logo
Earth is spinning faster. Why this could become a problem in the future

Earth is spinning faster. Why this could become a problem in the future

First Posta day ago
Today, July 22, the Earth will complete its daily rotation 1.34 milliseconds faster than the standard 24 hours, making it the second shortest day in history. Scientists note that shorter days are becoming the norm. But why is this planet spinning faster? What does it have to do with the Moon? read more
The Earth will spin faster today, making it the second-shortest day in history. Representational image/Pixabay
Do you feel as if you are running out of time during the day? Are you feeling like you can't fit all your tasks in a day? Well, it's not something you are imagining — today, July 22, will be recorded as the second-shortest day in history.
Scientists note that the Earth will complete its daily rotation 1.34 milliseconds faster than the standard 24 hours, making it the second shortest day in history. While this difference hardly makes a difference to our daily lives, it's a puzzling trend in Earth's rotational behaviour that has scientists intrigued.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Moreover, this isn't a one off. Scientists expect another shorter day on August 5 after witnessing a short one on July 9.
So, we put on our thinking caps and help in deciphering what's causing the days to become shorter and how it could affect our lives later?
Who keeps time and how?
Before we get into why days on Earth are getting shorter, let's understand how time is measured. A day is measured as per the time taken by the Earth to complete one full rotation on its axis — 24 hours or 86,400 seconds on average.
But the speed of Earth's rotation isn't fixed. During the Mesozoic, dinosaurs experienced 23 hours days, and as early as the Bronze Age, the average day was 0.47 seconds shorter. A 2023 study revealed that billions of years ago, a day was as long as 19 hours owing to the interplay of solar and lunar tidal forces
However, over time, the Moon's gravitational pull slowed Earth's spin, gradually lengthening days as the Moon drifts farther away. This process, called tidal friction, has been the main driver of Earth's slowing rotation for eons.
A day is measured as per the time taken by the Earth to complete one full rotation on its axis — 24 hours or 86,400 seconds on average. Representational image/Reuters
So, what's happening now? Why are days shorter?
Since atomic clocks began tracking Earth's rotation precisely in 1973, days were generally slightly longer than 24 hours.
However, recent times have shown a surprising twist. Since 2020, Earth has been spinning faster, repeatedly setting new records. The shortest day ever occurred on July 5, 2024, when Earth spun 1.66 milliseconds quicker than normal.
And again on July 22, when the Earth will complete its spin 1.34 milliseconds early. And current predictions place the shortest day, August 5, at roughly 1.51 milliseconds shorter than average.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
But what's causing this phenomena? Scientists note that there could be a number of factors that influence the Earth' s spinning rate. One of the primary reasons being the Moon. If it is remote from Earth's equator, the planet spins slightly quicker. A report in Space.com explains it accurately: if the Moon is far from the Earth's equator, it creates an off-centre gravitational pull that slightly changes Earth's axial wobble, leading to a small but measurable increase in rotational speed.
Melting ice and Earth's changing core are other reasons. Some experts note that the slowing of Earth's liquid core, could result in redistributing angular momentum in a way that makes the mantle and crust spin slightly faster.
Ocean level variations and volcanic eruptions also contribute. In fact, earthquakes can also affect the length of our days, say scientists.
The spin rate of Earth is affected by many factors, but the moon and the tides have traditionally played a major role. Representational image/Pixabay
How these shaved off milliseconds will affect our lives?
While we are unlikely to notice such a miniscule difference in time, it could lead to the possibility that scientists will have to add a negative leap second to the calendar by 2029.
Wait, what is a negative leap second?
Traditionally, when Earth's rotation slowed down over time, scientists added a 'leap second' to Coordinated Universal Time (UTC) to keep civil time aligned with Earth's actual spin. However, as the Earth spins faster, we could soon be ahead of atomic time, which would need us to remove a second. This is what is a negative leap second.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Duncan Agnew, a professor emeritus of geophysics at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography and a research geophysicist at the University of California, San Diego, told CNN, 'There's never been a negative leap second but the probability of having one between now and 2035 is about 40 per cent.'
Judah Levine, a physicist and a fellow of the National Institute of Standards and Technology in the time and frequency division, also concurred with this assessment. 'When the leap second system was defined in 1972, nobody ever really thought that the negative second would ever happen,' he was quoted telling CNN. 'It was just something that was put into the standard because you had to do it for completeness. Everybody assumed that only positive leap seconds would ever be needed, but now the shortening of the days makes (negative leap seconds) in danger of happening, so to speak.'
And this could be a huge issue, affecting everything from satellite systems and GPS accuracy to how we measure time itself. It could also have an impact on telecommunications, financial transactions, and electric grids.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
As Dr David Gozzard, an experimental physicist who specialises in technologies for precisely keeping and synchronising time at the University of Western Australia, told The Guardian, 'Computers, servers, GPS systems, banking and electricity networks, as well as large telescopes, all rely on incredibly accurate synchronisation, sometimes within a fraction of a billionth of a second, he says. 'We're transmitting data so quickly, and it all needs to be time tagged, so computers know what data goes where.'
Levine even goes as far as comparing it to the Y2K problem, which threatened to bring modern civilisation to a halt.
But for now, time continues to fly.
With inputs from agencies
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Not just humans, even ants follow caste. It defines their destiny
Not just humans, even ants follow caste. It defines their destiny

