Howard Marks says he used AI tool Perplexity to help write his latest memo
Marks, the billionaire co-founder and co-chairman of Oaktree Capital Management, has been writing memos for 35 years and turns 80 next year. That makes it perhaps a little surprising that he's drafted in a machine as a contributor.
"In a sign of the times, I'll let my new (and AI-powered) editorial assistant, Perplexity, fill you in on the background," Marks said in a Wednesday memo titled "More on Repealing the Laws of Economics."
The veteran fund manager said he hadn't "changed a word" of Perplexity's output, which was "pretty close to what I would have produced in an hour or two."
In support of his argument for free-market economics and less government intervention, Marks roped in the AI tool to lay out how regulations have distorted the fire insurance sector in California, resulting in widespread underinsurance.
"As Perplexity notes, insurers were told they couldn't price fire policies to reflect increases in the frequency and severity of forest fires," Marks said. "Likewise, they couldn't raise prices to pass through the higher premiums their reinsurers were charging based on the increased frequency and severity."
The distressed-debt investor asked whether a hypothetical insurer would cover a $5 million house with a 1% chance of burning down if the regulator only allowed it to charge $25,000 a year for a policy.
"I didn't need Perplexity to tell me the insurance company faces an expected payout of $50,000 on that policy," Marks said. "The answer's simple: you don't write that policy."
AI tools are divisive. Proponents hail them as productivity boosters that will free workers from mundane tasks and supercharge economic growth. Critics fear they'll stymie learning and development, erode skills, and destroy so many jobs that they cause mass unemployment.
Marks may have embraced AI but he still finds value in human wisdom. In his new memo, he quoted Buffett saying the US fiscal deficit was "unsustainable" and could become "uncontrollable" during Berkshire Hathaway's annual meeting in May.
The Wall Street legend also included his own colourful, incisive comments: "The behavior in Washington with regard to both the fiscal deficit and the precariousness of Social Security remind me of the tale of the guy who jumped off the 20-story building. As he passed the 10th floor, he said, 'so far, so good.'"
Marks may be in his golden years and as skeptical of high-flying assets as ever, yet seems open-minded about innovations.
For example, he went from dismissing bitcoin as "not real" in 2017, to trumpeting its privacy and convenience in 2021 after learning about cryptocurrencies from his son. He's clearly finding uses for AI too.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Social Security at 90: Where the program stands and how to fix it
Social Security is a vital source of income for millions of Americans, but after 90 years, the program faces significant financial challenges that could reshape it for future generations. If Congress fails to act, retirees could see their monthly checks cut by 23 percent in less than a decade — slashing thousands of dollars from the average person's annual benefits. Lawmakers are unlikely to let that happen, but so far, they've opted to kick the can down the road, avoiding politically unpopular solutions and complicating eventual fixes. President Franklin D. Roosevelt (D) signed Social Security into law on Aug. 14, 1935, as a way to give 'some measure of protection to the average citizen and to his family against the loss of a job and against poverty-ridden old age.' Here's what to know about the state of the program 90 years later: How many people receive Social Security? Nearly 70 million people received Social Security benefits in July, with the average check totaling $1,863. Retired workers made up the largest share — roughly three-quarters, or about 53 million. The program also supports other groups: Nearly six million people received survivor benefits last month, while more than eight million collected disability insurance. Most people aged 65 and older receive the majority of their income from Social Security, making it a vital lifeline for millions of adults — and children — who would otherwise fall below the poverty line. Without Social Security benefits, 37 percent of older adults would have had incomes below the official poverty line in 2023 — instead, only 10 percent did, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. More Americans now expect to rely on Social Security than in the past. In a recent Gallup poll, 37 percent of non-retirees said it will be a 'major source' of income in retirement — up from 28 percent two decades ago. When Social Security benefits could be cut Social Security isn't going away, but in less than a decade, millions of Americans could see their monthly retirement checks shrink if Congress doesn't intervene. The program's retirement trust fund is expected to run out by 2033, at which point Social Security would only be able to pay 77% of