Wall Street Analysts Are Bullish on This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock -- Here's What You Need to Know
Some Wall Street analysts see Upstart rising by 50% or more.
The company's results have improved since it released an updated AI model.
Upstart is making progress in the large auto and home loan makrets.
10 stocks we like better than Upstart ›
When investors think of AI stocks, Upstart (NASDAQ: UPST) may not be the first that comes to mind. However, the company has a strong claim to the title. It's harnessed the power of machine learning and data science for a new credit platform that has been more accurate at assessing creditworthiness than conventional FICO scores, according to Upstart.
As a stock, Upstart has been one of the more volatile names in the market as the business has considerable potential, but it has also struggled to turn a profit in recent years. Plus, any credit business is inherently risky, since loans could go bad if the economy sours, or Upstart's credit partners could stop buying its loans, eliminating the funding it needs to operate.
Upstart's latest earnings report offered more reasons to be optimistic. Its transaction volume jumped 102% in the first quarter to 240,706 with originations up 89% to $2.1 billion. Meanwhile, its conversion rate improved from 14% to 19.1% because of an update in its AI model that makes as many as 1 million predictions per applicant to determine whether to lend to the applicant and what interest rate to charge.
Overall, revenue jumped 67% to $213 million, and its adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA) improved from a loss of $20.3 million to a profit of $42.6 million.
Now, several Wall Street analysts have turned bullish on Wall Street, and some see considerable upside to the stock.
According to Tipranks, of the 11 analysts that have rated Upstart in the last three months, four analysts rate it a buy and seven call it a hold. However, the average price target for the stock is $65.33, or a 39% upside on average.
Among the analysts that are most bullish on Upstart are Peter Christiansen of Citi, who rates the stock a buy and gives it a price target of $83; Dan Dolev of Mizuho, who gives it a buy rating and a price target of $83; and Kyle Peterson of Needham, who gives it a buy rating and a price target of $70.
Christiansen has noted Upstart's increasing interest from private credit managers and improving partner network. Dan Dolev recently reiterated a buy rating after double upgrading the stock last year in response to the company's improved profitability, and it's capturing the benefits from AI in its updated model. Kyle Peterson of Needham also sees an improving funding backdrop and balance sheet at Upstart driving the stock higher.
Wall Street forecasts on their own aren't a good reason to buy the stock, but they can alert you to good buys. Upstart has its share of naysayers as well. Nearly 25% of the stock is sold short, and Goldman Sachs gave it a sell rating in February with a price target of $15.
However, Upstart's business is improving in multiple ways. In addition to the preceding numbers, the company is increasingly tapping into the auto and home loan markets, which represent the biggest addressable markets in front of it. In the first quarter, auto originations grew five times over the last year to $61 million, while home loans grew six times to $41 million. That still represents a small fraction of the company's business, but there is potential for it to get much larger.
Upstart's business model is also scalable. The tech platform fully automates more than 90% of loan applications and can therefore scale up to make more loans at a relatively low marginal cost. Operating expenses grew by just 11% in the first quarter even as fee-based revenue was up 34%.
Overall, Upstart's technology appears to give it a competitive advantage, and it's seeing momentum in customer demand and funding partnerships. If its momentum continues, its profit should rapidly improve.
With a long runway of growth, Upstart looks like a good buy.
Before you buy stock in Upstart, consider this:
The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Upstart wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years.
Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $651,049!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $828,224!*
Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 979% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 171% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join .