India Today

time2 hours ago

  • India Today

Not just humans, even ants follow caste. It defines their destiny

For ages, biologists have been fascinated by the world of ants, where destiny often depends on caste: queens grow large, sprout wings, and lay eggs, while their sisters remain small, wingless balance of genetics and environment in determining these roles has long been debated. Now, a study published in PNAS sheds new light on the intricate interplay between genes, body size, environment, and an ant's by Dr. Daniel Kronauer at The Rockefeller University, researchers set out to untangle whether environment or genetics is more important in shaping whether a developing ant becomes a queen or a worker. Using the clonal raider ant, Ooceraea biroi, which allows precise control of genetics and rearing conditions, the team found that size and caste are inextricably linked—but not by environment alone. The destiny is an interplay between genes, body size, environment. (Photo: Pixabay) Queens aren't just large workers; they possess wings, large ovaries, and special eyes, while workers lack these features. By manipulating food, temperature, and caregiver genotypes, the team found that these environmental factors influenced caste only by altering the ants' final body size, smaller ants remained workers, while those that grew big enough developed queen-like intriguing differences emerged when the team studied ants from different genetic lines under identical conditions. Some genetic lines produced ants that, even at small sizes, were more likely to develop queen-like traits."Genes don't just influence how big an ant grows," says Patrick Piekarski, co-author and postdoctoral researcher in Kronauer's lab, "they also set the body size threshold at which queen features appear."In other words, two ants of the same size but different genetics can have drastically different chances of becoming queens. Researchers set out to untangle whether environment or genetics is more important. (Photo: Getty) While environmental factors, like access to food, can increase or decrease overall size, only genetics determine how size translates to caste. The findings highlight that ant societies have evolved a robust, genetically controlled system for dividing roles, with genes both shaping growth and defining what that growth means to the the links between genes, size, and social roles isn't just about morphology, it's a window into the evolutionary logic behind insect societies and the roles individuals play within them.- EndsTrending Reel

Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Elon Musk's SpaceX
Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Elon Musk's SpaceX

