Pacific Edge Placement Upsized To NZ$16 Million
Pacific Edge is now targeting the opening of a NZ$5 million offer to eligible retail investors by way of a Share Purchase Plan (SPP) at the same NZ$0.10 cents per share offer price in July or early August 2025 (with the ability to accept oversubscriptions).
Note: PEB has released this update to the NZX and ASX as per listing rules.1*
Pacific Edge today announces it has successfully raised NZ$16 million of new equity in a placement of new ordinary shares (Placement) — NZ$1 million more than it sought — after Directors resolved to accept over subscriptions.2*
The Placement, which was well supported by existing shareholders, was completed on Friday 30 May 2025 and is subject to shareholder approval.3* It was priced at NZ$0.10 cents per share, a premium to the 20-day volume average weighted price (VWAP) prior to the announcement of the company's planned ~NZ$20 million equity issue.
Pacific Edge is now targeting the opening of a NZ$5 million offer to eligible retail investors by way of a Share Purchase Plan (SPP) at the same NZ$0.10 cents per share offer price in July or early August 2025 (with the ability to accept oversubscriptions).4 A shareholder meeting to approve the Placement is planned for late July or early August 2025.
The Placement and the planned SPP are aimed at ensuring Pacific Edge has additional resources and capacity to capitalize on its recent clinical and commercial milestones, grow in non-Medicare channels and regain Medicare coverage of its tests. Medicare coverage of the company's tests ceased after the 'Genetic testing for Oncology; Specific Tests' (L39365) Local Coverage Determination became effective on 24 April 2025.
Chairman Chris Gallaher said: 'We are delighted with the investor support we have received. The inclusion of Cxbladder in the American Urological Association's (AUA) new microhematuria guideline in February 2025 is significant and has allowed the company to view the non-coverage determination differently. We are leveraging the important AUA guideline to build on the commercial momentum we have already established, including our plans to regain Medicare coverage.'
Pacific Edge Chief Executive Dr Peter Meintjes said: 'The robust evidence emerging from our clinical evidence program is shifting clinical sentiment towards the broader adoption of our tests in the US and further afield and represents a significant opportunity in addition to Medicare re-coverage. We are delighted with the strong support we have received from investors to continue to pursue our plans, and we are looking forward to making the same offer to the remainder of our shareholders via the SPP.'
Pacific Edge is advised on the equity raise by Cameron Partners (investment banking advisers), Harmos Horton Lusk (legal advisers) and The Project (investor relations and communications advisers).
For further information on the detail and timetable of the equity raising please refer to the announcement and presentation dated Thursday 29 May 2025 and released by NZX and ASX on Friday 30 May 2025.
Footnote:
1* PEB has released the information contained in this update to the NZX and ASX as it regards it to be material, as defined in the NZX Listing Rules and Section 231 of the FMC Act.
2* Shareholder approval is required to settle the Placement (i.e., for payment for, and allotment of, the new shares offered under the Placement) given the Placement exceeds Pacific Edge's placement capacity (15% of Pacific Edge's current shares on issue) and due to Related Party participation. The Placement is also conditional on all necessary regulatory approvals. In this regard, the company intends to seek a waiver from NZX Listing Rule 4.19.1 to permit the allotment of shares under the Placement after shareholder approval is obtained. The Placement offer closed on 30 May 2025 for the purposes of clause 21(1)(b)(ii) of Schedule 8 to the Financial Markets Conduct Regulations 2014.
3* See footnote 1.
