When will the NJ Transit strike end?
Your morning commute just became a game of transit roulette. As of Friday, May 16, NJ Transit engineers have officially gone on strike, per The New York Times, halting all rail service on the country's third-largest commuter system, including Metro-North's west-of-Hudson lines. If you were hoping for a last-minute save, sorry: union leaders and NJ Transit brass failed to ink a deal before the deadline.
When was the last time NJ Transit went on strike?
That would be 1983, the year NJ Transit was born. Engineers picketed for 34 days back then. This current strike follows the rejection of a tentative contract by 87-percent of the union's voting members. Negotiators had been at the table late Thursday night but walked away, depending on who you ask, just before a deal could be struck. Talks are expected to resume Sunday, May 18, with both sides still publicly claiming a resolution is 'achievable.'
What will the NJ Transit strike affect?
Everything. No trains are running. Zip. Zilch. Nada. NJ Transit has about 172,000 daily rail riders and 350,000 total system riders. Without rail service, buses, light rail, PATH, ferries and rideshare apps are shouldering the chaos. Fans heading to MetLife Stadium for concerts from Shakira and Beyoncé may find themselves gridlocked—or stuck with sky-high Lyft fares. Meanwhile, daily commuters are being told to work from home unless absolutely necessary.
NJ Transit strike dates
The strike began at 12:01am on Friday, May 16. There's no official end date, but NJ Transit and the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) say they're open to continued negotiations. Sunday's talks may determine whether this mess drags into the following week.
NJ Transit travel disruptions
The strike suspended all NJ Transit rail services, including Metro-North's Port Jervis and Pascack Valley lines west of the Hudson. To ease the blow, NJ Transit is offering limited Park-and-Ride shuttle service from Secaucus Junction, Hamilton Rail Station, Woodbridge Center Mall and the PNC Bank Arts Center—though these only operate on weekdays during peak hours.
Rail tickets are being cross-honored on NJ Transit-operated buses and light rail, but they won't be accepted on Amtrak, PATH, ferries or private bus lines. Some bus routes near train lines will see added capacity, but officials warn the patchwork plan can only accommodate about 20-percent of normal rail ridership.
Expect bus overcrowding, packed light rail cars and heavier-than-usual traffic, especially during the morning and evening rush. Unless something gives this weekend, it's going to be a long ride—without the train.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Inside the rumoured Liverpool-Manchester rail link plan
Train journeys between Liverpool and Manchester could soon be half as quick if the rumoured rail link goes ahead. The quicker rail link has been on the wishlist of the Greater Manchester and Liverpool mayors after the HS2's northern leg was axed. The multi-billion pound rail link, which would cut journey times between the cities by 20 minutes, could become a reality if it receives government funding in the Chancellor Rachel Reeves' £113 billion spending review today. Journeys between the cities usually take between 45 and 55 minutes, with multiple stops in between. The government is expected to announce funding for the project today, a source told Metro. Greater Manchester mayor Andy Burnham said the Victorian rail infrastructure is 'now acting as a brake on growth,' while Steve Rotheram, the Liverpool City mayor, argued that the faster link is 'something that the people in the North quite rightly deserve.' It comes after the Chancellor announced £15 billion funding to transport projects in the North and Midlands last week, including for Greater Manchester buses and the Stockport tram extension, a new rapid transit link in Liverpool, and the new West Yorkshire and Leeds tram system. The £3 bus cap will also remain in place for at least two more years, the Chancellor confirmed. Here is everything that has been revealed about the new rail link so far. The Liverpool-Manchester Railway could 'supercharge economic growth' with a £15 billion boost and 22,000 new jobs during the construction, which could start in the early 2030s, the region's leaders said. Plans show the express rail link would have only three stops between Manchester Piccadilly and Liverpool Lime Street. The proposed stops would be at Manchester Airport, Warrington Bank Quay and Liverpool Gateway, although the exact gateway location has not been confirmed yet. Liverpool Lime Street, the seventh busiest train station outside London, and Manchester Piccadilly would be revamped. The city's stations have become 'bottlenecks' with limited platforms and track capacity, Rotheram said. The new railway would help alleviate the 'immense pressure' on the existing network, the mayors said. The areas around each station, will be redeveloped as new 'growth zones,' with new homes, jobs and regeneration in the pipeline ahead of the new rail link. As many as 500,000 new homes could be build along the rail corridor. People in Liverpool reacted to the news on social media, with many saying there should be a direct rail link to John Lennon Airport first. One person said: 'Create a direct link to John Lennon Airport, South Parkway is a total waste of time for people trying to use our airport.' Another Liverpool resident said: 'Manchester has the most to gain out of this plan – not Liverpool.' Burnham said: 'Just over 200 years ago, the world's first passenger railway was built to connect Liverpool and Manchester, transforming the nation's fortunes for centuries. But Victorian infrastructure is now acting as a brake on growth. More Trending 'A new Liverpool-Manchester Railway would be shorter than both London's Elizabeth line and East West Rail connecting Oxford and Cambridge, but would punch well above its weight in both growing the UK's economy and better connecting our high-growth sectors. 