Adam Back's Bitcoin Treasury Firm to Go Public with 30K BTC and $1.5B in Buying Power
Named Bitcoin Standard Treasury Company (BSTR), the firm announced on Thursday it plans to go public by merging with Cantor Equity Partners I (CEPO), a special-purpose acquisition company (SPAC) affiliated with the Wall Street investment bank run by Brandon Lutnick, son of Trump administration Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick.
Back, a cryptography pioneer and creator of Hashcash that inspired Bitcoin's proof-of-work consensus mechanism, will lead the firm as CEO. Sean Bill, a veteran investor who previously helped a U.S. pension fund make one of the first institutional allocations to BTC, is joining as CIO.
According to plans, the firm would debut with over 30,000 BTC, over $3.5 billion at current prices, on its balance sheet, immediately making BSTR the fourth-largest holder of bitcoin among publicly traded companies. The firm is also raising up to $1.5 billion in financing through a private placement in public equity (PIPE). At current prices, that $1.5 billion would buy more than another 12,500 bitcoin, potentially moving BSTR into the number three spot, behind just Strategy's mammoth 601,000 coins and MARA Holdings' 50,000.
That initial bitcoin stash comes from founding shareholders including Back contributing 25,000 BTC, plus 5,021 BTC in-kind contribution from early investors. The financing includes $400 million in equity offering, $750 million in convertible notes and $350 million in preferred stock. CEPO would also contribute up to $200 million, subject to shareholder redemptions.
The announcement comes as crypto treasury firms, are captivating Wall Street, seeking to mirror the playbook of Michael Saylor's Strategy that has become the world's largest corporate BTC owner. The Financial Times first reported on Tuesday that Adam Back and Cantor Fitzgerald were nearing an agreement to form a BTC treasury firm with 30,000 BTC.
CEPO was down 8% on Thursday following the announcement, though still higher by nearly 20% from the time the Back investment was leaked on Tuesday afternoon.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Professor Coin: What Gives Bitcoin Its Value?
Professor Andrew Urquhart is Professor of Finance and Financial Technology and Head of the Department of Finance at Birmingham Business School (BBS). This is the eighth installment of the Professor Coin column, in which I bring important insights from published academic literature on cryptocurrencies to the Decrypt readership. In this article, I discuss what gives Bitcoin value. In just over a decade, Bitcoin has gone from a niche innovation in cryptography to a globally traded asset with a market capitalization in the hundreds of billions. Yet despite its prominence, a persistent question remains: what gives Bitcoin its value? Bitcoin doesn't generate cash flow like a company, isn't backed by physical reserves like gold, and has no central authority guaranteeing its worth. So why are people willing to pay tens of thousands of dollars for a digital token? Recent academic research points to several factors. Scarcity and Monetary Policy The first pillar of Bitcoin's value is its programmed scarcity. Bitcoin has a fixed supply: only 21 million coins will ever be created. This limit is enforced by the network's consensus rules and is viewed by supporters as a bulwark against inflation. Academic studies have likened Bitcoin to gold because of this scarcity. Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) model Bitcoin as a decentralized network whose value stems from user adoption and security, both of which are underpinned by the incentives embedded in its monetary policy. In their equilibrium framework, scarcity plays a key role in sustaining long-term value. Why is Bitcoin's supply limit set to 21 million? Scarcity makes Bitcoin attractive as a hedge against inflation, particularly in a world of expanding money supply. A number of economists have investigated whether Bitcoin's scarcity can explain its valuation with Kruger, Meyer, and Withagen (2022) showing the widely discussed stock-to-flow model fits historical data reasonably well, reaffirming the importance of scarcity as one component of Bitcoin's perceived value. Network Effects and Utility Scarcity is not sufficient without demand—and Bitcoin's demand comes from its use as a peer-to-peer digital asset and from the belief that others will accept it in the future. This is where network effects come into play. According to Cong, Li, and Wang (2021) Bitcoin's value grows with its user base. Their tokenomics