Here are the ‘politburo' members who were really running the Biden White House, according to ‘Original Sin' authors
A small, tight-knit group in former President Joe Biden's inner circle was running the White House like a 'politburo', and they were the 'ultimate decision-makers' as Biden's health and cognitive function continued to decline, according to the authors of a bombshell new book.
This group, dubbed the 'politburo,' included a coterie of seasoned political veterans, including Mike Donilon, Steve Ricchetti and Bruce Reed — but also family members such as first lady Jill Biden and the president's son Hunter, the authors of 'Original Sin' claim.
'In terms of who was running the White House, it's a small group of people that have been around,' 'Original Sin' author Alex Thompson told PBS' 'Washington Week' on Friday. 'Some people within the administration called them the Politburo. That's the term we used in the book.'
Former White House chief of staff Ron Klain was at times part of the 'politburo,' as was former senior adviser to the president Annie Tomasini. Also on the 'politburo' was the first lady's former top adviser and 'work husband,' Anthony Bernal, whom The Post previously reported created a toxic workplace environment.
'And Joe Biden himself also is part of this. Joe Biden is not like — it's not 'Weekend at Bernie's,' right?' said co-author and CNN anchor Jake Tapper, referring to the movie about a dead guy who is wheeled around as part of an elaborate ruse.
'He has some purchase here. He has some agency. And he's aware of some of what's going on.'
Tapper added: 'He's aware of the fact that they are keeping the cabinet away from him, they are keeping some White House staffers away from him.'
Usually, the term 'politburo' refers to the top echelon of a communist state. Many of the seasoned politicos had been around Joe Biden for decades. Regardless of official titles in his 2020 campaign and administration, the 'politburo' generally called the shots and got Biden to agree.
'Five people were running the country, and Joe Biden was at best a senior member of the board,' one source familiar with the inner workings of the White House told the authors.
An unidentified cabinet secretary vented about the Politburo, saying, 'I've never seen a situation like this before, with so few people having so much power. They would make huge economic decisions without calling [Treasury] Secretary Yellen.'
The Politburo had been forceful in rejecting and diminishing concerns about the former president's age and mental acuity, according to the book. The advisers had generally seen 'concerns about Biden's age as simply a political vulnerability, not a serious limitation,' the book claims.
They believed that Biden was achieving real policy victories, entitling him, and them, to a second term, according to the book.
Former President Barack Obama had been leery about 'hangers-on' in Joe Biden's orbit, particularly on his 2020 campaign and stressed that 'I don't want him to be humiliated.'
Alumni of the Obama administration also spotted key differences in how Joe Biden's presidency operated.
'Obama would hash it out with deputies and mid-level aides. Biden, by contrast, mostly met with the Politburo and his top national security aides,' the book said.
'Many of Biden's own aides were also kept at arm's length from the president.'
The bombshell book explained that, irrespective of official titles, 'in practice, Bruce Reed was the real domestic policy adviser, Mike Donilon was the actual political director, Steve Ricchetti controlled Legislative Affairs, and Klain controlled a bit of everything.' Mike Donilon, senior adviser
Donilon, who served as a senior adviser to Biden from the start of his presidency until January 2024 when he hopped over to the campaign, had been a close confidant of the former president since the 1980s.
During his time on the 2024 campaign, he raked in a jaw-dropping $4 million salary, according to 'Original Sin.' Some outside observers, including Obama strategist David Axelrod, assessed that he was 'tied to Biden emotionally that he could not accept the truth.'
Donilon, a former pollster and media consultant, was widely seen as a true believer in Biden who earned the former president's mutual trust.
'The president valued Mike Donilon's advice so much that aides would later joke that if he wanted, he could get Biden to start a war,' Thompson and Tapper wrote. Steve Ricchetti, counselor to the president
Ricchetti, who served as counselor to the president throughout Biden's time in the White House, served as the 46th president's chief of staff during the latter half of his vice presidency and worked on Biden's campaign. He also previously served as the White House deputy chief of staff for operations in the Clinton administration.
During the Biden administration, Ricchetti played a key role in helping the former president steer through key legislative battles. At times, he would also weigh in on pressing political matters.
At one point, Ricchetti personally called a reporter of an unnamed media outlet off the record to refute claims from multiple sources about Biden's health, according to the book. He also fumed after actor George Clooney penned a stunning op-ed urging Biden to drop out of the race.
'Ricchetti read it and was furious. Internally, he threatened to shut Clooney down—some of his colleagues thought he sounded like a mob boss,' the authors wrote. Bruce Reed, deputy chief of staff for policy
Reed previously served as Biden's chief of staff during the first half of his vice presidency, prior to Ricchetti later taking over that post. He is also an alumnus of the Clinton administration.
