
Mamdani win freaks out some Dems about their own primaries
Left-wing insurgent Zohran Mamdani 's likely victory over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo in the New York City mayoral primary has some Democrats in Congress quietly worrying about their own reelections.
Why it matters: The shock upset against a onetime establishment powerhouse comes as potentially dozens of House Democrats are expected to face anti-establishment primary challenges.
Progressive Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) told Axios "there was a wake-up-call and a shot across the bow to the establishment and the old guard" with Mamdani's win.
Zoom in:"There's a lot of anxiety," a senior House Democrat told Axios on the condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive internal dynamics.
One senior House progressive told Axios: "I think you'll see about 30% of members face primary challenges. People have anxiety, rightfully so. Their hair is on fire."
Another senior House Democrat said they "100 percent" think that older, more establishment-oriented lawmakers are concerned about Mamdani's victory.
What happened: The primary was a shocking success for the left. Mamdani, a democratic socialist, had initially polled in single digits while Cuomo dominated the field for most of the race.
Mamdani could face Cuomo in the general election as an independent, along with incumbent mayor Eric Adams and ex-prosecutor Jim Walden running as an independents and Republican nominee Curtis Sliwa.
What they're saying: "I think you're going to see a number of young, insurgent progressives with a bold vision running in 2026," Khanna told Axios.
"One thing I've heard at all my town [hall] meetings is that people want us to fight harder, and that may have been part of the reason why Mamdani won," said Rep. Jim McGovern (D-Mass.).
"Yeah, the voters want us ... taking on the political establishment," said Rep. Jimmy Gomez (D-Calif.), who has repeatedly fended off primary challenges from the left.
What we're hearing: "Trump brings out ... Democratic activists saying things like, 'We don't need a statesman or a stateswoman right now. We need to fight fire with fire,'" said a fourth House Democrat who spoke on the condition of anonymity.
"'We want to fight crazy with crazy,' I do think that sentiment is definitely out there amongst some of the electorate, for sure," the lawmaker said, predicting there will be "a lot of challenges."
A fifth House Democrat said they think Mamdani's victory "might be something that emboldens someone to run ... they'll cite him as a reason why they're viable, like, 'No one gave him a chance.'"
By the numbers: Nearly 20 incumbent House Democrats who are either running for reelection or haven't announced their 2026 plans are facing at least one primary challenger, an Axios analysis found.
Many more could be on the way, with progressive strategists saying they expect another wave of announcements in the week after July 4.
Of the members facing primary challenges, more than half are 70 or older and facing younger rivals pitching their vigor and desire to fight the Trump administration tooth and nail.
The other side: Several House Democrats cautioned against over-extrapolating the mayoral results.
"It was an indictment of Cuomo, and it was an indication that people in New York, who are a very liberal crowd, want to see a lot of changes in government," said Rep. Steve Cohen (D-Tenn.).
"New York is a pretty special place," Cohen added. "I love New York, but it's a very liberal place and I don't know that can you can necessarily apply that to the rest of the country."

