JSW Energy enters race for Raigarh Champa Rail Infra as NCLAT allows fresh bidding
The development has come as a relief to JSW Energy which had sought permission to participate in the insolvency resolution process of Raigarh Champa Rail Infrastructure Pvt Ltd (RCRIPL), an ancillary company of KSK Mahanadi.
JSW Energy has already acquired KSK Mahanadi Power, a 3,600 MW thermal power plant in Chhattisgarh, for ₹16,084 crore through the insolvency process, earlier in March this year.
The Chennai-bench of the NCLAT said it sees no demerits in the decision of the lenders' body CoC to invite fresh Expression of Interest (EoI) by re-issuing fresh Form G, inviting new prospective buyers as it "will certainly increase competition and in all likelihood, result in higher bids."
".... since, the EoI is proposed to be reopened for everybody and not for JSW alone, it is fair and transparent and not discriminatory and that since, existing PRAs (Prospective Resolution Applicants) are proposed to be retained with option given to them to participate in challenge mechanism, it is also fair to the existing Resolution Applicants," it said.
Moreover, the tribunal over the bid submitted by Medha group, which was the highest and also approved earlier by RCRIPL lenders with 100 per cent votes earlier, said it is "proposed to be the Reserve Price, there cannot be any value erosion of the Corporate Debtor, if EoI process is reopened."
Five companies, including Adani Power, Jindal Power, Medha Servo Drives, Sherisha Technologies and Vedanta, were in the race to acquire the special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) promoted by KSK group.
Earlier, on April 3, 2025, the Hyderabad bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) denied permission to the RP and the lenders' body Committee of Creditors (CoC) for issuance of a fresh Form G and invitation of EoI from new eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants, including JSW Energy.
Instead, in fresh bidding, NCLT directed to conduct the challenge mechanism amongst the bidders as earlier decided by the CoC.
However, NCLAT said it sees no demerits in the proposal of the RP and decision of the CoC, as going by previous decisions, the lenders' body has the power to call for fresh Form G and permit other PRAs to participate even after submission of EoI.
"The Impugned Order of April 3, 2025, is hereby quashed and as a consequence. The relief as sought for, by the Resolution Professional, to be permitted to issue fresh Form G and to invite Expression of Interest (EoI) from new and interested eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants is granted," said the NCLAT order passed on June 19, 2025 by a two member comprising Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma and Jatindranath Swain.
Form G under IBC is an Invitation for Expression of Interest (EoI) and is published by the Resolution Professional (RP) to invite potential resolution applicants to submit their proposals for taking over a company undergoing CIRP.
JSW Energy has already acquired KSK Mahanadi Power, a 3,600 MW thermal power plant in Chhattisgarh, for ₹16,084 crore through the insolvency process, earlier in March this year.
RCRIPL is an SPV promoted by the KSK group to construct, lay a railway line and associated infrastructure from coal fields in Mand Raigarh to the power stations in Janjgir Champa.
It passes through the Indian Railways Network for transporting coal, associated fuels and such other raw materials, as well as fly ash and other.
CIRP was started against RCRIPL on January 1, 2021, and the first final Form G was issued on 24.08.2021. However, the EoI submission process remained pending till May 2024, because NCLT directed the RP of KMPCL (KSK Mahanadi Power Company Ltd) not to receive any resolution pending adjudication of various proceedings seeking consolidation of the CIRP of KMPCL and KWIPL (KSK Water Infrastructures).
Later on July 4, 2024, CoC approved the resolution plan submitted by Medha with 100% voting share and moved a plea before NCLT.
However, before the Hyderabad bench of NCLT could approve Medha's bid, the RP of RCRIPL filed another plea seeking permission for undertaking a challenge mechanism among the resolution applicants/bidders in accordance with the CIRP Regulations.
This application for withdrawal of Plan Approval by lenders was approved by a majority voting share of 78.59% of CoC, and NCLT allowed it.
However, instead of proceeding with the challenge mechanism, the RP then filed another plea, wherein permission for reopening of the bidding process for RCRI was sought, for the purpose of inviting an EoI from JSW Energy, enabling them to participate in the CIRP.
This new request of the RP to allow to opening bidding process and add JSW Energy was denied by NCLT, saying it was 'contrary to the principles of fairness and the timelines of the CIRP process'.
Later, JSW Energy also approached NCLT by filing applications seeking permission to participate in the CIRP of Raigarh Champa Rail Infrastructure by requesting issuance of a fresh Form G, which was again dismissed.
Finally, a third application was moved by RP to facilitate the entry of JSW as a Resolution Applicant in the CIRP of RCRI.
