Protesters rally against Government's ‘insane' Schools Bill
Protesters gathered in central London on Sunday to demonstrate against the 'insane' Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill.
Hundreds of teachers, parents and children marched from Whitehall to Parliament Square holding signs and chanting 'Two, four, six, eight, educate not legislate' and 'Hey, hey, ho, ho, this stupid Bill has got to go'.
The Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill, which is currently being considered in the House of Lords, proposes measures including a limit on the number of branded uniform items and stronger restrictions on home education.
Katharine Birbalsingh, headteacher at Michaela Community School and often described as Britain's 'strictest head', attended the protest holding a sign saying 'Don't break what's working'.
She called the legislation 'completely insane' and warned that it threatened to 'undo' improvements made in the education system during the past 15 years.
She told the PA news agency: 'We just want to show the Government that we are unhappy about the Schools Bill and that school leaders do believe that they are removing our freedoms.
'The freedoms that parents have, the freedom that school leaders have, we want to retain them. And the Government should be speaking to all of us. They're not talking to us.
'What they're going to do will not enable us to do what's best for our cohort and children. And that we know what's better for our specific children.
'I do feel that the Government is a little bit out of touch.
'It's completely insane.
'They're driving through an ideological Bill which in the end will harm children.'
People staged a demonstration against the Children's Wellbeing and Schools Bill (Emily Smith/PA)
On her message to to the Government, she added: 'Listen to school leaders and educators and allow us to keep the freedoms that have worked so well for children in this country.'
As protesters, joined by hundreds of children, marched through central London, they held signs that read 'We say no to state-controlled childhood' and 'Social media harms kids'.
Joe Butterfield, 31, a teacher in London, said he believed the Bill would be 'damaging' to the pupils he teaches.
He said: 'We are here protesting against the Schools Bill by the current Government because we think it will be damaging to children's education and lead to poorer behaviour in schools.'
Sarah, 48, an assistant headteacher from Essex, attended the protest holding a 'Stop the Schools Bill' sign.
She said: 'The Government needs to not put the Bill through because it's going to drive down standards and stifle innovation.
'You're not going to attract the best talent. If you're just a robot in the front of the classroom delivering a national curriculum to the letter, you're not going to attract people that want to make a difference.'
As the march reached Parliament Square, speeches were delivered by representatives from home education groups, religious organisations and children's charities.
Opening her speech to the crowd, Ms Birbalsingh mentioned the Education Secretary and said 'we have one enemy in common, and that is Bridget Phillipson', a comment that drew loud cheers from crowds.
'Keir Starmer and Bridget Phillipson are totally out of touch with what is happening to children on the ground,' she said.
'The children matter, schools matter, parents matter, and our freedom matters.'
A Labour source said: 'Nothing is going to stop this Labour government from delivering educational excellence for every child, and certainly not today's sparsely attended protest.
'Parents back the common sense measures this government is introducing, including free breakfast clubs, restricting the cost of uniform and putting a qualified teacher at the front of every classroom.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
22 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Joanna Cherry could be called in Moira Salmond legal case
The former First Minister raised a compensation claim of £3million against SNP ministers almost two years ago over a flawed sexual misconduct investigation by the Scottish Government. A Holyrood committee investigated the mishandling of the complaints and also found that there were serious shortcomings. The legal case concerns possible "misfeasance" - a civil law term meaning the wrongful exercise of lawful authority - by officials while Nicola Sturgeon was First Minister and was paused following Mr Salmond's sudden death in October last year. READ MORE: On Sunday, it emerged that Mrs Salmond's resolve to proceed with the case was strengthened by attacks on her late husband in Ms Sturgeon's memoirs, Frankly, published last week. Writing on X, Ms Cherry, who was a close ally of Mr Salmond and is a prominent critic of Ms Sturgeon, welcomed the report that the case is to resume. "It's important that this action continues," wrote the former SNP MP on X. "Misfeasance in public office is a very serious matter. The Scottish Parliament inquiry was hamstrung and partisan politicians had the wool pulled over their eyes. A court of law will be very different." Ms Cherry revealed last week that she is writing a book about her time in frontline politics when Ms Sturgeon was First Minister. The manuscript is due to be completed this autumn with the book due to be published next year. Referring to Ms Sturgeon's government's policies on gender self-declaration, which she opposed, she wrote: "I have a lot more to say about this in the book I'm currently writing although my take is slightly different." She