'For too long, such major infrastructure projects in the UK have been delivered in a top-down way. 'We want to work hand-in-hand with government to plan and deliver this railway from the ground up, enabling us to maintain our growth momentum for Greater Manchester. A new, locally-led delivery model will mean we can build our pipeline of regeneration, new homes, skilled jobs and green growth around the rail line with real certainty.' The northern mayors travelled to Westminster ahead of the spending review to ramp up the pressure on the government to back their plans. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man, 28, dies after crash that closed A14 for hours MORE: I tried out every Londoner's worst nightmare and spoke to other commuters MORE: Map reveals the most up-and-coming sex positions in major UK cities
The Guardian
5 hours ago
- The Guardian
Wednesday briefing: What to expect from the Treasury's spending review announcements
Morning. It's spending review day. After weeks of tense negotiations between ministers and the Treasury, Rachel Reeves is set to unveil exactly how the government will allocate the spending it announced in last year's budget. If you're wondering what this actually means, my colleague Archie Bland helpfully explained when the process began six months ago. In short: departments outline how they want to spend money over the next few years, then negotiate with the Treasury over how much they will actually get. We already have a good idea of what will be in this spending review. The government has given the go-ahead to the Sizewell C nuclear plant; announced £15bn in transport spending across the north of England; expanded free school meals for all children whose parents receive universal credit; and unveiled a £4.7bn plan to build three new prisons. We also know which ministers settled quickly and which were deeply unhappy. Angela Rayner, deputy prime minister and housing secretary, won out after a fraught and drawn-out process to secure more funding for social housing, while the home secretary, Yvette Cooper, warned that the government would not meet its manifesto promises on crime. The energy secretary, Ed Miliband, was able to keep cash for a major programme of insulation, but it is unclear whether other schemes will be scaled back as a result. After a troubled start in government, will this spending review give Labour the reset so desperately needed? I spoke to Jessica Elgot, the Guardian's deputy political editor. But first, the headlines. Israel-Gaza | The UK placed sanctions on two extreme-right Israeli ministers over their 'monstrous' comments on Gaza. Itamar Ben-Gvir and Bezalel Smotrich will face travel bans and freezing of assets. Austria | Ten people died and 12 were injured in a school shooting in Graz, Austria. The interior minister, Gerhard Karner, confirmed the 21-year-old suspect, who killed himself, was a former student at the school. US | The city of Los Angeles is instituting a curfew in downtown on Tuesday night as tensions between the Trump administration and California escalate over immigration raids, as governor Gavin Newsom warns democracy 'under assault'. UK politics | The Lib Dems have described the new Reform UK chair, David Bull, as a 'Trump sycophant'. Nigel Farage, however, says Bull's qualified doctor status will help counter Labour's 'lie machine' about the NHS. Transport | Driverless taxis are set to appear on London streets next spring, as confirmed by Uber and Wayve. The Department for Transport said the technology would make roads safer and could create 38,000 jobs. The UK has not had a full three-year spending review since 2015 because of the political turmoils of Brexit and the pandemic. There is a hugely important number that the Treasury wants front and centre this time: £113bn of capital spending. This is money for infrastructure, building schools and hospitals, that was unlocked by the change in fiscal rules before the October budget, which allowed more borrowing for long-term investment. 'For most ordinary voters, all they see the government committing to is political pain: whether that's winter fuel allowance or welfare cuts, the tough line that was taken at the budget and the spring statement,' Jessica explains. 