'I'm alarmed': With recession fears rising, jobless benefits still fall short: Report
'I'm alarmed': With recession fears rising, jobless benefits still fall short: Report
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Can you get unemployment if you quit? What to know about benefits.
Being out of work doesn't mean you automatically qualify for unemployment benefits. Here's what to know before applying.
During the COVID-19 recession, 22 million laid-off workers sought unemployment benefits, sparking chaos in the payment system and compounding the financial woes of jobless Americans.
Five years later, with many forecasters predicting another downturn is likely in 2025, a far less burdened benefits system remains plagued by myriad problems that could hamper payments to Americans who lose their jobs in an economic slump, according to a new report.
Nearly 1 in 5 unemployment insurance recipients say their benefits were inadequate, with a third complaining they've struggled with food insecurity despite the payments, according to a survey and study by the National Employment Law Project.
Large shares of beneficiaries also lament delayed payments, jammed phone lines, hard-to-navigate websites and incorrectly denied benefits, among other issues, according to the survey, which was conducted in partnership with online polling firm YouGov in September.
The firms surveyed 1,480 workers who were unemployed at some point from 2019 to 2024 and the results were provided exclusively to USA TODAY.
'I'm alarmed,' said Amy Traub, senior researcher and policy analyst for NELP and a co-author of the study. 'The unemployment insurance system is really falling far short in its function of supporting unemployed workers.'
The gaps exist even though Congress provided $1 billion in the American Rescue Plan of 2021 to shore up jobless benefits. Traub said the money did foster more timely payments and website improvements but there are still shortcomings in those and other areas.
States finance unemployment payments themselves while the federal government bankrolls the system's technology and infrastructure. Both are funded by payroll taxes that are generally paid by employers.
Why do we have unemployment insurance?
Besides helping workers make ends meet when they lose their jobs, jobless benefits bolster consumer demand, helping avoid – or dig the economy out of – a recession, the NELP report says. And the payments ensure that workers have enough time to find a job that best suits their skills, improving the efficiency of the labor market and economy.
Economists surveyed say there's a nearly 50% chance of a recession because of President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs on imported goods, according to a survey by Wolters Kluwer Blue Chip Economic Indicators. JPMorgan Chase has put the odds at 60%.
Among the lingering trouble spots with the system:
Benefits fall short
Nineteen percent of the unemployment recipients polled said the money they received wasn't enough to meet their financial needs, the survey showed.
To be sure, the checks go a long way toward helping laid-off workers stay afloat. Of unemployment applicants who didn't receive benefits, 51% experienced hunger, 40% struggled to pay their rent or mortgage and 37% had a hard time paying medical bills, according to the survey. By contrast, among those obtaining payments, 33% went hungry at times, 29% had issues with housing payments and 30% couldn't pay medical costs.
Yet it's troubling that about a third of beneficiaries still had difficulty covering basic expenses, Traub said.
'During the next recession, if we have large numbers of workers who lose their jobs, we want to be sure they're not going hungry or losing their homes,' she said.
A big reason many recipients can't cover such necessities is the wide disparities among states in their benefit disbursements, Traub said.
In early 2024, for example, Alabama workers received an average benefit of $252 a week, replacing 29% of their prior wage on average, while workers in Washington state got an average $721 a week, or 49% of their previous pay.
On average across the U.S., unemployment covered 36% of a worker's previous pay.
Also, most states provide up to 26 weeks of benefits – a standard that's typically expanded in a recession – but 13 states dole out checks for 12 to 21 weeks, including Arkansas, Iowa, Michigan, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Alabama, Kansas and Florida, according to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Jammed phone lines, uncooperative websites, late payments
During the COVID-19 pandemic, an unprecedented surge of applicants struggled to obtain payments. Surprisingly, freshly laid-off workers nowadays, numbering about 200,000 each week, still face obstacles.
From 2022 to 2024, about 22% of applicants said they couldn't reach their state unemployment office by phone, the same share as during the pandemic (2020-2021); 20% complained of hard-to-navigate websites vs. 23% during the health crisis; and 17% pointed to delays receiving payments, compared to 21% during the crisis.
Many states beefed up staffing during the COVID-19 pandemic, shifting workers from other parts of state unemployment agencies to customer service, but moved them back to their old positions as the spike in applications ebbed, Traub said. In many cases, that left a reduced but still sizable share of workers struggling to access benefits.
Employers discourage workers from applying
Nearly 1 in 5 workers said an employer tried to deter them from applying for benefits, with 14% saying such steps included telling them they weren't eligible and 5% threatening retaliation if they applied.
Employers may have the incentive to dissuade staffers from filing for unemployment because the taxes they pay to support the benefits system are based on the number of their workers who successfully file claims.
'It's not really up to the employer who's eligible and who's not,' Traub said.
Incorrectly denied benefits
About 17% of applicants polled said they were improperly denied benefits since the pandemic. The question of whether applicants are entitled to payments can get thorny, hinging on whether they were laid off or fired for cause, and whether they met thresholds for the number of hours they worked and the wages they earned in previous months, Traub said
Discrimination
About 7% of applicants said they faced discrimination because of race or other reasons when they sought benefits, the survey showed.
In a related issue, a growing number of states are using new ID verification systems to detect fraud, according to the report, which was coauthored by researchers Alexander Hertel-Fernandez and Sanjay Pinto. Twelve percent of Black workers report trouble verifying their identity, more than twice the share of white employees, according to NELP's survey.
The NELP report pointed to facial recognition technology that's less accurate for people with darker skin and questions that rely on data from credit bureaus. Black workers are less likely to have substantial credit histories on file, the report said.
Workers in Southern states face more hurdles
Broadly, workers in Southern states are far more likely than those in other regions to complain of discrimination, delayed payments, low payment levels and inadequate duration of payments, the report said. It cited racism and a 'lack of adequate support for social infrastructure' that may more prevalent in the South.
Among NELP's recommendations to bolster the system:
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hamilton Spectator
28 minutes ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Scotiabank ramps up return-to-office mandate to four days a week
Scotiabank is changing its return-to-office policy to require some employees to work in-person four days a week. In an internal memo shared last week, Scotiabank told staff the new mandate will apply starting in September. Teams that have limited office space will be expected to be present three or more days, with the goal of eventually having all employees based at the head office on Bay and King streets in four or more days each week, according to the memo seen by Bloomberg. And some employees won't be affected by the changes at all due to the nature of their work, with those on the global client-experience centre and Canadian banking collections teams seeing no change in their work arrangements. 'We know having our teams working together in-person has many benefits — greater collaboration, higher engagement, more career development opportunities, and a stronger culture and sense of belonging — and we are already seeing the positive impact this is having across the bank as we focus on executing on our strategy,' Scotiabank spokesperson Katie Raskina wrote in an emailed statement to the Star. 'We will continue to build on this impact as we bring our teams on-site more often, with the goal of reaching four days on-site across the bank over time.' One of the Big Six banks said it would tighten lending criteria for self-employed borrowers in Canada's Big Six banks, which have the largest presence in Toronto's financial district among other industries, have been leading the pack in the return-to-office movement . Since the COVID-19 pandemic, they started having workers back in the office as early as February 2022 — ahead of most companies. In May, it was reported that RBC has also asked its staff to work from the office four days a week, beginning in the fall. 'RBC is a relationship-driven bank, and in-person, human connection is core to our winning culture,' spokesperson Jeff Lanthier said in statement Monday. 'We have important commitments to our clients and bold goals for the future. We are confident that prioritizing working together in-person is a vital component in setting us up for continued, long-term success. Starting in September, we expect our employees around the world to be in the office, with flexibility to work remotely one day per week.' The Star contacted TD, CIBC, BMO and National Bank for their most recent return-to-office policies. National Bank spokesperson Alexandre Guay said each team has a different mandate depending on their needs — some employees work entirely in-person, while others follow a hybrid model. A CIBC spokesperson provided a similar statement. TD and BMO did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Last summer, the Star reported that Toronto Mayor Olivia Chow had met with several bank CEOs to discuss ways to get Torontonians back in the office at least four days a week, if not five, 'to make sure our financial district is vibrant.' She also said the banks had been calling on City Hall to 'set a good example and get all your workers back in.' With files from Bloomberg.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Most Americans Can't Cover A $2,000 Emergency As Inflation Keeps Eating Their Paychecks, Survey Shows
