logo
The Forgotten Front: How China's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression Shaped WWII Victory

The Forgotten Front: How China's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression Shaped WWII Victory

IOL News07-08-2025
CGTN's Media Chats commemorates the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression, exploring the often-overlooked Eastern Front and its pivotal role in the global fight against fascism.
Image: Supplied / CGTN
As we commemorate the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascism War, it is time to re-examine the Eastern Front – a theatre of war too often overlooked, despite the pivotal role it played in defeating fascism.
In the latest episode of Media Chats, I was joined by Dou Hongyu, reporter at CGTN Radio; Wes Cabangon, operations adviser and journalist at Business Mirror in the Philippines; and Garland Nixon, U.S. political analyst and radio talk show host. Together, we explored how China's war of resistance against Japanese aggression shaped the course of the Second World War and why that history still matters today.
A Bullet
That
Witness
ed
the Bloody Battle of Shanghai
Dou Hongyu revisited one of China's most crucial battles during WWII: the 1937 Battle of Shanghai. She shared the story of General Zhu Fuxing, recounted by his son, Zhu Weiji.
According to Dou, General Zhu was ordered to take his men to defend several places in Shanghai. 'He managed to do it. But in the end, he lost two thirds of his soldiers, but the Japanese were still coming again and again. They couldn't leave. They didn't give up,' she said.
"In the end, General Zhu Fuxing fought for seven straight days and nights without any sleep until he was shot and lost consciousness on the battlefield… There were three bullets in the body of Zhu Fuxing. The doctor took out two of them with the rest, one only one centimetre away from his heart. So he had to live with a bullet for the rest of his life."
Dou emphasised the strategic importance of the battle. 'That war convinced people that China could do a lot in their resistance against Japanese aggression. Before that, Japan said they were about to occupy China within three months, but just the Battle of Shanghai managed to hold them back for three months.'
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The
Wha
-Chi Guerrillas
and United Resistance
Wes Cabangon shared the story of the Wha-Chi guerrilla unit, a Chinese-Filipino resistance group that emerged during the Japanese occupation of the Philippines.
'The Japanese invasion in 1941 brought immense suffering to the Filipino people… But in the face of that hardship, Filipinos rose up through both organized military defense and grassroots guerrilla movements… It was in the spirit of shared resistance that the Wha-Chi, an anti-Japanese, Chinese-Filipino guerrilla unit, stood shoulder to shoulder with Filipino fighters,' Wes said.
'They started with only seven rifles. They managed to gain more munitions… At their height, they numbered at about 700 strong. They liberated several towns in the resistance efforts, from Japanese control here in my country.'
He added, 'While direct wartime coordination between China and the Philippines may have been limited by geography, our people were united by a common struggle for freedom. That legacy should inspire us today to deepen our cooperation with mutual respect and open dialogue.'
'We're
T
old
M
ostly
A
bout D-Day and Normandy'
Garland Nixon spoke candidly about the absence of China's wartime contribution in American public memory.
'Unfortunately, in the United States, the story of WWII is told from the perspective of the United States… We're told mostly about D-Day and Normandy invasion. In the Pacific, we are told about the naval battles… But sadly, the United States does not really expound upon the great sacrifices that were made by the Chinese people.'
Garland noted that most Americans have 'very little' understanding of China's contributions. 'It's very difficult for United States citizens to understand the Chinese perspective… And sadly, we are not taught here in history and in schools about the sacrifices and the contributions of China.'
'They
D
idn't
S
ee
T
hem
as
H
uman
B
eings'
Dou also shared her investigation into the atrocities committed by Japan's infamousUnit 731 — a covert biological warfare unit of the Imperial Japanese Army.
'On paper, its name was like an epidemic prevention center and water supply center, sounds harmless. But inside… they were secretly conducting experiments on live human bodies,' Dou said. 'One of the most infamous experiments is called vivisection on conscious people… They got their organs outside from their bodies without anaesthesia.'
She continued, 'Another experiment is called frostbite experiment… They expose those prisoners in extremely cold weather… and then expose them to some hot temperature… to see which one could get them warm more quickly.'
Among the most chilling details: 'They didn't refer to those so-called prisoners as human beings. They called those bodies for experiments as logs. That means they didn't see them as human beings.'
Garland acknowledged these atrocities, saying, 'I've heard stories about that before… The western governments and western media does not report on those kinds of things, because Japan is supposedly now an ally.'
'These
W
ere
C
rimes
A
gainst
H
umanity'
Wes drew a powerful parallel between atrocities conducted by Japanese soldiers in China and those in the Philippines, pointing to the Nanjing and Manila Massacres.
'In Manila… tens of thousands of innocent civilians were massacred in just a few weeks… Like in Nanjing, the violence was systematic, deliberate and intended really to destroy the soul of a people,' he said. 'These were not just tragedies, they were crimes against humanity.'
He continued, 'The Philippines and China must continue to preserve historical truth, support the victim's memory, and resist any attempts to deny or revise what happened.'
'We're
D
oing
T
hat for
P
eace,
N
ot for
H
atred'
As the conversation drew to a close, Dou reflected on why remembrance matters.
'I think each time when we commemorate our victory over fascism, there would be some voices saying that we're doing this to spread hatred, but that's just the opposite. We're doing that for anything but hatred, we're doing that for peace,' she said.
'Among all those people related to the World War Two that I interviewed, none of them talked about hatred. What they want is more peace, because today we have great technologies in great conditions for us to live a better life.'
She continued, 'We can choose either to live a peaceful life or fascism might rise one day and people may lose their dignity. And every one of us today could be a victim… So I think it is our responsibility to tell people that we commemorate our victory over fascism… for peace, for a better life, not for hatred.'
As Wes noted in his closing remarks, remembrance is not just historical, 'it's deeply personal,' he said. 'My great grandfather was among those that who lost their lives during the war. So this must happen, or like many families in Asia, we carry those memories with quiet dignity.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hiroshima and Nagasaki Exposes the Simmering Inequities in the UN System
Hiroshima and Nagasaki Exposes the Simmering Inequities in the UN System

