This animal's heart is the size of a small car
So, let's dive into the world of giants — from the deep sea to dry land — and get to know the planet's most colossal creatures.
1. The Blue Whale
If size alone could win awards, the blue whale would be an undisputed champion. These magnificent marine mammals are the largest animals not just alive today but in all of Earth's history — yes, even bigger than the dinosaurs.
ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW VIDEO
Can grow up to: 100 feet long
Weighs up to: 200 tons
Found in: Almost all oceans except the Arctic
Fun fact: A blue whale's heart is literally the size of a small car. It beats slowly and powerfully, just like the whale gliding through the deep blue. And yet, it survives on krill — those tiny, shrimp-like creatures.
2. African Elephant
When it comes to the land, nothing beats the African bush elephant in size and presence. These majestic beings roam across Africa, commanding both respect and curiosity.
Stands as tall as: 13 feet at the shoulder
Weighs about: 12 tons
Lives in: African savannas, forests, and deserts
Their giant ears, tusks, and strong social bonds make them unforgettable. Plus, they play a crucial role in maintaining their ecosystem — like knocking down trees to make paths for other animals or digging for water that others can use.
3. Saltwater Crocodile
If you're into ancient, armored predators, the saltwater crocodile is the real deal. These reptiles haven't changed much since the time of dinosaurs — and they're still absolutely massive.
Can grow up to: 23 feet long
Weighs about: 2,200 pounds
Found in: Southeast Asia and Northern Australia
With one of the strongest bites in the animal kingdom, these creatures are both feared and revered. But unless you're venturing into their waters, you're probably safe!
No animal sees the world from a higher vantage point than this spotted stunner. (Source: Freepik)
4. Giraffe
Graceful, tall, and unmistakable — the giraffe is nature's high-rise. No animal sees the world from a higher vantage point than this spotted stunner.
Can reach up to: 19 feet in height
Weighs around: 2,800 pounds
Roams across: African grasslands and woodlands
Their long necks help them nibble leaves way up in trees, and their height also gives them an edge in spotting predators. Their calm eyes and gentle steps make them one of the most beloved animals out there.
5. Whale Shark
Don't be fooled by the name — while the whale shark is enormous, it's also completely harmless. It's actually the largest fish in the world, and one of the ocean's friendliest giants.
Grows up to: 40 feet long
Can weigh: 20 tons
Prefers: Warm tropical oceans
With their dotted skin and wide mouths, they glide through the ocean filtering plankton, not hunting prey. If you're lucky, you might even get to snorkel beside one — an experience that stays with you forever.
6. Ostrich
Flight? Not really. Speed? Absolutely. The ostrich may be grounded, but it's the largest bird on the planet — and the fastest one on two legs.
Stands up to: 9 feet tall
Weighs up to: 320 pounds
Lives in: Africa's dry regions
Their eggs are the largest of any living animal, and when they run — they run. Think 60 km/h (about 37 mph)! They're living proof that you don't need to fly to be impressive.
7. Colossal Squid
Last but certainly not least, we head into the chilly depths of the Southern Ocean to find a creature shrouded in mystery — the colossal squid.
Estimated to be up to: 46 feet long
Weighs around: 1,500 pounds
Lurks in: Deep Antarctic waters
Rarely seen by humans, this squid has hooks on its tentacles and eyes as large as soccer balls. It's as much a legend as it is a living creature, and we still don't know everything about it.
Why These Giants Matter
These animals are more than just big — they're vital to the planet. Whether they're fertilizing the soil, balancing food chains, or drawing attention to conservation, they play irreplaceable roles in nature. And let's be real — they also remind us just how amazing life on Earth can be.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
11 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Whale said: How far have we come in the quest to eavesdrop on animals?