More than half of U.S. adults could not pay a $2,000 emergency bill from savings, the Federal Reserve's latest survey data shows, shining a light on the fragility of family finances despite a strong labor market. What Happened: According to the survey of Household Economics and Decision-Making, only 48% said they would cover the expense with cash on hand. The rest would borrow, cut spending, or simply default. Inflation tops the list of worries for the third straight year. 37% of respondents called rising prices their main financial challenge, up from 35% last year and four times the 2016 level. Separate Bankrate polling finds just 44% of households have enough savings to handle a $1,000 shock, a share that's barely changed since 2022. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — this is your last chance to become an investor for $0.80 per share. Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal: Invest in Cytonics and help disrupt a $390B Big Pharma stronghold. Savings gaps stretch wide. 18% of adults keep less than $100 set aside, 13% hold between $100 and $499, and another 10% sit in the $500-to-$999 range. Fed researchers say those figures mirror the 62% who still live paycheck to paycheck, a proportion LendingClub confirms in data from late 2023. Why It Matters: Economists warn that the thin cushions leave households vulnerable to even modest setbacks. Personal-finance nonprofit NEFE notes growing support for mandatory high-school money courses after studies link class-takers to higher emergency funds and lower late fees. Twenty-three states now require the instruction, up from 17 before the pandemic. Policymakers see mixed signals. The Fed report shows 55% of adults have rainy-day savings equal to three months of expenses, yet that share trails the 59% peak hit in 2021. With prices still climbing at 3% annually, CFPB data show late-payment rates on credit cards and auto loans are at their highest in years. New York Times best-selling author Ramit Sethi, who also hosts Netflix's new show 'How to Get Rich,' urges families to automate transfers into high-yield accounts and aim for at least one month of expenses before tackling larger goals. Read Next: How do billionaires pay less in income tax than you? Tax deferring is their number one strategy. Bezos' Favorite Real Estate Platform Launches A Way To Ride The Ongoing Private Credit Boom Image via Shutterstock Up Next: Transform your trading with Benzinga Edge's one-of-a-kind market trade ideas and tools. Click now to access unique insights that can set you ahead in today's competitive market. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? This article Most Americans Can't Cover A $2,000 Emergency As Inflation Keeps Eating Their Paychecks, Survey Shows originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Americans just wiped out $48B in credit card debt: Here's how
HONOLULU (KHON2) — In early 2025, Americans made significant progress in reducing their credit card debt. According to a new report, during the first quarter of 2025, consumers in the United States paid off approximately $48 billion in credit card debt. This brought the total national credit card debt down to about $1.29 trillion, which is $206 billion below the all-time high recorded in 2007. The average credit card debt per household stood at $10,767 at the end of Q1 2025. This figure is $2,156 less than the record set in 2007, indicating that households are managing their credit card balances more effectively. Several factors contributed to this decrease:Higher interest rates: Credit card interest rates exceeded 20% annually, making borrowing more expensive. This likely encouraged consumers to pay down their balances to avoid high finance charges. Increased consumer awareness: There has been a growing awareness about the importance of managing personal finances, leading more people to budget carefully and reduce unnecessary spending. Economic factors: Changes in the economy, such as inflation and shifts in employment, may have prompted consumers to be more cautious with their credit card usage. It's important to note that while the overall debt decreased, the charge-off rate — which represents debts that credit card companies consider unlikely to be repaid — increased by 4.24% during Q1 2025 and reached 4.67%. You can click here to read the full report. The early part of 2025 saw Americans taking meaningful steps to reduce their credit card debt, and this was influenced by higher interest rates and a heightened focus on financial health. Get news on the go with KHON 2GO, KHON's morning podcast, every morning at 8 However, the rise in charge-off rates suggests that some consumers still face challenges in managing their debt. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.