He was widely regarded as a 'policy wonk' and was among the advisers who helped prep Biden for his disastrous debate against President Trump. Ron Klain, ex-chief of staff
As Biden's first chief of staff during his presidency, Klain was very influential and had sway over key decisions and messaging strategy — even after he left the White House, according to 'Original Sin.'
Klain had been in Biden's orbit since the 1980s during the former president's Senate days. He also worked on the Clinton campaign in 2016.
He officially exited the White House in February 2023, but still retained influence on the former president and helped him prepare for his disastrous debate against Trump last June.
'Biden showed a particular deference to Klain even though his chief of staff was often more progressive. Biden had deep respect for Klain's intellect. 'Only one person here is smarter than me and it'sRon,' aides heard him say,' the book claimed. Hunter Biden and Jill Biden
Jill Biden had also been a key force in trying to shield her husband's faux pas from the public in what some have dubbed operation 'bubble wrap' and Hunter Biden was seen as a key force trying to prevent his father from dropping out of the 2024 race.
In the earlier stages of the former president's political career, the first lady had been a 'reluctant political spouse,' but she had significant influence throughout his administration, admonishing staffers at times for letting him ramble on too long in front of the cameras.
Hunter Biden had weighed heavily on his father during his second term, and some aides speculated it played a role in his decline.
'To understand Joe Biden's deterioration, top aides told us, one has to know Hunter's struggles,' the book said. 'Plum jobs'
Many 'politburo' members also brought key friends and family into plum Biden administration roles.
Donilon's niece landed a role on the National Security Council, according to the book.
Reed's daughter was a day scheduler for the president and Ricchetti's children also found jobs across the government, 'Original Sin' reported.
Top Biden allies have rejected many characterizations in the book, but Thompson explained that he 'had stopped believing their denials for a while' after he kept hearing evidence that countered White House narratives.
'Original Sin' hit bookshelves last Tuesday.
Originally published as Here are the 'politburo' members who were really running the Biden White House, according to 'Original Sin' authors

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

News.com.au
an hour ago
- News.com.au
Trump says Iran deal would not allow 'any' uranium enrichment
US President Donald Trump on Monday ruled out allowing Iran to enrich uranium under any nuclear deal between the foes -- as Tehran defended what it said was its "peaceful" pursuit of fuel for power generation. Uranium enrichment has remained a key point of contention in five rounds of talks since April to ink a new accord to replace the deal with major powers that Trump abandoned during his first term in 2018. "Under our potential Agreement — WE WILL NOT ALLOW ANY ENRICHMENT OF URANIUM!" Trump said on his Truth Social network after the Axios news outlet said Washington's offer would let Tehran enrich some of the nuclear fuel. Republican Trump also blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the impasse, saying the Democrat "should have stopped Iran a long time ago from 'enriching.'" Axios said the latest proposal that Washington had sent Tehran on Saturday would allow limited low-level uranium enrichment on Iranian soil, for an amount of time that has yet to be determined. Iran has insisted that Iran has "nothing to hide" on its nuclear program. Speaking in Cairo, where he met the UN nuclear watchdog's chief Rafael Grossi, Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said: "If the goal is to deprive Iran of its peaceful activities, then certainly no agreement will be reached." The remarks came after Grossi of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) on Monday called for more transparency from Iran following a leaked report that showed Tehran had stepped up uranium enrichment. - 'Need for more transparency' - The IAEA report showed that Iran has ramped up production of uranium enriched up to 60 percent -- close to the roughly 90 percent level needed for atomic weapons. "There is a need for more transparency -- this is very, very clear -- in Iran, and nothing will bring us to this confidence (besides) full explanations of a number of activities," Grossi said ahead of meeting Araghchi. Grossi added that some of the report's findings "may be uncomfortable for some, and we are... used to being criticized". Iran has rejected the report, warning it would retaliate if European powers that have threatened to reimpose nuclear sanctions "exploit" it. "Some countries are trying to abuse this agency to pave the way for escalation with Iran. I hope that this agency does not fall into this trap," Araghchi said of the IAEA. Iran meanwhile pushed for the United States to drop sanctions that have crippled its economy as a condition for a nuclear agreement with Trump's administration. Araghchi said on Saturday that he had received "elements" of the US proposal for a nuclear deal following the five rounds of talks, mediated by Oman. - 'With or without a deal' - Both Araghchi and Grossi met Egyptian President Abdel Fattah al-Sisi, who praised the US-Iran talks and called for "de-escalation in order to prevent a slide into a full-fledged regional war". On Monday, Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei told a news conference: "We want to guarantee that the sanctions are effectively lifted." "So far, the American side has not wanted to clarify this issue," he said. The US envoy in the nuclear talks said last month that Trump's administration would oppose any Iranian enrichment. "An enrichment program can never exist in the state of Iran ever again. That's our red line. No enrichment," Steve Witkoff told Breitbart News. Following a phone call with Witkoff the day before about the ongoing nuclear talks, Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty urged a peaceful solution and a nuclear-weapon-free Middle East, saying in Monday's press conference that "the region is already experiencing enough problems and crises". He warned that military confrontation would create "a state of chaos from which no one will be spared". Iran has vowed to keep enriching uranium "with or without a deal" on its nuclear program. The United States has sent Iran a proposal for a nuclear deal that the White House called "acceptable" and in Tehran's "best interest" to accept, US media reported on Saturday. The New York Times, citing officials familiar with the diplomatic exchanges, said the proposal calls on Iran to stop all enrichment and suggests creating a regional grouping to produce nuclear power.