promised benefits. For today's average retired worker, that would mean a cut of about $460 a month — more than $5,500 a year. That said, experts caution against claiming Social Security benefits early out of fear that the program may not be around in the future, as doing so results in permanently lower monthly checks. Federal lawmakers are expected to act before the cuts take effect, but the main concern is that the longer they wait, the more complicated the fix will become. Social Security is so widely supported that, until now, politicians have largely avoided moves that could prove unpopular with voters. The last major overhaul came roughly 40 years ago when the federal government gradually raised the full retirement age from 65 to 67. When that happened in 1983, Social Security insolvency was just months away. Why Social Security is facing a financial shortfall The program's financial shortfall largely stems from the nation's changing demographics, which have resulted in fewer workers supporting more retirees. In 2010, there were 43 million people age 65 and older, and by 2024, that number had grown to 59 million, according to the Peter G. Peterson Foundation. At the same time, the number of workers contributing to the program has fallen — from 2.9 covered workers per beneficiary in 2010 to 2.7 in 2024 — a ratio projected to decline further to 2.3 by 2044, the foundation said. That imbalance is a concern because Social Security is primarily funded through a payroll tax, which accounts for about 90 percent of the trust fund's income. Fewer workers mean less payroll tax revenue. The good news is that the demographic shift isn't a surprise, giving policymakers time to prepare. The bad news is that it's not easily reversed, and major policy changes may be needed to shore up the program for generations to come. Something else to keep in mind: Despite raising the income cap over time, a smaller share of wages is now subject to the payroll tax compared to the '80s and '90s. The portion of wages and salaries covered by the payroll tax has fallen to about 82 percent, down from 90 percent in 1983, according to the Tax Foundation. Part of that is due to a rise in employer-provided benefits, like health insurance, which is tax-deductible, and thus faces neither the income nor payroll tax, the Tax Foundation said. What can be done to fix Social Security? Lawmakers have a few options: increase Social Security revenue, reduce costs or, most likely, some combination of both. Democrats want to raise more money by making high earners pay Social Security taxes on income above the current cap. For 2025, the tax only applies to the first $176,100, so any earnings above that aren't taxed. Gradually increasing the payroll tax rate is another way to raise revenue. Right now, the Social Security tax rate is 12.4 percent total — split evenly between employees and employers at 6.2 percent each. The combined rate has been steady since 1990. While raising taxes is rarely popular, polling suggests boosting revenue is generally more acceptable to the public than cutting benefits. A 2024 Pew Research survey found that wide majorities of both Republicans (77%) and Democrats (83%) do not support Social Security benefit reductions. President Trump has repeatedly promised not to cut Social Security benefits and even suggested eliminating federal income taxes on retirement checks — though that move would worsen the program's financial shortfall. Like his predecessors before him, Trump has offered little concrete policy direction for fixing Social Security. Tech billionaire Elon Musk's efforts to root out widespread waste, fraud and abuse fell short of expectations and sparked significant confusion. Earlier this year, Brookings released a bipartisan blueprint for fixing Social Security. The proposal included tax-based revenue boosts like increasing the maximum taxable ceiling and raising the payroll tax from 12.4 percent to 12.6 percent. It also suggested benefit reductions, like increasing the retirement age for high earners, among other changes. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Watch live: Trump gives remarks as Social Security turns 90
President Trump will give remarks Thursday afternoon to mark the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act, which established the program that now serves as a vital source of income for millions of Americans. The comments come just over a month after Trump signed the 'big, beautiful' spending and tax package into law, which includes a $6,000 tax deduction for Americans 65 or older. While the provision does not fully end taxes on Social Security payments, it could zero out the tax burden for 88 percent of seniors, according to administration estimates. But, experts have also warned, the measure could speed up insolvency for the program's trust funds. The event is scheduled to begin at 1 p.m. EDT. Watch the live video above.
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
AT&T reached a $177M settlement over data breaches: Will you get a payment?
