logo
This Mercedes Red Pig Isn't What It Seems

This Mercedes Red Pig Isn't What It Seems

Yahoo28-02-2025

Read the full story on Backfire News
The Mercedes 'Red Pig' is famous among fans of AMG, the high-performance division in the automaker. After all, it's the car that started it all. From time to time, someone creates a tribute to the heavily modified Mercedes-Benz 300 SEL, but this one isn't what it seems.While the exterior is faithful enough to the original, grafted to the 300 SEL body is a 2017 Mercedes-MG C63 S chassis. If that sounds insane, it is, so it seems fitting the build comes from none other than S-Klub, a shop in Los Angeles that's famous for over-the-top creations like this.
We profiled another build of theirs before, a widebody Mercedes-Benz 300SL Gullwing that also uses modern AMG power.
The story behind this build apparently involves a friend of the shop buying a partially done, partially botched Red Pig tribute car, asking the S-Klub to do it properly. They did with their typical flair, as you can clearly see.
What's truly amazing is the shop finished the project in just 40 days. That's beyond impressive, crossing over into the insane. Considering S-Klub doesn't just slop through things, and the details of this car look amazing, that wasn't accomplished by cutting corners.
You'll note bits of modernity are present on the exterior, like the blacked-out trim, carbon fiber pieces with exposed weave, and of course modern LED headlights with red halos. That's the first sign this isn't just a straight tribute car.
Rather than just leave the C63 S powertrain alone, they upgraded the turbos, downpipe, and did some other tweaks. Horsepower has been pushed from the factory rating of 503 to 1,000. The guy from S-Klub says it's a legitimate racecar.
There are a lot of cool details on this build, especially if you pull up a photo of the original Red Pig and reference that as you watch. For fans of Mercedes and especially AMG it's a real treat.
Images via Autotopia LA/YouTube

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mercedes-AMG 推出 GLS 63 MANUFAKTUR Arctic Silver 版
Mercedes-AMG 推出 GLS 63 MANUFAKTUR Arctic Silver 版

Hypebeast

time15 hours ago

  • Hypebeast

Mercedes-AMG 推出 GLS 63 MANUFAKTUR Arctic Silver 版

Mercedes-AMG再次展現其極致性能與奢華設計,推出旗艦性能 SUV——2026 GLS 63 MANUFAKTUR Arctic Silver 特別版,全球限量僅 450 輛,預計於 2025 年底進駐美國指定經銷商。這款特別版不僅延續 AMG 一貫的大膽設計與強勁性能,更在細節上融入專屬個性化元素,將獨特性推向新高峰。 GLS 63 Arctic Silver 特別版採用 MANUFAKTUR Cirrus Silver Magno 霧面銀色車漆,與黑紅配色細節形成強烈對比。車身外觀搭配霧面黑色 23 吋 AMG 鍛造輪圈,並以紅色輪圈飾條和紅色 AMG 煞車卡鉗注入運動感。全車的 AMG 夜色套件更進一步強化外觀霸氣,包括高亮黑色的前分流器、後視鏡外殼、車窗飾條與後保桿。霧面黑色車頂行李架與深色鍍鉻尾管,則為整體設計增添一份冷峻與力量感。 內裝部分,GLS 63 Arctic Silver 版以胭脂紅與黑色 Nappa 皮革座艙為主調,座椅采用鑽石車縫紋設計,豪華質感一覽無遺。紅色點綴的 AMG 碳纖維飾板貫穿內裝,為車廂增添性能元素。細節方面,儀表板上專屬的 MANUFAKTUR Arctic Silver 銘牌,門檻板帶有發光 AMG 字樣,地墊更繡有專屬標誌,彰顯限量版的獨特身份。 >McLaren 發表全球限量 50 輛 750S Le Mans 特別版車型 >Bentley 迄今最強悍 Bentayga Speed 車型正式登場 >近賞 J Balvin 以《阿基拉 AKIRA》為靈感打造全新電能定製機車

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster
Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Column: Full-size electric pickups are failed product planning experiment and industry disaster