IOL News

time4 days ago

  • IOL News

Hiroshima and Nagasaki Exposes the Simmering Inequities in the UN System

A young boy watches as his paper lantern floats out on the Motoyasu River past the Atomic Bomb Dome (back R) to mark the 80th anniversary of the world's first atomic bomb attack, in the city of Hiroshima on August 6, 2025. Image: AFP Abbey Makoe The first week of every August in history exposes, in my view, the depths of the failures and deep-seated false pretences of international diplomacy as a vehicle for civil resolution of differences and a consensus-building mechanism. It was on August 6 and 9, respectively, 80 years ago, when the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki within three days apart, killing and maiming tens of thousands of innocent people in an unprecedented and unexpected jiffy. Many around the world often place tremendous importance on the total fatalities from the nuclear bombardment of the two Japanese cities in 1945. However, what I think of greater significance is the world's response in the aftermath all these years later. It is in the lackadaisical global response that I take umbrage. The disingenuity and deceitful nature and form of diplomatic engagements that have followed the dreadful events in Hiroshima and Nagasaki have steadfastly exposed what social scientists refer to as the disordered faults of progress in the post-WWII international world architecture built on the cooperative nature of the UN Charter. Every year on August 6 and 9, Japan holds 'Peace Ceremonies' in Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It is a painful period of annual reflection for the entire Japanese nation. It is a time when historical wounds are reopened. History revisited with tears and heartbreak. Over and above, it is a time to mitigate the pains of lingering yet unanswered questions: Why did the US bomb the cities and secondly, perhaps more importantly, why has the US not apologised throughout 80 years? For the uninitiated, let me recap: From Hiroshima alone, then a city of 350,000 people, America's atomic explosion killed a total of 140,000 innocent civilians. In Nagasaki, 74,000 people perished shortly after the US pilots had dropped the atomic bombs on the city. This year, Russia, a leading global nuclear power, expressed its exasperation with the seeming double standards in international relations that have permeated every sphere of society, including the highest office at the UN. In a Global North-dominated world order, led by the US through its hegemony dating back to immediately after the end of World War II in 1945, the narrative around Hiroshima and Nagasaki has been dominated by the West, which has refrained from blaming the US for the atomic bombings. Responding to Washington's failure to apologise for the unprecedented atomic bombardment in Japan, and the world's failure to demand accountability, Russia's Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova was vividly livid. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ She said Western politicians deliberately echo one another, consciously avoiding mentioning that it was the US that dropped the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Instead, added Zakharova, they push a line that says 'both the US and Russia had failed to learn lessons from those mistakes'. She called it an unbelievable fake narrative. 'And yet the UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres,' she charged, followed suit, stating on the occasion of this tragedy that fully omitted any mention of the United States.' She added that the narrative was intended to erase the Hiroshima and Nagasaki guilt from the US, and in doing so, they apportion blame to Russia. It is the West's nuclear hypocrisy, she said. Zakharova further asked: 'What does lack of condemnation mean for the US? It creates a comfort zone for them. It doesn't push them out of it. It keeps them in it so they don't have to wonder over questions like: Do you regret it? Would you do it again?' Emmanuel Pastreich, President of the Asia Institute, said the 80th commemoration of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombings should mark a time for truth and accountability. He said the 1945 bombings 'weren't militarily necessary – they were a demonstration – a test of power, a message to the world and a geopolitical gambit targeting the USSR'. He added: 'Eighty years later, the US still refuses to apologise, clinging to nuclear dominance as a rickety crutch. Instead of disarmament, they have modernised those weapons, spending trillions while science and ethics decay.' The Western narrative over Hiroshima and Nagasaki continues to be domineering to such an extent that, now a close ally of the US and a member of the US-led G7, it finds itself egg-dancing around the authentic history of bombings. At this week's ceremony at the atomic memorial site of the tragedy, the Japanese Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba could only express mourning for '100,000 precious lives' but never named the US, the nation that everybody knows had dropped the bombs. Such is an example of the manifestation of bogus diplomacy that dominates the US-led unipolar world order. This blatant attempt to misrepresent history cannot succeed. It has been correctly documented by upright historians, and instead of tweaking the naked facts, the US and the West would do well to own up and do good by the people of Japan, who still hurt to this day. In an ideal international world order based on the UN Charter of equality and mutual regard for one another, the spectre of unilateralism would never have succeeded to the point where the G7 has all but replaced the UN governance system.

