Judge Rules In Favour Of Justin Baldoni, Dismisses Blake Lively's Claims Of Emotional Distress
Washington:
In a recent development in the legal battle between Blake Lively and Justin Baldoni, a federal judge has ruled in favour of Baldoni, dismissing Lively's claims of emotional distress in their ongoing lawsuit.
This decision, which could have significant implications for the future of the case, comes just ahead of the trial set to begin in March 2026, as per Deadline.
The lawsuit, which centres around the making of the film It Ends with Us, includes a series of allegations from Lively against Baldoni and his production company, Wayfarer Studios.
Lively had initially sought to include emotional distress claims in the lawsuit, but recently moved to withdraw these claims.
However, Judge Lewis J Liman of the Southern District of New York shut down Lively's request on Tuesday, ruling that the claims would not be dismissed without prejudice unless both parties agreed to the terms.
In a succinct order, Judge Liman wrote, "The motion to compel is denied based on Plaintiff's representation that the relevant claims will be withdrawn."
According to Deadline, he further clarified that Lively's request to have the claims dismissed was denied "without prejudice to renewal", meaning that Lively's legal team would need to file a formal motion for dismissal if they wish to proceed with that course of action.
The judge's ruling added further weight to the situation by stating that if Lively's emotional distress claims are not dismissed, she would be precluded from presenting any evidence related to emotional distress in the case.
"For avoidance of doubt, if the claims are not dismissed, the court will preclude Lively from offering any evidence of emotional distress," Judge Liman stated, as quoted by Deadline.
Lively's legal team, led by attorneys Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, responded to the ruling with a statement expressing their disappointment with the outcome.
As per Deadline, they emphasised that Lively was still pursuing emotional distress damages through other claims in the lawsuit, including allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation.
"The court denied Wayfarer's motion," said Lively's lawyers in their statement, adding, "He told the parties to continue their discussions about the technicalities of how two of the 15 claims will be voluntarily dismissed. Ms Lively has offered to dismiss those claims because they are no longer necessary, and she will continue to pursue emotional distress damages through other claims in her lawsuit."
The lawyers also accused Baldoni and Wayfarer Studios of retaliatory tactics, arguing that these actions could expose them to significant legal and financial repercussions under California law.
"This is exactly where both parties were before the Baldoni-Wayfarer Parties rushed to file this utterly pointless motion to compel, all searching for yet another press moment," they added.
The case between Lively and Baldoni began making headlines in December 2024 when Lively filed a formal complaint accusing Baldoni and his associates of sexual harassment and retaliation.
The complaint, filed with the California Civil Rights Department, was followed by a defamation and extortion lawsuit from Baldoni against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and their public relations team.
As the legal conflict unfolded, the situation grew more complex, with multiple lawsuits filed on both sides.
Lively's legal battles have included accusations of mistreatment during the production of It Ends With Us, a film that was marketed as addressing serious themes of domestic violence.
The film did well at the box office, but reports of tension during its press tour and premiere quickly surfaced.
Despite the ongoing drama, sources close to the case have made it clear that a settlement is unlikely.
Both Lively and Baldoni have expressed their intention to fight the matter out in court, and the case now involves high-profile figures, including Lively's famous husband and Hollywood powerhouses such as Taylor Swift, Disney, and Marvel, all of whom have been drawn into the legal web.
With the trial scheduled to begin on March 9, 2026, the case between Lively and Baldoni is expected to intensify in the coming months.
