Apple loses bid to dismiss U.S. smartphone monopoly case
U.S. District Judge Julien Neals in Newark, New Jersey, denied Apple's motion to dismiss the lawsuit accusing the company of using restrictions on third-party app and device developers to keep users from switching to competitors and unlawfully dominate the market.
The decision allows the case to go forward in what could be a years-long fight for Apple against enforcers' attempt to lower what they say are barriers to competition with Apple's iPhone. An Apple spokesperson said the company believes the lawsuit is wrong on the facts and the law, and will continue to vigorously fight it in court.
A spokesperson for the DOJ declined to comment. Sales of the world's most popular smartphone totalled $201 billion in 2024. Apple introduced a new budget model iPhone in February with enhanced features priced at $170 more than its predecessor. The lawsuit filed in March 2024 focuses on Apple's restrictions and fees on app developers, and technical roadblocks to third-party devices and services, such as smart watches, digital wallets and messaging services, that would compete with its own.
DOJ, along with several states and Washington, D.C., says the practices destroy competition and Apple should be blocked from continuing them. Apple had argued that its limitations on third-party developers' access to its technology were reasonable, and that forcing it to share technology with competitors would chill innovation.
The case is one of a series of U.S. antitrust cases against Big Tech companies brought during the Biden and first Trump administrations.
Facebook parent Meta Platforms and Amazon.com are facing lawsuits by antitrust enforcers alleging they illegally maintain monopolies, and Alphabet's is facing two such lawsuits.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
44 minutes ago
- Time of India
Is Elon Musk's multi-billion dollar empire crumbling?
Elon Musk 's renewed heckling of President Donald Trump 's big tax breaks and spending cuts bill, which passed the Senate on Tuesday, threatens to put billions of dollars of his government contracts in jeopardy if Trump retaliates. The rupture of their tenuous peace has resulted in a wobbling of the stock price of a market-moving company and led the president to muse about deporting Musk to his native South Africa. Elon Musk to be Deported? In a Frankenstein-style twist, as Musk volleyed fresh critiques about the cost of Trump's signature legislation, Trump mused on Tuesday about turning Musk's Department of Government Efficiency back on its creator. "DOGE is the monster that might have to go back and eat Elon," Trump told reporters as he left the White House for a tour of a new immigration detention center in Florida, AP reported. Trump also suggested in an early morning social media post that if Musk lost his government contracts, he "would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa." Asked by a reporter later if he would deport Musk, Trump paused and said, "I don't know. We'll have to take a look." President Trump has said Musk is actually irritated by the legislation's dramatic rollback of the Biden-era green energy tax breaks for electric vehicles and related technologies. Musk has denied this, but the rollback could hurt Tesla's finances. Live Events 'Elon may get more subsidy than any human being in history, by far, and without subsidies, Elon would probably have to close up shop and head back home to South Africa,' Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social media network. Musk became a U.S. citizen in 2002, according to a biography of him by Walter Isaacson. It's unclear if Trump would take the extraordinary step of having the government explore the rare process of removing his citizenship, known as denaturalization, as per AP report. Worrying Times for Elon Musk The irony is that Musk's social media spat with Trump threatens his businesses from both sides. People won't buy his cars because of the memories of his friendship with Trump, and now that and his other businesses could get hurt because that friendship has soured. Musk's rocket and satellite company, SpaceX, is also in Trump's crosshairs. 'No more Rocket launches, Satellites, or Electric Car Production, and our Country would save a FORTUNE,' Trump said in his post. 'BIG MONEY TO BE SAVED!!!' SpaceX has received billions of federal dollars to help to send astronauts into space and other work for NASA, including a contract to send a team from the space agency to the moon next year. But the most immediate fallout of their feud was the tumbling stock in Tesla down 5 per cent in early afternoon trading Tuesday. Tesla stock's performance can have an outsize impact on the stock market index funds in which millions of Americans 401(k)s have invested their retirement savings. The electric vehicle maker is one of the Magnificent Seven, the group of companies that includes Apple and Google parent Alphabet and that account for about a third of the value of the S&P 500, as per AP report. FAQs Q1. Who is CEO of Tesla? A1. CEO of Tesla is Elon Musk. Q2. What are key indexes of US stock market? A2. Key indexes of US stock market are S&P 500, Dow Jones, Nasdaq.
