logo
The Risks of Offering 'Free' Goods and Services

The Risks of Offering 'Free' Goods and Services

Organizations often fall into a pricing trap. To increase adoption, encourage trial, or demonstrate goodwill, they offer their products or services for free. But research in consumer psychology and behavioral economics shows that 'free' comes with high, hidden costs. Once customers internalize 'free' as the reference price, it becomes difficult —sometimes impossible—to charge later. Worse, free offerings are frequently undervalued, overused, or abused. They create expectations that are hard to unwind and threaten long-term sustainability.
Fortunately, the same research also offers strategies for capturing the upsides of free without eroding perceived value.
Charging something is better than nothing.
Consumers equate price with worth. When you charge for something—even a token amount—you encourage people to treat it with more care, use it responsibly, and recognize its value.
Two parks in Egypt illustrate this point. When Al-Azhar Park opened in Cairo in 2005, critics balked at the idea of charging an entrance fee. After all, why should residents have to pay for access to public green space? But Al-Azhar Park's modest entrance fee helped create a sense of civic responsibility. Visitors were more likely to dispose of trash properly and respect the grounds. The fee also provided steady funding for upkeep and allowed the park to operate without relying solely on government or donor support. Fast-forward two decades, and the park is a thriving urban oasis. Just a few miles away, however, Al-Fustat Gardens—once a similarly ambitious park project—has slid into disrepair, marred by neglect and environmental decline. It has become so run down that the government is now spending another $120 million to rescue it.
As another example, consider free plastic grocery bags or giveaway items. People are less likely to reuse or appreciate them precisely because they cost nothing. Charging even a small amount can change behavior significantly.
Anchor value—even if you don't charge yet.
One of the most infamous examples of mismanaging 'free' comes from Netflix. In 2011, the company tried to split its DVD and streaming plans into separate services, each costing $7.99. But customers had long perceived streaming as a free add-on to their $9.99 DVD plan, and they rebelled when they were asked to pay for it separately. Netflix lost hundreds of thousands of subscribers and saw its stock drop 35% in one day.
The lesson is that even when you're not charging, you should communicate the monetary value of what you're providing. There are several ways to do this:
Strike-through pricing
Showing the original price—even if it's being waived—helps customers perceive a deal. For example, Adobe often promotes its Creative Cloud tools to students as 'normally $59.00/month, now $19.99/month,' signaling substantial value without asking for immediate payment.
Bundling
Amazon Prime includes a host of services—streaming, cloud storage, faster delivery—under one price. Even if customers don't use every feature, they know each has value, which helps justify the subscription price and builds loyalty.
Freemium tiers with visible upgrade paths
Spotify and LinkedIn both offer robust free versions of their services, but constantly remind users of the benefits they're not getting—such as ad-free listening or expanded networking analytics. These gentle nudges help establish what full access is worth.
The key is to make the value of the offering visible, even if the price is temporarily invisible. If customers think something has always been free, they'll resist paying later. But if they believe they're receiving something valuable for free, they'll eventually be more willing to pay when the time comes.
Time pricing information strategically.
The timing of a pricing change—or even the announcement of value—can make a significant difference. Behavioral research shows that people are more accepting of higher prices when they have psychological distance from the actual transaction.
Announce price changes well in advance, and people will focus more on benefits than costs. And before introducing any price, communicate three things: the level (how much it will cost); the value (why it's worth that amount); and the timeline (when it takes effect and for how long).
Consider a hypothetical SaaS company that has long offered its basic analytics dashboard free to enterprise clients as part of implementation. Over time, the dashboard evolves into a powerful data visualization tool with machine-learning features. Rather than start charging immediately, the company begins six months in advance by:
Sending usage reports to clients showing how much time the tool is saving their teams
Highlighting benchmarks that show its impact on decision-making speed and accuracy
Communicating that starting next fiscal year, the dashboard will be priced at $9,000 annually—while offering an early renewal discount
This long runway gives procurement teams time to budget, champions time to advocate internally, and executives time to associate the tool with business value—not just as a free add-on.
The same principle applies in other contexts: price increases introduced quietly at the end of a contract, or charges added to previously bundled services, tend to feel punitive. But when timed right, and paired with clear value communication, they can be accepted—even welcomed—as investments rather than losses.
Similarly, seasonal timing or communication channels can affect how price changes are received. Rolling out new fees during a quiet period (e.g., not during peak usage or major holidays) and explaining the rationale transparently can build trust and minimize backlash.
Use scarcity to reinforce value.
When offering something for free—if you must—limit it. Time-bound offers, 'only with purchase' deals, or restricted access signal that the product has genuine value. 'Free forever' may sound generous, but it erodes perceived worth.
Services like Headspace or The New York Times offer a 30-day free trial with clear messaging like 'a $12/month value, yours free for one month.' This sets a reference price that makes the eventual charge feel like a continuation of something worthwhile, rather than a new ask. These kinds of 'framing' tactics help customers associate value with the item, even if they didn't pay for it—yet.
. . .
Whether you're running a park, launching a product, or offering public services, free is rarely free. It sets expectations, shapes behavior, and, once entrenched, is difficult to reverse. Smart organizations understand that pricing is more than a financial decision—it's a strategic one. The best time to establish perceived value is before your offering becomes a habit. The second-best time is now.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