model shows that the more people adopt and trust Bitcoin, the more valuable the network becomes. This dynamic helps explain why Bitcoin has survived multiple boom-and-bust cycles. Furthermore, Bolt and van Oordt (2016) argue that the value of a virtual currency arises if users expect it to retain value and be accepted in transactions. Their model formalizes how expectations of acceptance can stabilize a volatile asset like Bitcoin. Cost of Production and Network Security Bitcoin is also underpinned by a real-world cost: mining. To secure the network and process transactions, Bitcoin relies on a system called proof-of-work, where miners compete to solve cryptographic puzzles using electricity and hardware. This energy-intensive process is not without controversy, but researchers such as Hayes (2015) have shown that the cost of production provides a fundamental floor for Bitcoin's price. He finds that Bitcoin rarely trades below the marginal cost of mining, reinforcing the idea that energy and security provision matter for valuation. Moreover, the work of Pagnotta and Buraschi (2018) supports this by showing that mining incentives and the strength of the network's security are central to Bitcoin's equilibrium value, not just supply and demand in the traditional sense. Speculation, Sentiment, and Attention In practice, however, Bitcoin's price also reflects investor sentiment and speculation. A surge in media coverage or social media buzz can trigger price rallies or sharp selloffs. Studies by Urquhart (2018) and Shen et al (2019) demonstrate that Bitcoin prices are strongly correlated with online search trends and that trading volume in turn, drives investor attention. Similarly, Liu and Tsyvinski (2021) show that cryptocurrency returns are significantly predicted by investor attention proxies. Unlike traditional assets, Bitcoin lacks ties to macroeconomic fundamentals, so sentiment and belief play an outsized role. Macroeconomic Role and Portfolio Demand Bitcoin's value is also shaped by its role in the broader financial system. In a low-interest-rate environment and amid concerns about fiat currency debasement, investors have turned to Bitcoin as a non-sovereign store of value. This is demonstrated by early work by Baur et al (2018) who show that investors are holding Bitcoin for long periods, but is supported by followup work by Jahanshahloo et al (2025). Recent research has reassessed Bitcoin's role in portfolios, particularly in times of market stress. Corbet, Larkin, and Lucey (2020) find that Bitcoin behaves more like a speculative asset than a traditional safe haven, but it can act as a weak diversifier under certain market conditions. In a similar vein, Ji, Bouri, Lau, and Roubaud (2021) use time-varying spillover models and show that Bitcoin's hedging properties fluctuate significantly, with greater hedging effectiveness during tranquil periods rather than during crises. Professor Coin: Can Bitcoin Replace Gold? Conclusion: Value from Code, Community, and Belief Bitcoin's value emerges from a blend of engineering and economics: scarcity enforced by code, utility derived from decentralized consensus, and demand shaped by sentiment, costs, and macro conditions. It behaves like a commodity, a tech stock, and a speculative token—often all at once. That complexity is what makes Bitcoin both so fascinating and so difficult to value with traditional models. In the end, Bitcoin's worth is anchored not in what it does today, but in what its users believe it can become tomorrow. And as long as that belief persists—backed by utility, adoption, and incentives—the value may persist too. References Baur, D. G., Hong, K-H., Lee, A. D. (2018). Bitcoin: Medium of exchange or speculative assets? Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 54, 177-189. Bolt, W., & van Oordt, M. R. C. (2016). On the Value of Virtual Currencies. Journal of Financial Stability, 17, 81–91. Cong, L. W., Li, Y., & Wang, N. (2021). Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation. Review of Financial Studies, 34(3), 1105–1155. Corbet, S., Larkin, C., & Lucey, B. (2020). The contagion effects of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from gold and cryptocurrencies. Finance Research Letters, 35, 101554. Hayes, A. (2015). A Cost of Production Model for Bitcoin. Telematics and Informatics, 34(7), 1308–1321. Jahanshahloo, H., Irresbeger, F., Urquhart, A. (2025). Bitcoin under the microscope. British Accounting Review, forthcoming. Ji, Q., Bouri, E., Lau, C. K. M., & Roubaud, D. (2021). Dynamic connectedness and integration in cryptocurrency markets. International Review of Financial Analysis, 74, 101670. Kruger, P., Meyer, C., & Withagen, P. (2022). Is Bitcoin's Stock-to-Flow Model Valid? Finance Research Letters, 48, 102956 Liu, Y., & Tsyvinski, A. (2018). Risks and Returns of Cryptocurrency. NBER Working Paper No. 24877. Pagnotta, E., & Buraschi, A. (2018). An Equilibrium Valuation of Bitcoin and Decentralized Network Assets. Review of Financial Studies, 31(9), 3498–3531. Shen, D., Urquhart, A., Wang, P. (2019). Does twitter predict Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 174, 118-122. Urquhart, A. (2018). What Causes the Attention of Bitcoin? Economics Letters, 166, 40-44. Sign in to access your portfolio
