New cars unveiled for Atlanta airport's plane train
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience.
Yahoo is using AI to generate takeaways from this article. This means the info may not always match what's in the article. Reporting mistakes helps us improve the experience. Generate Key Takeaways
New cars unveiled for Atlanta airport's plane train
Officials at Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport unveiled its new plane train cars on Wednesday.
The new plane train may not look much different or bigger, but it is brighter and more modern. Officials say it will be quicker too for passengers.
[DOWNLOAD: Free WSB-TV News app for alerts as news breaks]
Channel 2's Steve Gehlbach got a look at the first new car on Wednesday. It's one of 14 that will bring the total up to 73 used for the plane train.
The people mover connects all terminals and concourses. It currently runs about every two minutes, in a 3-mile loop.
The cars come from the same company that built the system in Atlanta in 1980 and it may not look that much different.
'A lot of the technology has been updated, mitigate obsolescence, make the vehicles more reliable and of course, some aesthetic improvement,' said Jason Aguirre with Alstom Transporation.
It will also run more frequently, every 90 seconds using up to 15 four-car trains combined with the new tunnel built for the extension.
TRENDING STORIES:
The new section of tracks and additional turnaround area will be fully up and running by the first quarter of 2026.
'It will dramatically improve the efficiency and capacity of our people mover system, ensuring we're ready to serve the increasing number of travelers who pass through Atlanta each year,' said Ana Maria Taroco, assistant general manager for Hartsfield-Jackson.
Passengers will still see some of the old cars on the tracks after the first 14 are delivered.
The rest of the fleet, which includes 10 cars added when the international terminal opened 15 years ago, will be replaced in the next few years.
[SIGN UP: WSB-TV Daily Headlines Newsletter]
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Our beach hut was worth £3,000 back in 1982. Now... it's almost half a million pounds
Yahoo News speaks to the owner of a beach hut on Mudeford Sands, Dorset, about why the holiday homes sell for "breathtaking sums." Tucked away on a remote sandy peninsula off the Dorset coast is a community of beach huts that are among the priciest in the UK. With gorgeous coastal views of the coast off the nearby town of Christchurch, soft white sand and clean, clear water, it's easy to understand why the 350 or so huts on Mudeford Sandspit are so highly prized. One online travel guide says you might have to "pinch yourself" to check you're still in England, with one local owner likening the setting to the south of France. And the prices reflect that. Anyone wanting a taste of beach hut living will probably have to pay somewhere between £350,000 and £465,000, according to Denisons Estate Agents. That's if you're lucky enough to get hold of one, of course. Many of these huts are passed through the generations as precious "family heirlooms", Stephen Bath, who part owns one of the huts, tells Yahoo News. "My hut cost exactly £3,000 in 1982. It would conservatively fetch £450,000 today," says Bath, managing director of aerial photography company Skycab Ltd. "These huts seem immune from the regular fluctuations of property prices," he says. "This is partly because there are more building plots made available in England all the time. But there is finite space at Mudeford. There have perhaps been 10 new hut plots since 1980." Another reason, says Bath, is that the huts get plenty of publicity whenever one sells for a "breathtaking price." Despite averaging just 150sq ft in size, they are "worth 50% more than the average home in Britain", he says – and that's with no mains electricity and no running water. Another restriction means owners are only allowed to sleep in the huts - converted from Victorian-era bathing machines - between March and October, due to local rules. Bath says people are so eager to buy a plot on Mudeford Sandbank "because it's so famous and breathtakingly beautiful. It's the South of France effect". Another selling point, he adds, is that owners can park their boats right outside their huts, like a car outside the home, providing easy access behind the sandspit and into Christchurch harbour. As for the price, Bath says the top prices huts have sold for are often a "well-guarded secret", adding that one sold for £585,000 around eight or nine years ago. "It was very hush-hush," he said, adding: "The sellers have usually made a very tidy sum for their asset, especially if it's been in the family for a long time. Perhaps they are slightly embarrassed to cash in and leave such a unique community." Growth is 'not sustainable' and 'prices are cooling' Purchases of these beach huts are cash only, which makes them out of reach to many aspiring owners, which perhaps adds to the sense of exclusivity of the community. If you are lucky enough to have over £350,000 lying around, investing might seem like a no-brainer, but Denisons - which has sold around 100 huts in the past 25 years - says the huts are still vulnerable to market forces. "Huts have followed the residential sales trend," said principal Andy Denison. "Prices have risen significantly in the past 10 years, as a result of demand for the huts." He says that while "significant demand after COVID did raise the bar on resales", prices have "noticeably cooled off in the past eight months and sellers are reacting by reducing the prices in order to attract buyers". One property expert even advised that, due to the huts only being available for cash and the limited yearly window you can sleep in them, they wouldn't particularly recommend them as an investment. Felix Newall-Smith told Yahoo: "They're not really the sorts of properties that we would be encouraging people to invest in, unless they had a really clever angle on how they could make a profit in the limited period of time." Simon Barnes, from estate agent Winkworth, told Yahoo the huts have a unique appeal due