logo
State's interdepartmental strategy to tackle hunger hampers South Africans' right to food — report

State's interdepartmental strategy to tackle hunger hampers South Africans' right to food — report

Daily Maverick09-06-2025
South Africans cannot hold a specific individual or department to account for the right to food not being realised because most of the national frameworks on food security are interdepartmental, says the author of the report released by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute. The report calls for the drafting of national framework legislation in relation to the right to food in the country.
The government of national unity (GNU) in South Africa has highlighted food security as part of its broader social and economic policies. According to its Statement of Intent, the GNU aims to tackle poverty, spatial inequalities and food security by providing a social safety net and improving access to basic services.
South Africa's National Policy on Food and Nutrition Security outlines strategies to ensure food availability, accessibility, utilisation and stability. The government has committed to promoting the right to adequate food, addressing hunger and improving food security through coordinated efforts across various departments.
Despite South Africa being food secure at a national level, household food security remains a challenge, with increasing food insecurity rates in recent years. The GNU's approach includes social support initiatives such as household grants and school feeding schemes to mitigate these issues.
In a report released by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) on Tuesday researchers recommended legislative and policy shifts that will help South Africans to have better access to food and potentially eradicate hunger. This is part of multiple recommendations that address other socioeconomic factors that create food poverty.
The report recommends continued advocacy for the South African government to ratify the Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which serves as a complaints and investigative mechanism for rights violations, including the right to adequate food.
The report recommends 'the drafting of national framework legislation in relation to the right to food in South Africa (e.g. a Food and Nutrition Security Act) in line with the recommendations under General Comment 12, as well as South Africa's National Policy on Food and Nutrition Security. This would set out the roles and responsibilities of the different actors in relation to food security in South Africa, including an interdepartmental body with oversight responsibility.'
It also recommends that the updated National Food and Nutrition Security Plan be amended to address and monitor affordability and food pricing and enable people's economic access to nutritious food (the ability to purchase food as opposed to direct access, which refers to growing one's own food).
The report, titled ' Food for Thought: Reflections on Food (In)Security. Laws, Experiences, Interventions ', aims to better understand how some of Seri's partners and client groups have been affected by, and responded to, food insecurity and hunger issues. Seri's research focused on the experiences of the leadership and of members as conveyed by leaders of the following partners: the Inner City Federation, the South African Informal Traders Forum, the African Reclaimers Organisation, the Commercial, Stevedoring, Agriculture and Allied Workers Union, the Izwi Domestic Workers Alliance and the Slovo Park Community Development Forum.
Other recommendations call for an awareness of vulnerability of certain groups in society when creating, amending and updating policies that foster food security:
'Acknowledge food system workers, for example farm workers and informal traders, and ensure and monitor that they have fair and safe working conditions, and receive living wages. Acknowledge how women might be differently affected throughout the food system, for example as producers, workers and consumers, and incorporate specific interventions to attain greater gender equality. This could take the form of monitoring and increasing the number of women who have access to land for productive purposes, addressing unsafe working conditions due to pesticide use on farms and low wages/seasonal work of female farm workers.'
The report further explains that sufficient funds have to be in place to implement these processes, which often need human and other resources to come to fruition. This is in line with the recommendations by the Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation in its evaluation of the National Plan.
The report took two years to compile, according to senior researcher at Seri Yvonne Erasmus. 'What is often missed is the issue of economic access, because food security has different dimensions, so national availability of food, whether food is nutritious, whether people have stable access over time, and a lot of the policy focus at government level is on the availability dimension. We do have more than enough food available nationally, we export a lot of our food and we waste a third of the food we produce.'
Erasmus pointed out that economic access to food seems to be what the government is struggling to create a sound and sustainable plan for. Also, one of the challenges was that South Africans couldn't hold a specific individual or department to account for the right to food not being realised, because most of the national frameworks on food security were interdepartmental.
Erasmus wrote the report and led the research, and legal researcher Michael Clark conducted the interviews and produced an earlier version of the report.
The national organising secretary of the Commercial, Stevedoring, Agricultural and Allied Workers Union, Karel Swart, said he is not sure whether new laws and policy will change anything.
He said the past 30 years were a 'complete failure'. Black economic empowerment had failed dismally under the ANC government. 'Farmworkers believe there was more food under apartheid. The current agriculture system does not work for the majority [only] for a tiny minority. I believe in reforms, but the current system must be replaced by a people-driven system… that caters for farmworkers and farm dwellers as well as for South Africa and the world.'
Swart was a panellist at the launch of the report in Johannesburg on Tuesday and the union was involved in the data collection and providing experiences for the report.
Swart echoed the sentiment that people need money to access food.
'The farms are lobbying the government to change the minimum wage and change the sectorial determination for farm and domestic workers. They want to hire and fire,' he said.
'They don't understand their actions on human behaviour. Children drop out from school in large numbers. Teenage pregnancies and sexual abuse are on the rise… violence and murder are also on the rise. All these things emanate in a country where hunger and starvation is on the order of the day.' DM
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans
National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans

The Citizen

time2 hours ago

  • The Citizen

National Dialogue will be in the hands of South Africans

The National Dialogue will take place within communities before the next national convention, Despite concerns that the National Dialogue has been 'hijacked' by the ANC and government, Lindiwe Mazibuko, who is a member of the Eminent Persons Group (EPG) has reassured South Africans that the process is citizen-led. Mazibuko delivered the closing address at the end of the first national convention in Pretoria on Saturday. The convention brought members of different sectors together with other stakeholders to discuss the framework of the dialogue process in communities. 'From the outset, we established that citizens will drive this dialogue grounded in our President's commitment to unity. This dialogue is owned by the people,' she said. Tough times ahead for the country Mazibuko said the process of national engagement will not be easy, but she said the EPG will be there to ensure the success of the National Dialogue. Her comments also come as several political parties and legacy foundations have distanced themselves from the dialogue, citing transparency and time frame issues. 'The road ahead will not be easy, our obstacles are deep-rooted and complex, we will have setbacks and we will have disagreements, there may be moments where despair seems more appealing than hope. 'The imminent persons group, which I am proud to be part of, is committed to walking this path with you. 'We will not waiver or abandon our efforts. This dialogue is for the people, and it belongs to you,' she said. ALSO READ: Calls for Kolisi & Co to 'save' the National Dialogue, ActionSA claims convention will cost R25 million Why have a National Dialogue? She said the dialogue will help shape the future of South Africa for the next 30 years. 'Together we will create a shared vision for the next 30 years. We are here because South Africans want real action jobs and livelihoods, safety from crime and corruption, a functioning education system, a state that embodies integrity, a culture of values and social cohesion, tangible progress in addressing violence against women and girls,' she said. When will the dialogue kick off? Despite Mazibuko's closing remarks, there are some who believe that the convention did not achieve its intended purpose because of the rushed nature of events. The convention had also failed to constitute a steering committee during the two days of the convention. Meanwhile, the EPG has been called upon to ensure that all finances related to the dialogue are spent in accordance with government regulations, which guide the spending of public money. NOW READ: National Dialogue: ANC talking to an empty room, but it must listen

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments
The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

The Citizen

time4 hours ago

  • The Citizen

The SACP comes to General Maphwanya's rescue after criticism for controversial foreign policy comments

South Africa has been criticised for its unclear foreign policy of non-alignment. The South African Communist Party (SACP) has come to the defence of South Africa's army chief, General Rudzana Maphwanya. This comes after the government distanced itself from controversial comments made by Mphwanya during his recent trip to Iran. Maphwananya came under fire for suggesting that South Africa and Iran have common goals. He also criticised Israel for its actions in the ongoing war in Gaza. In a statement on Saturday the SACP said there was nothing wrong with the comments Maphwanya made. 'The SANDF chief's comments in Iran regarding political and policy questions reportedly included South Africa's adopted and correctly articulated policy positions on Palestine.' it said. 'This reflects South Africa's international relations and cooperation policy, including solidarity.' The SACP believes that the government seems to be punishing Maphwanya for his comments. 'The government and the Presidency in particular, appears to have begun to act to isolate and punish the chief of the military for the alleged contravention of military code regarding political statements and policy statements made during the trip. 'This action is not an objective act of correcting the defence conduct of a soldier but is a political capitulation to Western-aligned imperialist, right-wing pressure directly influenced by the imperialists' political interests.' South Africa's foreign policy dilemma The SACP accused the South African government of mixed messages concerning its foreign policy. 'It clearly appears that the government is being cajoled to project itself as pro-West and anti-Iran.' Will action be taken against Maphwanya The party also said Maphwanya's comments should not be compared to the actions of DA MP Andrew Whitfield who went to the US on an unapproved trip during his time as deputy minister of trade, industry and competition. President Cyril Ramaphosa subsequently removed Whitfield as the deputy minister. 'This comparison is incorrect, as Maphwanya's visit took place within the framework of military regulations with the full knowledge of the Minister of Defence whereas Whitfield's visit was unauthorised. 'The SACP rejects the impending acts of isolation and scapegoating of Maphwanya to appease Western imperialist forces and their domestic agents. compromising South Africa's sovereign right to formulate and implement its own foreign policy, including on defence cooperation.' The party said any actions by the government towards Maphwanya as military chief must be based on strengthening the country's military institutions and their capabilities. 'The SACP rejects any attempt at dictating which nations South Africa may have bilateral relations with, including defence, trade and investment. 'We will defend our country's right to build relations based on mutual respect, equality and solidarity, free from the dictatorship of Washington, Brussels or their local political surrogates.' ALSO READ: Ministries distance themselves from SANDF chief's comments in Iran Tensions with the U.S The SACP's remarks come as South Africa is on a mission to reset relations with the US. The Trump administration has also slapped South Africa with a 30% tariff on exports. Relations with the US have been strained since the spreading of misinformation by some civic organisations. NOW READ: Ramaphosa unaware of 'ill-advised' Iran trip by SANDF chief – Magwenya

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store