Israel will let foreign countries drop aid into Gaza, Israel army radio says
An Israeli military spokesperson did not immediately reply to a Reuters request for comment on the report.
The Gaza health ministry has said more than 100 people have died from starvation in the Palestinian enclave since Israel cut off supplies to the territory in March.
Israel lifted that blockade in May but has restrictions in place that it says are needed to prevent aid from being diverted to militant groups.
In the first two weeks of July, the UN children's agency UNICEF treated 5,000 children facing acute malnutrition in Gaza.
World Health Organization chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said on Wednesday that Gaza was suffering man-made mass starvation caused by a blockade on aid into the enclave.
Aid groups have warned of surging numbers of malnourished children in war-ravaged Gaza as a trio of European powers prepared to hold an "emergency call" on the deepening humanitarian crisis.
Doctors Without Borders (MSF) said that a quarter of the young children and pregnant or breastfeeding mothers it had screened at its clinics last week were malnourished, a day after the United Nations said one-in-five children in Gaza city were suffering from malnutrition.
With fears of mass starvation growing, Britain, France and Germany were set to hold an emergency call to push for a ceasefire between Israel and Hamas and discuss steps towards Palestinian statehood.
"I will hold an emergency call with E3 partners tomorrow, where we will discuss what we can do urgently to stop the killing and get people the food they desperately need while pulling together all the steps necessary to build a lasting peace," British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said.
The call comes after hopes of a new ceasefire in Gaza faded yesterday when Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with Hamas in Qatar.
US envoy Steve Witkoff accused the Palestinian militant group of not "acting in good faith".
More than 100 aid and human rights groups warned this week that "mass starvation" was spreading in Gaza.
Israel has rejected accusations it is responsible for the deepening crisis, which the World Health Organization has called "man-made".
Israel placed Gaza under an aid blockade in March, which it only partially eased two months later.
The trickle of aid since then has been controlled by the Israeli and US-backed Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, replacing the longstanding UN-led distribution system.
Aid groups have refused to work with the GHF, accusing it of aiding Israeli military goals.
The GHF system, in which Gazans have to travel long distances and join huge queues to reach one of four sites, has often proved deadly, with the UN saying that more than 750 Palestinian aid-seekers have been killed by Israeli forces near GHF centres since late May.
An AFP photographer saw bloodied patients, wounded while attempting to get humanitarian aid, being treated on the floor of Nasser hospital in the southern city of Khan Yunis yesterday.
Israel has refused to return to the UN-led system, saying that it allowed Hamas to hijack aid for its own benefit.
Accusing Israel of the "weaponisation of food", MSF said that: "Across screenings of children aged six months to five years old and pregnant and breastfeeding women, at MSF facilities last week, 25% were malnourished."
It said malnutrition cases had quadrupled since 18 May at its Gaza city clinic and that the facility was enrolling 25 new malnourished patients every day.
Israel's military campaign in Gaza has killed 59,587 Palestinians, mostly civilians, according to the health ministry in the Hamas-run territory.
Hamas's October 2023 attack that triggered the war resulted in the deaths of 1,219 people, most of them civilians, according to an AFP tally based on official figures.
