logo
Should You Use a Dumbphone?

Should You Use a Dumbphone?

JOE BARONIO, REPORTER: How old were you when you got your first smartphone?
PERSON: I think I was 12.
PERSON: 14.
PERSON: I think maybe 12 or so, 11 or 12.
PERSON: When I was 12.
PERSON: I was 13.
PERSON: I think I was 12.
Yeah, if you were born in the past two generations, you've probably grown up with smartphones. In fact, a study from the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner in 2023 found that more than half of 10 to 13-year-olds and more than 90% of 14 to 17-year-olds owned a mobile phone. And, according to Redsearch, globally 13 to 19-year-olds spent around 7 1/2 hours on average per day looking at their screens.
PERSON: I think I use it around 4 hours a day.
PERSON: I think like 7 hours a day.
PERSON: Two to five hours a day sometimes.
PERSON: Probably 5-6 hours a day.
PERSON: A lot, yeah, a lot.
PERSON: Because a lot of the like the platforms I use like Instagram can be a little like addictive, sort of like it's hard for me to put it down.
JAMESON, THE LUDDITE CLUB: Despite all the times my parents tried to warn me and try to limit my screen time, it wasn't until I reached the conclusion that my phone had been harming me and my wellbeing that I really decided to do something about it.
This is Jameson and she is the co-founder of the Luddite Club in New York. The name Luddite actually comes from the 19th century. Back then, textile workers in England formed a rebellion, raided factories and destroyed machines they believed were threatening their livelihoods. During the industrial revolution. The idea for these Luddites is kind of the same without the destroying part. Instead ditching smartphones in favour of dumb phones, or feature phones, and promoting the conscious consumption of technology.
JAMESON: My sleep schedule was off the charts, I was staying up until 3:00 AM. I was staying in my room, you know, on my phone. And I just, I felt bad, but I didn't really consider any option. I didn't feel there any options of ways to combat that.
Jameson isn't alone. A new study published in the Journal of Human Development and Capabilities surveyed 100,000 generation Z's from around the world about their smartphone experiences. It found that for every year before the age of 13 that a person got a smartphone, their long-term mental health and wellbeing was worse, often leading to suicidal thoughts, aggression, detachment from reality, poorer emotional regulation and low self-worth.
PERSON: I remember in year 10 I was really at my lowest and I think that social media was like the significant contributing factor to it.
PERSON: I started really young, so I think because I also had social media, so when you start comparing yourself to those people there, I think it's really bad.
PERSON: There's many issues like attention span because like even myself like sometimes in class I just doze off cause like I just can't like spend that much time looking at the board and like it was related to mental health as well like bullying as well and all that.
JAMESON: Honestly, since I've gotten rid of my smartphone, I definitely spend more quality time with my family. I'm more present at family dinners. I do my schoolwork faster, I have better grades, I've become a lot less scatterbrained, and I've just become a lot more driven and ambitious.
While smartphone luddism is a growing trend among teens in places like the US and Europe, I wanted to find out if any young Aussies are getting involved. So, I set up a table at the University of Adelaide to find out.
Do any of you guys use dumb phones? You do? Nope. Anybody? Dumb phone? Was this a dumb idea? Maybe it was. In half an hour being here nobody's come, and that probably tells us something about how many people, young people do actually use these phones.
PERSON: Excuse me. Hello. Can you just take photographs of us?
Sure. I don't suppose you know anyone who uses one of these phones, do you?
PERSON: What is that?
This is this is a dumb phone. So, like one of these really old phones that doesn't have like apps or anything on it. You know anyone who does?
PERSON: Yeah, this is too old.
Too old? Fair enough. There you go. Should we move? I don't suppose you know anyone who uses a phone like this do you? No? Didn't think so. Well, we've been here about an hour, and nobody has even known anyone who's used one of these, so I'm gonna need to look elsewhere.
Do any of you know anybody who uses a phone like this?
PERSON: Yes, yes, yes. Carlos, a friend of ours in year 11.
So, a young person actually uses it?
PERSON: Yeah, but well, the motivation was a bit different because his phone got taken away.
Oh.
PERSON: No, not anymore, no.
PERSON: No, never.
PERSON: No, I don't know anyone.
PERSON: No.
PERSON: No.
PERSON: No.
PERSON: No.
PERSON: No, that's back in the old days.
DR MICHAEL CARR-GREGG, CHILD PHYSCHOLOGIST: It's certainly not something that my clients are doing here in Australia. In fact, I can honestly put my hand on my heart and say I don't have one who's doing that?
Doctor Michael Carr Gregg is a child psychologist, and he wrote the original report recommending phone bans in schools back in 2018, which has since been adopted in all state and territory public schools. But when it comes to smartphone use outside of the classroom, he doesn't see the Luddite trend taking off here any time soon.
DR MICHAEL CARR-GREGG: And that's because really the way in which my clients communicate with one another is through social media and therefore the smartphone is absolutely essential. It is the lifeblood of my clients to be with their friends. And developmentally, that's very appropriate.
PERSON: I think it's just a matter of just like people being a little bit more like addicted to like online content.
PERSON: I think there's a big fear of missing out. It's like if people aren't connected with their screens and like social media and stuff they like, can't see what other people are posting or doing on it.
PERSON: A lot of my friends like live in different places throughout the world and I wouldn't be able to call them on a phone like that.
What if the smartphone ban was enforced, though? One of the recommendations in the Journal of Human Development and Capability study is to implement graduated access restrictions for smartphones, keeping anyone under 13 from having one.
PERSON: It's just probably for the better in future life so, yeah.
PERSON: I think not for smartphones as a whole because I feel like it's important to have the communication when like, you're not with your parents and stuff.
PERSON: 13 is past that age where you sort of enter high school and that phase, that sort of culture, I feel like phones are a big part of socialising and that sort of connection that many people rely on, so I think, I think it's a bit harsh.
At the moment the recommendation is just a recommendation, but it's one that psychologists like Doctor Michael say should be considered by both parents and young people.
DR MICHAEL CARR-GREGG: Age, of course, doesn't define maturity, but the law requires it to be a particular age. For me, I think the restriction under 13 will impact on young peoples's social life, but I think that we can find a work around.
Would you guys ever give it a go? Ditching your smartphone for that?
PERSON: Yeah. Yeah, I'm down.
PERSON: Maybe it would be like a nice experiment to try.
PERSON: I'd probably struggle to, but I would maybe give it a try, like just to improve my mental health and stuff like that.
PERSON: Yeah, I think I would, I definitely think. I would, yeah.
PERSON: Yeah, I would.
PERSON: 100% cause like I'm I'm just way too addicted, you know.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla ordered to pay $US242 million in Autopilot death
Tesla ordered to pay $US242 million in Autopilot death

