&w=3840&q=100)
Why did China declare sovereignty over a disputed reef in South China Sea?
New Delhi
China has declared sovereignty over an uninhabited reef, known as Sandy Cay, in the South China Sea potentially intensifying tensions with the Philippines regarding the disputed area.
Television channel China Central Television (CCTV) reported Saturday that China's coast guard 'implemented maritime control and exercised sovereign jurisdiction' over Sandy Cay in mid-April.
This announcement represents China's most recent declaration of sovereignty in these disputed waters. China has long claimed authority over this area.
This report emerged while Philippine and US troops are conducting their annual military exercises, which include preparation for potential South China Sea conflicts. China has expressed opposition to these war games, claiming they disrupt 'regional strategic stability'. Tensions between China and the Philippines have persisted in the South China Sea, where both nations assert overlapping claims to reefs and small islands.
China bases its claim to the South China Sea on historical grounds, tracing back to records from the Xia and Han dynasties. China defines its territorial claims through the nine-dash line, which was put forward by Chiang Kai Shek in 1947. During China's republican period, China conducted surveys, created maps, and assigned names to 291 islands and reefs in the area. The United States maintains that the South China Sea constitutes international waters and that sovereignty in the region should be determined according to the United Nations Convention on Laws of the Sea (Unclos). Unclos stipulates that nations cannot claim sovereignty over any land formations that are underwater at high tide, or those that were previously submerged but have been artificially raised above high tide level through construction activities.
Hague's ruling over nine-dash line
In 2016, the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, Netherlands, ruled that China's expansive claims through its nine-dash line lacked legal grounding under international law, granting the Philippines a major victory. However, China, which rejects the ruling, has become more assertive in its actions. Beijing has deployed hundreds of coastguard vessels to patrol the disputed areas, raising concerns for the Philippines, other claimants, and countries operating in the South China Sea, including the United States.
Recent flashpoints in South China Sea
Confrontations between the Philippines and China in the South China Sea have intensified over the past year as Beijing has pushed its territorial claims. Central to recent standoffs between the Philippines and China are two hotly contested features located inside Manila's 200-nautical mile exclusive economic zone, but which Beijing claims as its own.
China uses the nine-dash line that takes in about 90 per cent of the South China Sea to assert its claim to sovereignty over the Scarborough Shoal, a submerged reef coveted for its bountiful fish stocks, and the Second Thomas Shoal, home to a small contingent of Filipino sailors living aboard a rusty warship that Manila intentionally grounded in 1999 to further its territorial claims.
Will the US get involved at South China Sea?
The United States maintains a Mutual Defence Treaty with the Philippines and has repeatedly emphasised that it would defend its ally if its coastguard or armed forces were attacked anywhere in the South China Sea.
The treaty significantly increases the stakes in the Philippines-China dispute should a miscalculation occur at sea. However, Philippine officials, including Marcos, have rejected suggestions of invoking the treaty in the current situation, emphasising that it would be considered only as a last resort.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

Business Standard
3 days ago
- Business Standard
China to launch new visa for STEM talent as Trump cracks down on immigrants
Effective October 1, 2025, China will introduce a new visa category — the K Visa — aimed at attracting young foreign professionals in science and technology. The change comes under an update to the Regulations of the People's Republic of China on the Administration of the Entry and Exit of Foreigners, approved by the State Council. While the government has not defined the category in full, State broadcaster CCTV reported that the Talented Young Scientist Programme has an upper age limit of 45, while the Outstanding Young Scientists (Overseas) Fund Project sets the limit at 40. What is the K Visa? The K Visa will be available to foreign nationals recognised as 'young science and technology talent' by Chinese authorities. Detailed requirements will be published on Chinese embassy and consulate websites, but applicants will need to: < Meet standards set by relevant Chinese authorities for foreign youth in science and technology < Provide documentation proving they meet these criteria 'The K-type visa only has specific requirements regarding age, educational background, or work experience, and does not require a domestic employer or inviting entity. The application process will also be more streamlined,' the report said. China currently issues 12 categories of ordinary visas, including the Z Visa for work, X Visa for study, M Visa for business, L Visa for tourism, and R Visa for high-level talent. The K Visa is expected to be more flexible in: < Number of entries permitted < Validity period < Duration of stay Other visa application procedures will remain unchanged. Part of China's tech ambitions Beijing has set a target to become a technology superpower by 2035, seeing skilled professionals as essential to this goal in its competition with the United States. The Talented Young Scientist Programme brings researchers from Asia and Africa to work in China, while the Outstanding Young Scientists (Overseas) Fund Project seeks top-level natural scientists and engineers. Top universities in China have offered competitive salaries and bonuses to attract overseas researchers. US researchers face a tougher climate In contrast, some researchers in the United States are dealing with reduced federal support and uncertainty since Donald Trump's return to the White House. Funding agencies, including the National Science Foundation, have been told to cut overheads — reductions that affect indirect costs such as laboratory space, infrastructure and administrative support, often linked to postdoctoral research.


