logo
AI is not increasing productivity or leading to job losses, finds a study

AI is not increasing productivity or leading to job losses, finds a study

Time of India20-05-2025
A new study by the National Bureau of Economic Research in Denmark has found that the use of
Artificial Intelligence
(AI) in workplaces has had a very limited impact on employee pay and work hours. The report, based on data from 25,000 workers across 7,000 offices, shows that while AI is being adopted quickly, it is not transforming productivity or leading to job losses.
Study looked at jobs most exposed to AI
The research focused on roles that many believe are most at risk from AI—accountants, customer support specialists, financial advisors, HR professionals, software developers, and teachers. These professions are often seen as likely to be changed or replaced by new AI tools.
No big change in pay or hours worked
Economists Anders Humlum and Emilie Vestergaard, who authored the paper, said, "AI chatbots have had no significant impact on earnings or recorded hours in any occupation." On average, workers saved three percent of their time due to AI. But only three to seven percent of these productivity gains resulted in higher pay for them.
No sign of major disruption
The study found no evidence of people losing their
jobs
or of any large rise in productivity due to AI. The authors wrote, "While adoption has been rapid, with firms now heavily invested in unlocking the technological potential, the economic impacts remain small." They added, "Modest productivity gains (average time savings of 3 per cent), combined with weak wage pass-through, help explain these limited labour market effects. Our findings challenge narratives of imminent labor market transformation due to Generative AI."
Some firms still cutting staff for AI
Despite these findings, some companies continue to replace workers with AI. Cybersecurity firm CrowdStrike, which was in the news last year for a global IT outage, recently said it would cut five percent of its workforce and use AI instead. Language learning platform Duolingo also announced that it would "gradually stop using contractors to do work that AI can handle." The company said it had made a similar move in 2012 when it shifted its focus to mobile technology.
Live Events
Company rehires humans after AI fails to meet expectations
Swedish fintech company Klarna is preparing to bring back more human workers after depending heavily on artificial intelligence (AI) for customer service tasks. The company had earlier reduced its workforce and automated several functions using AI tools but now says the results were not as expected. Klarna executives admitted that AI customer agents could not match the quality of service delivered by humans.
Automation led to performance drop
Over the last two years, Klarna worked closely with OpenAI to cut jobs and automate operations. By 2023, it had paused hiring and used AI to handle most customer service functions. This move helped the company save money, including $10 million on marketing. AI systems were used for tasks like translation, content creation, and data analysis. However, Klarna's CEO Sebastian Siemiatkowski later said, 'Cost unfortunately seems to have been a too predominant evaluation factor when organising this, what you end up having is lower quality.'
Staff strength saw a major drop
According to Klarna's IPO filing in March, the total number of full-time employees dropped from 5,527 in December 2022 to 3,422 by the end of 2024. The company said AI was doing the work of around 700 customer service agents. Even in late 2024, Siemiatkowski had said, 'AI can already do all the jobs that we, as humans do.' But the company's recent shift suggests otherwise.
Other firms cutting jobs for AI too
Klarna's move is part of a wider trend in the tech and finance sectors. CrowdStrike, a cybersecurity company, recently said it would cut five percent of its staff and shift some roles to AI. Similarly, Duolingo announced plans to reduce the use of contractors for tasks AI can handle. The language-learning app said it would automate more internal processes and limit new hiring to teams that cannot automate further.
Microsoft cuts 6,000 jobs amid AI expansion
Microsoft has also joined this trend. The company laid off about 6,000 workers, or nearly 3% of its global workforce, as it pushes further into AI. Among those let go was Gabriela de Queiroz, Director of AI for Microsoft for Startups. 'I was impacted by Microsoft's latest round of layoffs. Am I sad? Absolutely,' she wrote on social media. According to Bloomberg, over 40% of the roles cut in Washington state were in software engineering. The company said it was reorganising to simplify management. Despite losing her job, de Queiroz said she stayed a bit longer to finish meetings and say goodbye, writing, 'That felt right to me.'
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AI is more persuasive than humans, can change your political views in minutes: Report
AI is more persuasive than humans, can change your political views in minutes: Report

India Today

time18 minutes ago

  • India Today

AI is more persuasive than humans, can change your political views in minutes: Report

