logo
‘High proportion' of APP scam victims getting their money back under new rules

‘High proportion' of APP scam victims getting their money back under new rules

Independent15-05-2025

A 'high proportion' of scam victims are getting their money back since new mandatory fraud reimbursement rules were launched last October, according to the regulator overseeing the policy.
The rules, overseen by the Payment Systems Regulator (PSR), require banks to give people their money back when they have been tricked into transferring it to criminals.
An authorised push payment (APP) reimbursement limit of £85,000 has been applied under the rules, although banks can choose to go further than this and repay higher amounts.
Posting a 'snapshot' of what the regulator has seen so far, its managing director David Geale said on the PSR's website: 'We are pleased with what we've seen in the data and heard from stakeholders in the first few months, which demonstrates that the policy has been successfully implemented – and more consumers have been protected.
'This is testament to the efforts of industry to deliver the best outcomes for victims of APP scams and work with us to resolve any issues.'
Under the new code, reimbursement costs are split between the sending and receiving banks – giving the receiving firm an added incentive to stop the scam happening in the first place.
Mr Geale said: 'A high proportion of APP scam victims are being reimbursed consistently across a larger number of PSPs (payment service providers).
'And while it is too early to draw firm conclusions based on the period covered by this data, we have not seen evidence of spikes in claim volumes that some had feared would occur under the policy.
'Additionally, now that both parties in the payment journey (the sending PSP and the receiving PSP) share the cost of reimbursing victims, there is a much stronger incentive for all PSPs to prevent APP scams from occurring in the first place.
'We are pleased to see PSPs starting to collaborate more in the effort to fight this fraud.'
Looking at compliance data reported by payment service providers, the regulator said that in the first three months of the initiative, 86% of money lost to APP scams was returned to victims, totalling around £27 million.
The regulator said it is not possible to make direct comparisons with data from before its policy due to methodology changes, however 'we note that reimbursement for consumers in 2023 was 68% (by value), as per UK Finance's annual fraud report 2024 data'.
Before the mandatory rules came into force, many banks had signed up to a voluntary reimbursement agreement. However, consumer campaigners raised concerns about banks not applying this consistently.
The PSR said that before the policy went live, some organisations were concerned that there would be a sharp rise in the number of APP scam claims.
But, on its website, it said: 'We have seen no evidence of any increase to date.'
However, claim volumes 'have steadily increased each month and we expect this to continue in the short to medium term as victims become more aware of the policy,' according to the PSR.
Firms can opt to apply an excess of up to £100 when reimbursing customers, but this cannot be applied to vulnerable customers. Some firms have waived the excess.
Some APP fraud victims may also be refused reimbursement if they are deemed to have been 'grossly negligent'.
The PSR's website said: 'Just 2% of total claims were rejected because the consumer standard of caution has not been met. We also heard from industry stakeholders that they did not see a significant shift in customer behaviour as a result of the policy.
'However, we are seeing differences in how frequently firms are applying the exemptions. This is backed up in the data we are seeing: only 23% of firms that received a claim in the period used this exception as a reason for rejecting reimbursement.
'We're working with firms and other stakeholders, including the Financial Ombudsman Service, and will keep under review whether more clarity is needed on when this exception should be applied.'
Rocio Concha, Which? director of policy and advocacy, said: 'Which? campaigned for years to make reimbursement mandatory, so it's encouraging to see that the new rules appear to be having a positive impact, with more APP scam victims getting their money back and a more consistent approach from banks and payment providers.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Man Utd odds SLASHED in Jamie Vardy next club market as Wrexham & Rangers trail
Man Utd odds SLASHED in Jamie Vardy next club market as Wrexham & Rangers trail

The Sun

time10 minutes ago

  • The Sun

Man Utd odds SLASHED in Jamie Vardy next club market as Wrexham & Rangers trail

JAMIE VARDY is still on the lookout for his next challenge after quitting Leicester City. And judging by the sustained support with the bookmakers, a move to MANCHESTER UNITED is looking ever more likely by the day! 2 2 The 38-year-old has been linked with several clubs across Europe since he revealed he was quitting the Foxes. A club legend - described by Leicester as 'our greatest-ever player' - Vardy leaves having scored 200 goals in 500 appearances for the side. He also worked under 10 different managers in his 13 years at the King Power. In a lengthy statement, he closed it off by saying: "It's finally time to call it a day, which I'm devastated about it, but I think the timing it right." Vardy has been strongly linked with a move north of the border, with former boss Brendan Rodgers at Celtic before more concrete claims of interest from Rangers, who have recently been taken over. A move to Serie A is the current frontrunner with BetVictor, priced at 9/4 to move to any club. But without doubt the market mover in the Vardy next club market is for Manchester United, who were reportedly interested at the end of the January window. Ruben Amorim is desperate for options up to, with Marcus Rashford and Alejandro Garnacho on the way out and Rasmus Hojlund potentially exiting with them. Only Everton and the three, poor relegated sides scored less goals than United in the Premier League last season. They're trying to resolve that issue, having splurged over £60million on Matheus Cunha and in advanced talks with Bryan Mbeumo. So this move for Vardy on a free would be a much cheaper option to bolster the front line and likely be an attractive proposition for both parties. Such is the incredible nature of this market, Championship new boys Wrexham come next at 8/1 third favourites. The Hollywood-owned side were coined the 'obvious transfer choice of the century' for Vardy when he first revealed he was leaving Leicester but that seems to have cooled. A switch to Scotland, Crystal Palace and Sheffield Wednesday are all also 8/1. Remember to gamble responsibly A responsible gambler is someone who: For help with a gambling problem, call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or go to to be excluded from all UK-regulated gambling websites.

Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog
Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog

Auto Express

time33 minutes ago

  • Auto Express

Avoid using car finance claim firms, says financial watchdog

Consumers have been advised to steer clear of using car finance claim firms, as the UK's top financial watchdog says they could be spending money unnecessarily. The Financial Conduct Authority has begun setting out advice surrounding a possible redress scheme with regard to the ongoing car finance scandal which, according to experts, could see billions of pounds made available for potential claims. Advertisement - Article continues below However, with countless companies now popping up to assist potential claimants, the FCA is keen to remind motorists that in using one 'they may end up paying for a service they do not need and having to pay up to 30 per cent in fees out of any award they may receive'. Rather than utilise one of these paid services, consumers can submit timestamped complaints and claims themselves. Tools such as those on the MoneySavingExpert website can help people search for previous finance agreements, while the site also provides a template in order to draft a letter of complaint. With the Supreme Court set to make its judgement next month in regard to whether 'discretionary commission arrangements' (DCAs) were illegal in the first instance, the FCA is also advising finance firms on how they should calculate claims for disgruntled clients. The FCA is keen for a redress scheme to strike a balance between being fair to consumers, but at the same time not disrupting the market by putting finance firms out of business. In its latest release, the FCA says that the latter scenario could 'reduce competition and could make it more expensive for consumers to borrow money to buy a car in the future'. Such a scheme will fall under one of two arrangements: 'opt-in' and 'opt-out'. With the former – considered the most likely scenario – claimants would be required to notify their finance provider prior to a specified date if they wish to be considered for redress. 'Opt-out', on the other hand, would mean that everyone who is eligible will automatically be included, unless they contact their firm to be taken off the list. Consumers can expect the FCA to announce within six weeks of the Court's judgement in July as to whether a full redress scheme will be implemented, and how exactly it will operate. Tell us which new car you're interested in and get the very best offers from our network of over 5,500 UK dealers to compare. Let's go…

Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar
Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar

Telegraph

time40 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Magic circle executive banned for sexual misconduct at karaoke bar

A former employee at one of London's most prestigious law firms has been banned from working in the legal profession after touching a junior colleague's bottom in a karaoke bar. Vivek Ramsaroop has been punished after the solicitors' watchdog found that he grabbed a fellow worker's waist and started 'rubbing himself' against her while on a work night. At the time, he was an employee at the magic circle firm Linklaters. The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has ruled that the incident, which took place in November 2022, amounted to 'serious sexual misconduct' and banned him from working for other law firms in Britain. As part of its findings, the SRA said Mr Ramsaroop harassed a junior colleague, referred to only as 'Employee A', at a social event organised for Linklaters' London office. The SRA said: 'Whilst at the karaoke bar, Mr Ramsaroop approached Employee A and stood closely to her talking and said the words 'you're gorgeous' and 'you're amazing'.' He then put his arms around her waist and kissed the side of her face for several seconds, the regulator said. 'Shortly afterwards, Mr Ramsaroop started dancing directly behind Employee A, grabbed her waist with both hands and touched her bottom,' the SRA added. Mr Ramaswoop then 'started rubbing himself against' his colleague on the dancefloor 'with his pelvis pressed against Employee A's bottom,' the watchdog said. During his time at Linklaters, Mr Ramaswoop – whose last known address was in Johannesburg – was involved in Linklaters' legal practice but not employed as a solicitor. He specialises in mergers and acquisitions. The SRA said Mr Ramaswoop's conduct constituted 'serious sexual misconduct' as it involved repeated physical contact directed towards a junior colleague. As a result, the regulator issued a so-called 'Section 43' notice against Mr Ramaswoop, which restricts firms from employing individuals deemed to have committed misconduct, even if they are not working as lawyers. Mr Ramaswoop was also ordered to pay a portion of the SRA's £1,350 legal bill. The regulator says it expects law firms to take a 'zero tolerance' approach to sexual misconduct, which covers any abuse of a person's 'professional position to initiate or pursue an improper sexual or emotional relationship'. Linklaters is one of Britain's four 'magic circle' law firms. Last year, it paid its partners an average £1.9m, while its newly-qualified lawyers received starting salaries of £150,000. A Linklaters spokesman said: 'This relates to an incident involving a former employee who had joined the firm a few weeks prior. We had reported the matter to the SRA and the individual left the firm with immediate effect.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store