The Hyundai Ioniq 6 N Is What a Halo Car Looks Like in 2025
When somebody mentions halo cars, my mind goes to big-ticket models: The Porsche 918 Spyder, Ford GT, and so on. I could even be convinced that the Nissan GT-R is a halo car, given its significance to the culture. But Hyundai Performance Development Tech Unit boss Manfred Harrer just went on record calling the Ioniq 6 N a halo car, and it almost stopped me in my tracks. Is he right? Can we really call an electric sedan a halo car in 2025?
I'm torn, not because the car itself is lame—I actually quite like the idea of it—but because it forces me to reckon with the fact that cars aren't what they were when I was growing up. That was always going to be the case, of course; not much can stay the same in a world like ours. I'm just left wondering if such a vehicle, even with its 641 horsepower and crazy go-fast doo-dads, should be considered a halo.
Just so you know what quote I'm talking about, it's here, on Australia's Drive site (no relation to us):
'We are aware about it,' Harrer said of the limited demand for a car like the Ioniq 6 N. 'These are small volumes, and we also hit the limit regarding affordability for our customer base and fans face reality. We know this.
'But to justify the development cost and the engineering effort behind it, it's more for… It's a halo, it helps the brand. It shows our capabilities. That's the purpose behind it.'
When he puts it like that, I guess I can see it. The Ioniq 6 N is undoubtedly a big deal for the brand. You have to remember the turnaround Hyundai has made. It didn't even have an N performance model a decade ago, and now, the sub-brand has evolved into a legit rival to more established players like BMW M and Mercedes-AMG. Sure, you can't get a two-door Hyundai supercar yet, but the Ioniq 6 N is beyond anything the Germans have done with electric sedans (except for Porsche).
This sucker has dual-motor all-wheel drive that'll sling it to 60 miles per hour in 3.2 seconds. It knows how to precondition its battery for drag, track, and endurance running. Unless you're far, far above average, I doubt you could get everything out of this car around a road course. It's impressive. Hyundai
It's not like Webster's has a clear definition for the term 'halo car,' either. If you asked me what it means independently of all this, I'd argue that it's a car company's greatest technological feat that translates to higher performance. The Ioniq 6 N fits that bill, most certainly, as it takes everything from the 5 N and pumps it up. Love or hate the gimmicky N e-Shift faux gearbox, Hyundai made sure it results in minimal power loss while also enabling it to work alongside launch control, drift mode, and push-to-pass. It even went so far as to tune the acoustics so the spacecraft sounds are better than before.
I don't think there's any sense in comparing the Ioniq 6 N to a 918 Spyder. It's a Hyundai, not a Porsche, and that's fine. I think it might really be a halo car, but it still feels mighty weird saying it out loud.
Got a tip or question for the author? Contact them directly: caleb@thedrive.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
France new car registrations down 7.66% in July, Tesla sales drop 26.57%
(Reuters) -New car registrations in France slid 7.66% in July from a year earlier to 116,377 vehicles, data from French car body PFA showed on Friday. Tesla sales in the country fell 26.57% to 1,307 vehicles last month. Since the start of the year, Tesla's sales have slumped by 38.52%, while the overall French market has shrunk by 7.91% over the same period.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Major company reveals 40 jobs most vulnerable to be snatched by AI as Aussies sacked for new tech
A new study has revealed the roles most at risk and most protected from the rise of artificial intelligence (AI). While these tools have helped many workers across the country, they're causing others to lose their jobs. A poll of more than 1,200 Yahoo Finance readers found 20 per cent fear their job is on the line in the coming years thanks to the technology, while a further 43 per cent hate dealing with AI. Commonwealth Bank (CBA) and Atlassian have made headlines this week for announcing job cuts directly related to prioritising the futuristic new tech. Microsoft has now analysed hundreds of jobs to see which could be wiped out completely by AI in the future. RELATED Smiling billionaire spruiks AI as CEO fires 150 workers over video St George Bank increases fee to deposit or withdraw cash by 200 per cent Gen Z with $100,000 in savings reveals 'common' money traps Aussies waste cash on 40 jobs most at risk of being overtaken by AI Microsoft, which has its own AI model called Copilot, said writing and gathering research were the two areas that artificial intelligence-based large language models (LLMs) are currently well-trained for. The study developed an AI applicability score for each job, and those with the highest results involved those two skills. "We find the highest AI applicability scores for knowledge work occupation groups such as computer and mathematical, and office and administrative support, as well as occupations such as sales whose work activities involve providing and communicating information," the study said."Additionally, we characterise the types of work