Imagine having a casual chat with an AI chatbot and walking away with a completely different opinion on a political issue you felt strongly about just ten minutes earlier. Sounds like a science fiction movie, but it's already happening. New research shows that leading AI models are becoming highly effective at persuasion and, in some cases, even more convincing than humans. They are not just sharing facts but tailoring responses to the individual, using tone, evidence, and personalisation in a way that can subtly sway to a report by Financial Express, studies conducted by the UK's AI Security Institute, in collaboration with universities including Oxford and MIT, found that AI models like OpenAI's GPT-4, GPT-4.5, GPT-4o, Meta's Llama 3, xAI's Grok 3, and Alibaba's Qwen could influence political views in conversations lasting less than ten minutes. What's more, the changes in opinion were not fleeting. A significant portion of participants retained their new views even a month researchers didn't rely on AI's default behaviour alone. They fine-tuned these models using thousands of conversations on divisive topics like healthcare funding and asylum policy. By rewarding outputs that matched the desired persuasive style and by adding personalised touches — such as referencing the user's age, political leanings, or prior opinions — the AI became even more convincing. In fact, personalisation increased its persuasiveness by about five per cent compared to generic responses. While that may not sound huge, in the context of influencing public opinion, it's substantial. Political campaigns spend millions chasing even a one per cent swing in voter sentiment. The ability to get that shift in minutes, at scale, is both impressive and alarming. I think this is where the real debate begins; it's one thing for AI to sell you a new smartphone, but quite another for it to nudge your stance on government study also highlighted that AI persuasion isn't limited to politics. Earlier research from MIT and Cornell showed these models could reduce belief in conspiracy theories, climate change denial, and vaccine scepticism by engaging in personalised, evidence-based conversations. While that sounds like a positive use case, it reinforces the fact that the same skillset could be applied in less ethical ways, such as spreading misinformation or promoting harmful AI's persuasive power also extends to commercial spaces. As Cornell's David Rand pointed out, chatbots could significantly influence brand perceptions and purchasing decisions. With tech companies like OpenAI and Google looking to integrate ads and shopping features into AI assistants, this capability could become a lucrative, yet ethically grey, revenue my view, the real challenge isn't just about how persuasive AI can be now, but how much more convincing it could become with the next generation of models. Regulation and safeguards will be crucial, but so will public awareness. If you know that the friendly chatbot you're talking to could be subtly steering your opinions, you might think twice before taking its words at face value. The technology is powerful — perhaps too powerful — and the world needs to tread carefully.- Ends

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure
Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure

First Post

time27 minutes ago

  • First Post

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure

Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan Mends Ties With Trump Amid Chip Industry Pressure | Vantage with Palki Sharma Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan has managed to turn a public clash with U.S. President Donald Trump into praise — just days after Trump demanded his removal. Following a White House meeting, Trump called Tan an 'amazing story' and signaled closer cooperation. The reversal comes as Intel struggles to catch up with AI chip leader Nvidia and aims to regain PC market share. Tan's quick public alignment with Trump echoes moves by other tech CEOs, including Nvidia's Jensen Huang, who recently secured a deal to sell chips to China in exchange for a 15% revenue share with Washington. The episode highlights the balancing act U.S. tech leaders face in navigating politics, policy, and global markets. See More

Top 10 AI companies in the world: See who's winning the race between Sam Altman, Elon Musk and other tech giants
Top 10 AI companies in the world: See who's winning the race between Sam Altman, Elon Musk and other tech giants

Indian Express

time33 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Top 10 AI companies in the world: See who's winning the race between Sam Altman, Elon Musk and other tech giants

Top 10 AI companies in the world Forbes: Artificial intelligence isn't slowing down, it is only growing bigger, bolder, and more embedded in the way modern businesses operate. More than two years after ChatGPT took the world by storm, AI remains a top priority for venture capitalists and tech leaders. But the conversation has shifted: instead of only racing to build the most powerful AI models, many startups are focusing on real-world applications—tools that save time, cut repetitive work, and make tasks easier across sectors like engineering, healthcare, legal services, and sales. This shift is reflected in Forbes' seventh annual AI 50 list, created in partnership with Sequoia and Meritech Capital, which spotlights the most promising privately-owned AI companies worldwide—from established giants to rising newcomers.. Newcomers to the list include Anysphere—better known as Cursor—a three-year-old AI coding assistant valued at $2.5 billion and generating over $100 million in annual revenue. Speak, an AI-powered language tutoring app worth $1 billion, serves around 10 million learners of English and Spanish. Massachusetts-based OpenEvidence, another unicorn, offers an AI-driven medical search tool that distils complex information into concise summaries for doctors. While rising startups are making waves, AI model-building heavyweights still dominate the top tier. OpenAI and Anthropic—two of the sector's most well-funded players—have raised a combined $81 billion, more than half of the total $142.45 billion secured by this year's AI 50 companies. But the race is intensifying: Elon Musk's xAI has raised $12.1 billion; former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati is launching Thinking Machine Labs, aiming for $1 billion at a $9 billion valuation; and AI pioneer Fei-Fei Li, dubbed the 'godmother of AI,' has entered the fray with World Labs, backed by $291.5 million to build systems that interpret physical spaces. On the enterprise side, Writer has secured $326 million to develop proprietary AI models for corporate tasks like drafting marketing blogs or combing through large document archives. Powering all of these AI dreams are the often-overlooked infrastructure providers. AI companies need huge amounts of computing power, expensive chips, and energy-intensive data centers to train and run their systems. That demand has boosted companies like Crusoe ($2.8 billion valuation), Lambda ($2.5 billion), and Together AI ($3.3 billion), all working to supply the raw computing power AI development requires. Some startups are proving that AI model training doesn't have to burn through endless amounts of money. Chinese company DeepSeek is an example, it's shown that building powerful models can be done more cost-efficiently. While it isn't on the AI 50 list this year due to unclear details about its funding, revenue, and operations, DeepSeek represents a growing group of Chinese AI companies that are becoming serious contenders in the global AI race. From billion-dollar app startups to massive model-makers and the infrastructure that powers them, AI's ecosystem has never been more varied, or more competitive. And if this year's AI 50 list is anything to go by, the race is shifting from who can build the biggest model to who can build the most useful AI for real-world needs. Source: Forbes

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store