How did we get here?: Analysts, officials unsure how disability agency overspent
Health Secretary Laura Herrera Scott (right) and DDA Deputy Secretary Marlan Hutchinson on a panel during a Budget and Taxation Committee hearing. (Photo by Danielle J. Brown/Maryland Matters)
Gov. Wes Moore's proposal to slash $200 million in funding for a state administration that supports residents with developmental development sent shockwaves into the community that rely on those supports.
It's one of the largest cuts in the governor's attempt to fill a $3 billion budget deficit this year — particularly notable given that the agency only serves about 20,500 Marylanders.
While Moore's proposed budget funds the Developmental Disabilities Administration (DDA) at $1.3 billion in fiscal 2026, officials say cuts are necessary to contain growing costs for the DDA, which has seen unsustainable increased expenses and enrollment in recent years.
But how did Maryland get to a point where the agency is over $200 million in the hole? Analysts and legislators are still trying to piece together details.
'I don't think any of us want to cut DDA – we certainly don't want to cut DDA more than we need to,' Sen. Clarence Lam (D-Anne Arundel and Howard) said in a recent interview.
'I am curious as to how our forecasting hasn't predicted the need would increase this significantly,' he said. 'Any cuts, particularly in services for those in need, are difficult. We are obviously facing a very difficult budget situation currently, so fiscal decisions need to be made.'
State analysts are combing through details for future budget discussions but have found some factors that contributed to the unanticipated shortfall.
In a recent hearing in the Senate Budget and Taxation committee, David Romans, a budget analyst for Department of Legislative Services, said that the General Assembly budgeted just over $1 billion in general funds for the current fiscal year for DDA's community services, which is 97% of the agency's expenses.
But actual spending has overshot by some $450 million, 'about 42% higher than what was originally appropriated and thought to be the correct amount for the fiscal 2025,' according to Romans.
It's not the first time the DDA overspent its budget.
The DDA began overspending its annual budget in 2021, with significant spending increases in 2023 and 2024. But state analysts are not entirely clear why costs are rising for the agency.
Romans said that part of the challenge has been an ongoing lack of transparency from the DDA — along with inadequate probing from state oversight agencies.
'The DDA budget has always been a little bit of a black box … It's never been easy to tease out what is driving changes in the budget, and that's been true for decades,' Romans told the committee in January. 'That makes it very hard for DLS, DBM [Department of Budget and Management], any of these oversight groups to be able to understand what's going on. It puts a lot of reliance on getting information from the health department.'
Romans said responses from the department were 'vague' and 'in retrospect, incomplete' whenever DLS followed up on changes in the budget and expenses.
'They do provide numbers that add up to the allowance,' Romans said. 'You can't easily figure out what are the rate increases — and in recent years there's been a lot of unusual things related to COVID and some of the federal flexibilities that the state received that the DDA took advantage of. But you couldn't pull that out of the data that was being submitted so you had to go back to the department and ask for information.'
Budget and Taxation Committee Chair Guy Guzzone (D-Howard) asked if the shortfall was due to 'essentially an accounting failure — it's not at a sophistication of accounting that other agencies have provided.'
'I think that's fair,' Romans said. He wished his department pushed harder for answers.
'It's really important … to have more transparent DDA budget process,' Romans said. 'I wish we had asked more questions than we did. Sorry that we didn't – and that we didn't raise more concerns … about the somewhat vague answers.'
While the DDA's spending has exceeded its annual allocated budget since 2021, the 2024 fiscal year showed the largest difference between the actual spending and the DDA's appropriated funds.
That year, the DDA community service expenses exceeded its allotted $1.8 billion budget by $865 million. Some cost increases were expected due to provider rate increases that year.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
But some cost increases emerged during a transition on how providers were paid by the state, according to analysts.
'We knew that the payments under the new system were going to be larger than under the old system, and that was by design, that wasn't a surprise,' Romans said. 'But we weren't quite sure how much larger they were going to be.'
The DDA administers Medicaid waivers that allow Marylanders with developmental disabilities to receive a wide variety of services, from live-in caregiver supports to transportation, respite care, employment services and more. The Medicaid waivers primarily are split between state and federal funding, and the state health department issues payments to providers for their work with waiver recipients.
Prior to 2019, the DDA used a prospective payment model meaning that providers were paid in advance and costs were reconciled later.
The state moved to a fee-for-service model starting in 2019, called the Long Term Services Support System (LTSS), where providers would be reimbursed after services were provided. Most providers switched the new payment model in 2023 and 2024, and as of September 2024, all providers were using the fee-for-service payment model.