'On lots of different issues, people have heard that there's a return to fiscal discipline, which is a phrase they associate with austerity. And every bit of polling tells you that people have just had enough of that.' This spending review, therefore, is 'some kind of recognition that while they can still be seen to be fiscally responsible to avoid a Liz Truss-style crisis, they do have to present a more positive vision. They have to try and get some political benefit.' The way they will attempt to do this, she says, is by pointing out investing in infrastructure generates economic growth and a return on that money spent, unlike day-to-day departmental spending. So expect to hear a lot of ministers talk about 'choosing investments over decline'. Jessica goes further: 'The Treasury has felt particularly aggrieved that they haven't got credit for making this change in the fiscal rules and framing up this cash. You still get people saying they need to raise taxes and the grumpy retorts to that is 'we raised £40bn worth of tax for the last budget and we changed the fiscal rules to pay for £100bn pounds of capital spending'. So this is them belatedly trying to claim credit for that in order to cover up what we expect to be a very tight spending review for departments on day-to-day spending.' Starting from scratch The process for the spending review is brutal. Departments must justify their entire budgets from scratch, known as a zero‑based review approach, then negotiate with the Treasury. Jessica adds that there is the idea during this process that departments deploy what is known as a 'bleeding stump' strategy – where, for example, they tell the Treasury that they will have to stop providing an essential service, such as cancer treatments or free school meals, if there is no change to the budget. In 2011, then Conservative minister Eric Pickles had accused Labour councils of doing this in the midst of austerity. Some ministers settled early with the Treasury, including the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, so she could announce her prison building programme. Wes Streeting's department is also set to be one of the big winners of the spending review: it will lay the groundwork for the NHS's 10-year plan. So is Angela Raynor, with the chancellor announcing nearly £40bn worth of grants to be spent over 10 years for local authorities, private developers and housing associations. Other holdouts, including the Department of Education, and Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, settled recently with some decent wins. 'Some of the big beneficiaries are the defence industry. You will see capital spent on some schools and hospitals, actually slower than the ones the Tories promised, but Labour will say that that's because the Tories didn't have any money to fund things they committed to,' Jessica says. But, most importantly, 'all of these things take time to filter through'. Will voters feel better off? The multibillion-pound investment at Sizewell C on the Suffolk coast has been billed by the government as the biggest nuclear programme in a generation, and one that will 'get Britain off the fossil fuel rollercoaster'. Labour has also committed to big infrastructure projects in the north of England that should benefit populations there, but it will be a long while before those benefits are felt, Jessica says. 'That's a problem in terms of political cycles about who gets credit for what. None of this stuff is going to be built before the next election. I think that Sizewell C isn't going to be built until the end of the 2030s.' The government would argue it is building infrastructure that demonstrates the UK is a good solid place to invest. People should therefore start feeling the benefits of a growing economy. 'Your daily life should start getting less expensive, your wages should be rising, interest rates should be coming down, inflation should be coming down. That's the theory,' Jessica says. 'But you can see through the rise of Reform in the polls that people are frustrated they're not feeling that effect quickly enough.' 'Big, visible benefits' The partial U-turn on winter fuel allowance for pensioners and sluggish growth means Rachel Reeves has very little fiscal headroom for her day-to-day spending, Jessica explains. But though departments have had very tight settlements, the published accounts are not as bad as previously feared. Are there any other surprises on welfare coming, particularly on disability benefits and child poverty? 'I wouldn't expect any announcements on that front,' Jessica says. 'A lot of decisions have been deferred. On disability benefits, we're expecting very difficult welfare cuts to come at the end of June.' Labour MPs are being told that the major investments they are seeing in their constituencies are only possible because of these tough decisions, Jessica adds, with the Treasury framing it as 'making hard choices so we can afford big, visible projects that benefit everyone'. It is unclear if it will work. 'Maybe they'll be won over by that, but at the moment, not many of them are. That will be a very difficult moment.' On child poverty, the imminent taskforce report is likely to strongly recommend lifting the two-child benefit cap. There are suggestions that the prime minister is open to it. But again, it belongs in a different category of policy decisions, separate from the spending review. 'There's lots of suggestions out there that the PM himself is minded to act on that. But again, that's not a decision for tomorrow.' Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion Nadeine Asbali responds to the calls from Tory and Reform MPs to ban the burqa. She argues that the real issue isn't what Muslim women wear, but how deeper societal issues are being ignored. Sundus Abdi, newsletters team Gaby Hinsliff's sharp critique of Sarah Vine's memoir about life as a Westminster Wag may end up outshining the book itself. Aamna Going away but worried your plants won't survive the week without you? This week's houseplant clinic covers hacks like using self-watering devices to avoid returning to a plant graveyard. Sundus Okinawa, Japan's subtropical island, witnessed the Pacific War's bloodiest battle. This stunning piece of visual journalism follows one man's relentless quest to recover the fragments of a forgotten history. Aamna Bad Bunny, PinkPantheress and Bon Iver's recent releases have all made the Guardian's list of best albums of 2025 so far. Critics have also named Erika de Casier, Japanese Breakfast and many more. Sundus Football | Nottingham Forest has written to Uefa on Crystal Palace's participation in the Europa League next season, alleging that Palace is in breach of multi-club ownership rules. Cricket | Ben Duckett hit 84 off 46 balls in England's 120-run opening stand as the hosts beat West Indies to wrap up their T20 series 3-0. Football | Arsenal Women's FC will play all of their Super League matches at the Emirates Stadium next season to 'allow more people than ever to experience a matchday'. 'UK imposes sanctions on Israeli ministers for 'inciting violence'' says the Guardian, and that's on the front of the Times too, though the splash is 'NHS 'won't hit targets' even with extra £30bn'. Top story in the Mirror is 'Social housing boost – £39bn new build' and we get more of an idea from the Financial Times: 'Reeves puts £39bn affordable homes drive at heart of bid to 'renew Britain''. 'Come on Rachel, now for family farm tax U-turn!' pleads the Express while the Mail says 'Reeves rocked by jobs slump'. The Telegraph's top story is 'Rayner drops law on rough sleepers'. The grim news from Austria – 'Revenge massacre at school' – covers the front page of the Metro. 250 days on hunger strike: Can Laila Soueif secure her son's freedom? Who is Alaa Abd el-Fattah and why are British diplomats trying to obtain his release? Patrick Wintour reports A bit of good news to remind you that the world's not all bad Just over two hours from Glasgow, a six-day hike on the Isle of Arran doubles as a journey through 500 million years of Earth's history. Newly recognised as a Unesco Geopark, the island holds traces of rocks formed by ancient magma and cliffs shaped by tectonic plate shifts. If you're lucky, you might find yourself placing your hand in a 240-million-year-old footprint left by a reptile older than dinosaurs, like Stuart Kenny did. Kenny hikes the 65-mile Arran Coastal Way, and in his words: 'I abandon the geological hunt altogether and stop to watch otters fishing.' Sign up here for a weekly roundup of The Upside, sent to you every Sunday And finally, the Guardian's puzzles are here to keep you entertained throughout the day. Until tomorrow. Quick crossword Cryptic crossword Wordiply
Finextra
9 hours ago
- Finextra
Industry associations highlight cybersecurity risks at US regulatory agencies
Four industry trade associations have called for significant reforms to how federal financial regulators handle sensitive data following a data breach at the Office of the Comproller of the Currency that exposed over 148,000 private correspondences containing sensitive supervisory information about US financial institutions. 0 In a letter addressed to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, The Bank Policy Institute, American Bankers Association, MFA and Sifma say that growing threats from hostile nation-states targeting US critical infrastructure serve as a reminder of the urgency to address vulnerabilities. 'Government agencies are increasingly the target of persistent and sophisticated nation-state attacks that could disrupt financial markets and our economy,' the organizations wrote. 'It is imperative that federal regulators recognize that they are equally a target of malicious actors and implement the same or substantially similar cybersecurity and incident response practices that they expect financial institutions to maintain.' Financial institutions are legally required to share sensitive, proprietary and non-public information with their regulators as part of the supervisory process. This information can range from capital and liquidity management to cybersecurity protocols. However, centralizing large amounts of data can create a prime target for illicit actors seeking to harm US economic security, says the organisations. They point out that over the past two years, both the Treasury Department and the OCC have suffered significant cyber incidents. At the OCC, hackers were at work inside its systems for over a year-and-a-half before the intrusion were discovered. Immediately after the breach was reported both JPMorgan Chase and Bank of New York Mellon scaled back electronic information sharing with the agency. To mitigate risk and prevent similar problems in the future, the groups are urging the Treasury to hold federal agencies to the same security and data protection standards as private companies. They want to limit data collection to only what is necessary and avoid centralisation of sensitive data, allowing companies to maintain control and access to their data. The letter states: 'As firms are required to share non-public, highly sensitive information with regulators as part of the supervisory process, compromises at regulatory agencies could expose institutions' vulnerabilities and business information to malicious actors, putting them at strategic disadvantage.'
