Google: Actually, AI in Search is driving more queries and higher quality clicks
Reid's framing boils down to everything is peachy, and AI is making things better — even for websites! She wrote that Google Search's total organic click volume to websites has been "relatively" stable year-over-year. Reid also claimed Google sends more "quality clicks" (visitors who don't quickly bounce) to websites than a year ago. The company says people are also happier with the search experience.
The company didn't share any numbers — the post has no data whatsoever — to support its claims.
Google's explanation for the rosy outlook? "With AI Overviews, people are searching more and asking new questions that are often longer and more complex," Reid wrote. "In addition, with AI Overviews, people are seeing more links on the page than before. More queries and more links mean more opportunities for websites to surface and get clicked."
Reid does highlight a shifting landscape. She says user trends are resulting in lower traffic for some sites and increased traffic for others. Of course, the Google Search head didn't call out any specific websites. But she claims forums, videos, podcasts and posts with "authentic voices and first-hand perspectives" are thriving. Reid added that content like "an in-depth review, an original post, a unique perspective, or a thoughtful first-person analysis" does well. A Google AI Overview for the query (Google / Engadget)
The Google VP said people seeking simple Q&A types of searches are leaning more on AI. "For some questions where people are looking for a quick answer, like 'when is the next full moon,' people may be satisfied with the initial AI Overviews response and not click further," Reid wrote. "This has also been true for other answer features we've added, like the Knowledge Graph or sports scores. But for many other types of questions, people continue to click through, as they want to dig deeper into a topic, explore further or make a purchase. This is why we see click quality increasing — an AI response might provide the lay of the land, but people click to dive deeper and learn more, and when they do, these clicks are more valuable."
It's quite the contrast from the Pew report. It found that visitors who saw an AI summary clicked a traditional search result in eight percent of all visits. Those without an AI summary? They clicked on a traditional result in 15 percent of their visits. As for those source links in AI summaries? Pew found that only one percent of people clicked on those. Users were also more likely to end their browsing after visiting a page with an AI summary.
That aligned with comments Cloudflare CEO Matthew Prince made in June. He said search traffic referrals keep plummeting. "The future of the web is going to be more and more like AI, and that means that people are going to be reading the summaries of your content, not the original content," he said. Prince said that a decade ago, Google sent a publisher one visitor for every two pages it crawled. Early this year, it dropped to one visitor for every six pages. He said that, in June, it was down to one for every 18.
I can't tell you who to believe. But here's what the ultimate source had to say: Straight from the source! (Google / Engadget)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
38 minutes ago
- Forbes
Battery Scale: How The West Can Compete In A Market Built For Giants
Matthew Dawson | CEO, Elementium Materials. getty Over 30 years ago, the rapid commercialization of the internet led to the creation of a new industry, which became a cornerstone of the world's economy. Large amounts of capital flowed into this market during what was colloquially termed the 'dot-com boom,' totaling almost 40% of all venture capital investments in 1999. Years later, however, the market collapsed. The Nasdaq dropped more than 75% over 2.5 years, and more than half of the companies failed despite a promising outlook. However, when the dust settled, the companies that survived, such as Google and Amazon, became the backbone of the technology industry and the 21st-century economy. The energy industry now faces a similar situation, sitting on the precipice of a global shift with rapid economic growth, rising populations and explosive growth of new energy-intensive fields like artificial intelligence. Global electricity demand is expected to double by 2050 as the world rapidly shifts toward the electrification of traditional processes. The upcoming energy revolution will increase the need for more energy storage, with projections for annual battery storage manufacturing capacity exceeding 9 TWh by 2030. Corporate funding for energy storage companies reached $19.9 billion in 2024, supporting a sector that now hosts over 9,000 companies. As with the dot-com boom, the battery industry is saturated with as many promising technologies as it is bankruptcies, and it is unclear which companies will emerge as the future titans of the electrification industry. The Challenge Of Scaling Manufacturing The massive scale of the energy industry can be challenging to grasp. For example, reaching the 2030 goal of producing 9 TWh of battery capacity will require around 20 million tons of cathode material, 12 million tons of anode material and 6 million tons of electrolyte. That's because each kilowatt-hour of battery capacity uses about 4 kg of active materials. In total, the materials needed are similar in scale to the entire annual global production of copper, zinc and lead—highlighting just how massive the shift to electrification really is. Unfortunately, scaling up battery production in the Western world presents significant