4* No offer of new shares is made under the SPP unless and until Pacific Edge sends the SPP offer document to shareholders. No money is currently being sought, and new shares cannot currently be applied for or acquired, under the SPP.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
a day ago
- NZ Herald
How to create inter-generational family wealth
'The theory is that each time I have a child born, I would invest $22,000. The key is that the investment is not for my children but for my grandchildren. So for example, my child, let's call him Tim. 'When Tim is born I invest $22,000. When Tim turns 65, the investment is worth, say, $1 million. Each of Tim's children (who would be probably 30-40 years old) would be entitled to get a split of the payout. Note Tim does not participate in the investment. 'For Tim's children to receive their share, all they have to do is make an equivalent investment for their children to keep it running. They could make it out of their share of their payment. 'This may sound complicated, but the only difficulty I can see is the initial investment to be made. However, once past that hurdle, the scheme is self-perpetuating and, if you look forward far enough, covers potentially hundreds or thousands of descendants. 'I'm curious if this is a worthwhile idea or not. Considering the opportunity cost, what do you think? Note I have not yet thought through the funds management aspects or the 'trustee' responsibilities in 65 years.' A: I love it – even though your email makes me feel as if I'm back at high school, and I've been conned into helping someone do their homework! Other readers' main objection to doing something similar themselves, I suspect, will be that many couples making babies don't have $22,000 sitting around. But they could start with, say, $5000 or even $1000, and make a point of adding to it as soon as possible. Or in some cases, a grandparent might help. I like that your son isn't committing others in future to putting in money they may not have, given they can use some of their gift to invest for the next generation of recipients. Some issues for your son and others to think about: Your son suggests a return of 6%. That would have to be after fees and tax. It's probably a reasonable assumption if the money is invested in a share fund or a non-KiwiSaver aggressive fund. You would need to stick with it – not switching when the balance falls in a market downturn. If that's likely to be difficult for you, use a lower-risk fund and settle for a lower end balance. As your son acknowledges, inflation will eat into how much a future balance will buy. But it will still be great for the recipient – for perhaps a house deposit, or to repay a chunk of a mortgage. The amount a recipient puts in to keep the scheme running would need to be adjusted for inflation. If you have more than one child, obviously you would want to do the same for all of them. But what if one of your children has more kids than another?Cousins will be treated unequally. Maybe that's okay, but it's worth thinking about. What if one of your children has no offspring? Perhaps you could specify that they give the money to a charity of their choice. As your son notes, this would have to be set up with legal expertise. Basically, he is making the most of the power of a compounding investment over a really long time. I say: 'Go for it!' Small difference becomes big Q: Not a question, but a spectacular example of how a return of 8% versus 6% makes a massive difference after 42 years, is given in an online table I found. The 6% after 42 years provides $597,000. But the 8% provides $986,000, being nearly two-thirds more. A: You're right. Over long periods, a somewhat higher return makes a huge difference. That's why it would be best if the family in the previous Q&A, or anyone who wants to copy the idea, uses a high-risk fund – probably one that holds just shares. Stay with insurance Q: One of the benefits I received at my previous job was fully subsidised Southern Cross health insurance (Wellbeing One plan). Unfortunately, my new role does not include this coverage. I've since been in contact with Southern Cross, and continuing the policy independently would cost around $230 per month. Given that I've made very few claims in the past, I'm considering the alternative of setting that money aside in a dedicated savings account to cover any potential future health expenses. I'm in my late fifties, in good health and maintain a balanced lifestyle with daily exercise and a healthy diet. That said, I'm mindful that health needs can change unexpectedly. My current policy is on hold until the end of August, so I need to make a decision soon. I would really appreciate your thoughts or any guidance you may have on what might be the best course of action. A: There's no clear answer to your question – or the many variations on it that seem to come into my conversations often, now that my friends and I are no longer spring chickens! Let's just say that if I were you, I would keep the health insurance going. You may look back later and say you would have been better off if you had followed your self-insurance plan. But what people often ignore is peace of mind in the meantime. It's worth a lot to know that if you do suddenly develop a serious health issue, you won't have to either wait for perhaps months to get help or find big sums of money for treatment. The last thing you need at that time is money worries as well. And being in good health in your fifties – or sixties or seventies – certainly doesn't come with a guarantee that it will continue. Clearly, leading a healthy lifestyle must help you to fight any health nasties, but it doesn't prevent them. On the other hand, you will be shocked at how quickly health insurance premiums rise as you get older. You can keep costs down to some extent by limiting cover to specialist care, rather than including GP visits, and by increasing your excess – the amount you have to pay before insurance kicks in. How