UAE offers free-of-charge portable desalination plants to cover arid Cyprus' summer water needs
Agriculture and Environment Minister Maria Panayiotou told the state broadcaster that the UAE agreed to provide Cyprus, at no cost, an undetermined number of desalination plants that will produce a combined 15,000 cubic meters (530,000 cubic feet) of potable water daily.
Panayiotou didn't disclose exactly when the units will arrive and become operational, but she said UAE authorities are aware the need is immediate as the summer tourism season kicks into high gear and water needs reach their peak.
She said the deal is the result of secret negotiations over the last few months to cover Cyprus water needs that became acute when a fire knocked out one of its five static desalination plants, resulting in cuts to agricultural water supply. Each onshore unit produces 235,000 cubic meters (8.3 million cubic feet) of fresh water daily.
The plant won't be back in operation until August and the portable units from the UAE will cover that lost water capacity, said Panayiotou.
Technical staff are still trying to work out exactly where the portable units will be placed to maximize their utility, Panayiotou said. She didn't say when those units will be returned to the UAE.
Apart from its own desalination plants, Cyprus continues to rely on an extensive reservoir network with a total capacity of 330 million cubic meters. Water levels across the 108 reservoirs — the most relative to population than any other European country — are less than a quarter of their capacity following the second-driest winter in a decade. Reservoirs were at 47.2% capacity in 2024, official figures show.
Cypriot President Nikos Christodoulides disclosed the UAE deal during an interview with local TV station ANT1, hailing the agreement as the result of Cyprus' expanded diplomatic outreach and the friendly relations it has developed particularly with the Emirates and other countries in the region.
Panayiotou said irrespective of the UAE assistance, the government's medium- and long-term planning to permanently alleviate the island's water shortages is moving ahead.
The planning includes the procurement of four additional mobile desalination plants expected to begin operating in late autumn, each capable of producing 30,000 cubic meters (1 million cubic feet) of drinkable water daily.
Another two static desalination plants will be built over the long term, each with a 140,000 cubic meter (5 million cubic feet) daily output.
Panayiotou unveiled last month a government plan to subsidize construction of private desalination plants at hotels. Tourism accounts for 13.5% of Cyprus' gross domestic product. Tourist arrivals last year exceeded 4 million people, setting a new record.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
After Zelenskyy meeting, Trump calls for Ukraine leader to meet Putin
President Donald Trump seems to think so. "I think he wants to make a deal. I think he wants to make a deal for me," Trump was caught on a hot mic saying to French President Emmanual Macron, referring to Putin, as he prepared to sit down on Aug. 18 with Macron and six other European leaders who had traveled to Washington to shore up support for Zelenskyy and Ukraine. Zelenskyy gets warmer reception: Takeaways from high stakes Trump meeting Many Ukrainians, European officials and political scientists questioned Trump's commitment to Ukraine after he rolled out the red carpet for Putin in Alaska on Aug. 15. After their summit concluded, Trump echoed Russia''s position on peace negotiations and appeared to put his threat to impose onerous sanctions on Russia on the shelf. In Washington, Trump told Zelenskyy the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war, though the extent of any promised assistance was not immediately clear. He also appeared to dismiss the need for any ceasefire, a key demand of Ukraine, before peace negotiations can start. It remains wholly unclear if Ukraine would be willing to cede territory stolen by Russia before and during the war to achieve peace. Zelenskyy's been saying since 2022, when Russia's full-scale invasion began, that land-for-peace is a non-starter. Waiting on Putin Still, the Putin factor may be cloudier than all of these unknowns. Following Monday's meeting, Trump said he called Putin. It was around midnight Moscow time, according to Yuri Ushakov, a Russian foreign policy advisor whose remarks were published in state media. They spoke for about 40 minutes. In a post on his Truth Social media platform, Trump said he called Putin to start arranging talks between Russia's leader and Zelenskyy. He said he wanted to see Putin and Zelenskyy hold face-to-face talks, in a location to be determined. After that, Trump would join Putin and Zelenskyy for a discussion aimed at pushingthe two warring sides closer together. Zelenskyy changed his attire: Key moments from White House meeting with Trump Zelenskyy described the talks with Trump as the "best" so far. Trump said they were "very good." German Chancellor Friedrich Merz signaled the meeting might happen within the next two weeks. French President Emmanuel Macron suggested Geneva as a possible location. The plan for direct talks sounds straightforward. It may not be, according to Phillips O'Brien, a historian and professor of strategic war studies at the University of St. Andrews, Scotland. O'Brien has closely tracked the war in a daily newsletter. On Aug. 19, O'Brien wrote that the Putin-Zelenskyy "may or may not happen." For a start, for more than three years Moscow has repeatedly nixed the idea of a Putin-Zelenskyy sit-down. The two leaders are bitter enemies. Putin, by all accounts, runs an inscrutable if strongman geopolitical playbook. Trump's own relationship with both Putin and Zelenskyy has been winding, running hot, then cool, then hot. Overnight Russian attack: Ukraine says it shows Putin does not want peace Moscow itself did not shed any immediate clarifying light. "The idea was discussed that it would be worthwhile to explore the possibility of raising the level of representatives from the Ukrainian and Russian sides - that is, those representatives participating in the mentioned direct negotiations," Ushakov, the Kremlin aide, said in reaction to the proposed Putin-Zelenskyy meeting that would subsequently feature Trump, in remarks posted on the Kremlin's Telegram channel.