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Tesla ordered to pay $US242 million in Autopilot death

A Florida jury on Friday ordered Tesla to pay hundreds of millions of dollars to plaintiffs who blamed a deadly 2019 crash on the company's 'Autopilot' driver assistance technology. The jury found Tesla's system partly responsible for a crash in Key Largo that killed Naibel Benavides Leon and injured her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, according to attorney Darren Jeffrey Rousso, a partner at the law firm that represented Angulo and Leon's family. The plaintiffs had alleged that Autopilot was to blame when driver George McGee's Tesla careened into a Chevrolet sport utility vehicle, killing Leon and injuring Angulo. The jury awarded $US200 million ($309 million) in punitive damages, plus $US59 million ($91 million) in compensatory damages to Leon's family and $US70 million ($108 million) in damages to Angulo, according to court records. Since the jury assigned one-third of the blame to Tesla, the compensatory damages will be reduced, Rousso said, with the total impact of the jury award totalling $US242 million ($374 million) after these reductions. 'Justice was done,' Mr Rousso said. 'The jury heard all the evidence and came up with a fair and just verdict on behalf of our clients.' Tesla will appeal the decision, according to its defense attorneys. 'Today's verdict is wrong and only works to set back automotive safety and jeapordise Tesla's and the entire industry's efforts to develop and implement lifesaving technology,' Tesla said through its legal team. 'The evidence has always shown that this driver was solely at fault because he was speeding, with his foot on the accelerator — which overrode Autopilot — as he rummaged for his dropped phone without his eyes on the road. 'To be clear, no car in 2019, and none today, would have prevented this crash. This was never about Autopilot.'

