US designates BLA, Majeed Brigade as Foreign Terrorist Organisation
Balochistan Liberation Army
(BLA) and its alias, The
Majeed Brigade
, as a
Foreign Terrorist Organisation
.
BLA was designated as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist (SDGT) in 2019 following several
terrorist attacks
. Since then, the group has claimed responsibility for several attacks, including by the Majeed Brigade, the State Department said in a statement.
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals
By Vaibhav Sisinity
View Program
Finance
Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4
By CA Himanshu Jain
View Program
Artificial Intelligence
AI For Business Professionals Batch 2
By Ansh Mehra
View Program
The statement said the State Department is designating BLA and its alias, The Majeed Brigade, as a Foreign Terrorist Organisation (FTO), and adding the Majeed Brigade as an alias to BLA's previous SDGT designation.
The action, it said, "demonstrates the
Trump administration
's commitment to countering terrorism".
"Terrorist designations play a critical role in our fight against this scourge and are an effective way to curtail support for terrorist activities," the State Department said.
Live Events
The department further said that in 2024, BLA claimed responsibility for suicide attacks near Karachi airport and the Gwadar Port Authority Complex.
In 2025, the group said it was behind the hijacking of the Jaffar Express train travelling from Quetta to Peshawar in March, which resulted in the deaths of 31 civilians and security personnel, and over 300 passengers being taken hostage.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
42 minutes ago
- Time of India
'In any serious nation ...': Opposition objects to Op Sindoor heroes on TV show; links it to India-Pakistan cricket match revenue
NEW DELHI: The opposition on Wednesday raised objections over the appearance of three officers involved in Operation Sindoor on a TV show for Independence Day special. Taking to X, Kerala Congress said that inviting Sofiya Qureshi, Vyomika Singh and Prerna Deosthalee to a TV quiz show would be unthinkable in any serious nation with a professional military. "Three officers of the Armed Forces will appear on Kaun Banega Crorepati, a private entertainment show, in full uniform, explaining to a Bollywood actor the planning of a military operation," the party said. "In any serious nation with a professional military, this would be unthinkable. But this is the spectacle of New India under Narendra Modi," it added. Meanwhile, Shiv Sena (UBT) MP Priyanka Chaturvedi accused the TV network company of earning revenue from the upcoming India vs Pakistan cricket match in the Asia Cup, while also inviting the faces of Operation Sindoor to a quiz show. "Our heroic women in uniform who went on to become the face of Operation Sindoor have been invited by a private entertainment channel on their show. This private entertainment channel's parent company, Sony Pictures Networks India (SPNI), has also bagged the broadcasting rights of the Asia Cup till 2031," Chaturvedi wrote on X. "Yes, the very channel that seeks to earn revenue through India vs Pakistan cricket matches. Now join the dots," she added. A short teaser of the episode, which will be aired on August 15, was shared recently, showing the officers receiving a grand welcome from KBC host Amitabh Bachchan. In the promo, Colonel Qureshi was also seen explaining why Operation Sindoor, which India launched in the aftermath of the Pahalgam attack, was needed. "Pakistan has been carrying out such (terror) acts repeatedly. A response was necessary, and that's why Operation Sindoor was planned," she said.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
US begins probe against these Indian companies, shares fall, the companies are....
Trump on India trade Shares of Waaree Energies Limited and Premier Energies Limited were in focus on Wednesday, August 13 after Waaree Energies' stock fell by up to 5 per cent, dropping to Rs. 2,957.70, and Premier Energies' stock slipped by about 2 per cent to Rs. 996.20. The fall came after the US Department of Commerce has started an anti-dumping duty investigation, which has worried investors. Fears that such a duty might be imposed have put pressure on both stocks. What's anti-dumping duty investigation? The investigation is about the solar products these companies sell in the US market. Authorities want to check if they are being exported at prices lower than the actual cost, which could harm local US companies. The US Department of Commerce has started an anti-dumping duty and countervailing duty probe on crystalline silicon photovoltaic (CSPV) cells whether they are shipped as standalone solar cells or assembled into modules from India, Indonesia, and Laos. Dependence on the US market According to the US Department of Commerce website, India is allegedly 'dumping' solar cells in the US at a margin of 123 per cent and receiving a subsidy rate of 2 per cent. The department's preliminary findings on Indian solar cell imports will be released on September 2, 2025. At the end of the June quarter, Waaree Energies had an order book worth Rs. 49,000 crore for 25 gigawatts, with exports making up 41.3 per cent of the total. During the quarter, Waaree received orders for about 2.23 gigawatts, most of them from US-based clients. Premier Energies, however, has less exposure to the US market and is more focused on domestic sales.