to their "desert island" feeling - but not to hold your breath in hope of one becoming available soon. He added: "It's fair to say that these are legacy assets, passed down through generations of the same family. What has become a lovely thing to have and enjoy, remains a lovely thing to have and enjoy but has also become a prime, prize, exceedingly valuable asset. "Rarity value against demand is always one of the main factors in property which drives values. "They're so desirable because you really do have a genuine 'desert island' feeling when you are on the sandspit. With sea on either side, no concrete, just drifting sand, birdlife aplenty, and the pretty huts set in the long grass of the dunes, it has this really wild feel." Viewings are taking place, "but not at the levels we have experienced in the past", says Denison, who adds that the idea of continual growth is "not sustainable", with prices adjusting to sales in the wider residential market. With around four huts coming into the market per year, according to the estate agents, it's easy to see why, despite changing market conditions, they are still highly coveted. Most owners are 'never going to sell their huts' Whatever way the market is pointing, Bath, who was born in Southbourne Broadway just one mile away from his hut, says most owners wouldn't part with their family holiday homes anyway. While out-of-towners have to pay a £25,000 licence transfer fee to Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole Council, the fee for licencees transferring to their children is only £11,550, according to the council's website. Bath, former managing director of Bath Travel, inherited his hut from his father, who first bought the home in 1968 for £1,600. Having worked on the beach as a student in 1972, Bath says not a lot has changed, estimating that only 10 huts have been built since then due to the finite space on the peninsula. While all of the beach huts synonymous with Britain's coastline are remnants of bathing machines, which became obsolete after the First World War, Bath says no one knows why the Mudeford ones are so much bigger than the ones beachgoers would see in many other coastal towns. They are so sizeable and sturdy that they were temporarily removed from the beach between 1940 and 1947 due to fears German soldiers could use them as outposts if they invaded the beach, Bath says. This is yet another aspect of the community's unique history, which might explain why so many owners, according to Bath, are in no hurry to sell. 'Around 75% of the huts are still in the hands of families who bought them a long time ago and have passed them down generations," he says. "Most people don't consider themselves as rich as they are never going to sell their huts… they have them as an heirloom for their family." Click below to see the latest South and South East headlines Read more Boujee beach huts are booming — 3 decorating ideas for decking yours out (Country Living) 'We can't sell our £400k Dorset beach huts – and it's the council's fault' (The Telegraph) Beach hut owners accuse council of 'pushing' them to sell after fee doubles (The Telegraph) Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
16 hours ago
- Yahoo
CBS Has Said Canceling Stephen Colbert's Show Was 'Financial.' What Does The Average American Think?
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. As the supposed fallout of the Paramount/Skydance merger continues, the 2025 TV schedule is the beginning of the end for CBS's The Late Show with Stephen Colbert. With Colbert's surprise cancellation still lingering, and the corporate players proclaiming the move as a 'financial decision,' the validity of that motive has been questioned by not only celebrities and fellow late night hosts, but also the American public. A new poll reported by Yahoo seems to back that viewpoint, as the axing of The Late Show lead to some interesting data. Perhaps the most telling result are the top two results that pollsters pegged for why Paramount/CBS cancelled the almost 10 year program; as well as its legendary late night fixture. 40% of Americans disapproved of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's cancellation. 35% of Americans surveyed think that Stephen Colbert is 'about right' in sociopolitical content (versus 28% saying he's "too political," and another 3% saying he's "not political enough.") 37% of responses expressed that 'Paramount is trying to curry favor with Trump administration.' 36% agreeing that another cause was 'Stephen Colbert is too critical of Donald Trump.' Stephen Colbert and Jimmy Fallon are tied at 25% for the title of "favorite late-night show host." By the numbers, it would appear that 'the Average American' does not feel that The Late Show with Stephen Colbert's reported financial losses are truly the cause of its cancellation. Which aligns with some of the opinions we've seen from other late night notables. One such example would be Andy Cohen's remarks about the CBS cancellation, in which the Watch What Happens host offered a breakdown of what he felt would have been a more financially motivated strategy. Meanwhile, Skydance CEO David Ellison's alleged feelings on CBS personalities acting 'like they're the IP' poses a counterpoint that appears to be acting in the name of 'fundamentals.' Yet if you trust former Late Show with David Letterman producer Rob Burnett's thoughts, he might tell you the perceived threat to the Paramount/Skydance merger was the true problem. For all of the inside baseball discourse that exists around Stephen Colbert's May 2026 departure, the 'true cause' has certainly seemed to be up for debate. And that debate has hit every corner of the interwebs, from celebrities to the audiences watching at home. As the discourse continues to run around the Internet, The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will continue running -- for at least a few more months -- in its usual 11:35 PM ET slot on CBS, with new episodes heading to streaming for those with a Paramount+ subscription after they've aired. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Lucid Stock: Can Gravity Production Volume Solve All Problems?