The trial will take place in New York City, in the same courthouse where the high-profile sex-trafficking case against Sean 'Diddy' Combs is also being heard.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
7 hours ago
- India Today
Blake Lively slams manufactured shame against women after Baldoni lawsuit dismissal
Actor Blake Lively recently shared an emotional note after her legal win against actor-filmmaker Justin Baldoni's $400 million defamation lawsuit. Lively shared her views on the "manufactured shame" against women who face similar situations as her. She also pledged to fight for women's rights and support those who do not have enough 'It Ends With Us' actor shared a heartfelt gratitude note towards those who backed her in difficult times and also emphasised the pain one goes through in dealing with such circumstances. She wrote, "Last week, I stood proudly alongside 19 organisations united in defending women's rights to speak up for their safety."advertisement"Like so many others, I've felt the pain of a retaliatory lawsuit, including the manufactured shame that tries to break us. While the suit against me was defeated, so many don't have the resources to fight back," she added. Lively expressed her commitment towards voicing support for women's safety, integrity and dignity and said, "I'm more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity and their story. There are protections out there. Check out some of the incredible organisations below for resources and information."She concluded, "With love and gratitude for the many who stood by me, many of you I know. Many of you I don't. But I will never stop appreciating or advocating for you." Her post also linked name of legal and advocacy groups such as the California Employment Lawyers Association, California Women's Law Center, CHILD USA, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, and Equal Rights Advocates. Blake Lively shared a note on manufactired shame against women in her Instagram story. (Credit: Instagram/blakelively) advertisementLively issued the statement on Instagram after her legal victory over Baldoni on Monday. A federal judge dismissed both his $650 million defamation lawsuit against The New York Times and a related countersuit against Lively, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and their publicist Leslie SloaneThe 'It Ends With Us' actor had accused the group of extortion and defamation connected to their public comments and media coverage regarding the 2024 film. Judge Lewis J Liman, in his written opinion, found that Baldoni's team had failed to meet the legal standard for defamation. It indicated the defendants acting with 'actual malice' or knowingly spreading falsehoods."The Wayfarer Parties have not alleged that Lively is responsible for any statements other than the statements in her CRD complaint, which are privileged," Judge Liman was quoted in the court filing, obtained by PEOPLE."The Wayfarer Parties have alleged that Reynolds and [publicist Leslie] Sloane made additional statements accusing Baldoni of sexual misconduct and that the Times made additional statements accusing the Wayfarer Parties of engaging in a smear campaign," the judge for Lively, Esra Hudson and Mike Gottlieb, praised the ruling. The called it a "total victory and a complete vindication" not only for Lively, but also for Reynolds, Sloane, and The New York lawsuit stemmed from internal disputes during the production and marketing of 'It Ends With Us'. The movie, directed by Baldoni, also featured Lively opposite him. It grossed over $351 million globally despite drawing mixed critical January 2025, Baldoni filed a $400 million suit alleging Lively and Reynolds orchestrated a campaign to malign his reputation by accusing him of sexual harassment. He later expanded the suit to $650 million by also adding The New York Times and others to his was last seen in the black comedy 'Another Simple Favour'.Must Watch
Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Reddit chooses worst celebrity magazine covers; Taylor Swift, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston make it to the list
A post on Reddit has gone viral, where users have picked the worst celebrity magazine covers. The post has about 8k upvotes and close to 4k comments, with people coming with their personal suggestions and giving their two cents on the celebrity covers. The post has covers of artists like Taylor Swift, Madonna, Brad Pitt, Jennifer Aniston, Selena Gomez and Blake Lively, to name a few. (Also read: Usually demure Cartoon Network skewers 'bigoted' trolls on their Pride Month post; Reddit can't get enough of the sass) The post started with Jennifer Aniston posing for Interview magazine's March 2020 issue. Friends star Jennifer was seen wearing a black leather jacket, black underwear, and leather boots. Another user posted Madonna on the cover of Out magazine for their April cover in 2006, comparing it with the first US president, George Washington. A user posted Prince Harry and wife Meghan Markle's cover of Time magazine and wrote, "When Harry looked like he had just given Meghan a haircut". Some hilarious comments followed under the post like, 'He's suggesting streaks, just around