challenges. The time between a company's initial investments and first revenue, colloquially known as the 'valley of death,' is particularly difficult for the battery industry. At least half a dozen well-known battery companies with promising technological solutions filed for bankruptcy in 2024, citing supply chain issues, higher-than-expected capital costs or insufficient funds. While there was a boom of energy funding reaching record highs in recent years, many companies have begun to experience the bust end of the cycle. Domestically, American companies attempting to scale up their product face the chicken-and-egg challenge. Establishing robust manufacturing capabilities to scale up a product often requires significant capital. However, it's challenging to receive this capital without revenue from selling products, which by necessity must compete economically with incumbent solutions. This conundrum is especially difficult to overcome in the battery industry because of the dominant position of Eastern battery manufacturers. Explosive growth in supply and demand has allowed those who possess massive output capabilities to thrive with ever-thinning profit margins. Lithium-ion battery pack prices have dropped to a record low of$115/kWh in 2024, which is promising for driving greater levels of adoption. However, it presents challenges for smaller companies to break into the market. This is a pressing concern that the Western battery manufacturing world must overcome. Capital-Light Scaling And Strategic Partnerships It has become increasingly clear that battery companies must prioritize more rapid paths to commercialization. This requires designing with cost in mind from the beginning. Too many companies focus on technological breakthroughs while ignoring key factors like supply chain, safety and economics, thinking that all of these challenges will be solved with scale. However, companies must include these factors in their technological breakthroughs from the outset. For instance, new battery materials should rely on already existing, low-cost, mass-produced precursors with a diversified supply chain that mitigates geopolitical risk. Furthermore, companies that focus on capital-light scaling models—strategies that don't require heavy upfront investment in physical assets—much like the software industry, can better position themselves to achieve success. Utilizing alternative business models like focusing on core areas of expertise that provide a competitive advantage, coupled with toll manufacturing in noncore areas, can help rapidly scale while reducing the capital needs. While this business model may cut into margins, leveraging the knowledge of global titans with existing industry expertise could help accelerate the time to market and be the difference between zero customers and GWh-level production. On the customer-facing side, companies that focus on early adoption with low interference, low risk and low cost for customers will have the best chance of seeing mass adoption. Designing materials that fit into traditional customers' expectations without requiring additional steps during implementation lowers the barrier to entry. For example, battery electrolytes that are simply drop-in replacements to traditional liquid carbonate electrolytes, such as sulfonyl-based electrolytes—which I discussed in my previous article—will be more readily adopted than electrolytes that require changes to the cell manufacturing process. In addition, focusing on early adopters in niche markets facing major challenges can be a way to accelerate technology deployment and attract higher margins. Early success in these markets can bolster a company's financials while proving out the supply chain, positioning the company for larger market opportunities. These strategies are now being deployed to disrupt the highly competitive battery industry. The Western world has proven to be a leader in battery innovation, but the companies best positioned to be the titans of electrification will be those who solve the scale-up challenge, creating technologies and business models that allow them to compete with incumbents from day one. Forbes Technology Council is an invitation-only community for world-class CIOs, CTOs and technology executives. Do I qualify?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Do you tip at a coffee shop? This map reveals America's best (and worst) states for counter-service tipping.
Tipping at sit-down restaurants has been an American tradition since the late 19th century. But in the modern era, tipping expectations have been less clear-cut at coffee shops, fast food places and other counter-service restaurants. With the rise of technology and electronic payment systems, tipping has shifted from a small jar for extra cash and coins into a regular customer prompt. According to data from Toast, about half of counter-service customers paying with a card leave a tip, with an average value of 15.8% of their total tab after taxes and fees. As of 2023, nearly three-quarters of Americans said tipping expectations have spread to more places, according to Pew. Frequent tipping became more common in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, as the rise of payment technologies coincided with an appreciation for essential workers, and now some consumers are feeling tip fatigue. The national average tip amount for counter service has been falling since 2018. Explore the map and table to see which states leave the most tips at counter-service restaurants based on Toast data. Data does not include cash tips and is calculated among consumers who left a tip as a percentage of total cost including taxes and fees.