Hyundai Inster review finds top contender in compact EV realm
Hyundai Inster review finds top contender in compact EV realm

News.com.au

time6 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Hyundai Inster review finds top contender in compact EV realm

Cheap electric vehicles. For some time that's been an oxymoron. The influx of new Chinese manufacturers and slowing demand has seen the get-in price decline, but now there is a more recognised brand targeting the basement. Hyundai introduced the compact Inster in April that has a range of 327km with a $39,000 retail starting point. That equates to about $43,500 on the road. It's still a steep ask above the BYD Dolphin Essential which is $31,290 drive-away and has a 410km range. There is also the GWM Ora Standard Range which was recently available for $33,990 (310km range), while the MG4 Excite 51 has been down to $37,990 (350km). Hyundai differentiates itself with a strong dealership network and greater brand reputation. Is that enough to sway buyers from the cheaper alternatives? Our family sampled the base model, although there are extended-range derivatives that push the driving capacity to 360km for an extra $3500 along with the 'outdoorsy' Cross version which tops out the Inster range at $45k plus on-roads. What do you get? Plaudits don't much higher than being named 2025 World Electric Vehicle. That included a panel of more than 90 judges from 30 countries who recognised the Inster for its design inside and out. The bare-bones Inster is reflective of its model positioning, with cloth seat trim and liberal use of plastics across the cabin. Raising the quality bar are twin 10.25-inch screens, one a central touchscreen and the other for the driver instruments. Among the other features are a six-speaker stereo with Apple CarPlay and Android Auto, satnav, along with vehicle-to-load functionality which has a three-pin power point in the front for charging items like laptops, camping equipment, e-scooters and e-bikes. Over-the-air updates can also be undertaken, which means the Inster can get the latest software upgrades without returning to the dealer. That's handy, as servicing is only required every 30,000km or two years. Hyundai offers a prepaid pack of two services for $1310. White, ivory and khaki are all complimentary external colours. Black, yellow and orange add $595. Matt paint options are an extra $1000. Under the floor sits the 42kWh battery, which can be replenished from 10 to 80 per cent using an at-home charger in about four hours. Quicker public chargers would take just under an hour, while a super-fast 120kW one will do it in 30 minutes. We used a standard household power point combined with the provided 10amp charger on our test which proved reasonably quick, taking us from 10-100 per cent in less than 18 hours. How was the drive? Surprisingly adept in varying conditions, a long wheelbase for its size translates to impressive competency on the highway and twisty terrain. On paper the 0-100km/h time of 11.7 seconds looks slow and underwhelming. But the real-world experience is far from pedestrian, with the Inster feeling responsive to acceleration requests and nimble in traffic. Small cars with combustion engines typically feel asthmatic when it comes to hilly terrain, yet the Inster's electric power provided dependable surges up some challenging inclines. Despite its compact dimensions, the Inster has a turning circle of 10.6m. That's better than many vehicles, but given the size it initially felt like it could be tighter (some of our U-turn attempts quickly became three-point turns). Our test saw a thrifty return of 13.2kWh/100km, which was well under the official figure from Hyundai. Most fully electric vehicles we've driven recently are usually well beyond 15kWh/100km. Interior space is also impressive given the dimensions. Four adults can find comfort, with impressive head and knee space for those in the second row. However boot space is limited and we only managed four grocery bags in the boot before requiring the back seat – there is a false floor for additional cargo area. Would you buy one? Kel: Sprightly and distinctive, the Inster regularly induced smiles from onlookers. I enjoyed the drive and loved the exterior styling, especially the circular LED headlights and pixel graphic indicators. The size doesn't suit my demographic, but I could see the appeal for younger EV buyers with $40k to spend or for those who want their second car to be an electric runabout. Grant: When it comes to the bargain basement EVs, you have to look beyond the bottom line. Where the Inster separates itself from the slightly less expensive rivals is performance – it feels more confident and robust on the road than most of the others we have sampled. Sales have been slow and we've seen some Inster demonstrators available with low km for about $37k. For that kind of money it becomes the standout buy in the compact EV realm.

Is Snapchat's My AI a safe space or a slippery slope for teens?
Is Snapchat's My AI a safe space or a slippery slope for teens?

ABC News

time15 hours ago

  • ABC News

Is Snapchat's My AI a safe space or a slippery slope for teens?

Snapchat's new AI chatbot is already raising alarms among teens and parents, with poor privacy features and no access to parental guardrails without paying for a premium subscription, is this feature really as dangerous as it sounds? Also, major automakers are cancelling their upcoming electric vehicle launches in the US - what does this mean for us here in Australia? And unlike Elon Musk's brain-computer interface, Synchron's doesn't require open-skull surgery, and it has an OpenAI chatbot baked in. Is this a win for disability tech? Or the first step towards a Terminator-like revolution? Plus, how do you stop an AI model turning Nazi? What does the Grok drama reveal about how we train our large language models? And is there a better way to be doing it? GUESTS: Tobias Venus , technology and travel journalist technology and travel journalist Jennifer Dudley-Nicholson, Future Economies reporter for the Australian Associated Press This episode of Download This Show was made on Gadigal land and in Meanjin. Technical production by Ann-Marie Debettencour and Allyse Symons.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store