But as more providers transitioned into fee-for-service, costs appeared to have increased by about $300 million, though DLS is not completely sure why that happened.
'The LTSS seems to be the big driver here,' Guzzone said. 'Is it your impression that $300 million more services were provided? Or the same services, costing $300 million more?'
'I believe that it's the same services, though there could also been an increase in utilization,' Victoria Martinez, DLS policy analyst, responded.
Despite apparent increasing costs under the fee-for-service model, Secretary Laura Herrera Scott says that the new system is more stable and predictable.
'Under the prospective model payment system, providers received payments that would be reconciled at a later date,' she told the committee. 'As claims and expenses came in, they would have to be reconciled against that large upfront payment … it was difficult to predict expenditures moving forward because you were always reconciling advanced payments with the services that were rendered after the fact.
'The current system reimburses providers based on claims as they're rendered. So you can match the payment to the actual services that were rendered,' Herrera Scott said. 'We can track the expenses, so given the transition into the new system, payments are now relatively stable and easier to project … That's not something that DDA had ever prior to transitioning.'
An ongoing concern for the health department is an 'unsustainable' growth in enrollment and costs in the state's self-directed services.
In 2024, there were 16,827 Marylanders who selected a community model Medicaid waiver, where people join an established organization for disability care. But 3,632 waiver recipients elected the self-directed model, where the waiver recipient or their family hires individual employees for services.
According to the health department, enrollment for self-directed services have increased over 30% in both 2023 and 2024, particularly among young people who transition into the Medicaid waiver from school.
The Maryland school system oversees students with developmental disabilities until they age out at 21. Herrera Scott said that up until 2024, most transitioning youths would choose to join a community service provider, but now they're more likely to choose the self-direction option.
'In prior years, about 80% of our transitioning youth chose traditional services over self-directed services, and this year, that number flipped that we saw about 75-80% of our transitioning youth selecting self-directed services.'
The governor's budget proposes a $13 million reduction to eliminate certain wage increases for self-directed service staff. The budget also proposes a cap on certain goods and services that a self-directed waiver recipient can buy with Medicaid funds.
Those proposals have led to led to an outcry from self-directed Marylanders with disabilities who feel that their model is being unfairly targeted compared to the total budget concerns.
Department of Budget and Management Secretary Helene Grady told the Budget and Tax committee in January that there is 'still more work to do … to understand what level of data we need on an ongoing basis to understand what's happening within these costs and how best to optimize general funds across this universe towards the best outcomes for the clients.'
'We did not have a solid understanding … of the precise cost drivers, how much of the cost increase was true structural recurring costs, verses temporary costs related to the transition in reimbursement models and billing systems,' Grady said. 'Those are key questions for us.'
'But this work is not done,' she said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Activists take to streets to protest ICE in Southeast Baltimore
Over 100 activists from diverse backgrounds filled the streets of Highlandtown, banging drums, carrying signs, and chanting 'ICE out of Baltimore' in protest of deportation efforts targeting residents performing everyday activities like shopping for groceries or buying gasoline. The Wednesday rally, sponsored by the immigrant advocacy organization CASA, featured local families affected by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement or ICE, alongside Baltimore City council members Odette Ramos, Mark Parker and Jermaine Jones and state Del. Robbyn Lewis, who each became emotional when talking about the impact of ICE on Baltimore neighborhoods. Several of the residents wore shirts that read 'Jews United for Justice' and others carried placards saying 'Immigrants Are Essential' and 'Families Belong Together, Not in Cages.' The mass of activists marched down blocks of Fayette Street, sometimes tying up traffic but also receiving honks of approval from the waiting motorists. 'As you can imagine, I am angry. All of you should be angry,' said Ramos, who grew teary at times. 'Our neighbors are being treated so inhumanely only because they are not from here. And if they are coming for them, they are coming for us.' Ramos blamed the Trump administration's mass deportation policy. 'It is unacceptable, absolutely unacceptable,' she said. CASA reported 16 undocumented individuals have been taken by ICE in retail areas for the past three weeks in Baltimore. One of these instances was part of the viral video clip posted by the White House showing the arrest of five individuals at Home Depot on Eastern Avenue on May 20. The nonprofit organization also reported ICE agents taking an unknown amount of people at the Hazlo grocery store in Highlandtown Village on three different days. Baltimore communities have reported an escalation in ICE detentions in the past few weeks. 'No human being is illegal here, and I think what ICE is doing currently, especially our current administration, is very inhumane,' said Erika Rios, a protester from Prince George's County. 