much? Dunno Q: Another health insurance question. My husband and I are both 65 and face the common question of continuing our health insurance or to self-insure. It is hard to make this decision without a ballpark figure for self-insurance. I totally appreciate everyone's health is so variable and I understand the reluctance by brokers to provide a figure, but some guidance would be helpful and appreciated. Can you help? A: Sorry, but no. Or, if you insist, several hundred thousand dollars. Some medical procedures, including scans and surgery, cost thousands. What's more, you can't predict whether you will need several procedures at much the same time, as different parts of your body decide to misbehave. When to switch Q: You often refer to switching funds as locking in your losses. I never fully understood that. It makes sense to me if one switches funds because they are scared during a market drop and switch to a lower-risk fund long term. But in your view: does that apply to all fund switches? What are the risks when switching a fund? If I switch to a higher-risk fund while the market is down, do I still lock in any losses? I know timing the market is futile, but I don't understand what the downsides to switching at any given point are. A: I've been waiting for the markets to wobble again before running this Q&A. Funnily enough, it hasn't really happened for a while. Then again, it could happen between my deadline time and the time you read this. So let's get on with it! First, we'll look at switching to a lower-risk fund during a downturn. Let's say that your account balance falls from $20,000 to $15,000. If you worry it will fall further, and therefore you reduce your risk, you've locked in the $5000 loss. You won't get that money back again when the markets rise, because your new fund doesn't hold many shares, if any. And recovery always happens – although sometimes it takes a while, and occasionally several years. If, however, you had stayed the course, your balance would have returned to $20,000 or higher. You would have lost nothing. In those circumstances I would say, 'Sorry, but if you can't cope with volatility you shouldn't have been in a high-risk fund in the first place. But okay, if you really can't sleep, just take the loss and move to lower risk. And, importantly, stay there'. On other fund switches, it depends. If you move to higher risk during a downturn, that's a pretty good move. You've bought at a relatively low price and will benefit when prices later recover. That's called contrarian investing – moving in the opposite direction to most people. The trouble is it involves market timing which, as you say, is a fool's game. When the market falls, for example, we never know if it might fall a long way further, followed by a slow recovery. So the rule is: reducing risk in a downturn is bad; increasing risk in a downturn may be good – but only if you're lucky. Usually it works far better to just get your money into the correct risk level for you, and leave it there. There are, however, two circumstances in which moving risk makes sense: You're getting nearer to the time you expect to spend the money. In those circumstances, it can work well to move your money in, say, three lots, a month or two apart. That way you avoid happening to make the move at a bad time. You realise you can't tolerate downturns as much as you thought you could. But, as stated above, you must then stay in the lower-risk fund for the long term. Not so possible Q: In regard to your comments on the use of aggressive funds by the elderly or those entering retirement, it is of course possible to do well by transferring money from an aggressive fund to a cash fund or similar when the aggressive fund is showing a peak balance. Over six months to a year, the aggressive fund will rise and fall similar to the Dow or Nasdaq index. Of course it's all about timing, but for those who follow the world indices figures, such as the VOO or similar, it is not too difficult to do. A: It's not just difficult, it's impossible if you want to get it right more than occasionally by luck. As I've said often, it can work well for retired people to hold money they expect to spend in 10 or more years in an aggressive fund – usually a fund that holds shares only. But it's not a good place for shorter-term money. Your balance in such a fund can quite suddenly plunge – occasionally as much as halving. And, as noted above, recovery can sometimes take several years. Meanwhile, the grocery purchases can't wait. You're suggesting we simply watch how the markets are moving and switch to a lower-risk fund at market peaks – in other words, right before a market downturn. The big question – one that every active fund manager in the world would love to be able to answer – is when a market has peaked. Getting that right repeatedly can't be done. Every now and then a fund manager does well, reducing risk right before a crash. Convinced he – or rarely she – has learnt the secret, investors rush into their funds. And once in a golden moon, the fund manager gets it right a second time or third time, and even more investors jump on the wagon. And then, uh oh! If you want to try to do this with a small amount – let's call it play money – go for it. And good luck! But I would never suggest it for others. * Mary Holm, ONZM, is a freelance journalist, a seminar presenter and a bestselling author on personal finance. She is a director of Financial Services Complaints Ltd (FSCL) and a former director of the Financial Markets Authority. Her opinions do not reflect the position of any organisation in which she holds office. Mary's advice is of a general nature, and she is not responsible for any loss that any reader may suffer from following it. Send questions to mary@ Letters should not exceed 200 words. We won't publish your name. Please provide a (preferably daytime) phone number. Unfortunately, Mary cannot answer all questions, correspond directly with readers, or give financial advice.