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
The Importance Of Listening As A Leadership Skill
Heather Heefner is the owner of Dart Communication. She is a communication expert and leadership coach. The most expensive leadership mistake isn't a bad strategic decision—it's failing to listen effectively. Harvard Business School reports that when employees feel genuinely heard at work, they experience greater internal motivation, increased creativity and stronger engagement. Yet most leaders retain only a fraction of what they hear in conversations, missing critical insights, early warnings and breakthrough ideas flowing through their organizations daily. While everyone focuses on speaking more persuasively, the real competitive advantage comes from listening more effectively. Google's extensive research on team effectiveness found that psychological safety—the belief that one can speak up without fear of negative consequences—was the number one predictor of high-performing teams. And psychological safety begins with leaders who actually listen. In my practice of communication coaching and consulting, I've observed that the most effective leaders listen differently than their peers. They don't just listen for information—they listen for understanding. They don't just listen with their ears—they listen with their full attention. And they don't just listen to confirm what they already believe—they listen to discover what they don't yet know. 4 Levels Of Listening That Every Leader Must Master Not all listening is created equal. Understanding these four levels will help you recognize where you currently operate and where you need to go: This is pretend listening—when you're physically present but mentally elsewhere. You might nod and say "uh-huh," but you're actually thinking about your response, your next meeting or that urgent email. Your team can always tell when you're not really there, which erodes trust and pushes conversations into unproductive territory. At this level, you're engaged enough to respond appropriately. You follow the conversation thread and can ask relevant questions. This is the minimum acceptable standard for professional interactions, but it doesn't create conditions for breakthrough insights or a deep connection. Here, you're fully present and focused on understanding both content and emotion. You ask clarifying questions, paraphrase to confirm understanding and notice nonverbal cues. This level demonstrates respect and builds trust, and it's where most effective leaders consistently operate. The highest form of listening goes beyond understanding what is said to sensing what wants to emerge. You listen with such presence and openness that you create space for new possibilities. You hear not just words but underlying needs, values and aspirations. This is where innovation happens and conflicts transform into collaboration. Most leaders operate at levels 1 and 2 most of the time. The challenge is consistently practicing levels 3 and 4, especially in high-stakes situations. 3 Practices That Transform Your Listening Effectiveness Based on my work with leaders across industries, here are the three most impactful practices for elevating your listening: Before important conversations, take a moment to clear your mind and set an intention to be fully present. A simple practice: Take three deep breaths, let go of distractions with each exhale and silently commit to listening with both attention and curiosity. I worked with a CEO who began each meeting with 30 seconds of silence—a micro-meditation that helped everyone transition from previous activities and become fully present. The impact on dialogue quality was remarkable. Team members reported feeling more valued, decisions became more aligned and meetings became shorter because the quality of listening improved. One of the biggest barriers to effective listening is our tendency to evaluate what's being said—to mentally categorize it as right or wrong, useful or irrelevant, aligned with our views or opposed to them. Practice suspending judgment and listening instead for understanding. Your goal isn't to agree or disagree but to fully comprehend the other person's perspective—their reasoning, their concerns, their hopes. This doesn't mean you'll ultimately agree, but understanding must precede evaluation. A manager I coached was struggling with what she called a "difficult" employee. When she set aside her assumptions and listened with genuine curiosity, she discovered the underlying concerns driving the behavior. What seemed like resistance was actually valuable insight about process inefficiencies that, once addressed, improved the entire team's performance. The questions you ask reveal the quality of your listening. Surface-level listening produces surface-level questions. Deep listening enables questions that open new possibilities: "What's at the heart of this issue for you?" "How does this connect to what matters most for our customers?" "What's possible here that we haven't considered yet?" "What would make this a win for everyone involved?" These questions demonstrate that you've listened deeply enough to move the conversation forward in meaningful ways. An executive I worked with was known for his brilliant but overwhelming communication style. When he learned to listen first and ask generative questions, his influence dramatically increased because his ideas were better received and more readily implemented. The Competitive Advantage Of Deep Listening I've seen the transformative impact of deep listening in countless leadership situations: Teams that were deeply divided on strategic direction found common ground when their leader created space for each perspective to be fully heard without judgment. Executives who shifted from speaking to listening became catalysts for breakthrough results and stronger relationships. In a world where everyone is talking, the ability to truly listen has become a rare and valuable leadership skill that creates a competitive advantage for both you and your organization. Your Next Step Choose one upcoming important conversation this week. Before it begins, take three deep breaths and commit to listening for understanding rather than agreement. Notice what you learn that surprises you. That single shift—from speaking to listening—might be the catalyst for your next breakthrough as a leader. Remember: While others are focused on being heard, exceptional leaders focus on hearing others. That's where real influence begins. Forbes Coaches Council is an invitation-only community for leading business and career coaches. Do I qualify?