The Hindu

time8 hours ago

  • The Hindu

Trump's Golden Dome looks for alternatives to Elon Musk's SpaceX

The U.S. Trump administration is expanding its search for partners to build the Golden Dome missile defense system, courting Project Kuiper and big defence contractors as tensions with Elon Musk threaten SpaceX's dominance in the program, according to three sources familiar with the matter. The shift marks a strategic pivot away from reliance on Musk's SpaceX, whose Starlink and Starshield satellite networks have become central to U.S. military communications. It comes amid a deteriorating relationship between Trump and Musk, which culminated in a public falling-out on June 5. Even before the spat, officials at the Pentagon and White House had begun exploring alternatives to SpaceX, wary of over-reliance on a single partner for huge portions of the ambitious, $175 billion space-based defense shield, two of the sources said. SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment. Responding to a post about the Reuters story on X, Musk wrote, "Federal acquisition regulations require using the best provider at the best price. Anything else would be breaking the law." Due to its size, track record of launching more than 9,000 of its own Starlink satellites, and experience in government procurement, SpaceX still has the inside track to assist with major portions of the Golden Dome, especially launch contracts, sources say. Project Kuiper, which has launched just 78 of a planned constellation of 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites, has been approached by the Pentagon to join the effort, signaling the administration's openness to integrating commercial tech firms into national defense infrastructure and going beyond traditional defense players. Jeff Bezos, Amazon's executive chairman, told Reuters in January that Kuiper would be "primarily commercial," but acknowledged "there will be defense uses for these [low-earth orbit] constellations, no doubt." A spokesperson for Project Kuiper declined to comment for this story. The Pentagon declined to comment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Golden Dome's ambitions mirror those of Israel's Iron Dome, a homeland missile defence shield, but a larger, more complex layered defence system requires a vast network of orbiting satellites covering more territory. In the search for more vendors for the satellite layers of Golden Dome, "Kuiper is a big one," a U.S. official said. While SpaceX remains a frontrunner due to its unmatched launch capabilities, its share of the programme could shrink, two of the people said. Officials have reached out to new entrants like rocket companies Stoke Space and Rocket Lab are gaining traction and will be able to bid on individual launches as the programme matures, according to the U.S. official. Later in the development of Golden Dome "each individual launch is going to get bid, and we have to actually give bids to other people," besides SpaceX, the official said. There is an urgent need for more satellite production. Last year Congress gave Space Force a $13 billion mandate, up from $900 million, to buy satellite-based communication services in what was widely seen as one of many efforts to stimulate private sector satellite production. Amazon's Project Kuiper, a $10 billion initiative led by former Starlink managers dismissed by Musk for slow progress, Reuters has reported, has lagged behind SpaceX in deployment. But its potential defence applications, such as communications that could aid missile tracking, have drawn renewed interest as the administration prepares to allocate the first $25 billion tranche of funding authorised under Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill. Traditional defence giants Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and L3Harris are also in talks to support Golden Dome. L3Harris CFO Kenneth Bedingfield told Reuters in an interview the company has seen a surge in interest in its missile warning and tracking technologies, which are expected to play a key role in the system. Northrop, meanwhile, is pursuing several efforts including a space-based interceptor, a component that would enable missile strikes from orbit, Robert Fleming, the head of the company's space business, told Reuters in an interview. "Lockheed Martin is ready to support Golden Dome for America as a proven mission partner," Robert Lightfoot, president of Lockheed Martin Space, said in a statement. Golden Dome's initial outreach this spring invited smaller, newer Silicon Valley firms seen as nimbler, more sophisticated and potentially less expensive alternatives to the big defence firms to the table, but that was before the Musk-Trump feud upended that calculus. Several with close ties to Trump aside from SpaceX, including Palantir and Anduril, were considered early frontrunners to win big pieces of the $175 billion project. But the Musk-Trump feud has reshaped the competitive landscape. Musk recently launched the "America Party," a tech-centric, centrist political movement aimed at defeating Republicans who backed Trump's tax-and-spend agenda. Trump launched the Golden Dome initiative just a week into his second term, pushing for rapid deployment. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, confirmed by the Senate on July 17, is set to lead the programme with sweeping authority. Under a previously unreported directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Guetlein has 30 days from confirmation to build a team, 60 days to deliver an initial system design, and 120 days to present a full implementation plan, including satellite and ground station details, two people briefed on the memo said. Hours after Reuters published its story Tuesday morning, the Pentagon issued a press release acknowledging that an architecture for Golden Dome will be "developed within the next 60 days." The inclusion of commercial platforms like Kuiper raises security concerns. Its satellites would need to be hardened against cyberattacks and electronic warfare, a challenge that has plagued even SpaceX's Starlink network. In May 2024, Elon Musk said SpaceX was spending "significant resources combating Russian jamming efforts. This is a tough problem." Beyond the technical and political challenges, Golden Dome could reshape global security dynamics. A fully operational space-based missile shield may prompt adversaries to develop new offensive capabilities or accelerate the militarisation of space. Still, established defense players like Lockheed and RTX, formerly Raytheon, will likely be at the front of the line for contracts. Executives at RTX, maker of the Patriot missile defense system, said on Tuesday they believe the system is going to be integral to Golden Dome "especially if you want to make a significant impact over the next 2 to 3 years."

Trump's Golden Dome Defense System Looks For Alternative To Musk's SpaceX
Trump's Golden Dome Defense System Looks For Alternative To Musk's SpaceX