See the 10 stocks »
*Stock Advisor returns as of June 2, 2025
Jeremy Bowman has positions in Upstart. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Upstart. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Wall Street Analysts Are Bullish on This Artificial Intelligence (AI) Stock -- Here's What You Need to Know was originally published by The Motley Fool
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Wire
12 minutes ago
- Business Wire
The AI Collective Launches Globally to Mobilize Next Generation of AI Innovators and Stewards
SAN FRANCISCO--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The world's largest grassroots AI community today formally detailed its global rebrand as The AI Collective, its official incorporation as a non-profit organization, and the launch of three foundational initiatives to cultivate a collaborative ecosystem for the responsible stewardship of AI. Formerly The GenAI Collective, the organization boasts 70,000+ members across 25+ global chapters and partners including AWS, Meta, Anthropic, Roam, and Product Hunt. AI's future depends not just on faster models—but on rebuilding trust, fostering global collaboration, and aligning progress with human values. Share This announcement builds on initial excitement sparked by a social media reveal on Monday, June 3rd ( and coincides with flagship launch events currently underway in San Francisco, New York City, and across its global chapters ( As the race to develop artificial intelligence accelerates daily, fueled by intense competition and unprecedented investment, the essential work of aligning these powerful systems with human values and societal trust is often dangerously sidelined. The AI Collective is responding directly to this critical gap, positioning itself as the essential human counterpoint in the age of acceleration by building a global community to steward AI, informing decision-makers, and supporting mission-aligned entrepreneurs. "The ground is shifting beneath us. AI's exponential progress brings immense possibility, but also profound questions about our future, our work, and our very identity – and the institutions we rely on weren't built for this velocity," said Chappy Asel, Co-Founder and Executive Director of The AI Collective. 'Trust is the invisible thread holding society together, and right now, that thread is fraying under the strain of misaligned incentives and rapid, uncoordinated change. We believe that in an era of exponential transformation, our greatest strength lies in each other – in creating trusted, in-person spaces to make sense of this moment, ask the deeper questions, and collaboratively shape a future where AI genuinely enhances human flourishing, not just surpasses human capability,' Asel said. The AI Collective believes that without deliberate intervention focused on trust, openness, and participation, AI's trajectory risks leaving humanity behind. Recognizing that managing this requires bridging the widening gap between technological progress and societal adaptation, the organization is launching three foundational initiatives designed to rebuild trust through action and participation: Expanding Global Community & Events: Rebuilding Trust Through In-Person Connection. The AI Collective will rehumanize innovation by launching 100 chapters across six continents by end of year. Each chapter will fuse its community's unique vision with global shared values of openness and inclusivity, curating salons, hackathons, demo nights, mentorship circles, and cross‑disciplinary mashups to deepen trust and collaboration. Their network will converge at Singularity Fest this November 2025 in San Francisco for a multi‑day, decentralized celebration attracting 10,000 pioneers across domains for hands‑on labs, purpose‑driven keynotes, thematic tracks, and community‑led activations, ensuring AI's next leaps keep humanity firmly at the center. Informing Decision-Makers: Bridging the Gap Between Frontier Insight and Responsible Governance. To counter the risks of institutional blind spots and lagging policy, The AI Collective Institute, the organization's participatory research arm, connects frontier technologists directly with policymakers, industry leaders, and the public. It translates ground-truth insights from the AI ecosystem into practical guidance through open research, equipping frontline leaders to foster responsible innovation and navigate future shock effectively. Supporting Mission-Aligned Innovation: Actively Incentivizing Human-Centric AI Development. In pursuit of a values-aligned AI ecosystem driven by the community's unique trust and insight, Collective Investments acts as a dedicated founder-investor matchmaking program under the non-profit umbrella. It identifies and supports promising founders building trustworthy, beneficial AI, connecting them with values-aligned capital allocators (VCs, grants, angels) and providing crucial support to ensure the AI future being built reflects the principles of human flourishing and responsible progress. The AI Collective is celebrating this evolution with its ongoing flagship events and global chapter celebrations. The organization invites builders, thinkers, policymakers, investors, and pioneers