
20 Girlfriends, 2 Wives: Fake Cop From Muzaffarnagar Duped Women In 4 States
Naushad Tyagi targeted widowed or separated women, changing his identity based on their religion to deceive them—using Hindu names for Hindus and a Muslim name for Muslim women
In a shocking case of fraud and impersonation, a man from Muzaffarnagar, Uttar Pradesh, has been arrested for allegedly duping multiple women using fake identities. The accused, Naushad Tyagi, posed as a constable with the Uttar Pradesh Special Operations Group (SOG) and assumed different aliases to deceive women over the years.
Tyagi reportedly changed his identity based on the religion of the woman he targeted. Tyagi is believed to have had two wives, 20 girlfriends, and physical relations with at least 10 women. He was arrested on July 1 from Charthawal.
The case traces back to Sambhal, Uttar Pradesh, where Tyagi was living with a friend who worked as a police constable. When his friend departed for Madhya Pradesh due to the 2019 Lok Sabha elections, he inadvertently left his uniform and other belongings with Tyagi. This marked the beginning of Tyagi's deceitful exploits. He donned the uniform and relocated to Muzaffarnagar, presenting himself as a police constable.
In Muzaffarnagar, Tyagi's first wife, who is 23 years older than him, and his second wife living in Civil Lines area, were unaware of his double life. Tyagi targeted women, primarily those who were widowed or separated from their husbands, and deceived them by changing his identity based on their religion—Rahul or Ricky for Hindu women, and Naushad for Muslim women.
According to police, Tyagi's web of deceit extended across four states, including Delhi, Ghaziabad, Bulandshahr, Mathura, Sambhal, Muzaffarnagar, Meghalaya, and Assam. He duped approximately 20 women by assuming different names and developed physical relations with 10 of them, exploiting the trust they placed in him as a supposed UP Police constable.
Tyagi also used the guise of the police uniform to earn money through illegal means. To intimidate those around him, he befriended local policemen and frequently moved around the area with them under the pretext of treating them.
The scandal unravelled when Tyagi ensnared a widow running a shop in Muzaffarnagar. Introducing himself as Rahul Tyagi, he frequented her shop and feigned affection, promising marriage.
Under this pretense, he extorted about 2 lakh 75 thousand rupees and later persuaded her to part with jewellery worth 3 lakh rupees. When he started avoiding her marriage talks, the woman grew suspicious and reported him to the police.
Upon investigation, the police arrested Tyagi while he was preparing to flee and find new victims. They discovered objectionable photos and videos of numerous women on his mobile and various name plates he had used to change identities. Tyagi had been indulging in his debauchery under the guise of a uniform for nearly three years.
The police have filed a case against Tyagi under relevant sections and have recovered the uniform he used for his deceitful acts.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
22 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Court junks plea seeking FIR against Delhi exhibitor over MF Husain artworks
No communal unrest or public incitement was caused by the display of two artworks by MF Husain at an exhibition last year at DAG, formerly known as the Delhi Art Gallery, a Delhi court said on Tuesday while refusing to direct a police probe against the exhibitors. MF Husain (HT Archive) Additional sessions judge Saurabh Partap Laler of Patiala House Courts issued the order in response to a revision petition by an advocate. The advocate had challenged a magistrate's order from December last year, which had refused to register an FIR against DAG's director and owners. The advocate claimed DAG displayed allegedly obscene paintings by Husain that offended Hindu religious sentiments. The detailed order was released on Thursday. Observing that the matter lacked grave allegations, the court said, 'The allegations, while sensitive, pertain to artworks in a private gallery, not public incitement or violence. No communal unrest is reported, and the seized evidence suffices for adjudication.' The court noted that the petitioner faces no prejudice asshe can lead evidence in the complaint case, already ongoing before a magistrate at Patiala House Courts. Leading evidence refers to the complainant presenting evidence before the court through witness testimony and affidavits to support its argument. The petitioner, advocate Amita Sachdeva, filed a complaint in December last year, after attending the exhibition titled 'Husain: The Timeless Modernist' at DAG. She alleged that two of the paintings — one depicting Ganesha with a naked female figure on his lap, and another showing Hanuman holding a naked female figure — outraged the religious sentiments of Hindus. Following the complaint, the Delhi Police, acting on the court's directions,seized the paintings on January 22and stored them in the evidence room. Sachdeva also sought the preservation of CCTV footage from the exhibition held on December 4, 6 and 10, alleging that DAG tampered with evidence by removing the paintings shortly after she raised objections. DAG, meanwhile, denied any wrongdoing, emphasising its commitment to artistic freedom. It said that the paintings were acquired through legitimate channels and cleared customs upon entry to India. In January, judicial magistrate Sahil Monga ruled that the complainant, who claimed that the artworks offended her religious sensibilities, must substantiate her allegations rather than initiate a criminal investigation. The magistrate went on to order the case to proceed as a complaint case, entailing examination of the complainant as well as proposed accused, and the scrutiny of evidence before the court rules. Sachdeva, through advocate Makrand Adkar, contended the order, arguing that the offences necessitate a police investigation, including forensic investigation of the seized evidence, verification of the paintings' authenticity and an inquiry into potential financial fraud or tampering, which the complainant cannot undertake by herself. DAG was represented by senior advocate Madhav Khurana and advocates Shivam Batra and Rony O John. The court said, 'The primary grounds for challenge — that police investigation is essential — does not withstand scrutiny. The discretion under Section 175(3) BNSS (powers of a magistrate to order investigation) must be exercised judiciously, with application of mind, and not mechanically.' Noting that Sachdeva already has access to all the key evidence, including photographs, CCTV footage and the seized paintings themselves through which she can summon witnesses to show deliberate malice and outrage to religious feelings, the court said, 'The ATR (action-taken report) by the police confirms that the exhibition was acknowledged, but no malicious intent was discerned in the preliminary inquiry.' The judge dismissed the allegations of fraud or tampering, saying that they are unsubstantiated and appear speculative. The court said that in case police assistance is required, the magistrate who is presiding over the complaint case, holds the power to order a limited police inquiry to ascertain the truth, during the course of the matter. 'The impugned order (by the magistrate) reflects a reasoned application of mind, aligning with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. No police investigation is required at this stage, as evidence is accessible,' the order said. MF Husain remains a polarising figure in Indian art. His works have sparked numerous controversies, particularly for their depiction of Hindu deities in unconventional forms. Husain, who was conferred with the Padma Shri, Padma Bhushan and Padma Vibhushan, died in London in 2011. Regarding the seizure of the paintings, a senior police officer in Delhi said, 'We have not received any written or formal communication from the court yet. We will do as they they say. As of now, nothing is being returned.'


Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
1996 dhoti-pulling case against one of BJP's 1st 2 LS MPs dropped
representative image AHMEDABAD: Twenty-nine years after then Gujarat minister Atmaram Patel's dhoti was pulled during a BJP function at Sardar Patel Stadium, a city sessions court on Thursday dropped the criminal case against former Union minister A K Patel, one of the two first BJP Lok Sabha members. Another BJP politician, Mangaldas Patel, was also an accused in the case, registered at Naranpura police station under IPC Section 307 (attempt to murder) for allegedly assaulting and pulling off the minister's dhoti in 1996. The accused had backed Shankersinh Vaghela at the time of his rift with then chief minister Keshubhai Patel. The incident occurred immediately after BJP's Atal Bihari Vajpayee had finished addressing the party gathering. Public prosecutor Sudhir Brahmbhatt filed an application under CrPC Section 321 seeking withdrawal of the case against the 95-year-old former MP. The co-accused in the case, Mangaldas Patel, and witness (victim) Atmaram Patel, had passed away during the pendency of the trial. After hearing the submissions, additional sessions judge H G Pandya observed: "The case involves an internal political party dispute that occurred 28 years ago, and the victim, Atmarambhai Maganbhai Patel, has passed away... The public prosecutor's request to withdraw the case appears to be made with bona fide intentions, and sufficient consideration has been given to withdrawing the prosecution. Therefore, considering the records and the nature of the offence, it is appropriate to grant permission to withdraw the prosecution under Section 321 of CrPC in the interest of justice. " Earlier, on Jan 30, 2018, a metropolitan court had dropped a related criminal case against 41 BJP workers and politicians, including VHP leader Pravin Togadia and BJP MLA from Daskroi Babu Jamna Patel.


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Delhi Court Upholds Dismissal of Plea Seeking FIR over MF Husain Paintings Exhibition
New Delhi: A Delhi court upheld the dismissal of a plea seeking the registration of an FIR for the exhibition of two works depicting Hindu deities by the late painter MF Husain at DAG (formerly Delhi Art Gallery) alleged to be offensive. The court observed that it did not find any "illegality" in an earlier court's order. The court of additional sessions judge Saurabh Partap Singh Laler upheld an order passed by a judicial magistrate first class earlier this year, noting that it reflected a reasoned application of mind, aligning with statutory provisions and judicial precedents. "No police investigation is required at this stage, as evidence is accessible and Section 225 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita provides an adequate mechanism for any future inquiry. The criminal revision petition is dismissed. The proceedings before the learned JMFC shall continue as per law," the additional sessions judge said. The complaint against the exhibition was lodged by lawyer Amita Sachdeva. The additional sessions judge noted that the allegations about the paintings being hurtful to Hindus, while sensitive, pertained to artworks in a private gallery, not public incitement or violence. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo It stated, "No communal unrest is reported, and the seized evidence suffices for adjudication. The petitioner faces no prejudice, as she can lead evidence in the complaint case. " You Can Also Check: Delhi AQI | Weather in Delhi | Bank Holidays in Delhi | Public Holidays in Delhi | Gold Rates Today in Delhi | Silver Rates Today in Delhi On Jan 22, the JMFC's court dismissed Sachdeva's application filed under Section 175 (3) of BNSS, seeking directions to the station house officer of the police station concerned to register an FIR against the top officials of DAG. Judicial magistrate first class Sahil Monga, in his order dated Jan 22, noted that CCTV footage of DAG, network video recorder and the paintings in question had already been seized. He said that no further investigation and collection of evidence were required at this stage of the case because all the evidence was in the possession of the complainant as well as on record. The court, however, allowed Sachdeva to present the evidence directly to the magistrate. It will examine whether there is sufficient ground to proceed with the matter. In her complaint, Sachdeva alleged that two paintings of the late painter on display at DAG "depicted Hindu gods and goddesses in an obscene manner". Her complaint also sought the preservation of CCTV footage from Dec 4, 6, and 10, 2024 — the dates when the exhibition took place. On Jan 20, the court ordered the seizure of the two paintings by the celebrated painter following Sachdeva's complaint. Stay updated with the latest local news from your city on Times of India (TOI). Check upcoming bank holidays , public holidays , and current gold rates and silver prices in your area.