Long Covid: ‘I'm only in my 30s, but I'm not the person I was in December 2020′
Covid-19
in January 2021, she had no idea how much her life would change. Her symptoms at the time were quite moderate, she says, beginning with the expected loss of taste.
She qualified as a nurse in 2009, and began working at a
Cork
hospital
between then and when she contracted the virus.
'I didn't know back then – four years and six months ago – that that would be the last time I'd work,' she says.
Since her infection with the virus, Walsh has battled long Covid – a syndrome, characterised by the persistence or development of symptoms such as fatigue, breathlessness and muscle weakness, attributed to Covid-19.
READ MORE
'My quality of life is poor. I'm only in my 30s, but I'm not the person I was in December 2020. I've lost my career, which is a big identity loss,' she says.
'It's crippling, the fatigue. I have brain fog which would be quite severe. I forget things; I leave taps on, I mix up my own medications. Nobody wants a nurse with brain fog. I have nerve pain, muscular pain, palpitations. As the years have gone by, I worry this is as good as it is going to be. At the moment, we are very much in limbo.'
In the past three years, her recovery has 'plateaued', she says, 'but the bad days vastly outnumber the good days'.
In December 2022, the Government introduced a special payment scheme for healthcare workers living with long Covid. The scheme, which was introduced as a temporary measure, has been extended a number of times but was due to finish at the end of June.
Late on Thursday evening, the Labour Court
recommended a final extension
of the current special scheme for healthcare workers living with long Covid to run up to December 31st, 2025, which the Government accepted.
The Government said 159 Health Service Executive and Section 38 – or public service disability – organisation staff are currently on the scheme and in receipt of full pay.
[
My battle with Long Covid: I was in disbelief. Was I making it up? How could I not stand up while the kettle boiled?
Opens in new window
]
From the start of 2026, anyone still in receipt of payment under the scheme should transition to the Public Service Sick Leave Scheme, the court said.
Walsh is one such beneficiary of the scheme; she says she believes it should be available indefinitely to healthcare workers. Waiting to hear whether it would be extended once again was a 'horrible, stressful day', she says.
'We did what was asked of us and we went to work but we got sick at work and we are now paying the price with our health,' she says. 'We are obviously very, very grateful for the news [of the extension] but the hope is now that the Government will follow the rest of Europe as identifying Covid as an occupational illness.'
Olivia Barry is another nurse based in Co Cork who contracted the virus through work in December 2020. Over the course of her 20-year-long career, she used to work 12- or 13-hour shifts. She walked a lot and sometimes ran, she recalls.
'Now, some days it's difficult to get out of bed. I've lost a part of myself. We worked so hard to become nurses and for our career, and when that's taken away from you, that's soul destroying,' she says.
'We followed all policies and procedures that were in place but unfortunately they didn't protect us. So we've contracted Covid prior to there being vaccines available.'
Barry says she is grateful to the Government for the extensions to the scheme in recent months.
'But each time those extensions end, we're left on a cliff edge with such uncertainty. Like, how are we going to pay our mortgages? Once December happens again, we're back to square one.'
'I go up the stairs on all fours to conserve energy' - Ireland's ignored health crisis
Listen |
24:18
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
7 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
School meals fuss throws the baby out with the bathwater
As the summer draws to a close and back-to-school looms in the horizon, parents will no longer have to compete in the annual back-to-school photography Olympics of perfectly curated lunch boxes as all primary school kids can now avail of the free hot meals scheme. However, 350 new schools due to join the scheme will be put on hold due to proposed new rules from the Government's procurement department. The minister for social protection, Dara Calleary, confirmed that foods high in saturated fat, sugar, and salt will be removed from the programme from September. Up to now, such foods have been permitted once a week but only when selected by a child's parent(s). What has triggered the sudden hysteria around food ingredients and processed foods? Nobody argues with a pilot about how to fly a plane, but everyone thinks they're an expert on nutrition after watching a Netflix documentary, or by following social media influencers who pretend to be experts. There's a growing rhetoric in the past year suggesting that food labels are misleading and that the information can't be trusted. Nothing could be further from the truth. It seems some wellness influencers have positioned themselves as experts, but have clearly never read any of the EU food regulations. Nor do they understand how to interpret nutritional information and health claims on the label. Food labelling is highly regulated. People who confidently read lists of ingredients into the void in supermarkets have a lot to answer for as their videos amount to scaremongering of perfectly safe ingredients. Some might argue that influencers give correct information sometimes. That may well