India.com
4 days ago
- India.com
‘Indian Navy Sails Where It Wants': Philippine Envoy Hails New Delhi's Bold Naval Moves Near China
London: The Indian and the Philippine navies recently carried out a joint drill close to the South China Sea. The exercise took place in waters of strategic importance for Manila. The manoeuvres have become a talking point in the Philippines. Teodoro 'Teddy Boy' Locsin Jr., former foreign minister of the Philippines and now the country's ambassador to the United Kingdom, spoke about the Indian Navy on X. He said the Indian Navy sails wherever it chooses. The Indian Navy is the only one with the balls to go where it pleases; Western navies sing a cappella like castrati. — Teddy Locsin Jr. (@teddyboylocsin) August 13, 2025 His remark came during an online exchange about the recent India-Philippines exercise. Locsin also took a swipe at Western navies. He compared them to castrati who sing a cappella. Castrati were male singers in church choirs and opera houses who retained a high-pitched voice after being castrated before puberty. The ambassador's comment was part of a conversation about the scope of the joint drill. The exercise took place in the West Philippine Sea, a section of the Indo-Pacific near the Philippines. This drill came shortly before President Ferdinand Marcos Jr.'s visit to India. An analyst had described the drill as being inside a region that forms part of the larger South China Sea. He also referred to China's sweeping claims in those waters. Another X user rejected that view. The user stated that the drill was inside the Philippines' exclusive economic zone. He highlighted that the area lies thousands of kilometres from mainland China. The Philippine envoy joined the thread with his praise for the Indian Navy. He also pointed out that this was not the first such drill between the two navies. The West Philippine Sea hosted a similar joint patrol in 2021. Defence observers see these exercises as a sign of deepening India-Philippines security ties. The waters where the two navies operate are rich in resources. They are also contested by Beijing. For Manila, the presence of the Indian Navy signals wider cooperation in protecting maritime rights.


Economic Times
4 days ago
- Economic Times
India rejects Arbitration Court's IWT ruling as baseless
India has rejected the Permanent Court of Arbitration's ruling on water rights, asserting its lack of jurisdiction and legal basis. The Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson emphasized India's non-recognition of the court and accused Pakistan of misleading references. India maintains the Indus Waters Treaty is in abeyance due to Pakistan's support for cross-border terrorism, warning against further hostile actions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads New Delhi: India on Thursday rejected the recent award of The Hague-based Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) asserting that its rulings are beyond jurisdiction, lack legal basis and hold no significance to India's rightful use of waters."India has never accepted the legality, legitimacy, or competence of the so-called Court of Arbitration. Its pronouncements are therefore without jurisdiction, devoid of legal standing, and have no bearing on India's rights of utilisation of waters. India also categorically rejects Pakistan's selective and misleading references to the so-called award," ministry of external affairs (MEA) spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said at a press meet here."As reiterated earlier, the Indus Waters Treaty stands in abeyance by a sovereign decision of the government of India, taken in response to Pakistan's continued sponsorship of cross-border terrorism, including the barbaric Pahalgam attack," he warned Pakistan not to continue with its "hateful" rhetoric against New Delhi saying any "misadventure" will have "painful consequences".Jaiswal said, "We have seen reports regarding a continuing pattern of reckless, war-mongering and hateful comments from Pakistani leadership against India. It is a well-known modus-operandi of the Pakistani leadership to whip up anti-India rhetoric time and again to hide their own failures. Pakistan would be well-advised to temper its rhetoric as any misadventure will have painful consequences as was demonstrated recently."The MEA had announced that India has never recognised the existence in law of the so-called Court of Arbitration, and the country's position has all along been that the constitution of this so-called arbitral body is in itself a serious breach of the IWT. Consequently, any proceedings before this forum and any award by it are also for that reason illegal and per se void, New Delhi said.