The Wire
an hour ago
- The Wire
'Assam Tribune' Rejects Column Critical of CM Himanta and BJP
The newspaper instructed Patricia Mukhim to 'focus only on Meghalaya.' Within hours of sending in her bimonthly column to The Assam Tribune on the violation of human rights and 'dehumanisation' of Bengali-speaking Muslims in Assam, veteran journalist Patricia Mukhim was told by the paper on August 6 that the management had decided not to carry the piece. She was also instructed to concentrate only on Meghalaya. Patricia, who has been the editor of The Shillong Times for almost two decades now, started contributing to the Assam Tribune, one of the largest-selling English dailies in the northeast, around 2014. On Wednesday, she sent in her piece to the Tribune which was to be published the next day, August 7. Soon after being informed about the rejection, the Padma Shri-winning journalist decided to cut off her ties with The Assam Tribune and not contribute to the paper henceforth. This, she announced in a Facebook post. Expressing her disappointment at the development, the Meghalaya-based journalist wrote on the social media platform, 'To be told what to write on and how to write are the marks of an authoritarian regime. It's better to be a free spirit than be tied in knots and have your thoughts imprisoned.' 'Concentrate Only on Meghalaya' On August 6, an Assam Tribune staffer sent a text message to Patricia, saying 'Management has gone through your article — 'Needed a political catharsis' — and instructed me not to carry it. From now on, therefore, you are humbly requested to focus only on Meghalaya.' They also said they were 'simply conveying' to the journalist 'what the management said' — that she should 'concentrate only on Meghalaya'. 'For any query in this regard, you may talk to the executive editor,' the text message added. Patricia said when she started contributing to the paper around 2014, she was not given any such instruction on what she should or should not write on. 'I travel the region and am a keen observer of its socio-political and geo-strategic twists and turns.' 'Then I realised that the inevitable had happened.. Anything that runs contrary to the current regime will not be entertained by the mainstream media barring a few brave ones that continue to stand their ground and have refused to become lapdogs of the ruling regime,' she says in her Facebook post. 'Relentless drive to dehumanise Bengali-speaking Muslims' The 'rejected' opinion piece, published two days later by Scroll, draws attention to how 'the relentless drive to dehumanise Bengali-speaking Muslims, thousands of whom are now homeless and without a country, has crossed out 'human rights' from the political discourse' in Assam. Referring to former US President Ronald Reagan's inaugural address in 1981 in which he had famously remarked, 'In the present crisis, government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem,' Patricia writes that Assam today has a 'a one-man government'. 'We don't hear voices that will calm the chaos. It's as if the chief minister alone has taken upon himself the sole right of addressing the media. Assam society today is completely divided between Bengali Muslims and Bengali Hindus,' she adds. It is relevant to add here that under chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma, communal polarisation in Assam has reached an unprecedented peak with incidents of hate and violence against Bengali-speaking Muslims rising exponentially. In July, Sarma justified the 'fight' against minorities even if they are not 'foreigners', when he wrote in an X post, 'Just do not stop us from fighting for what is ours. For us this is our last battle of survival.' Earlier in May, the Himanta-led Cabinet brought in a scheme to give gun licenses to 'indigenous people' living in Muslim-majority areas. Justifying the move, Sarma has said, 'A gun is essential. Without a gun, how will you live in places like South Salmara and Mankachar? You will understand when you go there…' About 95% of the population in Salmara-Mankachar district are Muslims. In other words, Sarma, the constitution head of the state, made no bones about the fact that he felt guns were needed by Hindus to defend themselves against Muslims. It is interesting to note that on August 11, the Assam chief minister's office shared an Assam Tribune report on X which quotes Sarma justifying the gun policy by saying that gun is essential in vulnerable areas. The report says, 'The Chief Minister stated the new policy is strictly limited to areas where national security concerns are pronounced, particularly along Assam's international border with Bangladesh. Among the immediate areas being considered for arms licence issuance are Dhubri, South Salmara, Barpeta, Morigaon, and Nagaon.' Fact is, neither Barpeta, not Morigaon, nor Nagaon shares international border with Bangladesh. However, all three are Muslim-majority districts. The report in The Assan Tribune chooses to ignore that. In her article, Patricia does note how the media has joined the BJP government in Assam in polarising the society. 