1News
a day ago
- 1News
Why this Auckland doctor walks home in his scrubs
A Māori health expert believes that visible success and local government action are key to shifting youth aspirations and addressing the root causes of poor health outcomes in South Auckland. Dr Timoti Te Moke has experienced the power of walking home in his scrubs from Middlemore Hospital, a deliberate act meant to normalise brown excellence and show that Māori and Pacific doctors exist. Without them, he says, people see him as 'everyone else…doing it hard' and mistakenly identify him as a cleaner rather than a successful doctor. He shares his story as a testament to what South Auckland residents can achieve despite the challenges they face. Te Moke says local government has a role in supporting such role models. ADVERTISEMENT '…people in South Auckland need to see a brown skin doctor and they need to see it really, really often. So often that it's like it's just in their head that, yeah, that's just part of what we do,' he says. Te Moke recalls an encounter when he got off the bus near Hunter's Corner and noticed an eight-year-old boy staring at him from his bike. 'We walked past each other, and he goes, 'Hey, bro.' …because he's an eight-year-old boy looking to aspire to something. And a thousand times more often, he would see a gang patch. 'By the time he turns 15 or 16, if that's all he's seen, that's what he'll aspire to be. But if he sees a doctor all the time, he might go, 'I'm going to become a doctor',' he says. Beyond personal success Te Moke grew up in Māngere and is set to speak at a sold-out event at Māngere Library later this month as part of the Auckland Council's We Read Auckland series. His recently released memoir, which topped the New Zealand bestseller list, recounts his journey from a violent gang environment to medical school and explains why he has chosen to remain in South Auckland instead of moving to a more 'flash' suburb. ADVERTISEMENT 'I could go and live somewhere else, but I don't,' Te Moke says. 'I stay in a building complex with my own people because success needs to be visible in the community. That's the only way it can break cycles.' For him, the book is not about financial reward but about making an impact. 'I had no interest in financial reward. The plan is to convince the Office of the Ombudsman to recommend the book goes into prisons and rehabs. That's where it will have the most benefit, the most impact with people who find it hardest to get hold of a copy,' he says. Dr Timoti Te Moke's best-selling book, which he hopes to see in prisons to inspire change. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) 'I've decided to give 15 per cent to helping Māori who are in my circumstances, helping through… 15 per cent goes to non-Māori suffering from those negative social determinants… 15 per cent goes to the people of Palestine… I'm giving away virtually half of what I'm making. And I believe that that's what it should be done. And that's what I can do with my book.' Systemic barriers linked to local decisions At Middlemore Hospital, Te Moke sees the human cost of systemic issues daily - patients in Emergency Department queues unable to afford GP visits, returning to overcrowded, cold homes, and eventually bringing their whole whānau back to the hospital. ADVERTISEMENT 'You've got the government making it hard on local councils, then councils raising rates, and that flows straight to renters,' he says. 'Most of us are renters. That's …easier for employers… to not pay their employees as much as they should… We're being hit from both ends.' He argues that national and local policies must align on housing, access to healthy food, education, and employment to improve health outcomes. Council-backed platforms matter Louisa Tipene Opetaia, local business owner and communications specialist, will chair the library event. She believes Te Moke's story represents an important type of success for the community to celebrate. 'Dr Te Moke is such an impressive person and I'm really honoured that I get to kōrero with him about his extraordinary life,' she says. 'We know about our athletes and musicians, but to have a doctor who is also an author is important to show different kinds of success.' She says that events like this can directly impact on South Auckland audiences, especially young people. 'Dr Te Moke's message to young people is very important, that they should aim high and that they are capable of achieving success,' she says. 'Although we had very different upbringings and we're coming at this event from different perspectives, our kaupapa is aligned. ADVERTISEMENT 'We hope this event will uplift our community and encourage our rangatahi to use their gifts and live their own glorious lives.' She emphasises the significance of the event being free, council-funded, and held locally, making it more accessible. 'I might never have learned about him or read his book if not for this free event being held in our community,' she says. 'It is so important for our people to see someone like us, who comes from where we come from, living his best life. His is a story worth celebrating.' Local board support for visible role models Ōtara-Papatoetoe Local Board chair Apulu Reece Autagavaia underscores the powerful symbolism of Te Moke's choice to wear scrubs in public. 'We're fully supportive of having Māori and Pacific excellence displayed in our public spaces,' he says. 'Just like Dr Timoti wears his scrubs to normalise brown excellence, I wear my 'ie faitaga in the boardroom to show that we can be proud of who we are in any space.' Funding, visibility, and grassroots action ADVERTISEMENT Community advocate and founder of The BBM Program, Dave Letele, says it is 'very important' for rangatahi to regularly see role models who look like them and come from similar backgrounds. 'You can have nice stuff without being a drug dealer or bank robber,' Letele says. 