Sky News AU
6 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Inside Jill Biden's political rise amid her husband Joe Biden's cognitive decline: Jake Tapper book
Former President Joe Biden's inner circle considers first lady Jill Biden one of the most powerful first ladies in history, CNN anchor Jake Tapper and Axios political correspondent Alex Thompson reveal in their new book, "Original Sin." Jill Biden, who has a doctoral degree in education and whom White House staffers called "Dr. B" for short, was a reluctant political spouse in the early days of her husband's career. During his presidential campaigns and into his presidency, the first lady became his staunchest defender and a "political partner in addition to a spouse," Thompson and Tapper wrote. "Dr. B was a strong, protective force in the White House. She was also, without question, one of the chief supporters of the president's decision to run for reelection, and one of the chief deniers of his deterioration," the authors wrote. President Donald Trump's White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Thursday that Jill Biden should have to answer for her complicity in the "cover-up" of Biden's cognitive decline. Leavitt pointed to how Jill Biden jumped in to defend her husband during their joint interview on "The View" this month as evidence the former first lady is still covering for her husband. As Biden's sister, Valerie "Val" Biden Owens, and his adult children, Hunter Biden and Ashley Biden, stayed away from Biden's 2020 presidential campaign, Jill Biden took on a more prominent role, the book revealed. "She weighed in on potential hires and reviewed many of the campaign ads before they were aired. She campaigned hard and peppered aides with questions about how many reporters would be at her events," Tapper and Thompson said. Jill Biden sat for job interviews for White House aide candidates, and she "kept score" of which staffers were most loyal, with the help of her most trusted aide, Anthony Bernal, the book revealed. The White House began referring to Jill Biden's "spousal programming" events on foreign trips, and her team would request talking points, which Tapper and Thompson said some national security officials found strange. "[Bernal] had already begun planning the first lady's 2025 international travel schedule," Tapper and Thompson said. The first lady made an off-hand comment to French President Emmanuel Macron at a state dinner in 2022 about the difficult nature of campaigns and how she needed to stay in shape. Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's daughter, Alexandra, overheard and found it odd, according to "Original Sin." "Alexandra then turned to the president and asked if they should toast to another campaign. He looked back at her like he didn't understand. Alexandra thought her mom looked shocked. Everyone quickly gathered themselves. With Macron, they toasted to four more years," the authors said. Dr. B was particularly sensitive when asked about Biden's age and ability, according to the authors. After Biden's consequential debate performance in the summer of 2024, The Associated Press reported that Jill and Hunter Biden were urging the president to continue his re-election campaign. Sources told AP the family "questioned how he was prepared for the debate by staff and wondered if they could have done something better." "Hunter privately talked about it as being the family against the world. People sensed a more manic quality in him post-debate. He was determined to save his dad," according to Tapper and Thompson. Soon after the debate, Jill Biden joined Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., on the campaign trail. After defending the president's re-election campaign to reporters, Stabenow brought up some of her colleagues' concerns about Biden continuing in the race. "The First Lady didn't answer the senator's implied question, but she later fumed about it to White House staffers," the book alleged. A week later, Gov. Josh Shapiro, from the pivotal battleground state of Pennsylvania, told the president, "I have some concerns." However, before Biden could fully respond, the first lady was ushering him away. "Jill fumed with resentment about all the Democrats who she considered friends now pushing Biden out. She knew she had blundered in the aftermath of the debate with her belittling praise. She was only trying to help her husband in his moment of need. In the end, she told Biden: 'This is your decision. This is for you to decide,'" according to the book. Fox News Digital has written extensively dating back to the 2020 presidential campaign about Biden's cognitive decline and his inner circle's alleged role in covering it up. A Biden spokesperson did not immediately respond to Fox News Digital's request for comment.