The Herald Scotland
40 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
High stakes and nervous allies as Trump seeks Ukraine deal with Putin
Concern about what Trump would be willing to cede to Russia in his supercharged effort to reach an accord - the prime exhibit in his open campaign to win the Nobel Peace Prize - drew an extraordinary group of European leaders to the White House to back up Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy at a pivotal moment for Kyiv. More: Zelenskyy gets warmer White House reception: Takeaways from high stakes Trump meeting In the East Room on August 18, America's strongest allies wrapped layers of praise for Trump's leadership around warnings about the need to reach a ceasefire before negotiations begin, and before Ukraine is pressured to give up swaths of land to the nation that launched its latest invasion more than three years ago. But Russian President Vladimir Putin ruled out a ceasefire at his own meeting with Trump, this one in Alaska three days earlier, and he apparently won him over. Facing a united front from NATO and the European Community, from the leaders of France and Germany and Great Britain, Trump on Monday found himself more closely aligned on this key question with Moscow. On his way to Alaska, Trump had called a ceasefire crucial, threatening "serious consequences" if Russia didn't agree. But after Putin's flat nyet, Trump in the East Room described a ceasefire as a nice idea but not an imperative. More: Trump and Zelenskyy meet again, but Putin has faced Trump, other presidents many times Trump said the United States was prepared to participate in security guarantees for Ukraine, a significant step and one Putin indicated a willingness to consider. That surely increases the pressure on Zelenskyy to agree to what Trump calls "land swaps," perhaps including giving away territory that Russia has not yet won on the battlefield. Putin has demanded the Donbas, an area rich in industry and strategically located. Zelenskyy has rejected the idea of ceding any land. Foreign policy in an age of Trump 2.0 The whirlwind of developments in the space of a few days was a telling display of foreign policy in the age of Trump 2.0. For one thing, the tradition of slow-as-you-go diplomacy, of meticulous meetings by aides to hash out the details before the principals meet, has been replaced by sweeping declarations from the top - often streamed live to the world and updated in real time on Truth Social. For another, any inclination by foreign leaders during Trump's first term to challenge him too directly has been replaced by a strategy of flattery. More: A Nobel Peace Prize for Trump? World leaders are lining up That's true for Putin. He is a former KGB agent who has led the Kremlin with an iron hand for a quarter century. But on this, Putin has persuaded Trump that he has Trump's own interests at heart. "I think he wants to make a deal for me," Trump told French President Emmanuel Macron as they gathered for a group photo in the White House Cross Hall, a private aside picked up by a hot mic. "Do you understand? As crazy as it sounds." It's true for Zelenskyy, who showed up at the White House in a dark suit - a concession to Trump's complaints about his usual military-style attire at his last visit. That encounter imploded into acrimony. In the Oval Office this time, he heaped praise on the president. "Thank you very much for your efforts," he told Trump. Vice President JD Vance, who had laced into Zelenskyy in February's meeting for ingratitude, sat on the couch next to the president, silent and smiling. It was apparent among the European leaders, too. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte launched a round-robin of praise." "I really want to thank you, President of the United States, dear Donald," he said, crediting him with "breaking the deadlock" on the war and "starting the dialogue" for peace. More: Ukraine's Zelenskyy avoids Trump mauling at White House. Will he get Putin meeting? Zelenskyy and other leaders expressed particular appreciation for Trump's willingness to support security guarantees, though European forces would be expected to take the lead and the U.S. role hasn't been defined. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz raised the most direct caution of the day. "The next steps are the more complicated ones," he said, adding: "I can't imagine that the next meeting would take place without a ceasefire." A play for peace or a play for time? Just when and where that next meeting would take place isn't clear, but Merz later told reporters it was supposed to happen within the next two weeks. Trump had "paused" his conversation with the European leaders to hold a 40-minute phone call with Putin. Afterwards, he said he "began the arrangements" for a meeting, at a location to be determined, between Putin and Zelenskyy. "After that meeting takes place, we will have a Trilat, which would be the two Presidents, plus myself," he said in a social-media post. Skeptics warn that Putin is playing for time, for the opportunity to keep hammering Ukraine on the battlefield while giving lip service to seeking peace. Putin has another long-standing goal, too: To drive a wedge in the Western alliance that was forged in the aftermath of World War II, in large part as a check on Moscow. An expansionist Russia and a divided alliance is also the European leaders' greatest fear - not only for Ukraine's sake but also for their own. "The optimism of your president is to be taken seriously," Macron told NBC after he left the White House. But he expressed little of Trump's confidence in his new peace partner. "When I look at the situation and the facts, I don't see President Putin very willing to get peace now."