activities performed most successfully, how wage and education correlate with AI applicability, and how real-world usage compares to predictions of occupational AI impact." Here are the 40 jobs that could soon be taken away from humans thanks to AI: Interpreters and Translators Historians Passenger Attendants Sales Representatives of Services Writers and Authors Customer Service Representatives CNC Tool Programmers Telephone Operators Ticket Agents and Travel Clerks Broadcast Announcers and Radio DJs Brokerage Clerks Farm and Home Management Educators Telemarketers Concierges Political Scientists News Analysts, Reporters, Journalists Mathematicians Technical Writers Proofreaders and Copy Markers Hosts and Hostesses Editors Business Teachers, Postsecondary Public Relations Specialists Demonstrators and Product Promoters Advertising Sales Agents New Accounts Clerks Statistical Assistants Counter and Rental Clerks Data Scientists Personal Financial Advisors Archivists Economics Teachers, Postsecondary Web Developers Management Analysts Geographers Models Market Research Analysts Public Safety Tele-communicators Switchboard Operators Library Science Teachers, Postsecondary Sydney radio station CADA gained a lot of attention earlier this year when it was discovered one of its presenters was an AI-generated person, which went unnoticed for months. Workdays with Thy was a four-hour show that had a mix of music genres, and the host's voice and likeness was taken from an employee in the company's finance team. 40 jobs least at risk of being taken over by AI It should come as no surprise that many of these roles are physically demanding or at least require some element of physical interaction. Here are the jobs least likely to be taken over by AI: Phlebotomists (medical professional who withdraws blood) Nursing Assistants Hazardous Materials Removal Workers Helpers-Painters, Plasterers, Embalmers Plant and System Operators, All Other Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons Automotive Glass Installers and Repairers Ship Engineers Tire Repairers and Changers Prosthodontists (dentist who treats complex dental and facial matters) Helpers-Production Workers Highway Maintenance Workers Medical Equipment Preparers Packaging and Filling Machine Op. Machine Feeders and Offbearers Dishwashers Cement Masons and Concrete Finishers Supervisors of Firefighters Industrial Truck and Tractor Operators Ophthalmic Medical Technicians Massage Therapists Surgical Assistants Tire Builders Helpers-Roofers Gas Compressor and Gas Pumping Station Op. Roofers Roustabouts, Oil and Gas Maids and Housekeeping Cleaners Paving, Surfacing, and Tamping Equipment Op. Logging Equipment Operators Motorboat Operators Orderlies Floor Sanders and Finishers Pile Driver Operators Rail-Track Laying and Maintenance Equip. Op. Foundry Mold and Coremakers Water Treatment Plant and System Op. Bridge and Lock Tenders Dredge Operators Microsoft said while these jobs might not be affected by LLMs like Copilot or ChatGPT, that isn't to say they might not be impacted by other types of AI in the future. The study called out operating machinery, like truck driving, as one example of how that could change down the line. Morris Misel is a global business futurist who predicts how current trends will evolve in the coming years. He told Yahoo Finance that while the rise of AI might be terrifying to some people, he didn't think there will be large swaths of workers suddenly without a job. "AI will create far more jobs that it decimates," he said. "There are so many things that humans can do that technology and artificial intelligence won't do for a long time." But he said you need to be adaptable and willing to learn new skills if you want to survive. CBA and Atlassian pull the trigger on job cuts due to AI Australia's biggest bank was slammed for revealing it would be shelving dozens of jobs. While this has happened multiple times recently at CBA, this was the first where AI was the main reason behind it. Ninety jobs are due to be cut by the bank, according to the Finance Sector Union (FSU). Half of those are roles in direct banking that are being impacted by a new voice bot system and local customer messaging specialist roles who interact with customers through the bank's online chat. 'To meet the changing needs of our customers, like many organisations, we review the skills we need and how we're organised to deliver the best customer experiences and outcomes. That means some roles and work can change,' a spokesperson told Yahoo Finance. The FSU is concerned what this wave of new AI technology will mean for Aussie workers in the future. 'There is a human cost to this. You can't just replace frontline jobs with a voice bot and expect the same service for customers," national secretary Julia Angrisano said. 'Customers shouldn't expect to speak to someone in Australia anymore, or even someone with a voice box. Atlassian, an Australian-American software company, also revealed this week that 150 staff are getting the flick. The news was delivered to employees in a pre-recorded video message by co-founder and CEO Mike Cannon-Brookes. Customer service and support roles are being impacted in the cuts, with some of their tasks now set to be done by artificial intelligence (AI). The company said jobs weren't being directly replaced with AI, but the technology had helped usher in improvements in customer experience, and, as a result, some roles wouldn't be in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data