Sydney Morning Herald
a day ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Why did Trump double his steel tariffs? Because he could
Apart from trying to show that he still has some, albeit more limited, authority to act on tariffs, Trump's announcement, to a rally of US steelworks, had a secondary purpose. Loading During last year's election campaign, Trump was vehemently opposed to a proposed $US15 billion ($23.3 billion) acquisition of US Steel by Japan's Nippon Steel - as was Joe Biden, who blocked the deal only days before he left office. Both were chasing the votes of steelworkers and their powerful union in the critical swing state of Pennsylvania, where US Steel is headquartered and has its major plants. Having won the election, however, Trump has had a change of mind. While the US will impose some significant conditions on the deal -- including, perhaps, a 'golden share' that would give the government a veto over major decisions along with a commitment from Nippon Steel to appoint a US chief executive and a majority of Americans to the board – it now appears that he will approve the deal, even though he says he hasn't seen its final details. Nippon Steel, one of the world's most sophisticated steel producers, has promised to invest about $US14 billion in US Steel's operations, which have been struggling, shrinking and suffering from under-investment for decades. Trump's doubling of the tariff rate for steel and aluminium is a way of justifying the decision to approve the deal, as well as enhancing the economics of US Steel and other US steelmakers and helping to underwrite Nippon Steel's massive investments, most of which will occur over the next four years. Trump's original tariffs on steel and aluminium infuriated America's trade partners, including Australia, even though Australia's exports of those metals to the US are quite modest. Canada, whose steel exports represent about a quarter of US steel imports and half its aluminium imports, has far more at stake. Mexico, Brazil, South Korea, Vietnam, Japan and European nations will also be impacted, with Canada and the European Union already threatening retaliation, as they did in response to Trump's initial 25 per cent tariffs. Australia is still, probably fruitlessly, seeking an exemption. Loading The decision to allow the Nippon Streel deal to proceed, if that is the final outcome, is good policy. The US steel industry is small – about half the size it was half a century ago -- and has been shrinking. It has poor profitability and ageing technology. Nippon Steel's investment and its technologies can arrest that decline. The decision to double the tariffs on steel – indeed the original decision to impose the 25 per cent tariff – is, however, poor policy. It will increase investment in the sector, and will probably improve its profitability, plant utilisation rates and employment numbers. But that will come at a significant cost. In 2018, when Trump first imposed tariffs on imported steel, steel prices rose almost 10 per cent, the sector's profits rose by about $US2.5 billion, capacity utilisation jumped from 74 per cent to about 80 per cent and nearly 10,000 jobs were added within the sector. The impact was quite short-lived, with those numbers subsequently reversing as the industry resumed its long-term decline. The initial impact was predictable. Tariffs are protectionist. They protect domestic industries and companies from more efficient producers elsewhere by boosting their sales, margins and profits. That's what happened after the 2018 tariffs. Loading They come, however, at a cost to the customers of the protected industries, which is also what happened after Trump's 2018 tariffs were imposed. A Peterson Institute for International Economics study concluded that the 2018 tariffs cost US downstream steel-using industries about $US5.6 billion, or about $US650,000 for each new job they added in the steel sector. The US Federal Reserve Board concluded that they cost about 75,000 jobs in those downstream industries, or more than eight times the number of jobs added by the steelmakers. Steel is a key input to the manufacturing industries, whose protection Trump has trumpeted as the rationale for his trade wars. It's also extensively used in the construction sector. With the 25 per cent version of the tariffs on steel and aluminium not only set at twice the 2018 rate, but also applying more broadly – they now also extend to downstream products containing the metals – their impact on steel and aluminium users and US companies and consumers will be far more significant and damaging. Trump might regain a little of the authority and ego he lost when the court knocked out, perhaps temporarily, his broader weaponisation of tariffs against the rest of the world. He might also have ingratiated himself with the steelworkers whose jobs he will protect, but the economic benefits of his metals tariffs will be far outweighed by their costs to the rest of the US economy. The probable impact on the steel and aluminium industries and their customers provide, in fact, a glimpse of the broader damage that Trump's trade wars on everyone – if the courts allow him to continue them, or he can find other means to implement them – will inflict on the world's largest economy.