later continued: "In her political afterlife as in her political life Nicola evades scrutiny. For those hoping to understand better what was really going on behind the scenes during her leadership, this memoir will disappoint. It will be left to others to spill the beans." A family friend told the Sunday Mail that Mrs Salmond was "upset and angered by the continued attempts to smear Alex in the book" with "ridiculous and inaccurate" allegations. "It has only strengthened her resolve to make sure the full truth comes out and Alex's name is cleared," they told the paper. Now executor of Mr Salmond's estate, his widow has assembled a legal team including a KC and two junior counsel and has raised money to fund the case. The friend added: "Her case against the government is now live, the legal team is in place, the finance in place and this will be going ahead, no question of that. "Alex may not be here to defend himself but his family are determined to stand up to those who continue to attack him." Ms Sturgeon's book includes strongly disputed claims Mr Salmond opposed gay marriage, failed to read the 650-page independence white paper and that he or an aide acting on his behalf may have been responsible for the leak to the Daily Record about the Scottish Government investigation into complaints against him. She also denied there had been any "conspiracy" to ruin Mr Salmond's reputation - a claim the former Alba Party leader maintained until his death at the age of 69. Ms Sturgeon said her former mentor "would have rather destroyed the SNP than see it succeed without him". She also claimed he "impugned the integrity of the institutions at the heart of Scottish democracy - government, police, Crown Office", adding: "He was prepared to traumatise, time and again, the women at the centre of it all." Ms Sturgeon and Mr Salmond fell out dramatically in 2018 after it emerged her government had investigated misconduct complaints made against him by two female civil servants. Mr Salmond had the probe struck down at the Court of Session as unfair, unlawful and "tainted by apparent bias", and was awarded £512,000 in legal costs. He was later cleared of 13 sexual assault charges at the High Court in Edinburgh in 2020. He launched the Alba Party as a rival to the SNP a year later. The former First Minister, who admitted he could have behaved better towards women on occasions, had always denied any criminality. He sued the Scottish Government in November 2023 alleging there had been misfeasance by various civil servants under Ms Sturgeon and sought damages of around £3million. Promising a "day of reckoning", he said at the time: "Not one person has been held accountable. With this court action that evasion of responsibility ends." In a Court of Session hearing last August, Mr Salmond's lawyer said the police were probing whether one senior civil servant "gave a false statement under oath" to a Holyrood inquiry that was probing how the sexual harassment claims were handled. The civil action was frozen when Mr Salmond suffered a fatal heart attack in North Macedonia. But Mrs Salmond's legal team is now reactivating proceedings. A spokesman for the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service told The Herald that the case had been "sisted" until 19 September. He added: "Following this date the parties would advise the court, if they are ready to proceed or if they are requesting a further sist to the case." The Scottish Government has previously vowed to defend itself "robustly" in court. Last night a Scottish Government spokeswoman said: 'It would not be appropriate to comment on live litigation.' The SNP was approached for comment.
The National
24 minutes ago
- The National
Scottish Greens need to 'broaden appeal' outside middle class voters
The co-leadership contender argued that the party needs to shift the perception that it is for the middle-class, and that it should 'tailor its messages better' to attract working-class voters. Mackay, MSP for Central Scotland, is currently on maternity leave taking care of her seven-week-old son Callan, and told The National the party needs to offer policies that fit the needs of the young people they targeted a decade ago – who are now likely to be in their 30s, getting married and starting families. Mackay is vying for one of two co-leadership positions, with Lorna Slater, Dominic Ashmole and Ross Greer also in the running. It will be the first time in 17 years that Patrick Harvie has not held one of the top jobs. The MSP said that it is going to be a 'big change', but that it was time for a 'generational shift' as the party looks ahead to the next Scottish Parliament election. READ MORE: Labour refuse to release files on secret meeting with Gideon Sa'ar 'I think it is time to now grow with those young people that we were targeting 10 years ago, because we now have children, or folk are getting married and having families and all that sort of thing,' she explained. 'And while we've always got that sort of young demographic targeted pretty well, we haven't quite grown with the people that we were capturing back then. 'For me, it's about that change and how we make that step forward with people. 'I think there's a lot of our policies around families that we should be refreshing and renewing and bringing to the fore to keep those people with us. 'And again, there's a demographic beyond those young people that came into the party that would absolutely benefit from this and see this and maybe convince them to vote for us.' (Image: PA) Mackay added that the party needs to look outside of the 'stereotypical middle class demographic' that the Greens are 'painted as chasing'. Based in Grangemouth, the town where she grew up, Mackay insists that there are 'benefits' the party can bring to communities outside of Edinburgh and Glasgow, where the party tends to get most of its support and has its largest base of activists. 'I think sometimes we talk at such a technical, high level – folk actually want to know what they're going to see, hear, feel, experience in their communities, as a result of whatever it is that we're putting forward,' she said. 'I think some of that is we need to simplify the concept of what we're putting forward, rather than talking about all these really high level things, which has its place, but when we're communicating with voters, I think it needs to be much plainer and go outside of that typical heartland that we've got.' Mackay believes that making sure policies to tackle climate change are 'woven' through every portfolio, such as health and education, is part of the solution to expanding the voter base. That, and the party needs to 'tailor our messages better', she adds. READ MORE: Just 7 per cent of Edinburgh TV Festival panellists based in Scotland Mackay explained: 'Politics can often be, how general can we get it to apply to as many people as humanly possible? And that doesn't then serve those communities who do have those differences. A working-class community in rural Highland is very different to Grangemouth, and they do need different things from us as the Greens, but also from politics in general. 'I do think we need to tailor that message. It's giving branches and activists that support to be able to pick up bits of what we're doing nationally. 'Not everything applies to everywhere. We've done things on mountain hares that will play far better in Highland than it will in Falkirk or North Lanarkshire. 'That's not that people don't care about wee fluffy bunnies across the country, but there are places where it's more tangible, more real, and it's happening on people's doorsteps.' Mackay added that in her role as health spokesperson, she looked at how to make prescriptions greener through recycling projects, and how to expand the lifespan of machinery used in the health service. 'Medicine is a huge source of waste within the NHS, and [it's about] how we make medicines greener and have less emissions,' she added. 'I think there's elements that we can weave through every single portfolio to be talking about climate a lot more than we actually are.' With the looming threat of Nigel Farage's Reform UK playing a significant role in the upcoming election campaign, Mackay insists that the party needs to make its policies 'tangible' as an antithesis to far-right talking points and ensure that they are 'easy to understand'. She explained: 'We need to fight fire with fire, and get to those communities and say, 'Well, this is what we've been talking about, 'but this is what it means for you'. 'Because at the moment, I think there are some of our policies that people might not be able to explain what the benefit would be to them.'
Leader Live
31 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Paul Weller sues former accountants after being dropped over Gaza statements
The former frontman of The Jam has filed a discrimination claim against Harris and Trotter after the firm ended their professional relationship after more than 30 years. In a pre-action letter seen by the PA news agency, lawyers for Weller say the singer-songwriter was told in March that the accountants and tax advisers would no longer work with the 67-year-old or his companies. According to the letter, a WhatsApp message from a partner at the firm included: 'It's well known what your political views are in relation to Israel, the Palestinians and Gaza, but we as a firm are offended at the assertions that Israel is committing any type of genocide. 'Everyone is entitled to their own views, but you are alleging such anti-Israel views that we as a firm with Jewish roots and many Jewish partners are not prepared to work with someone who holds these views.' Lawyers for Weller claim that by ending their services, the firm unlawfully discriminated against the singer's protected philosophical beliefs including that Israel is committing genocide in Gaza and that Palestine should be recognised as a nation state. Weller said: 'I've always spoken out against injustice, whether it's apartheid, ethnic cleansing, or genocide. What's happening to the Palestinian people in Gaza is a humanitarian catastrophe. 'I believe they have the right to self-determination, dignity, and protection under international law, and I believe Israel is committing genocide against them. That must be called out. 'Silencing those who speak this truth is not just censorship – it's complicity. 'I'm taking legal action not just for myself, but to help ensure that others are not similarly punished for expressing their beliefs about the rights of the Palestinian people.' Weller will donate any damages he receives to humanitarian relief efforts in Gaza, the legal letter also states. Cormac McDonough, a lawyer at Hodge Jones and Allen, representing Weller, said that his case 'reflects a wider pattern of attempts to silence artists and public figures who speak out in support of Palestinian rights'. Mr McDonough added: 'Within the music industry especially, we are seeing increasing efforts to marginalise those who express solidarity with the people of Gaza.' Harris and Trotter have been contacted for comment.