‘I've never called anybody the K-word': McKenzie denies racism claims amid calls for his removal
‘I've never called anybody the K-word': McKenzie denies racism claims amid calls for his removal

TimesLIVE

time4 days ago

  • TimesLIVE

‘I've never called anybody the K-word': McKenzie denies racism claims amid calls for his removal

Sport, arts and culture minister Gayton McKenzie has refuted claims of racism after screenshots of his old X posts, in which he allegedly used derogatory language from the apartheid era against black people, recently resurfaced. McKenzie last week took legal action against the podcast Open Chats over perceived offensive remarks against the coloured community. In the wake of that, McKenzie's tweets dating back to 2013 in which he allegedly used the K-word to refer to black people, went viral, leading to growing calls from parties including the EFF, DA and African Transformation Movement (ATM) for his removal as minister. In a Facebook live stream video, McKenzie denied the claims. 'I never thought people would accuse me of racism,' he said. 'In my entire life, I've never called anybody the K-word. We are the victims. This is a political campaign driven by the EFF, together with some influencers on X. Let them show me where I used the K-word referring to someone. They can't. 'There must be a victim. Racism has a victim. Who is the victim, and did I ever use the K-word on? That's the first thing they should prove. Secondly, is there anyone in this world who can say I've been racist towards them? No.' He said he cannot be racist, citing his diverse background. He said his grandmother is Irish, his grandfather is Japanese, and his mother is Sotho. The EFF has called for his removal as minister and demanded a public apology. 'It is important to note the remarks were made years after his release from prison, demonstrating he is not 'rehabilitated' as he claims,' said EFF spokesperson Sinawo Thambo. 'His words prove his outlook remains rooted in division, hate and disdain for the very people he now claims to serve.' Thambo stressed the sport, arts, and culture ministry need to promote unity, inclusion and pride. 'It must lead outreach to the very communities McKenzie has called 'k***s'. Leaving him in office sends the message that the government condones such racism, provided it comes from a politically connected individual.' The ATM has written to President Cyril Ramaphosa requesting an investigation and the removal of McKenzie as minister. 'Resurfaced tweets authored by the minister contain racially derogatory slurs directed at black South Africans, language that is indefensible and deeply corrosive to the principles upon which our democracy is built,' said ATM parliamentary leader Vuyo Zungula. 'This is not a matter of political rivalry or petty offence. It is a matter of ethics, constitutional duty and the moral fabric of the Republic.' ActionSA has reported the matter to the South African Human Rights Commission =. 'Racism and the dehumanising of any person, regardless of their race, has no place in South Africa,' ActionSA MP Alan Beesley said, adding the party has a complaint against public works and infrastructure minister Dean Macpherson (DA) after referring to ActionSA supporters as "hobos". PA co-founder Kenny Kunene has come out in support of McKenzie, posting that he is being "unfairly attacked on old tweets of 2011 to divert attention from the insensitive and rude insults" on the podcast against the coloured community.

Gayton McKenzie reacts to claims he LIED about his race
Gayton McKenzie reacts to claims he LIED about his race

The South African

time5 days ago

  • The South African

Gayton McKenzie reacts to claims he LIED about his race

Gayton McKenzie has reacted to allegations he 'lied' about his racial background. The Patriotic Alliance leader – whose old tweets using the K-word recently resurfaced – identifies as a coloured South African. This week, the Minister of Sport, Arts and Culture called for the hosts of the Open Chats Podcast to be cancelled over their derogatory comments about the racial minority. On his Facebook account, Gayton McKenzie reacted to screenshots of social media users who accused him of 'lying' about being a coloured person. One screenshot of an X post said of the minister: 'Gayton Mckenzie's real surname is Makena. It was allegedly changed by his father to McKenzie during Apartheid for better employment opportunities. Another claimed that Patriotic Alliance leader's son Calvyn Le John used his mother's maiden name as to secure government contracts, a claim he has since disputed. Gayton reacted to the accusations with several laughing face emojis. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 Posted by Gayton Mckenzie on Sunday 10 August 2025 In his 2006 biography The Choice, Gayton McKenzie – who was born and raised in Bloemfontein – shed light on his diverse background. He wrote: 'My grandmother is Irish, my grandfather Japanese. My father is a product of that, but looks like a coloured man. My mother is Sotho. I simply look black. 'I am not entirely clear about my ethnicity. My parents have the photographs at home, but the genetics have been shuffled with a deck of wildcards, and the result is me, someone who looks nothing like the Irish, but has their luck, who looks nothing like the Japanese, and can't think of anything I have that's remotely related to them, except the DVD player at home. 'I can't even say I'm a typical Sotho, but at least I can tell you that in Sotho. Ke ka o bolelo ntho eo ka Sesotho'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1. Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X, and Bluesky for the latest news.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store