worldwide to join the conversation and contribute to shaping a future where technology serves all of humanity. Read the organization's foundational perspective, " Trust in the Age of Acceleration," learn more and join the community at: and follow the journey @_ai_collective on social platforms. ABOUT THE AI COLLECTIVE The AI Collective (formerly The GenAI Collective) is the world's largest non-profit, grassroots community dedicated to empowering the AI ecosystem to collaboratively steer AI's future toward trust, openness, and human flourishing. Founded in 2023, the AI Collective has rapidly grown into a global force: 70,000+ members: Comprising leading founders, researchers, investors, and multidisciplinary operators from OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Databricks, Cohere, and more. 200+ AI startups launched or showcased at demo nights, connecting directly with investors and clients; participating companies subsequently raised $72M+ in funding. 25+ active chapters with 200+ events hosted, located in major tech hubs globally including New York City, London, Paris, Washington, D.C., Seattle, Bengaluru and more. 40+ leading partners, including Amazon, Anthropic, Andreessen Horowitz, Meta, Github, TedAI, Product Hunt, Roam, Linux Foundation, and top academic institutions. A dedicated global team of 100+ volunteer organizers committed to building authentic, impactful community experiences. Through its focus on in-person connection, participatory research via The AI Collective Institute, and support for mission-aligned innovation via Collective Investments, the organization serves as a vital hub for sense-making, collaboration, and responsible stewardship in the age of artificial intelligence.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Factbox-UK Market Exodus: Companies that have moved away from a London listing
(Reuters) -British money transfer firm Wise became the latest UK listed firm on Thursday to say that it intends to move its primary listing to the U.S. from London. A growing number of companies have shelved or shifted plans to list in London, due to investor pushback and Brexit-related challenges that have pressured UK market valuations. Instead, they have opted for the U.S. and other markets, where they see stronger appetite and higher valuations. Cobalt: The Glencore-backed metals investor scrapped its plans for a London IPO on Wednesday, which, according to one source, was driven by a lack of demand. The company, valued at around $230 million, would have seen London's largest market debut since Air Astana's listing in February 2024. Indivior: The drugmaker said on Monday it will cancel its secondary listing on the London Stock Exchange effective July 25, citing cost savings and a desire to align more closely with its U.S.-focused operations. The 1.25 billion pound ($1.70 billion) pharmaceutical firm will retain its primary listing on the Nasdaq. BHP: The world's largest miner by market value ($125.10 billion) made Australia its primary stock market when it ended its dual-listing structure in 2021. The company was the second largest by market value in London when it left the stock market. Unilever: The Ben & Jerry's maker in February picked Amsterdam as the primary listing for its ice cream business. The business, which generated a turnover of 8.3 billion euros ($9.47 billion) in 2024, will have secondary listings in London and New York. Glencore: The Swiss miner said in February it was considering moving its primary listing from London. The company, with a market value of 34.5 billion pounds, said New York was at the top of the list under consideration. Shein: The online fast fashion retailer is working towards a listing in Hong Kong after its proposed initial public offering (IPO) in London failed to secure the green light from Chinese regulators, three sources with knowledge of the matter told Reuters in May. However, before its attempt to list in London, Shein had pursued a listing in New York, as part of its efforts to gain legitimacy as a global, rather than a Chinese company, and access to a wide pool of large Western investors. Ashtead: The second-largest equipment rental company in the U.S. said in December it plans to shift its listing to New York. With a market value of 18.3 billion pounds, Ashtead has been listed in London since 1986, and transformed into a major U.S. player in the early 2000s. Just Eat Takeaway: The Amsterdam-listed food delivery company delisted from the London Stock Exchange in December, citing efforts to reduce administrative and regulatory costs. The company has a market value of 4.05 billion euros. Flutter Entertainment: The FanDuel-owner in 2024 moved its primary listing to the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), just a few months after it added a secondary listing in the US. CRH: The building materials solutions provider, which has $61.29 billion in market value, switched its primary listing to the NYSE in 2023, while maintaining a standard listing on the London Stock Exchange. Arm Holdings: The UK-based chip designer chose Nasdaq over London for its 2023 IPO — the largest of that year. The company, now valued at just over $138 billion, was previously listed in London for 18 years till 2016, when it was taken private by SoftBank in a $32 billion acquisition. ($1 = 0.8763 euros) ($1 = 0.7355 pounds) Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Forbes