CNBC
6 hours ago
- CNBC
Expect the crypto rally to cool in August as new tariffs ratchet up macroeconomic concerns
Institutional adoption of cryptocurrencies has been trouncing the macroeconomic narrative as the main performance driver for the past two months. Now investors should look for a reversal of that dynamic over the coming month, however. Ether stole the spotlight from bitcoin in July, roaring ahead more than 49% in the month, but bitcoin still managed an 8% gain and climbed to a new all-time high at mid-month. The price action in both coins was largely supported by inflows into ETFs – a steady stream of new investment dollars that continued in bitcoin ETFs and was coupled with a sudden explosion of flows into ether funds – as well as the new crop of crypto treasury companies focused on accumulating the coins. But after the broad sell-off in stocks and rally in bonds on Friday , following weak jobs data and President Donald Trump's new tariffs ranging between 10% and 41% , investors expect crypto to pull back in August with traders likely to dump their more highly speculative and volatile assets. "Bitcoin is caught between ETF-driven optimism and uncertainty around global trade tensions," said Ray Youssef, CEO of crypto app NoOnes. "It remains the risk benchmark, but it may trade in a tighter range unless a new macro catalyst emerges, such as another unexpected rate move or geopolitical shift … I expect August to be relatively muted in terms of price volatility, but deceptively active in terms of positioning." mountain 2025-07-01 Ether (ETH) and bitcoin (BTC) since July 1 Given how hot cryptocurrencies and stocks were in the second quarter, some investors see any pullback as a healthy and strategic cooldown rather than a reaction to a crisis. Especially in what has historically proven a weak trading month for many markets. Among crypto-related stocks, Coinbase gained 27% in the past two months, Galaxy Digital jumped 45%, and the bitcoin miner Iren surged 76%. As part of a rotation from bitcoin to ether-focused plays, ether treasury company Bitmine Immersion soared 136% and stablecoin stock Circle surged more than 400%. "Near term, I think bitcoin stays range-bound unless we get a big macro shift," Pauline Shangett, chief strategy officer at crypto exchange ChangeNOW, told CNBC. "ETH has more momentum thanks to ETF demand and whale activity , which could help it hold up better even in a choppy market," she said, referring to ether, and large investors who hold large positions in a particular asset. Ether ETFs saw more than $5 billion in inflows in July alone, bringing its total inflows to $9.64 to date. Bitcoin ETFs saw monthly inflows of about $6 billion in July, out of a cumulative $55 billion since their introduction. "We are taking advantage of this consolidation and playing for this highly compelling setup to reaccelerate and break out," Read Harvey, technical analyst at Wolfe Research, said in a note Wednesday. "For now, we're buyers of pullbacks in the space and expect reaccelerations in coming weeks, a development that should lead to further crypto outperformance vs. equities." Youssef at NoOnes expects bitcoin to trade between $114,000 and $120,000 for most of August, and find buying support whenever it trades between $103,000 and $109,000. If ether can hold above $3,750 per coin, bulls could push for a retest of $4,000 – a challenging psychological and technical level for traders since the 2021 bull market – with support between $3,200 and $2,900, according to Youssef. "The real wildcard is the September Fed meeting," Youssef said. "[Chair] Jerome Powell's remarks often create sharp, short-term volatility, and with geopolitical tensions rising, we could see sudden shifts in sentiment. Still, unless macro conditions deteriorate significantly, both BTC and ETH appear to be building momentum beneath the surface." —CNBC's Michael Bloom contributed reporting.