'Refuge is a human right. A lot of people come here for a better life that their economy or political status from their country isn't providing for them.' ICE officials could not be reached for comment. Lewis, who represents the sixth legislative district, grew teary-eyed as she spoke about how the individuals being targeted by ICE are similar to African Americans who escaped enslavement in this country through the Underground Railroad. The former slaves were helped to freedom by good neighbors, she said. 'The tactics that are being used today to terrorize our neighborhood residents, Marylanders, have been used and perfected in this country against African Americans,' Lewis said. 'And those abolitionists went out of their way because their strong morality helped us. So it was my destiny to live in this moment so I can use my energy to help others. This is the way of thanking the abolitionists who helped my ancestors.' Protests initially erupted in Los Angeles over immigration enforcement raids. In response, President Donald Trump called in the National Guard troops and Marines to restore order. Demonstrations have now spread to other cities, such as Baltimore, Washington, Seattle and Austin. Many protests have been peaceful but there have been clashes with police that have resulted in arrests. Bishop Angel Nuñez of the Bilingual Christian Fellowship pointed out that the activists in Baltimore were peaceful and not resorting to violence. One resident who identified himself as Dedrick worried the protests and marches would provoke those in power. 'This is going to make them angry,' he said on the street as the activists marched past him. 'I understand, you're angry and this is the only way you know how to do it. March. My people did it and see where it got us: Martin Luther King got killed.' Others noted the protests were needed to stop the aggressive enforcement. 'We are losing families that were doing the work that some of us refuse to do: clean your house, cut your grass, clean fish for you, your restaurants, the good foods,' said Garry Bien-Aime, executive director of the Committee Haiti, a nonprofit in Baltimore advocating for the Haitian community. Have a news tip? Contact Todd Karpovich at tkarpovich@ or on X as @ToddKarpovich or Stella Canino-Quinones at scanino-quinones@
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Annapolis mayoral candidates hold cordial debate on environment, housing, other topics
Annapolis mayoral candidate Rhonda Pindell Charles, left, responds to a question during a debate Tuesday with her Democratic primary opponent, Jared Littmann, right. Baltimore Banner columnist Rick Hutzell, the moderator, center, listens. (Photo by William J. Ford/Maryland Matters) Rhonda Pindell Charles and Jared Littmann cordially debated, and mostly agreed, Tuesday on how they would improve Annapolis if they were elected the next mayor of the capital city. Both would form partnerships with community and nonprofit organizations. Both would work to eliminate environmental hazards in some of the city's underserved communities. And both Democrats bestowed high praise on current Mayor Gavin Buckley (D), who is term-limited from serving a third, four-year term. 'I think he's one of the best mayors we've had … and I've been here my entire life,' said Pindell Charles, who has served as an alderwoman on the city council since 2009. Littman, a former alderman who served five years on the council before his term ended in 2017, noted that he and Buckley have a number of similarities, including both having two children, but added that 'my demeanor's a bit different' than the outgoing Buckley's personality. Buckley was one of dozens on hand for Tuesday's nearly 90-minute debate hosted by the Caucus of African American Leaders at the Wiley H. Bates Legacy Center. Some sported blue Littmann T-shirts and others wore red or white shirts supporting Pindell Charles. There was at least one difference between the two besides their supporters' T-shirts: Pindell Charles and Littman outlined different approaches to hiring city personnel. 'I have committed to keeping all staff. I have never heard any other mayor say that,' Pindell Charles said. 'I've worked with these folks on a regular basis. I see how they operate [and] how they get things done.' Although Littman commended city staff, he said he would interview each of the city's directors and chiefs to assess their priorities, any expectations and how they would measure themselves against those expectations. Anyone who may scores themselves a '10 out of 10 of everything always makes me skeptical,' he said. 'I look for people who identify where there's room for improvement.' 'I do not promise anybody a job. Everybody's got to work for their job,' he said. Littman has been working for the mayor's job for 18 months already, declaring his candidacy in January 2024. Pindell Charles announced her candidacy in September. As of Tuesday, they were the only two candidates seeking to be mayor, although others have until July 28 to file. The Sept. 16 primary looms large in the city, where registered Democrats outnumber Republicans by a ratio of 2.5-to-1. The Anne Arundel County Board of Elections said that as of Tuesday, about 13,881 Democrats were registered in Annapolis, compared to 5,518 Republicans and 6,006. unaffiliated voters. If no other candidates emerge, the primary winner could have a free pass to the mayor's office. Pindell Charles received a bachelor's degree in business administration from Morgan State University, before earning a law degree from the University of Maryland School of Law. The retired prosecutor, a native of the city she hopes to lead, seeks to make history as the city's first elected Black mayor. Alderman John Thomas Chambers Jr. (R), who was Black, served on an interim basis for two months in 1981 after the suicide of Mayor Gustav Akerland (R). Her time on council included a brief stint as acting mayor, when