For centuries, human beings believed they were the only species that could 'speak'. MAMA?: Research has shown that elephants respond to the unique calls family groups use for specific individuals. (Adobe stock) The buzzing of bees, calls of birds, lion's roar and dolphin's screech were just a background score in this production in which we were the main characters; nobody else got any lines. Then, in the early 1900s, Karl von Frisch proved that honeybees perform a dance in the hive that conveys to other bees where the nearest food sources are. This kicked off the study of how animals communicate. By the 1960s, it was clear that certain species call and sing to each other in notes that vary with the message: summons, warning, invitation to mate. One such set of sounds, recorded by Roger Payne, Katy Payne and Scott McVay, became the best-selling 1970 album Songs of the Humpback Whale. Now, researchers are finally beginning to decode how some of this communication works. In February, for instance, an international study published in the journal Science analysed eight years of recordings from humpback whales to find that certain shorter sounds are used far more frequently than other, more complex ones. Essentially, whale songs fall into a pattern called the Zipfian distribution, in which the most common word in a language (eg 'the') shows up twice as often as the second-most-used word, and three times as often as the third-most-common word (and so on). The Zipfian distribution is common to all human languages. The fact that it appears to hold true for whales indicated that their songs convey far more than innate, reflexive responses to external stimuli. The unexpected discovery was made because the study roped in behavioural ecologists, scientists and linguists to work with the marine biologists. This kind of collaborative research is part of what is pushing the envelope in this field; the other big change, of course, is machine learning (ML) and artificial intelligence (AI). Last June, ML helped a team of researchers (led by behavioural ecologist Mickey Pardo of Colorado State University) analyse 469 vocalisations made by family groups of adult female African elephants in Kenya and their offspring, over 14 months. Their study, published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, showed that the animals appear to have unique calls for specific individuals. When these calls were played back to the elephants, the researchers noted, specific individuals reacted to their 'names', perking up their ears and rumbling back in reply. In the Dominican Islands, meanwhile, since May last year, marine biologist David Gruber and his research organisation Project CETI (for Cetacean Translation Initiative) have been working to use AI to decode what sperm whales are saying, in their Morse-code-like pattern of clicks called coda. They plan to then use AI to generate clicks of their own, in an effort to 'speak back'. Elsewhere, marine biologist Laela Sayigh and her team at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution studied the wide range of clicks and whistles used by wild bottlenose dolphins off the coast of Florida and believe they have deciphered how two of the 22 types of whistles are used. One functions as an alarm and the other as a query, says a study published as a preprint on bioRxiv this April. 'Our study provides the first evidence in dolphins for a wider repertoire of shared, context-specific signals, which could form the basis for a language-like communication system,' Sayigh and her team note. In May, building on these signals, Google DeepMind released DolphinGemma, a large language model (LLM) that aims to help researchers gather and analyse 'dolphin-speak'. Does this mean we could gain the ability to communicate, at least in limited ways, with certain species? Well, two fundamental hurdles would remain, even if we did decode every whale click and dolphin whistle. Most animals appear to communicate mainly to signal ('food', 'danger', 'it's time to mate', etc), which is a more limited version of the skill humans have evolved. Meanwhile, many animals use visual, chemical and mechanical signals, alongside sound, in ways that humans do not. This could potentially make any 'speaking back' on our part both difficult and meaningless. What we can expect, for now, is to at least gain a greater understanding of how meaningful, layered and even deeply intentional animal communication can be. Like an elephant calling out across the grasslands in Kenya, and her calf turning around, recognising the distinct sound his family uses just for him.
Hindustan Times
2 days ago
- Hindustan Times
Smoke from boreal wildfires could cool the Arctic
There are two things which climate scientists hate about 'positive feedbacks'. One is that they are bad news. A positive feedback, in the science of complex systems, is an amplification; in climate change, this comes about when a consequence of rising temperatures drives a further rise in temperature. Such feedbacks are the sorts of things that drive tipping points. The other problem is that they sound like good news. Negative feedbacks face the opposite problem. In a negative feedback, which need not be harmful, a change in the system produces a response that pushes the system back towards where it was. Think of an air conditioner's temperature setting or a radiator's thermostat. A recent analysis by Edward Blanchard-Wrigglesworth of the University of Washington and colleagues suggests that a much more important negative feedback may now be operating in the Arctic, one which could curb the region's rapid temperature increase and markedly slow the decline in its sea ice. Indeed, it looks strong enough to have an effect on overall global average temperature. This particular negative feedback is driven by the increasing frequency, size and intensity of wildfires in boreal forests. The climate models that scientists use to simulate warming over the coming century run on scenarios that assume these fires will continue more or less as they did in the 2000s and early 2010s. Since then, though, they have become considerably larger. Where there is fire, there is smoke. Some is sooty and dark; some is lighter. Dr Blanchard-Wrigglesworth and his colleagues think that the brighter, more reflective smoke wins out, cooling the ground below. Taking the fire-trend into account, they reckon that, in the 2030s, the extent of sea-ice cover in the Arctic ocean will be at least 3m square kilometres more than it would be in a fire-trend-free model. Without the fire trend, an ice-free Arctic September would be expected in 2050. Fires delay its onset by over a decade. None of this says that the fires are a good thing, or that they will avert catastrophes elsewhere. Fires are a massive shock to ecosystems, and smoke which reflects sunlight also harms humans and other animals. Moreover, the carbon that fires release will warm the entire planet for some time to come. That is clearly bad news. Curious about the world? To enjoy our mind-expanding science coverage, sign up to Simply Science, our weekly subscriber-only newsletter.