Forbes
3 hours ago
- Forbes
Matching Occupational Exoskeletons With The Right Work Task
Regardless of whether one thinks of industrial exoskeletons as personal protective equipment (PPE), an engineering solution, or something in between, these wearable devices are still an ergonomic solution that needs to be applied to the correct problem. In the decade that this technology has started to see an ever-growing adoption at work sites, the responsibility of matching the exoskeleton with a job task continues to fall on the end user or buyer. This is a persistent hurdle towards mass adoption, with several solutions on the horizon. How it started: Like any new technology, exoskeleton startups had no choice but to sell their products directly. This meant that if a company wanted to select and compare devices, it had to discover each one and establish unique communication channels. This process can be slow and laborious, and the lessons learned by one buyer are often not shared with others. One exception that exists in the public domain is 'The implementation of cobotics and exoskeletal devices for the Australia red meat processing industry,' a 91-page report published by AMPC comparing 19 industrial exoskeletons. Ten years later, the landscape has gone through some dramatic changes. Multiple standards bodies have looked into classifying and evaluating occupational exoskeletons. Fraunhofer IPA, a leading German research institute, has created a series of parcours to evaluate occupational exoskeletons as product families grouping results by task. Another change is the emergence of distributors, which could either be dedicated to one supplier or carry multiple products from different developers. As a quick note, choosing the correct exoskeleton solution (or deciding if a wearable is even the correct solution) for a repetitive work task is just one piece of the puzzle for a successful implementation. Still, it is often the first step in the process, and an error there will cascade down through pilots and long-term adoption efforts (and will most certainly negatively impact any return business). Even with all these changes, the majority of occupational exoskeletons are still sold directly by their producers, with some alternative acquisition and comparison pathways emerging: First, several dedicated consulting companies have sprouted in North America and Europe, which can provide support in choosing the right exoskeleton system for a fee. Second, some distributors carry devices from multiple developers, and their sales team is becoming more experienced with the strengths of each one. Third, some companies go beyond the role of a distributor and have become closer to an integrator that goes on a journey with the end user and buyers, helping them through the entire process of selection, comparison, and setting up a pilot. Last but not least, in the age of AI and digital tools, there have been multiple systems proposed that can collect data from repetitive work tasks, and some are designed specifically for wearables. The challenge with this digital solution is data collection, which can range from cell phone videos to motion tracking or even full EMG studies, but that is not all, because in addition to data collection, data interpretation with these systems is not trivial and requires effort before it can be condensed and summarized into a digestible report. How could things shape up in the future? There are a few likely scenarios on how the complexity of selecting an occupational exoskeleton could be reduced while creating a more positive and streamlined experience for decision makers and buyers. The car dealership route - developers of occupational exoskeletons could continue to consolidate so that each one has a full portfolio. This would be similar to shopping for a car, where car company A would offer sedans through trucks and everything in between, and the dealership next to it would offer the same range of vehicle classes from a different maker. An alternative to that would be an increase in multi-vendor distributors that already carry competing brands. Some examples of this happening right now would be Stanley Handling and FoxInnovation in Europe, The Exoskeleton Store and ExxoVantage in the Americas and Oceania. With this model, buyers have to visit fewer places and can also leverage the experience of the multi-vendor distributors to assist with selection. The final version could be an investment and improvement in digital tools. This could include online comparison tools, such as those found on car or camera equipment websites, or something more custom that can collect and interpret data from job sites and compare it against the known capabilities of different types and brands of industrial exoskeletons. All this work will lead to the formation of a marketplace, allowing buyers and end users to compare and evaluate industrial wearable solutions against data or prior knowledge. This would simplify the buying process considerably and lower the entry barrier for professionals and companies interested in becoming early adopters of wearable devices that provide direct physical support for their jobs.