'That's why it's very important that those who make it out come back to help others.' When discussing whether council-funded community events and programmes can make a tangible difference in shaping youth aspirations, Letele is cautious. 'I don't think so. I would rather see this funding go to community groups working with youth in need. Support their events. Support their mahi.' Dr Timoti Te Moke, South Auckland doctor who works at both Middlemore and Auckland hospitals. (Source: Local Democracy Reporting) He believes that more grassroots support is needed. 'Invest in highlighting the work being done and those doing well.' From his work with whānau, Letele observes the same links Te Moke identifies between housing, food insecurity, and poor health outcomes. ADVERTISEMENT 'One thousand per cent,' he says. 'Look at the Māori or Pacific health models, Te Whare Tapa Whā or Fonofale. Health is having all the pillars standing strong. Too often, we don't have access to warm housing, and food insecurity is very real for Pasifika families. It's no surprise we are overrepresented in almost all the bad stats.' On how local government can help prevent young people from aspiring to negative role models, he is direct. 'It all comes down to supporting the groups that are doing the mahi with next to no resources. Help them to do the mahi, and don't make them fit into the system that works for the council. What they do works, just support them and get out of the way.' Auckland Council approach Auckland Council reading engagement specialist, Ineka Vogels, says We Read Auckland is designed to celebrate local talent and make literature accessible to all. 'The purpose of We Read Auckland is to foster a shared love of reading and writing across the diverse communities of Tāmaki Makaurau,' she says. 'Representation and lived experience are top priority in our hyper-local programming model.' ADVERTISEMENT She says libraries strive for a good regional spread of events to ensure communities can access workshops and author talks nearby, with all events being free. 'We look for stories that are uniquely 'Auckland' and offer fresh voices and perspectives,' she says. 'It's about creating opportunities, whether it's a budding writer attending a workshop or a long-time fan seeing one of their favourite authors speak. Our libraries bring literature to life in new ways.' Call to action for change Te Moke believes the next step involves turning personal empowerment into influence at the ballot box. 'What's preventing me from realising that potential are the barriers that are put in front of me, and the barriers are being put in front of me by these people that are in power,' he says. 'The way to start getting rid of those barriers right at the beginning is getting them out of power. The way I do that is utilising my vote.' He says everyone in South Auckland has potential, but that potential cannot be realised until those barriers are removed. 'Everyone has the potential in South Auckland,' Te Moke says, 'but people are prevented from realising our potential because of the negative social determinants we are born into.'
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Five Times More Māori Nurses Needed To Reflect Population
Aotearoa New Zealand needs five times more Māori nurses if the workforce is to reflect the Māori population and be able to provide culturally safe health care, a new report shows. The report "Growing, but not fast enough: Māori nursing workforce insights" was written by economic consultancy company Infometrics and released at the Indigenous Nurses Aotearoa Conference in Rotorua tomorrow - Thursday - when about 300 Māori nurses from throughout the country gather. Te Rūnanga o Aotearoa NZNO Kaiwhakahaere Kerri Nuku says the report shows Aotearoa New Zealand needs about 1,350 more Māori nurses a year for the next decade to achieve population parity. "That would mean increasing the number of Māori nurses entering the workforce from the current 300 a year to almost 1,650 - a five-fold increase. "This is an intense number and shows the intense need we have to ensure Māori get the culturally safe and appropriate nursing they need. Research shows culturally safe nursing is key to achieving better outcomes for Māori. "Health leaders, Māori leaders, academics, economists and the media have been asking what an effective Māori nursing workforce would look like. Now, thanks to this report, we know," she says. "What better place to highlight this need, the economics of Māori nursing, at the country's largest gathering of Māori nurses. "I'm so concerned about the future of Māori health - this country's health. These numbers are so intense and would appear like mission impossible under this Government. But it is our duty to call for what is best for the health of our people," Kerri Nuku says. Currently Māori make up 18% of the New Zealand population but only 7.4 per cent of the nursing workforce and Māori are dying seven years lower than non-Māori, the report found. About 27,000 Māori enrolments in nursing training were needed as less than two-thirds of Māori nurse trainees complete their qualification, it found. In 2023, a total of 3,230 students enrolled in registered nurse training but only 435 of them were Māori. "The report also confirms for us what we've always known - Māori nurses are more likely to help keep Māori out of hospital by identifying the risk of preventable illnesses, enabling early intervention and saving the health system money," Kerri Nuku says. The report also suggests numbers needed for a 20-to-30-year timeframe and workforce policy commitment. This year's annual conference theme is Mauri oro, mauri reo, mauri ora which speaks to a return to vibration, voice and wellbeing through the lens of mātauranga Māori. The prestigious Akenehi Hei award will be presented on Friday morning while the Tapuhi Kaitiaki Awards - the Māori nurse awards - will be presented that evening.