NDTV
3 days ago
- NDTV
Ethiopian Fossils Reveal New Species In Human Evolutionary Tree
Researchers have unearthed tooth fossils in Ethiopia dating to about 2.65 million years ago of a previously unknown species in the human evolutionary lineage, one that lived in the same time and place as the earliest-known member of the genus Homo to which our species belongs. The scientists, in the Ledi-Geraru research project area of northeastern Ethiopia's Afar Region, discovered 10 teeth - six molars, two incisors, one premolar, and one canine - that they concluded belonged to a new Australopithecus species. The teeth came from two individuals. Until now, six species of the genus Australopithecus, an important early human ancestor that displayed a mix of ape-like and human-like traits, were known from fossils at various African sites. The researchers said the newly found teeth bore traits indicating they belonged to a seventh species. A genus is a group of closely related species that share similar characteristics. For example, lions and tigers belong to the same genus but represent distinct species. The scientists also discovered three other teeth dating to 2.59 million years ago that had traits showing they belonged to the oldest-known species of Homo, one that was first revealed by a jawbone unearthed in the same vicinity in 2013. Scientists have not yet assigned names to the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by these 13 teeth because of the incomplete nature of the fossil remains. Our species, Homo sapiens, is the most recent member of the Homo genus, first appearing roughly 300,000 years ago in Africa before later spreading worldwide. The new dental fossils provide insight into a poorly understood period in human evolution. The close age of the teeth suggests that this newly identified Australopithecus species coexisted in this region with the early Homo species, raising questions about whether they competed for the same resources. The teeth also indicate that there were four hominins, as species in the human evolutionary lineage are known, that inhabited East Africa at the time. Previous fossils showed that another Australopithecus species and a species of Paranthropus, a hominin possessing a specialized skull adapted for heavy chewing, lived in East Africa during this time. An additional Australopithecus species also inhabited southern Africa, bringing the number of hominins then on the continent to five. The presence of these contemporaneous hominins illustrates the complicated nature of the human evolutionary process. "This reinforces the idea that the story of human evolution is not of a single lineage changing slowly through time," said University of Nevada, Las Vegas paleoanthropologist Brian Villmoare, lead author of the research published on Wednesday in the journal Nature. "Rather, the pattern of human evolution is similar to that of other organisms, repeatedly branching into multiple species throughout the fossil record, many of whom lived at the same time," Villmoare added. The researchers are seeking clues about the nature of any interaction between the Australopithecus and Homo species represented by the 13 teeth. "We are currently analysing teeth to see if we can tell if they ate the same thing," said Arizona State University paleoecologist and project co-director Kaye Reed. If so, they may have fought over resources, Reed said. Crude stone tools dating to about the same time were previously discovered nearby, Reed said, probably made by the Homo species. The researchers determined the age of the teeth using a technique that dated feldspar crystals contained in volcanic ash in the sediments where they were discovered based on radioactive decay of the element argon. The Afar Region, one of Earth's hottest and lowest places, is an arid expanse of badlands. But at the time of these species, rivers flowed across a vegetated landscape into shallow lakes in a landscape populated by a splendid array of animals. These included giraffes, horses, pigs, elephants, hippos and antelopes, as well as predators such as sabre-toothed cats and hyenas. Homo is generally thought to have descended from a species of Australopithecus, though the exact species and the timing have been a matter of debate. Australopithecus eventually died out. Australopithecus includes the famous fossil Lucy, who was a member of the species Australopithecus afarensis who lived approximately 3.18 million years ago. Lucy's remains were discovered in 1974, also in the Afar Region. The newly discovered teeth had characteristics that showed they did not belong to Lucy's species, the researchers said. "This new Australopithecus species is in no way some 'missing link,' and we don't think that it was necessarily ancestral to any known species," Villmoare said. "Species arose and many went extinct," Reed said. "Each find is a piece of the puzzle that puts human evolution into a twiggy tree, rather than a linear graphic."