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trillions On The Sidelines: Could Corporate Cash Be The Key To Bitcoin's Next Big Move?
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. When MicroStrategy (NASDAQ:MSTR) transformed from a struggling software company into a Bitcoin proxy with explosive market cap growth, it ignited a debate that's reshaping how we think about cryptocurrency investments. The question isn't just whether Bitcoin is a good investment—it's whether the strategies that work for individuals make sense for corporations, and vice versa. The Individual Investor's Bitcoin Playbook For retail investors wondering if they've 'missed the boat' on Bitcoin, the consensus among experienced crypto investors is clear: you're not too late, but your expectations need calibration. While the days of turning small investments into life-changing wealth may be behind us, Bitcoin still offers compelling long-term opportunities. Don't Miss: Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. The most recommended approach for individuals centers on dollar-cost averaging—making regular, small investments regardless of price fluctuations. This strategy acknowledges Bitcoin's extreme volatility while capitalizing on its long-term upward trajectory. As one analysis noted, 'every 4 years there's always a huge opportunity,' referencing Bitcoin's halving cycles. Individual investors benefit from Bitcoin's core characteristics that institutions often overlook. Its decentralized nature means no government or corporation controls it, offering protection against currency debasement and inflation. The 21 million coin cap creates scarcity that traditional currencies lack. For individuals, Bitcoin serves as both a hedge against inflation and a potential wealth-building vehicle over time. The key is self-custody for significant holdings. Hardware wallets like Trezor or ColdCard provide security that exchange-held coins cannot match. This control aligns with Bitcoin's philosophical foundation: being your own bank. Trending: Grow your IRA or 401(k) with Crypto – . Why Corporate Bitcoin Strategies Miss the Mark Despite MicroStrategy's success, corporate Bitcoin adoption faces fundamental problems. Companies hold cash for specific purposes: funding daily operations, weathering economic storms, and capitalizing on growth opportunities. Bitcoin's volatility undermines these core functions. When a company needs cash during a market downturn, Bitcoin might be down 50% or more. This defeats cash's primary purpose as a stable 'shock absorber.' Moreover, corporate managers typically lack the expertise to time cryptocurrency markets effectively, often buying high and selling low. The shareholder choice argument carries significant weight. Instead of speculating with Bitcoin, companies should return excess cash to shareholders through dividends or buybacks, allowing individuals to make their own investment decisions. The Four Exception Cases Corporate Bitcoin investment isn't always wrong, but it requires specific circumstances. First, companies with 'Bitcoin savant' leadership—executives with proven cryptocurrency expertise whom shareholders explicitly trust—might justify the strategy. MicroStrategy exemplifies this rare exception. Second, businesses requiring Bitcoin for operations, like PayPal (NASDAQ:PYPL) or Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN), legitimately need cryptocurrency holdings proportionate to their transaction companies in countries with unstable currencies might use Bitcoin as a stability hedge. Argentina-based MercadoLibre (NASDAQ:MELI) represents this 'Bitcoin escape artist' scenario. Finally, failed companies with speculative stock characteristics might pivot to Bitcoin investment, though this remains extremely risky. The Broader Market Implications Widespread institutional Bitcoin adoption presents a double-edged sword. While it increases demand and potentially price stability, it might fundamentally alter Bitcoin's characteristics. Institutions tend to follow trends, potentially increasing volatility during downturns and making Bitcoin behave more like traditional assets. For individual investors, the takeaway remains consistent: focus on education, practice dollar-cost averaging, maintain long-term perspectives, and only invest money you can afford to lose. Corporate Bitcoin strategies shouldn't influence personal investment decisions—the two operate under entirely different risk profiles and objectives. The Bitcoin opportunity remains open for patient individual investors, even as the corporate adoption story continues evolving. Read Next: A must-have for all crypto enthusiasts: . Image: Shutterstock This article Trillions On The Sidelines: Could Corporate Cash Be The Key To Bitcoin's Next Big Move? originally appeared on