There is a statistic in my colleague Laurence Iliff's story on the failure of full-size electric pickups that, pardon the pun, shocked me. The combustion and hybrid Toyota Tundra had more new-vehicle registrations during the first quarter than the entire industry's collection of full-size electric pickups — by a lot. That statistic is in no way a brag on the Tundra, which remains a distant No. 5 in what is now a five-horse segment since the death of the even slower-selling Nissan Titan. According to S&P Global Mobility, the Tundra recorded a meager 36,895 new registrations in the U.S. in the first quarter, while the Ford F-150 Lightning, Tesla Cybertruck, Chevrolet Silverado EV, GMC Hummer, Rivian R1T and GMC Sierra EV collectively posted about 22,000 registrations. By comparison, combustion-powered pickups from Ford, Chevrolet, GMC and Ram reached 478,823 registrations in the first quarter, S&P said. Were it not for investments and expectations that rival the size of the immense front fascias on virtually all of the aforementioned full-size behemoths, this failed experiment would already be over. The score: Newtonian Physics ∞, Hype & Hope 0. Sign up for Automotive Views, Automotive News' weekly showcase of opinions, insights, ideas and thought leadership. I can't begin to fathom how many tens of billions of dollars were spent by automakers and their suppliers developing and building those full-size electric pickups over the last decade. You can, however, get some sense of how bad the miss was when you look at the sales/production volumes auto executives anticipated, including Elon Musk's quarter- to half-million annual sales estimate for the Cybertruck, or Ford's initial F-150 Lightning estimate of up to 150,000 sales annually. So why did full-size electric pickups fail so badly? I would argue that it wasn't just physics — though the need for a bigger, more expensive battery to push these bigger vehicles farther as long as they are not towing anything shouldn't be minimized. But I think a share of the responsibility for this collective flop also lies with the companies' product planning departments. While all vehicles are compromised in some form or fashion by the time they reach consumers, full-size electric pickups lack a fundamental quality that has made their combustion-powered counterparts the U.S. sales champs for decades: Uncompromised utility. The legacy pickups are renowned for accomplishing whatever task their owners set them to. That unstoppable capability is what gave rise to the 'lifestyle' pickup in the first place, as consumers desired at least a taste of that confidence, even if they rarely, if ever, actually needed that power. Product planners and their auto executive bosses failed to account in their sales projections for just how much compromise an electric-pickup owner would face in everyday life. Sure, the trucks have some excellent features, including loads and loads of torque, but so do their combustion counterparts. And while it may cost extra fuel to tow a trailer with those combustion-powered vehicles, a heavy trailer sucks up a battery pack's juice quickly — and recharging is not nearly as quick and convenient as a gas station fill-up. It's the same reason that battery-electric semis are probably doomed to failure: It's just the wrong technology for that use case. Sorry. In a world ruled by logic and not emotion, society would consign new technologies to the areas where they have the greatest advantage. Battery-electric powertrains make the greatest sense in vehicles with limited mass and with limited demands, while hydrogen (and diesel) is more efficient in larger, demand-dependent vehicles where towing capability is paramount. We don't live in that world, unfortunately, which is why full-size electric pickups are failing. Have an opinion about this story? Tell us about it and we may publish it in print. Click here to submit a letter to the editor. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Carvana (CVNA): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?
Carvana (CVNA): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?

Yahoo

time18 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Carvana (CVNA): Buy, Sell, or Hold Post Q1 Earnings?

Since June 2020, the S&P 500 has delivered a total return of 83.5%. But one standout stock has more than doubled the market - over the past five years, Carvana has surged 201% to $342.50 per share. Its momentum hasn't stopped as it's also gained 36.3% in the last six months thanks to its solid quarterly results, beating the S&P by 38.8%. Is now still a good time to buy CVNA? Or is this a case of a company fueled by heightened investor enthusiasm? Find out in our full research report, it's free. Known for its glass tower car vending machines, Carvana (NYSE:CVNA) provides a convenient automotive shopping experience by offering an online platform for buying and selling used cars. As an online retailer, Carvana generates revenue growth by expanding its number of users and the average order size in dollars. Over the last two years, Carvana's retail units sold, a key performance metric for the company, increased by 13.8% annually to 133,898 in the latest quarter. This growth rate is among the fastest of any consumer internet business and indicates its offerings have significant traction. Free cash flow isn't a prominently featured metric in company financials and earnings releases, but we think it's telling because it accounts for all operating and capital expenses, making it tough to manipulate. Cash is king. As you can see below, Carvana's margin expanded by 30.2 percentage points over the last few years. This is encouraging, and we can see it became a less capital-intensive business because its free cash flow profitability rose more than its operating profitability. Carvana's free cash flow margin for the trailing 12 months was 6.4%. Average revenue per unit (ARPU) is a critical metric to track because it measures how much customers spend per order. Carvana's ARPU has been roughly flat over the last two years. This isn't great, but the increase in retail units sold is more relevant for assessing long-term business potential. We'll monitor the situation closely; if Carvana tries boosting ARPU by taking a more aggressive approach to monetization, it's unclear whether units can continue growing at the current pace. Carvana's positive characteristics outweigh the negatives, and with its shares beating the market recently, the stock trades at 24× forward EV/EBITDA (or $342.50 per share). Is now a good time to initiate a position? See for yourself in our full research report, it's free. Donald Trump's victory in the 2024 U.S. Presidential Election sent major indices to all-time highs, but stocks have retraced as investors debate the health of the economy and the potential impact of tariffs. While this leaves much uncertainty around 2025, a few companies are poised for long-term gains regardless of the political or macroeconomic climate, like our Top 6 Stocks for this week. This is a curated list of our High Quality stocks that have generated a market-beating return of 183% over the last five years (as of March 31st 2025). Stocks that made our list in 2020 include now familiar names such as Nvidia (+1,545% between March 2020 and March 2025) as well as under-the-radar businesses like the once-small-cap company Exlservice (+354% five-year return). Find your next big winner with StockStory today.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store