14 minutes ago
- Forbes
Artificial Intelligence Collaboration and Indirect Regulatory Lag
WASHINGTON, DC - MAY 16: Samuel Altman, CEO of OpenAI, testifies before the Senate Judiciary ... More Subcommittee on Privacy, Technology, and the Law May 16, 2023 in Washington, DC. The committee held an oversight hearing to examine A.I., focusing on rules for artificial intelligence. (Photo by) Steve Jobs often downplayed his accomplishments by saying that 'creativity is just connecting things.' Regardless of whether this affects the way you understand his legacy, it is beyond the range of doubt that most innovation comes from interdisciplinary efforts. Everyone agrees that if AI is to exponentially increase collaboration across disciplines, the laws must not lag too far behind technology. The following explores how a less obvious interpretation of this phrase will help us do what Jobs explained was the logic behind his genius The Regulatory Lag What most people mean when they say that legislation and regulation have difficulty keeping pace with the rate of innovation because the innovation and its consequences are not well known until well after the product hits the market. While that is true, it only tells half of the story. Technological innovations also put more attenuated branches of the law under pressure to adjust. These are second-order, more indirect legal effects, where whole sets of laws—originally unrelated to the new technology—have to adapt to enable society to maximize the full potential of the innovation. One classic example comes from the time right after the Internet became mainstream. After digital communication and connectivity became widespread and expedited international communication and commercial relations, nations discovered that barriers to cross-border trade and investment were getting in the way. Barriers such as tariffs and outdated investment FDI partnership requirements—had to be lowered or eliminated if the Internet was to be an effective catalyst to global economic growth. Neoliberal Reforms When the internet emerged in the 1990s, much attention went to laws that directly regulated it—such as data privacy, digital speech, and cybersecurity. But some of the most important legal changes were not about the internet itself. They were about removing indirect legal barriers that stood in the way of its broader economic and social potential. Cross-border trade and investment rules, for instance, had to evolve. Tariffs on goods, restrictions on foreign ownership, and outdated service regulations had little to do with the internet as a technology, but everything to do with whether global e-commerce, remote work, and digital entrepreneurship could flourish. These indirect legal constraints were largely overlooked in early internet governance debates, yet their reform was essential to unleashing the internet's full power. Artificial Intelligence and Indirect Barriers A comparable story is starting to unfold with artificial intelligence. While much of the focus when talking about law and AI has been given to algorithmic accountability and data privacy, there is also an opportunity for a larger societal return from AI in its ability to reduce barriers between disciplines. AI is increasing the viability of interdisciplinary work because it can synthesize, translate, and apply knowledge across domains in ways that make cross-field collaboration more essential. Already we are seeing marriages of law and computer science, medicine and machine learning, environmental modeling, and language processing. AI is a general-purpose technology that rewards those who are capable of marrying insights across disciplines. In that sense, the AI era is also the era of interdisciplinary boundary-blurring opportunities triggered by AI are up against legal barriers to entry across disciplines and professions. In many professions, it requires learning a patchwork of licensure regimes and intractable definitions of domain knowledge to gain the right to practice or contribute constructively. While some of these regulations are generally intended to protect public interests, they can also hinder innovation and prevent new interdisciplinary practices from gaining traction. To achieve the full potential of AI-enabled collaboration, many of these legal barriers need to be eliminated—or at least reimagined. We are starting to see some positive movements. For example, a few states are starting to grant nurse practitioners and physician assistants greater autonomy in clinical decision-making, and that's a step toward cross-disciplinary collaboration of healthcare and AI diagnostics. For now, this is a move in the right direction. However, In some other fields, the professional rules of engagement support silos. This must change if we're going to be serious about enabling AI to help us crack complex, interdependent problems. Legislators and regulators cannot focus exclusively on the bark that protects the tree of change, they must also focus on the hidden network of roots that that quietly nourish and sustain it.