Buckley appointed her in 2o20 to serve while he traveled home to his native Australia to care for his ailing mother. Littman received a bachelor's degree in environmental engineering from Washington University in St. Louis and a law degree from the University of Maryland, Baltimore. He has worked as an associate county attorney in Montgomery County and is currently a small business owner with his wife, running K&B Ace Hardware in the city. During Littman's time on council, he sponsored several pieces of legislation that included a forest conservation law that's a model for local and state leaders throughout Maryland. On Tuesday, the candidates were asked about a dozen questions, including their plans to redevelop the City Dock, how they would account for financial gaps created by federal government cuts and ideas on how to improve public transportation in the next four years. Phillip Ateto, who lives in the city's Ward 3, said after the debate he didn't hear the candidates provide specifics on housing. In addition, he said they didn't answer a question on how would they respond to a crisis like the current protests in Los Angeles. 'I was disappointed neither one of them really answered the question about what's going on in L.A. and if it happened here,' Ateto said. 'The community needs to know what we can expect from our law enforcement.' Carl Snowden, convener of the Caucus of African American Leaders that hosted the debate, had a message for voters. 'Any citizen who has a candidate knocking on their door should ask one question: 'If I elect you as a member of city council or mayor, how will the quality of life change for me and my family?'' Snowden said. 'And if that person is not able to speak in specificity, then you be minded.' SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
Political notes: Torres steps down at CASA, bay analysts put their heads together, more news
Gustavo Torres, executive director of CASA (left), speaks to Del. Joseline Peña-Melnyk (D-Prince George's and Anne Arundel) in a photo from 2023. (File photo by Bryan P. Sears/Maryland Matters) CASA's longtime executive director Gustavo Torres plans to retire in November. Torres began his work as an advocate with the immigrant rights group when it started out in a church basement in Takoma Park. Now, 34 eyars later, CASA is an organization with more than 170,000 members in Maryland, Virginia and Pennsylvania — and in Atlanta, where it opened a welcome center in Atlanta in 2022. In a statement Friday, Torres said he wants to take a break and spend his time with family, to 'give the same love, attention, and presence to the people who've stood by me through it all.' 'I look around me and see a new generation of leaders that are ready to take the helm, and I am confident that CASA is strong, rooted, and ready for what's next,' his statement said. 'These powerful, young, diverse Black and brown leaders in our organization are going to move forward with the same boldness these next 30 years.' The organization has become an authoritative voice on migrant issues and immigration legislation at the local, state and natioanl levels over the years. It did face controversy in November 2023, after some members issued statements and social media posts expressing solidarity with Palestinians during the war in Gaza that began Oct. 7 of that year. CONTACT US It led somelawmakers, including Montgomery Count's Senate delegation to publicly scrutinize CASA and threatened to pull public funding. Private donors also announced they would withdraw funding. CASA released a public apology from Torres in response. The organization has been busy this year. Even before President Donald Trump's (R) January swearing in, CASA held 'Know Your Rights' events to prepare for possible enforcement actions from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. CASA leaders were in Annapolis lobbing for legislation, including one to prohibit local police from entering into 287(g) agreements with ICE. On the last day of the legislative session in April, lawmakers passed a watered-down version of a bill that does not include the 287(g) ban, the biggest loss for immigration. advocates this year. CASA plans a nationwide search for someone to build on Torres' 'unshakeable legacy, carrying forward CASA's mission to build people power, advance equity, and drive lasting systemic change,' said Melissa Guzman, the organization's chief operating officer. 'We invite visionary leaders from inside CASA and across the country to apply and help shape the next chapter of this movement.' Torres will be honored at CASAs 40th anniversary celebration on Sept. 18. Unlike the typical student, the Chesapeake Bay has long received two report cards from two different schools: One from the University of Maryland Center for Environmental Science, and another from the Chesapeake Bay Foundation. But that could be changing. At an event in Eastport on Tuesday to release the latest UMCES report card (which gave the bay a grade of 'C'), officials from the center and the nonprofit said they're looking to combine their efforts. 'We're really excited about this, because it will reduce the confusion of having two separate report cards and slightly different messaging,' said Heath Kelsey, director of the Integration and Application Network at UMCES. Bill Dennison, UMCES vice president of science application, said he approached the Bay Foundation decades ago about working together on a single report card, to no avail. 'With the new leadership at the Bay Foundation, I think that dream could be realized,' Dennison said. Hilary Harp Falk has been president and CEO of the foundation since 2022. She said Tuesday there's lots left to iron out, but the potential partnership between the two organizations is exciting. 