
Chicago sued by white men barred from Bally's casino investment
The city violated the civil rights of Richard Fisher and Phillip Aronoff, who said they were unable to invest in the project because they're White men, according to the suit filed Wednesday in federal court by the American Alliance for Equal Rights.
'We're not trying to stop the casino, we're trying to stop the race discrimination,' Dan Lennington, a lawyer for the plaintiffs. 'The minute they insert race-based qualifications into an investment, that's when it becomes illegal and invalid under federal law.'
Bally's devised the share-purchase program to make good on a pledge made in its casino bid to bring under-represented groups into the project and help build wealth in the local community. But such diversity, equity and inclusion practices have come under fire in the private sector and are getting rolled back by the federal government under the new Trump administration.
The suit challenges a provision in the Illinois Gambling Act requiring gaming companies to establish diversity programs that award 25% of contracts and other agreements to women and minority-owned businesses. In 2022, when the city awarded its sole casino license to Bally's, the deal included plans to offer a stake to minorities and women.
'Bally's has a binding Host Community Agreement with the City of Chicago to build what will be the best regional casino in the country,' the company said in an emailed statement. 'Bally's honors its commitments.'
A spokeswoman for the Illinois Gaming Board declined to comment. The city of Chicago law office didn't respond to requests for comment on Thursday.
Last month, Bally's announced the initial public offering of Class A shares that would provide a 25% equity stake only to women and minorities. But the suit alleges the limitations — which bar initial investors from reselling their shares to White males — are illegal.
Fisher and Aranoff 'would like to be dealt in on this offering but are excluded from the table solely based on immutable characteristics,' according to the lawsuit. 'In short, defendants have stacked the deck against them.'
The plaintiffs are asking a judge to order Bally's to sell them Class A shares and to lift the restriction in resale of shares to White men.
American Alliance for Equal Rights focuses on lawsuits targeting DEI initiatives and 'distinctions made on the basis of race and ethnicity,' according to its website. The organization was founded by conservative legal activist Edward Blum.
The case is American Alliance for Equal Rights v. Chicago, 25-cv-01017, US District Court, Northern District of Illinois (Chicago).
Originally Published: January 30, 2025 at 2:08 PM CST
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CNN
4 hours ago
- CNN
Bakari Sellers to Republican: Name one threat Trump's followed through on against Putin
President Donald Trump didn't rule out using US troops to help guarantee Ukraine's security while he hosted Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House along with several European leaders. CNN political commentator Bakari Sellers criticized MAGA supporters who he says are ok with boots on the ground now, but would have been adamantly against it months ago.

Wall Street Journal
6 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Trump Meeting With European Leaders in Oval Office
A White House official said the multilateral meeting in the East Room between President Trump, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders has ended. Zelensky and the European leaders are meeting with Trump in the Oval Office, the White House official said. The East Room meeting included a larger group of aides. The Oval Office meeting is expected to be smaller.

Wall Street Journal
7 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
Lawmakers Win Round in Spending Fight With White House
WASHINGTON—The Trump administration has restored a public website that tracks federal spending, marking a victory for lawmakers who complained that the White House was using the blackout to freeze funding without public disclosures. The dispute over the website has coincided with a fight between President Trump and Capitol Hill over the administration's aggressive efforts to curtail what it deems excessive spending, challenging Congress's power of the purse. The website was taken down in March by the White House Office of Management and Budget, prompting a lawsuit by advocacy groups that argued the administration was violating a public-disclosure law.