Ex-Treasury boss Ken Henry says ‘mind boggles' over axing of carbon tax, calls for tougher environmental reform
He said 'it still boggles the mind that we had the world's best carbon policy' and questioned: 'Why the hell did we ever drop it?'
The carbon pricing scheme was introduced by Labor in 2012 and placed on about 500 of Australia's largest polluters.
Under the policy, companies had to purchase credits to offset the amount of carbon produced, with the funds generated form the levy returned through tax cuts and increases to welfare payments.
The measure was later repealed by the Abbott government in July 2014 and replaced with an offset scheme to incentivise companies to avoid emitting CO2 by earning carbon credits.
Speaking at the National Press Club on Wednesday, Mr Henry, who was the Treasury secretary from 2001 to 2011, criticised the scrapping of the tax.
'It still boggles the mind that we had the world's best carbon policy and then, for
purely political reasons, decided that we can afford to do without it,' he said, speaking as the chair of not-for-profit Australian Climate and Biodiversity Foundation.
'A country that's capable of creating the best and then decides that it doesn't need anything at all – well, my God, of course we need a carbon tax.'
Mr Henry urged the government to not 'give up' and fix Australia's 'broken' environmental laws, taking aim at the 'not fit for purpose' and outdated Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC).
'Report after report tells the same story. The environment is not being protected. Biodiversity is not being conserved. Nature is in systemic decline,' he said.
'Of particular concern, they are incapable of supporting an economy in transition to net zero, and they are undermining productivity.'
He noted that the government's pledge to erect 1.2 million homes by 2030 would require more land and transport, meaning more interaction with EPBC assessments.
In strong criticism, he said there was 'no point in building a faster highway to hell', and while approvals needed to be granted faster, the environment needed to be protected.
'These projects, be they wind farms, solar farms, transmission lines, new housing developments, land-based carbon sequestration projects, new and enhanced transport corridors or critical minerals extraction and processing plants, must be delivered quickly and efficiently,' he said.
Speaking more broadly about government spending, Dr Henry, who authored the Henry Tax Review in 2010 to guide tax reforms over the next 10 to 20 years, said there needed to be more 'spending discipline'.
'If the budget is to meet these growing spending pressures, then we've got two options. We either increase taxes, as a share of GDP, or we grow the economy faster,' he said, noting productivity growth had slumped from an average of 2.31 per cent in the '90s to 0.98 per cent in the last 25 years.
'That's a pretty fundamental difference.
'If we continue on that trajectory, as we said in 2002, we will have no option but to raise taxes, and quite significantly, by several percentage points of GDP … or cut spending.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
26 minutes ago
- News.com.au
Latest poll shows Aussies support climate action to prevent risks from extreme weather events
A new poll has revealed a majority of Australians want the government to take stronger climate action and limit risks from extreme weather events such as bushfires. YouGov surveyed 1500 Australians, finding 77 per cent of respondents wanted stronger climate action, while 13 per cent thought the government should do less to prevent risks from extreme weather events. A report released by the Productivity Commission this week found the cost of ignoring climate risks would cost the economy an extra $26bn in the next two decades. The Commission found Australia was expected to experience more extremely hot days, longer fire seasons, heavy rainfall over short periods, rising sea levels, coastal flooding and intense tropical cyclones. It stated a harsher climate would increase costs for Australia from $9bn in 2023 to $35bn by 2050 if Australia did nothing to adapt. 'Disasters create lasting health effects for households, and negatively affect education outcomes and earnings,' the report stated. The government is expected to reveal its 2035 target by September with advice from the Climate Change Authority. Climate Council chief executive officer Amanda McKenzie said setting a strong 2035 climate target will help protect Australians from climate harm while driving new jobs and economic opportunities. 'Climate action and renewable power have been vote winners at the last two federal elections,' she said. 'Voters' concerns about extreme weather are justifiably growing more urgent. 'Almost eight in 10 want Australia's climate plans to reduce risk from climate-fuelled extreme weather, while more than six in 10 think the government should do more overall on climate.' The Climate Action Network program director Barry Traill said support for credible climate action and strong, science-backed pollution reduction targets are solidly mainstream positions in Australia. 'MPs can't afford to turn their backs on people losing their lives, their savings and their homes,' he said. 'Climate denial has and will continue to be punished at the ballot box. Australians want real action to protect lives and livelihoods.'

The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
Albanese shies away from reforms as Treasury says company taxes are hurting wages
The federal Treasury has conceded Australia's current company tax system is contributing to the nation's poor productivity performance and hurting workers' wages, while warning young people will increasingly shoulder the pain of propping up the budget. But hopes of a major overhaul of the tax system emerging from Labor's economic summit have been dampened by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing, is the one that we took to the election, and indeed the one that the Coalition voted against on the floor of the parliament, which is – we're reducing income taxes,' Albanese said on Thursday. The remarks undermine calls for major tax reform, such as business groups' push for company tax cuts, the Productivity Commission's suggestion of a groundbreaking cashflow tax to spur innovation and independent MP Kate Chaney's plan for a broader GST to be offset with cash handouts. In an issues paper to set the roundtable's tone, Treasury said there were growing problems with current tax arrangements, including inconsistent taxation of 'passive income' such as capital gains and superannuation investment. Loading It noted Australia's current top company tax rate of 30 per cent was 'relatively high' by international standards, backing complaints from business groups that the tax system was hurting all Australians. 'Company tax settings can also distort business decisions and disincentivise investment, which can result in lower productivity, fewer jobs and lower wages,' it found. The department, however, warned that the entire tax system was under pressure from 'demographic and economic shifts'.

Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
‘Inescapable reality': Australia nearly ‘unsafe to live' as Labor does nothing over racism
Sky News host Sharri Markson slams the Albanese Labor government's inaction on the climbing racism in Australia. 'I want to speak about racism in Australia, the truth is the Albanese government is not serious or genuine about tackling racism, isn't it ironic, a left wing woke government that claims to care about minority groups has taken no action whatsoever on recommendations to address racism,' Ms Markson said. 'Racism has never been worse in modern Australia.'