her face,' a user wrote. Another user wrote, 'Have you ever considered balayage?' A third user commented, 'Shorter pieces to frame the face.' A user shared Taylor Swift's cover for Times magazine and wrote, "This is what popped in my head immediately. I don't know how to explain it, but her facial expression, the angle and how the photo was taken remind me of several professional photos of Trump." Users started commenting on the post with some crackling one-liners. One comment read, 'Now I know what a young Donald would look like if he were played by Christopher Reeve back in the 70s.' Another user commented, "Someone just yassified the Trump mugshot, it's not official!". Another comment said, 'This is how he sees himself.' One user put Brad Pitt's GQ cover in which he wears an electric blue shirt with a lizard crawling on his chest. The users started mentioning how he looks almost dead in the picture. One user commented, "He looks like it's his viewing at the funeral. Yikes". Another one said, 'It's very corpse-y' Next on the sub post was Blake Lively's cover of Lucky magazine for their September 2016 issue. The It ends With Us actor wears a blue coat while looking at the camera. The OP posted with the caption, "the expression, the way she's clutching at her coat, it's haunted me for years." The commentators couldn't help but agree. One user said, "She doesn't have a stylist. She trusts herself." Another commented, 'She's just realised she's locked herself out whilst taking out the trash.' Musician Selena Gomez's Vogue Mexico cover wasn't spared either. Users compared her pose to that of someone going through a stomach ache. One user wrote, 'Looks like her tummy hurts but she's trying to be brave and power through it.' Another user wrote, 'As a tummy ache survivor this tracks.' A third user commented, 'It really feels like they had no idea what they were doing, everything is just confusing and not framed properly. ' The post also had magazine covers of celebrities like Miley Cyrus, Kanye West, Hugh Jackman and Robert Pattinson.
Time of India
9 hours ago
- Time of India
Blake Lively's link to Judge Lewis J Liman's brother revealed after SHOCKING dismissal of Justin Baldoni's $400M lawsuit; netizens call it 'Conflict of interest'
's courtroom victory over has come under the radar after social media users uncovered a past connection between the actress and the brother of federal Judge Lewis J Liman, who dismissed Baldoni's $400 million lawsuit. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now On Monday, Judge Liman of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed the 'It Ends With Us' director's defamation and extortion lawsuit against Lively, her husband , and The New York Times. Judge Liman ruled that Lively's statements were made within the bounds of legal privilege and could not serve as the basis for a defamation claim. However, shortly after the decision, social media users began circulating a detail that has since gone viral. The viral post claims that the judge is the brother of Hollywood filmmaker , who directed Lively in the past. The post claimed that the actress was a teen when she worked with director Doug in a 2008 pro-Obama campaign ad for The ad also featured Lively's Gossip Girl co-star . 'FUN FACT: the judge that dismissed Justin Baldoni's claims against Blake Lively is Lewis Liman, brother to Doug Liman. Doug and Blake worked together years ago—small world,' wrote one user on X, triggering a wave of commentary and speculation. Some critics questioned a potential conflict of interest, despite the brief and indirect nature of the connection. 'I don't understand how he could preside then. That's a conflict of interest, I'd assume,' one commenter wrote. Others quickly pushed back, arguing that the 2008 collaboration between Lively and Doug Liman—a commercial involving dozens of public figures—hardly constituted grounds for judicial recusal. 'You think this judge would dismiss a lawsuit because Blake did a COMMERCIAL with his brother? Lmfao,' one user replied. Judge Lewis J Liman, a Harvard and Yale Law School graduate, has served on the federal bench since 2019 following a distinguished legal career that included time as a federal prosecutor and appellate division chief. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now His brother Doug has directed major studio films including The Bourne Identity, Swingers, and Edge of Tomorrow. There is no indication at this time of any formal conflict of interest or ethics violation. The judge has not commented on the social media reaction, and legal experts have noted that distant, professional overlaps involving family members are generally not disqualifying—especially when no ongoing or personal relationship exists. Lively celebrated the dismissal on Monday with a public statement, saying, 'I'm more resolved than ever to continue to stand for every woman's right to have a voice in protecting themselves, including their safety, their integrity, their dignity, and their story,' she wrote. The judge, however, said Baldoni could revise the lawsuit if he wanted to pursue different claims related to whether Lively breached or interfered with a contract. His legal team indicated it planned to do so.