DocuSign: Questions Around Growth Remain
DocuSign: Questions Around Growth Remain

Yahoo

time26 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

DocuSign: Questions Around Growth Remain

DocuSign posted revenue and earnings growth, beating estimates. The company's free cash flow fell slightly, and its full-year forecast underwhelmed investors. DocuSign has steadied itself, but investors are not yet seeing clear answers to the question of how growth can accelerate from here. 10 stocks we like better than Docusign › Here's our initial take on DocuSign's (NASDAQ: DOCU) financial report. Metric Q1 FY25 Q1 FY26 Change vs. Expectations Revenue $709.6 million $763.7 million 8% Beat Earnings per share (adjusted) $0.82 $0.90 10% Beat Non-GAAP billings $709.5 million $739.6 million 4% n/a Free cash flow $232.1 million $227.8 million -2% n/a There was a lot to like about DocuSign's latest quarter. Revenue and adjusted earnings per share were up 8% and 10%, respectively, topping Wall Street expectations. GAAP (generally accepted accounting principles) gross margin came in at 79.4%, up 5 basis points from a year ago, and the company posted solid free cash flow of $227.8 million. DocuSign also surpassed the 10,000 Intelligent Agreement Management customer threshold during the period. Billings rose 4% in the quarter, but DocuSign warned that it expects momentum to fade as the year goes on. For fiscal 2026, DocuSign is now forecasting total billings of $3.285 billion and $3.39 billion, down from its prior guidance for $3.3 billion to $3.4 billion. The billings revision, though slight, highlights the biggest challenge facing DocuSign right now. The business is healthy and profitable, but investors are worried about where growth will come from. The company is forecasting full-year fiscal 2026 revenue of $3.15 billion to $3.16 billion, which, at the midpoint, would represent just a 5% gain from last year's $2.98 billion in total revenue. DocuSign is putting its cash to work for investors, announcing a new $1 billion repurchase program. But with the company's share count up nearly 6% in just the last three years, much of the buyback would only serve to offset share-based compensation that has added to the float. Investors were more focused on the look ahead than the results. DocuSign shares were down 15% in aftermarket trading following the release but ahead of the company's call with investors. CEO Allan Thygesen, who has been on the job since October 2022, called the results "an important quarter for Docusign's long-term transformation," highlighting the company's "ambitious product roadmap." Expect investors to press Thygesen for specifics about how the transformation is going and when it will translate into real, sustained growth. DocuSign invented its category and continues to hold strong in its core business, even up against competition from Adobe (NASDAQ: ADBE) and Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), which can incorporate e-signatures into broader offerings. But Wall Street is forward-looking. Shares of DocuSign are up nearly 75% over the past year as an initial response to Thygesen's turnaround ambitions. Until investors gain confidence that DocuSign has found a formula to expand its core offering and generate significant revenue growth, the stock could face limits on its ability to accelerate higher from here. Full earnings report Investor relations page Before you buy stock in Docusign, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Docusign wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $674,395!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $858,011!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 997% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 172% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025 Lou Whiteman has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Adobe, Docusign, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. DocuSign: Questions Around Growth Remain was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio

Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds
Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds

The adoption of ad-supported tiers is on the rise, with Antenna finding that ad-supported streaming hit a total of roughly 100 million subscriptions at the end of the first quarter of 2025, up from 53 million two years prior. Per the new report from the research firm, 65% of ad-supported subscriptions in the U.S. were made up of new users, compared to 23% that were 'win backs,' who previously subscribed to a service, canceled, and resubscribed to the ad-supported tier, and 11% that were 'traders,' who switched from an ad-free tier. Hulu had the largest share of ad-supported plans in the first quarter at 24%, followed by Peacock at 22%, Netflix at 15%, Paramount+ and Disney+ at 14% each, Max at 8% and Discovery+ at 3%. When looking more closely at Netflix, Antenna found that 44% of ad-supported subscribers were new users, compared to 69% for all other streamers. Meanwhile, about 40% were traders who switched from an ad-free tier and 16% were win backs, compared to 6% and 25% for the rest of the streamers, respectively, while 16% were win backs, compared to 25%. The new data comes as both Nielsen and the streamers themselves offered their own updates about the state of their ad-supported progress during upfronts week in May. Disney reported a total of 164 million monthly active users globally across Disney+, Hulu and ESPN+, up from 157 million in January. Meanwhile, Netflix surpassed 94 million monthly active users. Amazon's Prime Video claimed an audience of more than 130 million in the U.S. alone, up from 115 million previously, with a 37% increase in monthly viewing hours. When combining the streamer with Amazon's other owned and operated entertainment properties such as Twitch, MGM Studios, Wondery and Amazon Music, the tech giant's entertainment portfolio reaches an average monthly ad-supported audience of more than 300 million. NBCUniversal noted its entire portfolio reaches 286 million people a month, with 95% of that being ad-supported. Peacock has nearly 100 million monthly active users, according to Comcast. Paramount ad chief John Halley told TheWrap that the company reaches a total of 115 million ad-supported viewers per month across its streaming footprint. Warner Bros. Discovery, which has a total of 122.3 million direct-to-consumer subscribers globally across Max, Discovery+ and traditional HBO cable subscriptions, did not break out its ad-supported viewership for Max, but said the base in the U.S. has doubled in the past year, with roughly half of new subscribers choosing that option. Per Nielsen, ad-supported platforms across the media landscape accounted for 72.4% of TV viewing in the first quarter of 2025, compared to 27.6% for ad-free platforms. Cable and broadcast made up roughly 28.9% and 28.7% of ad-supported viewing, respectively, while streaming accounted for the remaining 42.4%. The post Ad-Supported Streaming Reaches 100 Million Subscriptions, Antenna Finds appeared first on TheWrap.

How High Can Netflix Stock Climb? It's Just Getting Started
How High Can Netflix Stock Climb? It's Just Getting Started

Forbes

time6 hours ago

  • Forbes

How High Can Netflix Stock Climb? It's Just Getting Started

Streaming giant Netflix (NFLX) has built a 3.5% lead this week alone, thanks to price-target hikes from UBS to $1,450 on Wednesday, and from Jefferies to $1,400 on Tuesday. Out of the gate on Thursday, the shares hit a record high of $1,262.81, bringing its year-to-date tally up to 40%. If you missed the train on this frenetic rally, never fear, because the stock is flashing a historically bullish signal on the charts. NFLX's new high comes amid historically low implied volatility (IV) -- a combination that has been bullish for the stock in the past. According to data from Schaeffer's Senior Quantitative Analyst Rocky White, there have been seven other instances in the past five years when the stock was trading within 2% of its 52-week high, while its Schaeffer's Volatility Index (SVI) sat in the 20th annual percentile or lower -- as is the case with the equity's current SVI of 25%, in the 4th percentile of its 12-month range. The data shows that one month after those seven previous signals, Netflix stock was up 7.1%, on average and finished the month higher 86% of the time. From its current perch at $1,248.37, another move of that magnitude would put the equity above $1,300. Per the chart below, this would take NFLX past an ascending trendline starting from its December highs. Also note the double bottom pattern that could signal this rally has legs, and the upward-sloping 20-day moving average containing short-term pullbacks. Netflix stock chart Even with the bull notes this week, Netflix's consensus 12-month price target of $1,167.35 is a 6.5% discount to its current perch. If analysts continue to adjust to Netflix's chart dominance, those price-target hikes will keep the wind at the security's back. Short-term options traders are heavily put-skewed right now. NFLX's Schaeffer's put/call open interest ratio (SOIR) comes in at 1.50, and sits in the 100th percentile of its annual range, showing such a preference for short-term puts is rare in the last 12 months. An unwinding of these bearish bets in the options pits is one final contrarian angle that could keep the momentum going.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store