Of the 251 hostages taken during the attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza, including 27 the Israeli military says are dead.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
Irish Examiner view: This may be the dawn of the clean energy era
Even five years ago, we might have looked at the head of the UN saying 'the sun is rising on a clean energy age' with the shining hope it deserved. It wasn't blind hyperbole last week. Some 90% of renewable energy projects are now cheaper than their fossil-fuel equivalents. A surge in solar adoption has been important, and the huge focus on low-carbon manufacturing from China has played a significant role. This should probably be seen as dovetailing with the country's policies around control of the materials vital for green energy. And yet, in the face of the continuing rise in global temperatures, the struggle to encourage accelerated adoption of EVs (bearing in mind the vast number of petrol and diesel vehicles still on the roads), and a US administration that is turning the clock back on renewable energy, one might almost see António Guterres's statement as a pyrrhic victory. Still, we could look at this in five years and comment on a remarkable turnaround. Guterres is right to point out that a great deal of energy insecurity revolves around fossil fuels, and so they are susceptible to the price shocks that accompany wars, invasions, and other geopolitical events. He said: 'There are no price spikes for sunlight,' he said. 'No embargoes for wind.' Let us look on his speech last week with the positivity it deserves. When it comes to hope, like the Irish phrase says: 'Níl sé marbh fós.' It isn't dead yet, even if it is a faded shade of what it once was. Real battles are for resources History might, to adapt Jacob Field, seem like one bloody thing after another, but it seems to have been an endless resource grab. For example, the ceaseless scramble for raw materials led to the carving up of Africa by European imperial powers in the 19th century and the same of the Americas from the 15th century on. Water is likely to be a future issue, but right now the flashpoints centre around things like rare earths (vital for semiconductors) and minerals that are essential for modern technology and green energy. The Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), subjected to what we would now class as crimes against humanity by Belgian interests in the 19th century, is as important to minerals as Saudia Arabia has been to oil. The EU has been working to secure contracts there. America, however, has been improving its position, attempting to capitalise on ongoing violence sponsored by DRC's neighbouring countries such as Rwanda. This as Donald Trump still harbours ambitions of annexing the mineral-rich Canada and Greenland, as well as securing a treaty with Ukraine that allows for US exploitation of its mineral wealth. All that, though, still leaves every country trailing well behind China. China, having spent the last few years greatly expanding its influence through its belt and road initiative, has extensive footholds in Africa now, between mining contracts and loans to fund infrastructure. It has mining operations around the world, and some 60%-80% of minerals — including cobalt (batteries) and uranium — are within its orbit. This has been seen as a security threat by some Western powers, and the thought is not without merit (even if some Western countries would do the same if they could). What if China simply cut off Western access to the minerals under its control? Or hiked all the prices? How long would existing supplies for advanced and everyday technology last? China has typically taken the long — some would say very long — view when it comes to economics. It may well be the manufacturing hub of the world, but that doesn't mean it couldn't simply outwait the countries that have outsourced their manufacturing industries to its cities. We live in a globalised world, despite the best efforts of some, and the phone in your hand or pocket with the cobalt in its battery serves as a reminder of just how delicate it is and how interconnected we all are. What's your view on this issue? You can tell us here Making dreams come true When it comes to connections, despite our own travails at home, it is good that we, as a country, still remember that there are those with greater needs than our own. As reported by Imasha Costa in today's edition, there are now six children's homes in Sri Lanka that have been funded by Irish people. All are named after the towns that support them. Initially founded by Wicklow-Wexford TD Brian Brennan, these began in the aftermath of the 2004 tsunami that devastated swathes of Asia. They have since grown in number. While Sri Lanka itself has its dangers — Costa notes in a first-person piece that emigration is common, extreme poverty is endemic, and she herself was injured in an attempted robbery there in 2023 — it is something of a balm to know that there are oases of calm for children. The country faces significant economic and political challenges, yet some of the boys and girls who have spent time at the homes have gone on to bigger and better things. They are described as 'exceptionally talented … they have incredibly massive dreams'. Mol an óige agus tiocfaidh sí. Read More Letters to the Editor: Blurred line between right and wrong
Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
From Kilkenny to Sri Lanka: Meet the vet helping to care for three million street dogs