It sought permission of the tribunal for issuance of a fresh Form G and invitation of EoI 'from new, interested, and eligible Prospective Resolution Applicants' for submission of Resolution Plans.
This was again rejected by a two-member bench of NCLT comprising Members Sanjay Puri and Rajeev Bhardwaj on April 3, 2025.
This was challenged before the appellate tribunal NCLAT, which on June 16 quashed the NCLT order.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
Govt plans changes to bankruptcy code to resolve clashes with money-laundering law
The Indian government is preparing amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) to streamline its interplay with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) after asset attachments by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) highlighted conflicts between the statutes, two people informed about discussions in the government said. Close to a dozen court orders with conflicting interpretations of the immunity from prosecution and asset protection granted under IBC to an unrelated new management of the bankrupt company necessitated these legislative amendments, they added. The idea is to ensure that the two laws work cohesively, they said, adding discussions are underway at the highest levels of government about the legislative changes needed for this. 'Officials of the ministry of corporate affairs, the revenue department and the regulators have already held discussions on the matter. The government is attempting to bring a bill in the current session of Parliament, but if the necessary approvals take longer, it may be introduced in the winter session," said one of the two people cited above, adding that the specifics of the legislative changes would be finalised soon. Clarity needed A dozen or so court orders since 2018, including the 2 May Supreme Court order in the case of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd, have raised questions about the interplay of the two laws and an urgent need for more clarity, said the other person cited above. On 2 May the Supreme Court said the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT's) stay on the ED's ₹4,025-crore asset attachment was invalid as NCLT and NCLAT could not review public law actions. That order also annulled JSW Steel's ₹19,300-crore debt resolution plan for Bhushan Power and Steel. The court, however, left open the interpretation of the IBC provision that protects assets from attachment by law enforcement agencies such as ED for pre-debt resolution offences, subject to riders. But on 31 July the Supreme Court recalled its judgement, terming it a case fit for review. Another ongoing case in the Supreme Court—committee of creditors vs Directorate of Enforcement—is considering questions on the primacy of IBC Section 32A over PMLA and NCLT's jurisdiction, said the first person quoted above. Section 32A of the IBC offers immunity from prosecution to the new, unrelated management of a bankrupt company and protects its assets from being attached for violations under the previous management. The idea is to encourage investor participation in distressed assets and give such companies the best possible chance of a revival by offering a clean slate. It took effect in December 2019 with the aim of furthering the government's goal of accelerating debt resolution and improving the health of the corporate and financial sectors. Subodh Dandawate, associate director - regulatory services at Nexdigm said, 'To uphold the IBC's objective and ensure legal clarity, it is essential to amend Section 32A, reinforcing its supremacy over conflicting statutes such as the PMLA during the bankruptcy resolution process." The 'clean slate' principle enshrined in the provision is vital to attract resolution applicants, he added. 'However, conflicts between the IBC and the PMLA – both containing overriding clauses – have led to inconsistent judicial interpretations. Courts have even held against the jurisdiction of NCLT and NCLAT in PMLA-related matters, creating uncertainty around Section 32A's application," Dandawate said. Queries emailed to Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India, the ED, the ministry of corporate affairs and the finance ministry remained unanswered.
Hindustan Times
16 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
MCG invites tech ideas for ‘smarter, cleaner' Gurugram
In a push towards a smarter and more sustainable urban environment, the Municipal Corporation of Gurugram (MCG) has invited individuals, startups, companies, academic institutions, and civil society organisations to submit innovative and technology-driven ideas to address the city's pressing urban challenges and improve civic service delivery. Only submissions from entities with relevant expertise and experience in the field will be considered, said officials. (HT Archive) In an official notice issued this week, MCG commissioner Pradeep Dhaiya said the initiative is part of the civic body's commitment for 'smart, sustainable, and citizen-centric urban development.' It aims to tap into a wider pool of ideas to enhance service delivery, improve efficiency, and strengthen citizen engagement across Gurugram. Proposals can be submitted under one or more of eight identified themes which is sanitation monitoring, construction and demolition waste processing, stray animal management, including cattle, monkeys, and dogs; utilities monitoring and management for drinking water, sewerage, and stormwater; air quality management; digital infrastructure and smart city technology; waste processing and management; and the development of a unified mobile application for MCG services. Only submissions from entities with relevant expertise and experience in the field will be considered, said officials. Applicants are required to submit an Expression of Interest (EoI) along with their profile and proposed solution. The last date for submission is August 16, 2025, via email to itmanager@ 'This is a step towards collaborative governance where experts and innovators can partner with us to build a cleaner, smarter, and more sustainable Gurugram,' the notice read. Gurugram has undergone rapid urbanisation over the past two decades but continues to grapple with persistent civic issues such as unregulated waste dumping, inadequate sanitation, stray animal menace, deteriorating air quality, and ageing infrastructure for water supply and sewerage. Officials say that by crowdsourcing ideas, the civic body hopes to come up with cutting-edge technologies and community-driven models that can be implemented at scale. MCG also urged participants to ensure their proposals are not only innovative but cost-effective and aligned with long-term sustainability goals. 'Solutions that combine smart technology with citizen participation will have the potential to create lasting change,' an official said.
