Popular brewery faces demolition
Young Henrys has been in the heart of Newtown since 2012.
It rose in popularity thanks to its Newtowner pale ale and Natural Lager.
It was also where Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and now fiancee Jodie Haydon had their first date.
Under a proposal made by Loucas Architects in May, who lodged a development application with the Inner West Council, the warehouse would be demolished and replaced with a new six storey building as well as ground-level retail and commercial spaces. Young Henrys Brewing may need to change its location. Supplied Credit: Supplied
The planned site would cost just short of $21m, adding 40 new residential apartments, with seven reserved for low income housing.
In late May Loucas Architects lodged the developments, which has yet to be approved by the Inner West Council.
Young Henrys co-founder Oscar McMahon told NewsWire the brewery would find a new home elsewhere but they are unsure where at this stage.
He said the move was something that was a long time coming.
'This warehouse was built around 1979 and is the last little industrial complex in Newtown,' he said.
'Newtown is now a high density living area that attracts pretty high rent and house prices.'
'We've always had a good relationship with the owner and it has always been a down the track thing but now it makes the most sense as a way forward for the owners and we were open to it as we ran out of space,' he said.
Despite the move Mr McMahon said Young Henry's made its name in Newtown and would look to try and find a solution that can keep them local.
'Young Henrys was born and bred in Newtown and we will do everything we can to always have a Newtown presence,' he said.
'The way we are looking at it, there are some great opportunities although there is sadness.
'We built a brand and business on this little patch of dirt and there'll always be something special and wonderful about this place.
'It's a shabby old warehouse complex, but it's our shabby old warehouse complex that we made our home.'
Mr McMahon said due to the growing business demands, the brand has had to expand to productive facilities in Goulburn and Victoria, meaning there won't be any production hiccups.
While the plans have not gone through the council just yet, Young Henrys will be looking to say goodbye to the place in a fitting way.
'We've got such a great relationship with many of our customers, so we look forward to many farewell beers that will be had over the coming 6 to 12 months,' Mr McMahon said.
'I also really look forward to taking people on a bit of a journey into the next integration of Young Henrys.' Young Henry's Cold XPA beer for What We're Loving Right Now column. Credit: Supplied
The proposal is open to community submissions until June 26.
According to planning alerts, the project received mixed reviews.
One said 'I support this application.
'Sydney is in the grip of a housing crisis, and medium-density housing near existing infrastructure is one of the fastest and most effective ways to address it. This proposal ticks all the right boxes, it's close to Newtown Station and within easy walking distance of shops along Enmore Road and King Street.'
'The Inner West needs more well-considered developments like this one.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
6 hours ago
- Courier-Mail
Revealed: The hidden cost of Australia's ute tax breaks compared to EVs
Don't miss out on the headlines from Motoring. Followed categories will be added to My News. OPINION: We've all seen the headlines: electric vehicle (EV) tax breaks are costing taxpayers billions. According to Government modelling, the Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) exemption for EVs, alongside other related perks, is forecast to cost Australians $23.4 billion by 2036. That's a staggering figure, especially when you consider this policy only began in July 2022. As the Productivity Commission highlighted in its second report, the cost of the EV FBT exemption has blown out from an initial forecast of $55 million per year to a staggering $560 million, leading to calls to scrap it. But have you ever wondered about the figures for subsidising big, diesel and fuel-chugging utes over the past decade? Well, that number doesn't exist. RELATED: What Albo's new road tax means for you 2025 Ford Ranger Wildtrak PHEV. Picture: Supplied While policymakers and commentators are lining up to slam EV incentives as 'inefficient' or 'costly', Australia's longstanding love affair with utes is being ignored. HUGE COST OF UTES IGNORED These vehicles, which make up four of the top five best-selling models in the country, are quietly driving away with generous tax perks – and Aussies are paying for it. Under Australia's tax system, commercial vehicles, such as dual-cab utes, can claim a Fringe Benefit Tax exemption, provided they're used 'primarily' for work. But the rules are so vague, that many use utes for personal reasons, which is allowed as long as it's 'minor, infrequent, and irregular'. In reality, many of these utes aren't ferrying tradies and tools. They're doing school drop-off, towing jet skis, and sitting in suburban streets. According to the Australian Institute, there are 1.5 times more utes on the road than there are actual tradies, which suggests a lot of people are claiming a tax break for a 'tool of trade' that's really just a big, comfy family car. MORE: New ute to spark price war Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers during Prime Minister Anthony Albanese opening remarks at The Economic Reform Roundtable at Parliament House in Canberra. Picture: NewsWire / Martin Ollman It's not just FBT, utes also avoid the Luxury Car Tax, even if they cost well over six figures, because technically, they're not 'passenger vehicles'. So you can buy a RAM 1500 and avoid paying LCT, while someone buying a more efficient EV might get slugged. In 2023, high-end American-style utes alone cost Australians over $250 million in foregone revenue from the Luxury Car Tax, according to a report by the Australia Institute. That figure doesn't even count the tax revenue lost from the FBT exemption. Australia Institute research director Rod Campbell said Australia is subsidising 'big, dumb utes by hundreds of millions of dollars each year'. 