A Kilkenny woman who moved to Sri Lanka last summer to work as a veterinarian described how it felt like she was 'regressing back into her teens' after living at home with her parents in Ireland. Sarah Rochford, aged 37, said she had always been travelling and had only moved back home to live with her family in Kilkenny after the covid pandemic. 'I was renting and then living at home, and I felt like I was regressing back into my teens,' she told the Irish Examiner. 'I had eventually saved up for a deposit, but once I saw the first house, I just could not do it. 'I was weighing things up, and it felt like signing up for a mortgage was signing up for a lifetime. I just did not know if I wanted to do that,' Ms Rochford added. Ms Rochford said she decided to apply for a job as a vet in Sri Lanka after seeing a post on Facebook. 'I did not know anything before I came here,' Ms Rochford said, 'but I always knew I wanted to travel.' Sarah Rochford said: 'We catch them, neuter and vaccinate them before releasing them.' She now works in a mobile unit for a charity on the south coast of Sri Lanka, looking after street dogs. WeCare, the charity, was established 11 years ago by British veterinarian Dr Janey Lowes, who was backpacking in Sri Lanka in May 2014. According to the charity, while these dogs love their freedom and often have a safe place to sleep and a guardian who feeds them, the real problem that stray dogs face in Sri Lanka is the lack of access to 'even the most basic of veterinary care'. The charity helps catch and neuter stray dogs. Sri Lanka has some three million stray dogs, according to Ms Rochford, and the goal of the mobile unit is 'no rabies, no babies'. 'We're tipping away, and we give these animals a UK standard of care,' Ms Rochford said. 'We catch them, neuter and vaccinate them before releasing them, and that's our work down in the mobile van.' The 37-year-old added that she could see herself in Sri Lanka 'for the foreseeable'. The climate was tricky to adjust to at first, especially being pale Irish. I got heat rashes, I get dehydrated and migraines as well. 'But it was easy enough to adapt to the lifestyle and local culture here. The fruit is unbelievable, it is so fresh and tasty. However, I do miss curry chips and salt and vinegar crisps,' Ms Rochford added. She said that while she does not make Irish wages in Sri Lanka, the cost of living is quite low, and that the country had a 'better way of living'. 'They live day to day, there is no set goal,' Ms Rochford said. 'I do miss home the odd time, and the longer I am away, it is hard to keep in touch with day-to-day life of people back home. 'I do miss my family, my mam, the cat, but I also do love it here.' Read More Report makes recommendations to increase the welfare of horses
RTÉ News
3 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Tariffs aren't good news but it could have been much worse
While the crucial US EU trade deal announced this weekend does bring certainty for businesses, there are significant drawbacks. Fundamentally, tariffs are negative for trade. The US is a significant export market for Ireland, and many sectors now face duties of 15% which did not exist last year. The biggest issue is pharmaceuticals, which are the largest Irish export to the US, valued at €44bn in 2024. In recent months US President Donald Trump had threatened enormous duties on drugs imported by America. He had ordered a national security investigation of the pharmaceutical sector. Last night, Tánaiste Simon Harris said his understanding was that after the investigation concludes the maximum tariff which could be imposed would be 15%. So, while the threat of more damaging duties is averted, pharmaceuticals made in Ireland may well face 15% tariffs in future, up from zero at present. Another key sector for Ireland is the manufacture of computer chips. Like pharmaceuticals it has been subject to a separate investigation by the Trump administration and faced the possibility of punitive tariffs, but it too could face a 15% tariff after the investigation ends. Last night, European Commission President Ursula Von Der Leyen said there was no decision yet regarding spirits exported to the US. This is critically important to Ireland's whiskey industry which has already seen several recent closures. There had been speculation that sector could have been part of a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement, but that is not yet agreed. Another important area for Ireland is aircraft leasing. Ms Von Der Leyen said last night that aviation would be part of a tariff-free arrangement. For other EU countries the massive duty of 27.5% which was imposed on European cars now falls to 15%. Some existing tariffs will be folded into that baseline 15%, meaning it would be an all-in tariff. For example, it is expected to include the existing "most favoured nation" duties of 4.8% which exist currently under World Trade Organization rules. The fact there is a deal at all avoids the threat of a prolonged tit-for-tat trade war. It means businesses can plan, investments can be made, and job-creating projects can proceed. But exporters are already seeking Government support as they navigate the new reality of the Trump administration's tariffs. The EU-US agreement is not a trade deal in the usual sense. Normally these pacts are negotiated over years and culminate in a document running to hundreds of pages. What was announced yesterday was the framework of a deal with much detail yet to be finalised. Yesterday wasn't the end of the negotiations, but it was a milestone.