NDTV

time16 hours ago

  • NDTV

Trump's Golden Dome Defense System Looks For Alternative To Musk's SpaceX

Washington: The Trump administration is expanding its search for partners to build the Golden Dome missile defense system, courting Project Kuiper and big defense contractors as tensions with Elon Musk threaten SpaceX's dominance in the program, according to three sources familiar with the matter. The shift marks a strategic pivot away from reliance on Musk's SpaceX, whose Starlink and Starshield satellite networks have become central to US military communications. It comes amid a deteriorating relationship between Trump and Musk, which culminated in a public falling-out on June 5. Even before the spat, officials at the Pentagon and White House had begun exploring alternatives to SpaceX, wary of over-reliance on a single partner for huge portions of the ambitious, $175 billion space-based defense shield, two of the sources said. Musk and SpaceX did not respond to requests for comment. After Reuters reported initially that SpaceX was a frontrunner to build parts of Golden Dome, Musk said on X that the company had "not tried to bid for any contract in this regard. Our strong preference would be to stay focused on taking humanity to Mars." Due to its size, track record of launching more than 9,000 of its own Starlink satellites, and experience in government procurement, SpaceX still has the inside track to assist with major portions of the Golden Dome, especially launch contracts, sources say. Project Kuiper, which has launched just 78 of a planned constellation of 3,000 low-earth orbit satellites, has been approached by the Pentagon to join the effort, signaling the administration's openness to integrating commercial tech firms into national defense infrastructure and going beyond traditional defense players. Jeff Bezos, Amazon's executive chairman, told Reuters in January that Kuiper would be "primarily commercial," but acknowledged "there will be defense uses for these [low-earth orbit] constellations, no doubt." A spokesperson for Project Kuiper declined to comment for this story. The Pentagon declined to comment. The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Golden Dome's ambitions mirror those of Israel's Iron Dome - a homeland missile defense shield - but a larger, more complex layered defense system requires a vast network of orbiting satellites covering more territory. In the search for more vendors for the satellite layers of Golden Dome, "Kuiper is a big one," a US official said. While SpaceX remains a frontrunner due to its unmatched launch capabilities, its share of the program could shrink, two of the people said. Officials have reached out to new entrants like rocket companies Stoke Space and Rocket Lab are gaining traction and will be able to bid on individual launches as the program matures, according to the US official. Later in the development of Golden Dome "each individual launch is going to get bid, and we have to actually give bids to other people," besides SpaceX, the official said. Need For Satellites There is an urgent need for more satellite production. Last year Congress gave Space Force a $13 billion mandate - up from $900 million - to buy satellite-based communication services in what was widely seen as one of many efforts to stimulate private sector satellite production. Amazon's Project Kuiper, a $10 billion initiative led by former Starlink managers dismissed by Musk for slow progress, Reuters has reported, has lagged behind SpaceX in deployment. But its potential defense applications - such as communications that could aid missile tracking - have drawn renewed interest as the administration prepares to allocate the first $25 billion tranche of funding authorized under Trump's sweeping tax and spending bill. Traditional defense giants Northrop Grumman, Lockheed Martin, and L3Harris are also in talks to support Golden Dome. L3Harris CFO Kenneth Bedingfield told Reuters in an interview the company has seen a surge in interest in its missile warning and tracking technologies, which are expected to play a key role in the system. Northrop, meanwhile, is pursuing several efforts including a space-based interceptor, a component that would enable missile strikes from orbit, Robert Flemming, the head of the company's space business, told Reuters in an interview. "Lockheed Martin is ready to support Golden Dome for America as a proven mission partner," Robert Lightfoot, president of Lockheed Martin Space, said in a statement. Golden Dome's initial outreach this spring invited smaller, newer Silicon Valley firms seen as nimbler, more sophisticated and potentially less expensive alternatives to the big defense firms to the table - but that was before the Musk-Trump feud upended that calculus. Several with close ties to Trump aside from SpaceX, including Palantir and Anduril - were considered early frontrunners to win big pieces of the $175 billion project. But the Musk-Trump feud has reshaped the competitive landscape. Musk recently launched the "America Party," a tech-centric, centrist political movement aimed at defeating Republicans who backed Trump's tax-and-spend agenda. Rapid Timeframe Trump launched the Golden Dome initiative just a week into his second term, pushing for rapid deployment. Space Force General Michael Guetlein, confirmed by the Senate on July 17, is set to lead the program with sweeping authority. Under a previously unreported directive from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, Guetlein has 30 days from confirmation to build a team, 60 days to deliver an initial system design, and 120 days to present a full implementation plan, including satellite and ground station details, two people briefed on the memo said. The inclusion of commercial platforms like Kuiper raises security concerns. Its satellites would need to be hardened against cyberattacks and electronic warfare, a challenge that has plagued even SpaceX's Starlink network. In May 2024, Elon Musk said SpaceX was spending "significant resources combating Russian jamming efforts. This is a tough problem." Beyond the technical and political challenges, Golden Dome could reshape global security dynamics. A fully operational space-based missile shield may prompt adversaries to develop new offensive capabilities or accelerate the militarization of space.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store