Key Points The EV maker's second quarter fell short of Wall Street estimates. The loss of regulatory credit sales is a blow to Lucid and other EV makers. Lucid is now drastically accelerating production of the Gravity SUV. 10 stocks we like better than Lucid Group › Despite coming into the second quarter with momentum after a number of consecutive quarterly sales records, Lucid Group (NASDAQ: LCID) was the latest electric vehicle (EV) maker to pump the brakes on expectations. Lucid, among its competitors, is driving through tricky waters when it comes to navigating tariffs, removal of the federal EV tax credit, and the loss of regulatory credit sales. One saying rings true for Lucid though: Volume solves all problems. More specifically, Gravity SUV production volume will solve all problems. Here's why. Q2 recap and speed bumps Automakers around the globe are navigating choppy waters when it comes to increasing costs due to tariffs. Lucid started things off by trimming its full-year production outlook, making Lucid only the latest automaker casualty to pump the brakes after tariff and trade policy changes. The automaker now expects to produce between 18,000 and 20,000 EVs in 2025, down at the midpoint from its earlier forecast for 20,000 vehicles. Revenue of $259 million fell short of Wall Street estimates, as well as its adjusted loss of $0.24 per share, which was worse than the $0.22 per share loss consensus estimate. Regulatory credit loss Adding to Lucid's pain is the loss of regulatory credit sales. Essentially, automakers that produce EVs were given credits for their production, while automakers producing vehicles that didn't meet emissions standards were fined. One way to avoid the fine was to simply purchase regulatory credits from automakers with a surplus, such as EV-only automakers like Lucid. That was until the Trump administration removed the fine for vehicles not meeting emissions standards, effectively and immediately removing any incentive to purchase regulatory credits, shutting off a valuable chunk of business for EV makers such as Lucid. Volume solves problems What Lucid needs is a good dose of volume! More specifically, Lucid desperately needs to ramp up the production of its Gravity SUV, which has been in low production since launching. It's important because the $7,500 federal EV tax credit is set to disappear on Sept. 30, effectively pulling forward demand from those on the fence to get in before the discount is removed. That means there will be a roughly equal power lull during the fourth quarter, so the sooner the Gravity is producing at full capacity, the better. Unfortunately, things haven't gone exactly to plan. "This is something I've said before, and I say it again, we're not where we want to be with the Gravity at this time of the year. We actually wanted to be ahead, making significant ... progress every day," Lucid CEO Marc Winterhoff said in an interview with Yahoo! Finance shortly after Q2 earnings. On the bright side, Lucid does expect production to ramp up drastically during the second half of the year. But to meet its lofty goal of 18,000 to 20,000 vehicles it would need a serious acceleration. Consider that Lucid produced only 6,075 vehicles during the first half of the year. To meet expectations Lucid would have to pull forward the launching of a second shift at its Arizona Factory. What it all means One of the major developments to watch with Lucid is the company's fight to become gross profit positive, which rival Rivian Automotive accomplished in both the fourth and first quarter. The problem is investors might not see desired progress in gross profits during 2025, depending on the countermeasures Lucid unleashes during the fourth quarter to help offset the lull following the pull-ahead in demand. Those discounts and incentives can be costly. Ultimately, despite a less than glamorous second-quarter report, Lucid still has momentum and is well-positioned with production of its Gravity accelerating as we speak. But long-term investors would be wise to anticipate a bumpy few quarters as the industry, and consumers, grapple with changes in pricing due to tariffs and trade policy. Should you invest $1,000 in Lucid Group right now? Before you buy stock in Lucid Group, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Lucid Group wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $653,427!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,119,863!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,060% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 182% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 11, 2025 Daniel Miller has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Lucid Stock: Can Gravity Production Volume Solve All Problems? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