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
21 minutes ago
- New York Post
Trump's appeals court nominee responds to allegation he suggested DOJ say ‘f— you' to courts: ‘I'm not anybody's henchman'
Justice Department official Emil Bove pushed back Wednesday against claims that he's President Trump's 'henchman' or 'enforcer' during a contentious Senate hearing on his nomination to serve a lifetime appointment on a federal appeals court. Bove, who served as Trump's personal lawyer during his criminal cases last year, has faced criticism from Democrats over his role in the dismissal of federal prosecutors who worked on Capitol riot cases; request for corruption charges against New York Mayor Eric Adams to be dropped; and allegations from a whistleblower that he suggested administration officials should defy court orders. 'I respect this process, and I'm here today to address some of your questions about those decisions, but I want to be clear about one thing up front, there is a wildly inaccurate caricature of me in the mainstream media,' Bove said in his testimony. Advertisement 'I am not anybody's henchman. I'm not an enforcer. I'm a lawyer from a small town who never expected to be in an arena like this,' the senior DOJ official added. 3 Bove was nominated by Trump to serve as a judge on the third circuit appeals court earlier this year. Getty Images One day before Bove's confirmation hearing for the judicial post on the 3rd US Circuit Court of Appeals, which oversees district courts in Delaware, New Jersey and Pennsylvania, fired former DOJ official Erez Reuveni alleged that the nominee told federal prosecutors that the Trump administration may not abide by court orders that would impede its mass deportation plans. Advertisement Sen. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) brought up the whistleblower complaint during his questioning, and repeatedly used the expletive Reuveni claims Bove used during a March 14 meeting discussing Trump's yet-to-be signed proclamation invoking the Alien Enemies Act. 'In the complaint, it says, 'Bove stated the DOJ would need to consider telling the courts, f— you and ignoring any such court order.' Did you say anything of that kind in the meeting?' Schiff asked the judicial nominee. Bove responded: 'Senator, I have no recollection of saying anything of that kind.' 'Wouldn't you recall, Mr. Bove, if you said or suggested during a meeting with Justice Department lawyers that maybe they should consider telling the court 'f— you'? It seems to me that would be something you'd remember … Unless that's the kind of thing you say frequently,' Schiff pressed. Advertisement 'Well, I've certainly said things encouraging litigators at the department to fight hard for valid positions that we have to take in defense of our clients,' Bove shot back. 3 Bove served as Trump's defense team during his criminal cases last year. Getty Images 3 A whistleblower has accused Bove of informing DOJ officials that they may have to defy court orders regarding the use of the Alien Enemies Act to deport migrants. via REUTERS 'Have you frequently suggested that they say, 'f— you' and ignore court orders? Is that also something you frequently do so that you might not remember doing it on this occasion?' the senator continued. Advertisement Bove asserted that he 'did not suggest that there would be any need to consider, ignoring court orders,' noting that during the meeting Reuveni describes in his complaint, 'There were no court orders to discuss.' 'Well, did you suggest telling the courts 'f— you' in any manner?' Schiff responded. Bove answered: 'I don't recall.'


New York Post
30 minutes ago
- New York Post
GOP congressional lawmaker says she's been getting ‘imminent death threats' since revealing life-threatening ectopic pregnancy
Rep. Kat Cammack (R-Fla.) said that 'imminent death threats' forced the evacuation of her offices on Wednesday, days after she revealed that she suffered an ectopic pregnancy last year. Cammack, who is currently pregnant, said the threats were directed at 'me, my unborn child, my family, and my staff,' in a post on X. 'These threats erupted after the Wall Street Journal reported on my life-threatening ectopic pregnancy — a nonviable pregnancy with no heartbeat,' the congresswoman explained. 'Since then, we've recieved [sic] thousands of hate-filled messages and dozens of credible threats from pro-abortion activists, which law enforcement is actively investigating.' Advertisement 3 Rep. Kat Cammack attends a House Judiciary Select Subcommittee hearing in the Rayburn Building on May 18, 2023. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Images 'In light of recent violence against elected officials, these threats are taken very seriously.' Cammack, who represents Florida's 3rd Congressional District, included screenshots of some of the disturbing messages she's been receiving since the Wall Street Journal published a piece Sunday on her life-threatening ectopic pregnancy. Advertisement 'Too bad those of us who actually believe in freedom fought for the medical care that saved your life!! We all would be better off if you hadn't survived!! The only good republican is …. A DEAD ONE,' read one unhinged Instagram comment shared by Cammack. 'Count your days,' a deranged Instagram user direct messaged the congresswoman. 'You should've been dead the other like every other women has been due to the laws you agreed to,' the menacing message continued. 3 Cammack, who is currently pregnant, said the threats were directed at 'me, my unborn child, my family, and my staff,' in a post on X. Kat Cammack/X Advertisement In the Wall Street Journal piece, Cammack shared the challenges she faced getting medical treatment for the unviable pregnancy as Florida's six-week abortion ban went into effect just as she discovered she was five-weeks pregnant. The congresswoman said doctors and nurses feared losing their licenses or going to jail if they provided her with drugs to terminate the pregnancy, which could have ruptured her fallopian tube, but eventually agreed to offer her the treatment. 'To those spreading misinformation: I did not vote for Florida's heartbeat law; I serve in the US House of Representatives, not the Florida Legislature,' Cammack noted in her X post. 'Let me be clear: I will not be intimidated. I won't back down in the fight for women and families,' she continued. 'Ensuring women have the resources and care they deserve is critical.' Advertisement 3 Rep. Cammack speaks during the Republican Study Committee press conference on May 19, 2021. CQ-Roll Call, Inc via Getty Imag 'We need real conversations about maternal healthcare in America—conversations based on truth, not fear.' Cammack is generally opposed to abortion but supports the procedure in cases of rape or incest or when the life of mother is in danger. Her office and US Capitol Police did not immediately respond to The Post's requests for comment.


Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump officials to give first classified briefing to Congress on Iran strikes
WASHINGTON (AP) — Senators are set to meet with top national security officials Thursday as many question President Donald Trump's decision to bomb three Iranian nuclear sites — and whether those strikes were ultimately successful. The classified briefing, which was originally scheduled for Tuesday and was delayed, also comes as the Senate is expected to vote this week on a resolution that would require congressional approval if Trump decides to strike Iran again . Democrats, and some Republicans, have said that the White House overstepped its authority when it failed to seek the advice of Congress and they want to know more about the intelligence that Trump relied on when he authorized the attacks. 'Senators deserve full transparency, and the administration has a legal obligation to inform Congress precisely about what is happening,' said Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer, who said Tuesday that it was 'outrageous' that the Senate and House briefings were postponed. A similar briefing for House members was pushed to Friday. CIA Director John Ratcliffe, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth are expected to brief the senators on Thursday. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard was scheduled to be at the Tuesday briefing, but will not be attending, according to a person familiar with the schedule. The briefing could be contentious as questions have swirled around Trump's decision to strike Iran and whether the attacks were successful. A preliminary U.S. intelligence report found this week that Iran's nuclear program had been set back only a few months, contradicting statements from Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu about the status of Iran's nuclear facilities, according to two people familiar with the report. The people were not authorized to address the matter publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity. On Wednesday, Gabbard and Ratcliffe sent out statements backing Trump's claims that the facilities were 'completely and fully obliterated.' Gabbard posted on social media that 'new intelligence confirms what @POTUS has stated numerous times: Iran's nuclear facilities have been destroyed.' She said that if the Iranians choose to rebuild the three facilities, it would 'likely take years to do.' Ratcliffe said in a statement from the CIA that Iran's nuclear program has been 'severely damaged' and cited new intelligence 'from a historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Most Republicans have staunchly defended Trump and hailed the tentative ceasefire he brokered in the Israel-Iran war. House Speaker Mike Johnson even went as far as to question the constitutionality of the War Powers Act , which is intended to give Congress a say in military action. 'The bottom line is the commander in chief is the president, the military reports to the president, and the person empowered to act on the nation's behalf is the president,' Johnson told reporters. But some Republicans — including some of Trump's staunchest supporters — are uncomfortable with the strikes and the potential for U.S. involvement in an extended Middle East conflict. 'I think the speaker needs to review the Constitution,' said Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky. 'And I think there's a lot of evidence that our Founding Fathers did not want presidents to unilaterally go to war.' Paul would not say if he is voting for the resolution by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., that would require congressional approval for specific military action in Iran. The resolution is likely to fail as 60 votes would be needed to pass it and Republicans have a 53-47 majority. But Kaine says it's important to put the Senate on the record. 'You have a debate like this so that the entire American public, whose sons and daughters are in the military and whose lives will be at risk in war, get to see the debate and reach their own conclusion together with the elected officials about whether the mission is worth it or not,' Kaine said. While he did not seek approval, Trump sent congressional leaders a short letter Monday serving as his official notice of the strikes, two days after the bombs fell. The letter said that the strike was taken 'to advance vital United States national interests, and in collective self-defense of our ally, Israel, by eliminating Iran's nuclear program.' Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .