logo
‘The President's Wife' Review: Would Madame Get Your Vote?

‘The President's Wife' Review: Would Madame Get Your Vote?

New York Times17-04-2025

From 1995 to 2007, the conservative (if politically capricious) Jacques Chirac was the president of France. But, 'The President's Wife' isn't all that interested in Chirac, played as a clueless yet charismatic charlatan by Michel Vuillermoz. The first lady, Bernadette Chirac, gets the spotlight, with the French film icon Catherine Deneuve bringing glamour and droll gusto to the part.
Spanning the years of Chirac's presidency, this low-key comedy by Léa Domenach tracks the evolution of Bernadette's public image from scorned spouse in kitschy-colored skirt suits to beloved girl-boss in modern Chanel threads. A Greek chorus of church singers and a disclaimer in the opening title cards tell us that this quasi-biopic is highly fictionalized. No, Bernadette didn't secretly meet with rival politicians in confessional booths or frequent nightclubs with pop stars to rally fund-raising for her children's hospital charity.
The film takes creative leaps in scenes like these as part of its puckish approach to mythmaking. Though other seemingly absurd moments are ripped straight from the TV news archives, such as her visit with Hillary Clinton to a primary school in central France (Deneuve is transposed onto footage of that real-life encounter with the help of green-screen tech).
Belittled by rivals and family members alike — including her daughter Claude (Sara Giraudeau), who is one of her father's advisers — Bernadette teams up with her chief of staff, Bernard Niquet (Denis Podalydès), to revamp her political career. The duo's scheming and easy rapport make up much of the film's brisk humor, which at times can be a bit too culturally specific to resonate fully with non-French viewers. And while Deneuve brings a wonderful blend of neuroses and feigned indifference to her character, the film's pop-feminist through line dulls the comedy, creating a more conventionally celebratory portrait.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran
Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump does not intend to sign joint G7 statement on Iran

President Donald Trump does not intend to sign a joint statement calling for de-escalation between Israel and Iran that had been drafted by G7 leaders in Canada, according to a person familiar with the matter, though officials preparing the document held out hope that he could eventually be convinced to add his name. The draft statement, which had been spearheaded by European officials at the summit, says Israel has a right to defend itself and that Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump's decision not to sign on to the statement set up an immediate divide with his counterparts as the summit was getting underway in the Canadian Rockies. Hours before the conference was set to convene, talks were ongoing among the G7 delegations about language in the draft statement. European officials, led by French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz and British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, were hoping to finalize a consensus among the leaders about the Middle East situation alongside the summit's host, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney. But Trump, who has questioned the utility of multilateral organizations like the G7, intends for now to withhold his signature, preventing for now a show of resolve from the world's leading democracies. 'Under the strong leadership of President Trump, the United States is back to leading the effort to restore peace around the world. President Trump will continue to work towards ensuring Iran cannot obtain a nuclear weapon,' a White House official said in response to a question about Trump's plans when it came to the joint statement. A senior Canadian official said delegations representing the seven G7 leaders would continue to work on the language of the statement, and that European leaders in particular are still engaged in the hopes of reaching a consensus. 'This is not a done deal yet, this is something that will be discussed at the leader level. We expect that the bulk of that conversation will happen in the global security session this evening. It's too early to speculate on what will or will not come out of that conversation,' the senior Canadian official said. Trump told reporters Monday morning before the summit started that he believes Iran wishes to de-escalate its conflict with Israel as the skirmish between the two nations enters its fourth day. 'Yeah,' Trump told CNN when asked if he's seen any signals or messages from intermediaries that Iran wishes to de-escalate the conflict. 'They'd like to talk, but they should have done that before. I had 60 days, and they had 60 days, and on the 61st day, I said, 'We don't have a deal.' They have to make a deal, and it's painful for both parties, but I'd say Iran is not winning this war, and they should talk, and they should talk immediately, before it's too late,' he said as he met with Carney. Trump issued a two-month ultimatum this spring for Iran to strike a nuclear deal or face consequences. On Friday — day 61 — Israel launched unprecedented strikes on Iran, targeting its nuclear program and military leaders. The US president declined to say what, if anything, would prompt US military involvement in the conflict. 'I don't want to talk about that,' he said, remaining vague when pressed on what intelligence the US is providing Israel. Trump's counterparts at the G7 planned to press the US leader on his strategy for dealing with Israel and Iran, officials from multiple delegations said, as the spiraling Middle East conflict shadows the first day of the summit. It's not clear to European officials what makes Trump confident that talks can continue, given the scale and scope of Israel's attacks. Given US influence over Israel, Trump's fellow leaders want a clearer picture of how long the US intends to allow the conflict to continue, or whether Trump plans to apply pressure on Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to de-escalate, the officials said. Already, a difference has emerged between Trump and Macron over a role for Russian President Vladimir Putin to play in mediating the conflict. After a phone call with Putin this weekend, Trump said Sunday he believed the Russian leader could act as a mediator. But Macron dismissed the idea during a visit to Greenland, saying Moscow's own violation of the UN Charter in Ukraine disqualified it from acting as a peace broker. The two men's differences over Putin were on full display Monday during Trump's first public appearance at the G7, where he criticized of the bloc for ejecting Russia eleven years ago. It was a combative opening to the president's outing in Canada, where he will meet with fellow leaders for the next two days on a wide range of subjects. 'Barack Obama and a person named Trudeau didn't want to have Russia in. And I would say that that was a mistake, because I think you wouldn't have a war right now if you had Russia in,' Trump said during his meeting with Carney. Russia was removed from the then-G8 after annexing Crimea in 2014. Justin Trudeau, whom Trump criticized repeatedly Monday for deciding to omit Russia, become prime minister a year later. 'They threw Russia out, which I claimed was a very big mistake, even though I wasn't in politics,' Trump said. He said not having Putin at the table 'makes life more complicated.' When later asked about Putin joining, he said, 'I'm not saying he should at this point, because too much water has gone over the dam.' CNN's DJ Judd and Paula Newton contributed to this story. This is story has been updated with additional developments.

After almost 20 years, this Italian restaurant in Miami Beach has closed for good
After almost 20 years, this Italian restaurant in Miami Beach has closed for good

Miami Herald

time23 minutes ago

  • Miami Herald

After almost 20 years, this Italian restaurant in Miami Beach has closed for good

Another restaurant has fallen victim to Miami's cruel summer. Sardinia Italian restaurant at 1801 Purdy Ave. in Miami Beach served its last plate of pasta and poured its last glass of wine on Father's Day. The restaurant, which was famous for its robust wine list and wood-burning oven, announced its closing on social media. There was no reason given for the closing, just heartfelt thanks to loyal customers. 'It's the end of an era,' the post said. 'As we draw the curtain on an incredible 20 year journey, we want to take a moment to express our heartfelt gratitude. Your support has been the foundation of our success, and every meal shared, every story exchanged and every smile has made our restaurant a home.' 'We are deeply thankful for the memories we've created together and the friendships we've forged. It has been an honor to serve you, and we will cherish these moments forever.' Sardinia was owned by Chef Pietro Vardue, who grew up in Sardinia, and restaurateur Antonio Gallo. The partners opened the restaurant in 2006 in the Sunset Harbor neighborhood, serving pasta, pizza, grilled meats and seafood. This isn't the only closing affecting the Miami Beach area recently. The steakhouse Red South Beach closed in May after 17 years in Miami Beach, while the French spot Le Zoo closed in April in Bal Harbour. Other notable closings around town include the Michelin-recommended Portuguese restaurant Sereia, which closed at the end of May, and the Michelin-starred EntreNos closes at the the end of June.

Key takeaways from grooming gangs report
Key takeaways from grooming gangs report

Yahoo

time29 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Key takeaways from grooming gangs report

A review into abuse carried out by grooming gangs in England and Wales has been published. The government asked Baroness Casey to carry out the audit, examining existing data and evidence on the nature and scale of group-based child sexual abuse, in January. Here are some of its key findings and recommendations. The report highlights flaws in data collection, which it says means it is not possible to assess the scale of the issue. It cites the Complex and Organised Child Abuse Dataset which identified around 700 recorded offences of group-based child sexual exploitation in 2023, saying this is the only figure on group-based child sexual exploitation. The report says this is highly unlikely to reflect the true scale of the issue, given this crime is under-reported and suffers from confusing and inconsistently applied definitions. One key data gap highlighted by the report is on ethnicity, which is described as "appalling" and a "major failing". It says the ethnicity of perpetrators is "shied away from" and still not recorded in two-thirds of cases, meaning it is not possible to draw conclusions at a national level. However, the report says there is enough evidence from police data in three areas - Greater Manchester, South Yorkshire and West Yorkshire - to show disproportionate numbers of men from Asian ethnic background amongst suspects for group-based child sexual exploitation. It adds that the significant number of perpetrators of Asian ethnicity identified in local reviews and high-profile prosecutions across the country also warrants further examination. The report says more effort is needed to explore why it appears perpetrators of Asian and Pakistani ethnicity are disproportionately represented in some areas. In response, the government has said it will make it a formal requirement to collect both ethnicity and nationality data for all cases of child sexual abuse and exploitation, as well as commission new research into the cultural and social drivers of the issue. The review also notes a significant proportion of live cases appear to involve suspects who are non-UK nationals or claiming asylum in the UK. The government said it was bringing forward changes so anyone convicted of sexual offences would have their asylum claim rejected and be denied refugee status. Follow live updates and reaction to the report 'The abuse was almost daily' - grooming survivors share their stories Over the weekend, Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer accepted the report's recommendation that there should be a full national inquiry into child sexual exploitation in England and Wales. The PM had previously dismissed calls for a national inquiry, arguing the issues had already been examined in a seven-year investigation by Prof Alexis Jay, which concluded in 2022. Instead the government commissioned Baroness Casey's review and unveiled plans for five local inquiries - to be held in Oldham and four other areas yet to be named. However, Baroness Casey said she changed her mind on the need for a national inquiry, after being "duly unimpressed" that more local councils did not volunteer to set up their own inquiries and some organisations were reluctant to talk to her own investigators. Her report recommends both a national police operation to review cases of child exploitation not acted on, as well as a national inquiry. It says this would be overseen by an Independent Commission, with full powers to compel witnesses to provide evidence, and should be time-limited and targeted. The inquiry would review cases of failures by local services to identify areas where investigations should be instigated and coordinate a series of targeted local investigations. The report also recommends tightening the law in England and Wales so adults who have sex with a child under 16 are always charged with rape, calling on society to "see children as children". Despite the age of consent being 16, it says there are too many examples of child sexual exploitation cases being dropped or downgraded from rape to lesser charges where a teenager has been "in love with" or "consented to" sex with the perpetrator. In response, Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has pledged to change the law as the report recommends, as well as work with the Crown Prosecution Service and police to ensure there are safeguards for consensual teenage relationships. She also accepted a recommendation to review criminal convictions of victims of child sexual exploitation, "so that those convicted for child prostitution offences while their rapists got of scot-free will have their convictions disregarded and their criminal records expunged". Taxis have previously been identified as a way children can be at risk of sexual exploitation, both as a potential way for perpetrators to meet their victims, as well as traffic them to different locations. Taxi licenses are issued by local authorities but the report points out that some areas are much more stringent in their processes to protect children. For example, in Rotherham the council has introduced taxi cameras and a 100% pass mark requirement for safeguarding tests for drivers. However, the report says these efforts have been hindered by more lax approaches in other areas and legal loopholes which mean drivers can apply for a license anywhere in the country but then operate in another area. It calls for this loophole to be closed immediately and for more rigorous licensing standards to be introduced. Fears children at risk due to taxi driver licensing Sign up for our Politics Essential newsletter to keep up with the inner workings of Westminster and beyond.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store