rahul Gandhi's endorsing U.S. President Donald Trump's 'dead economy' remark about India and said the Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha may have had his 'own reasons' for saying so. The remarks came after Congress MP Mr. Gandhi on Thursday (July 31, 2025) agreed with US President Donald Trump's statement that the Indian economy is 'dead' and said he is 'glad' that the U.S. President has stated a fact. Speaking to the mediapersons, Mr. Tharoor said, 'I don't want to comment on what my party leader has said. He has his reasons for saying so. My concern is that our relationship with the U.S., as a strategic and economic partnership, is important for us. We are exporting around 90 billion worth of goods to America. We can't be in a position to lose that or have it diminish significantly.' 'We must wish our negotiators strength to get a fair deal for India. We should also be talking to other regions for exporting our goods. Then we could make up for some of what we might lose in the U.S. We have to support our negotiators,' he added. Speaking to reporters, Mr. Gandhi said that the whole world knows the Indian economy is 'dead' except for the Prime Minister and Finance Minister. 'Yes, he is right. Everybody knows this except the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister. Everybody knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. I am glad that President Trump has stated a fact. The entire world knows that the Indian economy is a dead economy. BJP has finished the economy to help Adani,' said. On Wednesday (July 30, 2025), U.S. President Donald Trump made a shocking statement on his social media platform Truth Social after the announcement of 25% tariffs against India and threatened an additional 'penalty' for importing Russian oil.