'These vehicles are damaging roads, reducing safety and increasing emissions, yet they are given a massive tax break,' he said. I'm not ignoring the $23 billion figure attached to EV tax breaks, including FBT exemptions, import tariff relief, and other incentives but these tax breaks are designed to make EV ownership more accessible and affordable, particularly through novated leasing. MORE: Chinese brand moves into Holden's home A driver charging his car at an EV charging station in Caringbah. Picture: Jonathan Ng According to the National Automotive Leasing and Salary Packaging Association, more than 100,000 Australians have taken up an EV novated lease since mid-2022. These policies are critical to making EVs accessible, especially as the upfront costs are a little higher than petrol and diesel equivalents. These EV tax breaks are part of a broader push by the Federal Government to reach net zero by 2050, with transport making up 20 per cent of national emissions. HALF-PREGNANT APPROACH But the Productivity Commission's report now recommends scrapping the EV FBT exemption, arguing it's too costly and now 'duplicative' with the New Vehicle Efficiency Standards (NVES). Sure … the (NVES) will encourage automakers to import cleaner cars into the market, but that's only half the battle. If consumers aren't incentivised to buy them, nothing changes. You need both; one brings supply, the other brings demand. BYD electric cars for export waiting to be loaded onto a ship at a port in Yantai, in eastern China's Shandong province. (Photo by AFP) / China OUT As the Federal Chamber of Automotive Industries (FCAI) noted, without continued consumer support, the 'continuation of current customer buying preferences will inevitably lead to the accrual of substantial penalties.' Automakers can't just absorb these costs; they will likely have to raise prices on popular models, reduce their availability, or exit the market altogether. Countries that have successfully transitioned to high EV adoption rates such as Norway, have almost always used both strong efficiency standards and generous consumer incentives. Relying solely on one or the other often leads to slower progress. So if we're serious about being fair and decarbonising the transport sector, then shouldn't we be looking at everything? Including utes. So why are we ignoring the ute loophole? Is it because it's politically uncomfortable? Talking about utes means comforting one of Australia's most beloved vehicle segments. Tradies vote and Aussies rely on them. If the Federal Government decides to pull EV tax breaks now, while leaving the ute loophole wide open, that's like turning off a light in a room and calling it a major win for energy efficiency. We need better policy and smarter decisions. Originally published as EV cuts loom while Aussies pay for ute tax
Perth Now
9 hours ago
- Perth Now
Drought fund expanded for algal bloom response
A federal body that supports drought-stricken farmers will expand its operations to support those impacted by "significant ecological events" such as South Australia's devastating algal bloom. Visiting Adelaide on Wednesday, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced the Regional Investment Corporation - which provides concessional loans to farmers - would have a new stream added to ensure longer term support. "It's very clear that slow onset events like marine heatwaves and algal blooms will continue to impact our natural environment, communities and businesses," he said. "What we will do is work with the minister for agriculture, who's been working closely with relevant stakeholders to extend the operations of the RIC and improve those operations." The algal bloom has killed tens of thousands of marine animals since it was identified off the Fleurieu Peninsula in March, and has since spread along some of the coastline. The prime minister did not provide further details on the funding or how much would be made available in South Australia. He also announced that in addition to the existing $28 million algal bloom package, further federal measures included $4 million for local government grants, $2 million to enhance monitoring and data collection of marine heatwaves, and $250,000 for algal bloom research. He told South Australians "the federal government stands side by side with you" and that support would be provided as requested. Asked if he would acknowledge the algal bloom as a natural disaster, as it was described by Premier Peter Malinauskas, Mr Albanese said the government had "acknowledged it as a significant ecological event". The prime minister was visiting Adelaide company AgileX Biolabs, which has set up a new national brevetoxin testing lab, meaning samples no longer have to be sent to New Zealand. Brevetoxins have been detected in shellfish in SA, forcing the closure of some harvesting areas. Earlier, Mr Albanese visited Kangaroo Island, and commented on social media that the algal bloom has had "a heartbreaking impact on our marine life, on our fishers, and on our communities". "We're responding on all fronts: providing relief for those affected, new investments to restore our coasts, and long-term measures to better protect our environment," he wrote on X. Opposition Leader Sussan Ley said Mr Albanese's refusal to recognise the algal bloom as a natural disaster "beggars belief" and Mr Malinauskas had "failed to stand up for his state". "He let the prime minister get away with weasel words instead of demanding a proper disaster declaration and real support," she said. SA Opposition Leader Vincent Tarzia said if Mr Albanese was only here for a photo opportunity, "then he shouldn't waste his time". "Declare it a natural disaster or don't bother coming at all," he said.
Sydney Morning Herald
17 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
No phones, no handlers, no nice snacks: day one in Chalmers' VIP lock-up
The catering staff of Parliament House are taking to heart the issues central to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese's economic roundtable. As the late lunch break started on the first day of the three-day love-in, the staff rolled out the remnants of the morning's work. A trolley with four large but near-empty hot water urns and a collection of mugs stained by lukewarm coffee. What was noticeable was what was absent from the trolley. No discarded sandwich wrappers. No waxed paper with chocolate muffin remains. Not even a container of half-eaten Venetian biscuits. Traditionally, gatherings of the grand, self-important and policy wonks in federal parliament are catered as if an army is dropping by for a week. But perhaps in a sign of the topic matter, the economic roundtable was focused only on what was necessary to get the collective minds of business leaders, unionists, academics, community groups and politicians thinking. In this case, coffee, tea and some plain biscuits. Loading At one point, Treasurer Jim Chalmers – perhaps getting in some training for running a meeting in the federal cabinet room – told those assembled they could get up and walk around to stretch their legs. But none took up the option, focused as they were on the issues at hand. Without mobile phones (which were left at the cabinet door) or handlers or media managers, it was left to the almost 30 people in the room to work through the agenda put in front of them. And that agenda kicked off with an issue close to the heart of almost every person on the planet, particularly the current occupant of the White House, a discussion about tariffs.