be the case, but a broken watch is also right twice a day Many people also believe that if is there is a long list of ingredients with words that are unfamiliar, sound scary, or may be difficult to pronounce, then the food is deemed to be "bad" according to them. Pyridoxine, ascorbic acid, and phylloquinone are just Vitamins B6, C, and K. Nothing to be afraid of, trust me. The nutritional value of an uneaten school lunch is zero. Compromise is key. There is no such thing as a good food or a bad food. It is the overall diet that counts, not the inclusion or exclusion of a few specific foods that might be high in fat, salt and/or sugar. Using such a simplistic approach would result in very nutritious processed foods being incorrectly categorised and banned — such as cheese. Unless a child's diet consists of just one or two foods, then it is the overall combination of foods in the diet that will determine if it is nutritionally adequate to support growth and development. Even the HSE's own food pyramid has processed high in fat, sugar, and salt foods on the top shelf; they are allowed once or twice per week as part of a healthy diet, so why are they being banned in school meals? Sensory issues Parents have the option to completely avoid whatever meals they personally perceive to be unhealthy by just not ordering them. Alternative meals are always available. What about neurodivergent children and those with sensory issues around food texture and colour? How are they going to be impacted by the exclusion of such foods? Nuance is needed here instead of the sledgehammer approach. Parents are supposed to be gatekeepers for their children's health. There is an onus on parents to seek advice from reliable sources. A recent study carried out in DCU, which analysed 67,000 videos on social media platform TikTok, found that only 2.1% of nutrition content was accurate; the remainder was misleading or potentially harmful. Another study in Ireland found that only 6.1% of nutrition-related posts were classified as being of good quality. Social media is the wild west when it comes to nutrition information and, unfortunately, it is not moderated It's so disheartening to see health professionals such as experienced paediatric dietitians / clinical nutritionists share their expertise, but are often torn to shreds — particularly on Instagram. The way so many people leap to defend influencers by trolling actual experts is cult-like behaviour. Of course, everyone is entitled to their own opinions — but not to their own facts. Two of the most important ultra-processed foods are infant formula, which is essential, and fortified breakfast cereals which are highly nutritious and affordable for so many people living in food poverty. We should not assess school lunches from a point of privilege. When this scheme was initially launched in 2019, it focused on providing school lunches in Deis schools only. Now that all children are being included, as a cost-of-living measure, the voice of the privileged is driving the narrative. It's turning into a circus. It would be wrong to assume that a meal which contains a few chicken goujons or fish fingers is unhealthy or problematic. No single food could skew nutrition intake to that extent unless the child consumed no other foods or beverages. For context, today I analysed a school lunch from one provider's gluten-free menu. It was a hot wrap containing baked chicken breast goujons and some ketchup. The analysis showed that the meal was low in saturated fat, low in sugar, high in fibre, and high in protein. The meal qualified for those nutrition claims as the nutritional composition met the strict criteria set out in EU food law. Available information Most providers' websites have the nutritional information readily available, and I certainly haven't seen any meals that set off alarm bells. Where's the hysteria coming from? Would it perhaps be that school principals haven't time to deal with this and are asking parents, who probably get their own nutrition information from social media, for assistance in choosing a supplier? A school lunch provides around one third of a child's daily nutrition needs, or around 24% of their overall food intake in a typical school week However, children only attend primary school for 183 days per year. We also need to exclude weekends and school holidays, so the likely contribution of school lunches to a child's overall nutritional intake is only around 12%. The focus should be on helping parents to optimise the other 88% of their children's nutritional intake. In 2017, the Government issued a detailed document on nutrition standards for school meals which clearly sets out the rules. Why was the nutritional composition of the menus not requested or audited until now? If the HSE or minister has some new scientific evidence that allowing one processed high in fat, sugar, and salt food option once a week in a school lunch is detrimental to a child's health, then I'd love to see it. Are we in danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater with the proposed changes to the hot school meals scheme? It would be much better use of State resources to audit the allergen declarations on the school menus. Children are the largest cohort of the population with food allergies, which ranges from 2% of younger kids to 5% of older children. Consuming a processed high in fat, sugar, and salt food once a week carries no risk to a child, but inaccurate allergen labelling could lead to a potentially life-threatening situation. Nutrition is a science, not an opinion. Context matters.
Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
A close shave: Colm Keena on the trials and tribulations of a summer job in St James's hospital
A while ago, while telling a friend about the job I got during the summer after I left school, he appeared shocked when I mentioned that, among other duties, I'd shaved a dead man. The job was that of ward orderly in James St Hospital, Dublin. It was reasonably well paid and came with the bonus of working alongside a load of female student nurses. I was working in the geriatric wards and, still years away from having to shave myself, one of my duties was shaving the patients. This quickly became the cause of some anxiety, not for me, but for the poor patients. The equipment comprised a plastic basin, a bar of soap, a shaving brush, and a razor. After my first few outings, I added a roll of loo paper. I'd soap the men's faces, then set to work with the razor, often as the patient and I indulged in friendly banter. The problem was the nicks. I'd be shaving away and then I'd feel it, the nick, and the patient would too, as evidenced by their flinch. A dribble of blood would begin to mingle with the lather on their cheek as I tore off some loo paper and used it to stem the flow. READ MORE Sweeny Todd, one of the men kindly called me, referring to the fictional London barber who used to murder his customers. One of older wards had six to eight beds on each side of a long, wide room and I have a memory of surveying my morning's work and seeing an array of older men in striped cotton pyjamas, all with brave smiles, the shakes, and spots of bloodied loo paper stuck to their faces. I have no memory of any complaints, and a hazy view that, despite the nicks, they wished me well. Ireland, back then, was a less litigious place. As already mentioned, one of the upsides to the job was the student nurses. I was hugely shy and both delighted and terrified to be working with them. I had lots of different jobs, including giving the men baths, helping with meals, and helping the nurses with various unskilled nursing chores. One day, a few weeks into the job, a nurse came up to me and told me to stop what I was doing and go shave Mr X, who was in another ward. There were some visitors nearby and I motioned the nurse to one side and, speaking quietly, conveyed what I thought was important news. 'Mr X is dead.' She looked at me as if there was no bottom to my stupidity. 'I know he's dead. That's why I want you to shave him.' I fetched my equipment and off I went. The curtains were drawn around the dead man's bed and when I stepped inside it was just me and him. Someone had placed a ribbon around his head to hold his jaw in place until rigor mortis set in. It felt a bit weird, being there, in a tight space, with the body of a man I'd washed and fed over the previous days and weeks. But I decided to get on with it. I removed the ribbon, lathered his face, and started to shave. Pretty soon I felt it, a nick, and I stopped. But no blood emerged. Ah, I said to myself, as the penny dropped. No blood flow. And I proceeded to give him a good close shave. Curiously enough, I felt glad of the opportunity to do him the service. As I remember it, there was quite a good atmosphere on the wards, among both the staff and the patients. Everything I've seen in the years since has bolstered the idea that caring for others, and thereby not having the time to fixate on your own needs, makes humans happy. When doing so as a team, this creates its own, special atmosphere, so that even those receiving the care are positively affected. Or so it seems to me, Sweeny Todd.
Irish Times
17 hours ago
- Irish Times
Assessments of children who may have had unnecessary hip surgeries pushed back to next year
Children who may have been subjected to unnecessary hip dysplasia surgery must wait until next year before they are assessed by a team of external experts for a second medical opinion. In May, the HSE published an independent audit on hip surgery thresholds for children with developmental dysplasia of the hip. It examined 147 cases across three hospitals : Temple Street , the National Orthopaedic Hospital Cappagh and Crumlin Hospital . In Temple Street, 60 per cent of surgeries audited did not meet the clinical threshold for surgical intervention, while this was the case for 79 per cent in the Cappagh hospital. Following the report, the HSE announced it was commissioning an independent expert review panel that will work to review patient files to determine the appropriateness of the original decision to operate. READ MORE The HSE said then that the review panel would be set up within six months. However, a spokeswoman for the executive has now said it will be January before the review of individual cases begins. The health service issued an international call for experts, with applications accepted up until last Friday. 'Expressions of interest have been received from a wide range of regions including Ireland, the UK , the USA , Canada , Asia and other parts of Europe,' the spokeswoman said. 'These submissions will be subject to a shortlisting and recruitment process prior to the formal announcement of the panel, which is expected to convene in September.' She said an international expert has been identified and agreed to chair the external panel, and terms are being negotiated. The organisation is designing a 'robust scientific and methodological framework' for the review, which is expected to be agreed between September and December this year. 'It is expected that the review of individual cases will commence in January. This timeline reflects the complexity of the work involved and the need to ensure a rigorous and comprehensive approach,' it added. The HSE, Children's Health Ireland (CHI) and patient advocates held a meeting on the external review panel last Thursday. In a statement following the meeting, Hip Dysplasia Advocacy Group, a newly-established representative organisation, said there must be 'full transparency' between the HSE and the families regarding these reviews. It said 'everyone is left completely in the dark'. 'We strongly suggested they set up a webpage to inform families of updates in a timely manner and we hope to see this implemented swiftly,' the statement said. The advocacy group described the engagement with CHI at the meeting as positive, adding that the paediatric healthcare provider anticipates all follow-up appointments for affected children will be completed by the end of the year.
