
Let's choose a homegrown energy future
The UK offshore energy industry is vital to our national interests. It powers our homes, fuels our economy, supports skilled jobs across the country, and helps to drive down emissions. As the UK moves towards a lower-carbon future, this sector will remain essential in meeting the country's energy needs while building the infrastructure of tomorrow.
From offshore oil and gas to wind, hydrogen and carbon capture, the sector is already delivering the mix of energy sources needed to keep the lights on, grow the economy and progress towards net zero. But it needs a clear, stable energy strategy from government to continue investing, protect jobs, and ensure UK energy security.
This is not a theoretical debate, but a practical one. The choices made today will affect energy bills, jobs, investment and emissions for decades.
Currently, around 75 per cent of the UK's energy comes from oil and gas. These fuels are essential—not just for heating and transport—but for making products like steel, chemicals and cement. While demand will fall over time, it won't disappear overnight.
Even in the most ambitious net zero pathway, the UK will need oil and gas for decades. The Climate Change Committee estimates we'll need 13 to 15 billion barrels by 2050, yet we're on track to meet less than a third of that from domestic resources.
With the right policy environment, we could meet up to half of that demand, supporting energy security, protecting jobs and delivering over £150 billion in economic value. Every barrel we produce at home is one we don't import.
Relying on imports means exporting jobs, raising emissions, and losing control of our energy future. It also increases vulnerability to global shocks.
Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe
The offshore sector supports over 200,000 UK jobs, including 90,000 in Scotland, and contributes £25 billion annually. It's already delivering major low-carbon projects and is one of the UK's biggest infrastructure investors.
But these jobs are at risk. A report from Robert Gordon University warned tens of thousands could be lost by 2030 without policy support. The solution lies in expanding renewables while avoiding an accelerated decline in oil and gas production.
We're already seeing warning signs. In May, Harbour Energy announced 250 job losses, and Ørsted paused the Hornsea 4 wind project—both citing rising costs and investment challenges.
We are not making the most of our natural resources. We need pragmatism to unlock them responsibly. As the UK seeks more energy investment, delays and job losses highlight the urgent need for stable policy.
The UK has set ambitious climate targets, and the industry shares that ambition. Producers have cut production emissions by 20 per cent since 2018 and aim to halve them by 2030, reaching net zero by 2050.
The same infrastructure and expertise that powers oil and gas today is enabling new technologies like carbon capture, hydrogen, and floating wind.
The Green Volt project off Peterhead illustrates this. Floating wind turbines will power oil and gas platforms and provide clean electricity to homes—using supply chains built through decades of experience.
The UK has the natural advantages to lead in offshore energy: the second-largest offshore wind capacity globally, geological potential for carbon storage, and remaining oil and gas reserves.
But without the right investment climate, these opportunities may go elsewhere. In Q3 2024, the UK imported nearly 40 per cent of its energy. Meanwhile, prices remain higher than in many European countries.
We need a balanced, pragmatic policy. A successful North Sea requires practical solutions that protect jobs, attract investment, and maintain control over our energy mix.
The offshore sector is investing in the future but needs stability and confidence from government: clear licensing, fair taxation, and a supportive investment environment.
This is a crucial moment. The decisions we make now will shape our energy future, job market, and climate leadership.
Let's choose a homegrown energy future.
Related

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Statesman
2 days ago
- New Statesman
Labour students revolt over Gaza
Youth membership for the Labour party has collapsed – from 100,000 to just 30,000 under Starmer's leadership. The relationship between Labour HQ and its members on university campuses has soured over the past year, reaching boiling point following the prime minister's decision to conditionally recognise a Palestinian state in September, unless Israel agrees to a ceasefire. Anoosh Chakelian is joined by Hattie Simpson. Read: Inside Labour students' revolt over Gaza Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related


Spectator
2 days ago
- Spectator
Is Britain's wind power gamble about to backfire?
Over the last few years, we heard a lot about how the giant turbines that dominate hillsides and coastlines across Britain and Europe would power a new era of prosperity. They will generate an endless supply of cheap, environmentally friendly energy. They will create hundreds of thousands of 'well-paid green jobs'. And the countries that embraced it would become the technological leaders of the 21st century. Indeed, the former prime minister Boris Johnson promised to turn the UK into the 'Saudi Arabia of wind'. And yet, the outlook for the wind power industry currently looks far from secure. Today, Orsted, the Danish giant of the industry, has been forced into what is effectively a state-funded bailout. Has the wind has been knocked out of wind power? It has been a bad day for Orsted shareholders. The company's shares were down 28 per cent as it announced a rights issue to raise $9.4 billion () of fresh capital and they are now down by 47 per cent over the last year. The Danish government, which owns half the company, will put up its share of the money, meaning that, in effect, this is a taxpayer-funded rescue. Its immediate challenge is President Trump's decision to cancel wind farm developments in the United States. But Orsted has been struggling for the last year with rising costs and disruption to supply chains. As the Bloomberg energy expert Javier Blas put it, 'the problem with this company is that historically its leadership has been …building at 'any costs' GW of wind power, rather than 'profitable' GW wind power'. In other words, wind power that actually makes money is tricky. Britain will be particularly badly impacted by this. Orsted is a major player in the UK renewable energy industry. It has already pulled out of the massive Hornsea 4 wind farm in the North Sea, and it is now looking to sell Hornsea 3 as well, although it is unlikely there will be many offers. Of course, companies run into trouble all the time. And yet, when it comes to wind power, it is not just Orsted. Siemens Energy, another giant of the European industry, has also run into losses on its wind unit. There is a wider point to be made here than just the struggles of one business. Wind power was fine so long as there were unlimited subsidies on offer from the government. Once the industry is expected to deliver energy at reasonable prices, wind power no longer looks nearly as attractive. Britain has made a huge bet on wind power as a core part of both its industrial and energy strategy. It is starting to look as if that wager could go horribly wrong – and it may be too late to change course.


New Statesman
5 days ago
- New Statesman
Eurostarmer
Nine years after the Brexit referendum, the dream of 'Singapore-on-Thames' has quietly evaporated. Instead, we've got a Labour government embracing high taxes, stronger workers' rights, even state ownership. What's behind Labour's European turn and is Starmer quietly reversing Thatcher's legacy? Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe Related