(NEXSTAR) — Earlier this year, AT&T agreed to a $177 million settlement after a pair of massive data breaches had targeted customers. If you were among those impacted, we now know how you can file a claim. In March of last year, AT&T confirmed that a dataset found on the 'dark web' contained personal information for about 7.6 million current AT&T account holders and 65.4 million former account holders. That breach began in 2019, CNET reported. Then, in July, the company said the data of nearly all customers was downloaded to a third-party platform in a 2022 security breach. Two lawsuits were brought against AT&T. According to court documents, a federal judge in Texas has given preliminary approval for two settlement funds: one for $149 million, the other $28 million. Trump admin may reclassify marijuana: Would that make it legal in the US? 'While we deny the allegations in these lawsuits that we were responsible for these criminal acts, we have agreed to this settlement to avoid the expense and uncertainty of protracted litigation,' AT&T told Nexstar via email. 'We remain committed to protecting our customers' data and ensuring their continued trust in us.' A recently established settlement site has offered new details about who qualifies and how you'll get your payment. Do I qualify for the AT&T settlement? This varies based on the settlement class, according to the case website. Included in the first settlement class related to the March 2024 data breach are 'all living persons in the United States whose data elements' — names, addresses, telephone numbers, email addresses, dates of birth, account passcodes, billing account numbers, and Social Security numbers — were in the breach. 'Particularly unfair': AriZona founder considers raising price of iconic 99-cent iced tea In the second settlement class are AT&T account owners and line or end users whose data elements were involved in the 2022 breach. In this case, these data elements include telephone numbers of current and former customers, and 'the telephone numbers with which those customers interacted, counts of those interactions, aggregate call durations for a day or month, and for a small subset of individuals, one or more cell site identification numbers associated with the interactions.' If you're unsure whether you fall into either or both categories, try checking your email. Kroll Settlement Administration, the settlement administrator, said it is sending email notices to qualifying customers from the address attsettlement@ Be sure to check your junk folder. How do I make a claim? You'll need to submit a claim online by November 18, or by mail that is postmarked by the same date. Online, you'll be asked to input your class member ID from the emailed notice, as well as your email, AT&T account number, or your full name. Then you'll be guided through the form. Farmers' Almanac predicts 'wild weather' in winter outlook. Is it accurate, though? While you, as a current or former customer, may be included in the settlements, you'll also need to prove that you suffered damages because of the breaches. How much will I get? Citing court documents, USA Today and CNET report that the highest payments for those impacted by the first breach are $5,000. For the second breach, the top payment is $2,500. Remaining funds would then be distributed to others who were impacted. Qualifying for those large payments will depend on the impact you experienced from the breaches. According to the settlement site, if you experienced losses in 2019 or later because of the first data breach, you'll need to provide supporting documentation that shows 'the losses are fairly traceable' to the incident to receive up to $5,000 in a 'loss cash payment.' 'Tariff rebates' proposed: How would they work? There are alternative options for the first breach. If your Social Security number was included in the breach, you can make a claim for a Tier 1 payment. If any of your data elements were included, but not your Social Security number, you can make a claim for a Tier 2 payment. Tier 1 cash payments will be five times the amount of Tier 2 payments, according to the administrators. To receive the top payment of $2,500 in the second breach, you would again have to prove that any losses you experienced on or after April 14, 2024, are 'fairly traceable' to the 2022 incident. If you were an AT&T account owner at the time, you can also submit claims on behalf of other users on your plan. Without documentation, you can apply for a Tier 3 payment. The payout will depend on the funds remaining after other costs and service awards have been paid, and the number of valid claims submitted. Trump promised lower grocery prices 'on Day One.' Here's what happened If you were impacted by both breaches, you may qualify for payments in both settlements. However, if you're applying for the largest payouts, you'll need documentation unique to each incident, administrators explain. When will payments be made? The deadline to opt out or object to the settlements, according to court documents, will be October 17, 2025. The deadline to file a claim is set for November 18, 2025. A final approval hearing in the case has been set for December 3, 2025. It will still take some time after that date for settlement payments to be disbursed, but a spokesperson for AT&T told Nexstar that payments are expected to be issued early next year.