'We've been talking a lot about our shared goals and the strengths of the different products, and how we can both show how the bay is doing and answer that question, but also show a path to success, which I think has been elusive,' Harp Falk said. 'We think the strength of our report card and our work and the UMCES science could really be a force multiplier.' Dennison said looming cuts at federal environmental agencies have made the collaboration more urgent. On April 1, the center held a workshop with the Bay Foundation, as well as some riverkeeper groups that also have their own regional report cards, to discuss the future of bay report cards. 'This is a tough time for us environmentalists. The federal budgets are being slashed, and so we have to — more than ever — we have to work together,' Dennison said. About 8,200 Maryland residents who use long-term care programs could soon pay more for services, as four life insurance companies are asking state officials to increase premium rates for those services. During a virtual meeting with Maryland Insurance Administration officials Tuesday, representatives from life insurance companies argued that because people are living longer and more people are using long-term care services for longer periods of time, those rate increases are justified. 'Mutual of Omaha understands premium adjustments are never welcome news and we do not take such actions lightly,' said Rylan Deemer, product director and actuary at Mutual of Omaha. 'Due to increasing use of long-term care services and longer open claims, we found it necessary to file this rate adjustment. In other words, more policyholders are recognizing the benefits of their long-term care insurance policies, using benefits more often and for longer than anticipated.' Those justifications were shared by representatives from the other insurance companies Tuesday: – Metropolitan Life Insurance, Prudential Insurance Co. and Transamerica Life Insurance Co. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE Requested rate increases range from 24% to 52%, depending on company and plan. The requests are not unusual for long-term care plans, but they come at a time when insurers are also looking to increase premiums on certain health care plans due to the possible loss of a federal subsidy under the Trump administration. State regulations prohibit insurers from raising premiums more than 15% in a 12-month period, meaning that larger increase proposals would be spread out over the course of a couple years, if approved. Each of the insurers Tuesday said they were sympathetic to policyholders who would not be able to afford long-term care plans at the higher rates, and said they would offer lower-priced, lower-coverage plans to those who could not afford to keep their current plans. The rate increases are not finalized. MIA officials raised concerns that some of the rate requests could be too steep. The proposed rate increases are open to public comments until next week. In the first use of a new state emergency fund, state officials announced Tuesday that they will award $459,375 in financial assistanceto Allegany County to help victims of May 13 floods that swamped homes, schools and businesses and forced evacuations in Allegany and Garrett counties. The funding is coming from the Maryland State Disaster Recovery Fund, a form of state-assisted financing for county and local governments 'for the purpose of providing essential assistance to individuals, households, businesses, and local governments affected by disasters,' according to a news release from the governor's office. Local governments can request aid from the fund, which is administered by the Maryland Department of Emergency Management. 'These funds will help Marylanders get back on their feet in the wake of historic flooding,' said Gov. Wes Moore in the release. 'I encourage all affected Marylanders to learn if they're eligible for additional resources and supports.' Allegany County officials requested the funds after damage assessments showed recovery needs were beyond the county's means, the governor's office said. Heavy rains from May 12-14 led rivers and creeks in the region to flood, with Georges Creek reaching a near-record level of 12.41 feet. Rising waters forced evacuations in Garrett and Allegany counties, with the town of Westernport hit particularly hard. Floodwaters caused significant damage to more than 200 homes and businesses in the region. 'The comprehensive assistance — from multiple state departments — has been extraordinary, and this monetary award through the new Disaster Recovery Program is both timely and impactful,' Allegany County Commission President David J. Caporale said in the news release. 'As the first recipients of this program, we recognize the significance of this moment, and we are committed to putting these resources to immediate use to help our neighbors and communities rebuild stronger than before.' The Maryland Department of Emergency Management is also working with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and state agencies in recovery efforts to mitigate the risk of flooding due to the impacts on the local rivers and streams in the area. State officials estimate that volunteer organizations have provided more than $400,000 in support services, including muck-out and cleanup of residences and businesses across Allegany County. Area residents may also be eligible for disaster loans through the U.S. Small Business Administration Physical Loan program. A Disaster Loan Outreach Center, serving both counties, at 103 1st St. in Westernport will be open Monday through Friday from 8 a .m. to 5 p.m. and Saturday from 10 a.m. to 2 p.m. Multiagency resource and support centers remain open at the Bruce Outreach Center in Westernport on Saturdays and Mondays from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m and Wednedays from 1-7 p.m.; and at the Good Will Fire Co. Armory in Lonaconing from 10 a.m. to 4 p.m. Sundays and Tuesdays and from 1-7 p.m. Thursdays.