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
The bleak farce over Ukraine is a typical ‘great power' carve up
Standing on a stage emblazoned with a slogan that proclaimed they were 'pursuing peace', the two men announced – not the promised ceasefire, much less a permanent end to hostilities – but, rather, a vague insistence that progress was being made. This should surprise no-one. The war in Ukraine is not a war of liberation, but a proxy war between Russia and the nominal West (which is represented by Nato and, in particular, the United States). READ MORE: David Pratt: 'Art of the deal' fails again as Donald Trump is outflanked This is reflected in the fact that the Alaska discussions were conducted between Washington and Moscow, bypassing both the Ukrainian government and its European allies. The secondary talks in Washington on Monday – in which Trump hosted Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy, various European leaders and Nato secretary general Mark Rutte – only served to underline the fact that the Ukraine war is an inter-imperialist conflict. In a proxy war, it is the puppet master, not the puppet, who ultimately calls the shots. The problem for Zelenskyy and his European allies is that the puppet master is Donald Trump, and he has decided to comprehensively shift American resources from Europe to East Asia, in an attempt to counter the rise of China. In doing so, Trump is extending the Obama-era policy of a 'pivot to Asia'. However, unlike his Democrat predecessors, the current incumbent in the White House has come to the conclusion that the US cannot counter China's threat to US global hegemony while maintaining its post-Second World War commitments in Europe. That – and not Trump's supposed 'pro-Russian' sympathies – is why the US president is seeking to bring the Ukraine war to an end. It is also why at the Nato summit back in June, Trump insisted that Nato's European members and Canada commit to increasing their military expenditure to 5% of their GDP. The direction of travel of the current diplomatic manoeuvres is towards a carve-up of Ukrainian territory agreed, first and foremost, between the Americans and the Russians. For the main European leaders – particularly French president Emmanuel Macron, German chancellor Friedrich Merz and UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer – this is a problem because it would mark a further step in the US's uncoupling from Europe. It would be naïve in the extreme to take at face value the European leaders' claims of 'solidarity' with Ukraine and concern for the country's 'territorial integrity'. Since the war began, the Western alliance's interest has been – not Ukrainian victory – but the slow, military diminution of Russia. That is why the Nato powers have provided Ukraine with just enough weapons to keep the conflict grinding on. In other words, Western governments have proven themselves very happy to continue fighting to the last drop of the Ukrainian people's blood. That strategy – which relied, as Nato itself relies, on US leadership and resources – is now in crisis. As Monday's meeting at the White House showed, Trump's policy of a step-by-step reduction in the American commitment to Europe has forced Zelenskyy and the European leaders into the role of supplicants. READ MORE: Nigel Farage claims court ruling removing asylum seekers from hotel as 'victory' The roots of this crisis date back long before Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. That invasion was brutal and outrageous, but it was not – as many Western leaders and commentators insist – irrational. In 1990, US secretary of state James Baker assured Soviet president Mikhail Gorbachev that Nato would not move 'one inch eastward' in response to the dismantlement of the Warsaw Pact and the Soviet Union. That was a deliberate, calculated lie. The subsequent, rapid eastward expansion of Nato and the European Union (which, significantly, have worked in tandem throughout) has taken the Western imperialist bloc right up to the borders of Russia. The West's attempt to exploit its perceived 'victory' in the Cold War has backfired catastrophically. Such an explanation of the origins of the Ukraine war is not – as pro-Nato commentators claim – an attempt to justify Putin's invasion. It is, rather, the only way we can understand both why the war started and the deeply unsatisfactory terms on which it is likely to end. It was ever thus with inter-imperialist rivalries. For example, the present cataclysm in the Middle East has its roots in the European powers' carve-up of the territory of the collapsing Ottoman Empire. In his fine stage show Nowhere (which is currently playing at the Traverse Theatre as part of the Edinburgh Festival Fringe), the excellent Scots-Egyptian actor and theatre-maker Khalid Abdalla talks about the Sykes-Picot Agreement. This was the secret arrangement, made in 1916, by which the British and the French drew a line across the map of the Middle East, dividing the Ottoman territories between themselves. The consequences were disastrous and manifold. They included the infamous Balfour Declaration of 1917, by which the British government declared its support for the partition of Palestine and the creation of the State of Israel. The Zionist movement's oft-stated dream of making a deal with the imperialist powers to enable it to drive the Palestinians from their land began to come to fruition. The subsequent British 'mandate' in Palestine, under the Sykes-Picot Agreement, laid the foundations for the Nakba ('Catastrophe') – the mass murder and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians, and the creation of the Israeli state – in 1948. READ MORE: It's interesting to see who the British state views as its enemies The rest – from the occupation of the West Bank, Gaza, East Jerusalem and the Golan Heights in 1967 to the current genocide in Gaza – is, as they say, history. Such carve-ups – and their disastrous consequences for the peoples of the affected regions – are the inevitable consequence of inter-imperialist rivalries. The division of Africa – primarily between the British, the French, the Portuguese and the Belgians – had catastrophic consequences that the people of the continent continue to live with to this day. The same is true across Asia, the Americas and Oceania. The coming Russo-American carve-up of Ukraine is part of a long and terrible history of imperialist imposition. Until we break the cycle of nationalism, militarism and power bloc rivalries, we are doomed to repeat the dark farce of the current manoeuvres over Ukraine.