Mint
a day ago
- Mint
Faster M&A clearances may keep traffic moving—until the roadblocks hit
A new standard operating procedure has set the framework for slashing the longdrawn procedural drift involved in securing regulatory approvals for mergers and demergers, creating much-needed predictability for dealmakers. Yet, the toughest hurdles remain untouched. The SOP rolled out by the National Stock Exchange of India Ltd and BSE Ltd, effective 1 August, promises a seven-working-day processing window for merger and demerger applications if all the documents are in order. Until now, the processing window typically stretched for 3-5 months. The framework, which has been mandated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India, also scraps physical paperwork, requiring only digital filings through platforms such as NSE's Electronic Application Processing System and BSE's Listing Centre. However, companies listed on stock exchanges still need to approach the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) to secure approvals for mergers and demergers, a time-consuming and laborious processthe government had considered eliminating. Also, regulatory scrutiny and sequence can still stretch deal timetables, said market participants and lawyers, adding that the new framework's rigidity could create fresh risks. 'While the SOP imposes a streamlined and timebound mechanism it simultaneously gives rise to certain challenges, primarily due to the inflexible nature of the framework, undefined obligations of Sebi, and the absence of safeguards against unforeseen procedural failures," said Madhavan Srivatsan, senior partner, Emerald Law Offices. The SOP enforces strict timelines at every stage. Companies must file their draft scheme for a merger or demerger within 15 days of board approval, and will be given only two opportunities to respond to queries from the exchanges. The exchanges, if satisfied with the draft scheme, will issue a no‑objection certificate or observation letter to Sebi, which will then issue its clearance. Only then can a company approach the NCLT for a final sanction. Ketan Dalal, managing director at compliance and advisory firm Katalyst Advisors, termed the first step of securing exchange and Sebi signoffs as 'long and tortuous". 'The first step of taking approval from exchanges (where they internally take Sebi's approval) is now taking 3-5 months. Unless this approval comes, companies cannot apply to the NCLT," he said. Dalal urged for a structural change: Allow parallel NCLT filings, with companies committing to incorporate Sebi-driven amendments in their draft scheme or withdraw if the plan is rejected. 'This parallel tracking will help to save 4-5 months in a situation where the current timelines are out of sync with commercial reality," he said. Some gaps, but keeps traffic moving Srivatsan of Emerald Law Offices pointed to the lack of a statutory outer limit for Sebi's signoff in the new framework, leaving the overall timetable open-ended. 'The SOP could have clarified an outer timeline for exchanges to grant the NoC to the issuer, which actually matters the most to the issuer for filing the scheme with NCLT," he said. Srivatsan also flagged the absence of redressal mechanisms for technology failures, which could potentially require restarting the review cycle. The SOP's strict reminders-and-return mechanism for incomplete responses could penalize issuers even when delays stem from exchange systems or required third-party inputs, he added. Other practitioners warned about the tighter response pressures in the new framework. 'They (companies) will now only get two opportunities to respond to the deficiencies before the application is rejected," said Yash Vardhan Singh, counsel, Sarvaank Associates, adding that the mandate to respond only through a digital platform could test the digital-readiness of a company. Ravi Mehta, leader–transaction tax, BhutaShah and Co. Llp, flagged that limited timeline allowed for companies to respond to queries from the stock exchanges. 'Companies must respond to exchange queries in three working days, which may be tight if internal approvals, like (from the) board or auditors, are needed. There could also be risk of rejection or deferral if deadlines are missed," he said. 'The exchanges should ideally have the power to relax the time period for responding certain queries upon request," added Anand Jayachandran, partner at law firm Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas. The new framework, despite these complaints, offers several advantages, market participants and lawyers said. The fixed turnaround times and common checklists in the new SOP should cut friction, enable cleaner equity issuance timelines, and support capital deployment schedules for investors and private equity funds, said Mehta. 'The SOP also ensures quick transmission of documents to Sebi, which often has been a bottleneck in large deals. Investors and private equity can better estimate when regulatory clearance might arrive," he said. 'Any step that defines or reduces approval timelines is a net win," added Jayachandran. 'They may not eliminate traffic lights, but will ensure listed companies and exchanges try to keep the traffic moving."