News18
3 hours ago
- News18
Trump's DOGE Tells SEC To Go Easy On Wall Street To Boost Growth: Report
Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) seeks rollback of Biden-era SPAC and data‑sharing rules. US President Donald Trump administration's drive to cut red tape has prompted the US markets regulator to ease rules for Wall Street, news agency Reuters said in a report. As part of the move, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), blank-check companies which are also known as Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) and private investment funds may face fewer disclosure requirements, allowing them to operate with greater confidentiality. Officials from the SEC's DOGE arm have recently begun meeting with staff to review and possibly ease regulations that some companies say are overly burdensome. The Reuters report pointed out that the discussions include revisiting rules introduced under former US president that tightened oversight of SPACs and increased data disclosure requirements for private investment advisers to help regulators track systemic risk. 'Under President Trump's leadership, Chairman [Paul] Atkins and the SEC will ensure that the United States remains the best and most secure place in the world to invest and do business." A spokesperson for the SEC said: 'The SEC is working with DOGE to find cost efficiencies and ensure public funds are being used as effectively as possible." About the Author Shankhyaneel Sarkar First Published: July 01, 2025, 22:57 IST
Time of India
3 hours ago
- Time of India
Trump's Big, Beautiful Bill survives Senate showdown; who are the winners & losers? Know in 10 points
In a dramatic overnight session, Senate Republicans on Tuesday advanced President Donald Trump's sweeping tax and spending legislation past a critical hurdle, keeping the bill alive by the slimmest of margins. The 50–50 split required Vice President JD Vance to break the tie, marking a tense victory for Trump's flagship economic agenda. According to Reuters, the bill—combining nearly $4.5 trillion in tax cuts with deep reductions in social spending—triggered fierce debate within the GOP and uniform opposition from Democrats. Three Republicans—Thom Tillis, Susan Collins, and Rand Paul—voted against it, citing concerns over deficits and policy impacts. Below are major points on the winners and losers emerging from this historic Senate vote, according to reports by NBC News and Al-Jazeera. Winners: Corporations: Companies stand to benefit from the permanent extension of Trump-era tax cuts, including a corporate tax rate locked at 21%. Businesses investing in equipment, research, and Opportunity Zones will enjoy expanded incentives through 2033. The bill also preserves tax breaks for traditional car manufacturers by ending credits for electric vehicle purchases, potentially boosting demand for gasoline-powered cars. High-income households: The legislation sharply raises the deduction cap on state and local taxes from $10,000 to $40,000—a boon for wealthier homeowners in states with higher taxes. It also doubles the estate tax exemption, shielding inheritances up to $15 million. According to the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center, more than a third of the total tax relief would flow to households earning over $460,000 annually. In total, about 57% of the benefits would go to those making $217,000 or more per year. Analysts estimate the average household tax cut would be roughly $2,600 in 2026, with much larger gains at the top. Tipped and overtime workers: The bill delivers on Trump's promise to exempt tips and overtime from federal income tax. Though the benefit may be limited for low earners who already owe no tax, it will help some workers keep more of their paychecks. Under current law, employees must report tips over $20 per month to their employers, and this income is taxed. The legislation would eliminate federal tax liability on these earnings altogether, though workers would still owe payroll and state taxes. Families with children: If the legislation is enacted, the child tax credit would permanently rise from $2,000 to $2,200 per child each year. While this increase is smaller than the $2,500 credit included in the earlier House version, it still prevents the credit from dropping to $1,000 in 2026, as scheduled under current law. Border security advocates: A $350 billion boost is earmarked for border enforcement, including deportation operations, paid partly through new fees on immigrants. Fossil fuel companies: The legislation unwinds many Biden-era climate measures, eases methane pollution fees, and delays emissions rules, while adding tax carve-outs to help oil and gas firms bypass alternative minimum taxes. The Senate version also includes a provision to fast-track fossil fuel infrastructure projects, delaying penalties on excess methane emissions and rolling back restrictions on vehicle pollution. Live Events Losers: Younger generations: The bill is projected to add around $3 trillion to the deficit over 10 years. Rising debt will burden future taxpayers and limit the government's ability to fund education, housing, and infrastructure. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that total interest payments on the debt will soar, potentially consuming more than a third of federal revenues in the coming decades and reducing flexibility to respond to future crises. Healthcare workers: Cuts to Medicaid funding and insurance coverage could eliminate up to half a million health care jobs, while restrictions on funding for Planned Parenthood could shutter clinics. The bill also imposes new work requirements for Medicaid recipients under age 65 without disabilities, which could force millions off coverage. More than 71 million Americans are currently enrolled in Medicaid. Clean energy sector: Wind and solar developers face steep penalties on new projects starting after 2027. The rollback of subsidies threatens billions in investment and thousands of clean energy jobs. Additionally, tax incentives for consumers buying electric vehicles, solar panels, and energy-efficient appliances would shrink, making clean technology upgrades less accessible. EV manufacturers, including Tesla, have sharply criticized the bill, warning it could set back clean energy adoption by years. Lower-income Americans: Deep cuts to Medicaid and food assistance programs will hit vulnerable communities hardest. Work requirements could leave an estimated 12 million people without health coverage, particularly in rural areas. The bill would reduce spending on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) by more than $68 billion over the next decade, which could lead to millions losing food assistance. In 2023, over 42 million people relied on SNAP each month to buy groceries. While Republicans hailed the bill as a necessary step to reignite growth, critics warned it would deepen inequality and saddle the next generation with unsustainable debt. The measure now heads toward negotiations with the House, where differences over spending cuts and tax provisions will have to be resolved before final passage.