'Today, politics is driven purely by divisiveness and hatred. Day after day, TV channels and YouTubers carry out a vicious campaign against Muslims as if they do not deserve to live. Thousands of them are reduced to a life that hangs by a thread in what is the most inhuman treatment meted out to them.' It is crudely ironic that in the piece itself, Patricia repeatedly refers to the shrinking space for questioning the powers that be. 'Today we have reached a point in this country when asking hard questions from the ruling establishment turns you into a Pakistan sympathiser or an 'anti-national'. Never in the past, not even during the Emergency, did we feel this sense of repression that we feel today.' Things have come to such a passe, Patricia notes, that the Assam chief minister 'is hell-bent on bringing to its knees the University of Technology and Management', an institute located not in his state but in Meghalaya, 'simply because its chancellor and founder is a Muslim'. 'I sense a caste bias here': Patricia Mukhim Speaking to Alt News, the senior journalist who is considered one of the most representative voices from the northeast, said that around 2014, it was 'a personal approach' by the then executive editor, PJ Baruah, which started her association with The Assam Tribune. 'He asked me to give a name to my column. I called it Rough & Tumble. He allowed me complete freedom and we never once had any complaints.' About the manner in which the present editorial team treated her, Patricia said she could sense a caste bias at play here. 'After having contributed to The Assam Tribune for over a decade the communication for not carrying my article was being conveyed by a junior staff of the newspaper. I can sense a caste bias here since I am a tribal and therefore am not supposed to comment or write on issues pertaining to the Assamese people, who until 1971 ruled over Meghalaya and other northeastern states before we were considered politically mature to manage our own affairs.' Patricia referred to the historical reluctance of the Assamese gentry to grant autonomy to the tribes while explaining why she thought that the way the paper treated her was as problematic as the response itself. 'The debates in the Constitution-making body when the tribes of Meghalaya demanded the Sixth Schedule as a protective cover for tribal customary practices and governance must be re-read to understand the views of the Assamese gentry at the time. They were against granting the Sixth Schedule to the tribes lest it lead to secessionism. It is against these backgrounds that the relations between the Assamese and the tribals continues till date. The equations have always been unequal.' Senior journalists express anger Reacting to the development, veteran journalist and author Paranjoy Guha Thakurta said he was 'angry and deeply saddened' by the decision of The Assam Tribune to not carry Patricia Mukhim's opinion article on the religious polarisation in Assam, Meghalaya and other parts of the northeast. 'If the owner of the publication is responsible for 'killing' Patricia's story, it cannot be justified under any circumstances. And if the concerned person has acted at the behest of the chief minister of Assam, Himanta Biswa Sarma, it indicates how subservient a large section of the media has become in Assam and elsewhere. The chief minister seems to be following the playbook of his mentors in New Delhi, Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union home minister Amit Shah. More strength to Patricia!' he added. Columnist, author and former editor of The Times of India Bachi Karkaria, who has known Patricia closely, told Alt News, 'It must have been a difficult decision to let go of a platform with such huge reach in the north east. But she would have betrayed all that she has stood for if she had continued.' Bachi called Assam Tribune's response 'pitiable'. 'I am sure Assam Tribune gave her the column in 2014 as much for her strong voice as for her deep understanding of the people, culture and politics of the northeast. For them to stop just because it went against the ruling party at the Centre and the state was pitiable. To do it with such lack of grace makes it doubly so.' 'I have come to know, admire and respect Pat from our common membership of South Asian Women in Media (SAWM). She has always led from the front to defend the freedom of journalists. When her own rights were muzzled, to have quietly continued with Assam Tribune would have been hypocritical. Pat is neither hypocritical nor quiet,' Bachi noted. Alt News has written to The Assam Tribune seeking a response to Patricia Mukhim's remarks. This story will be updated if the paper gets back to us. This article is republished from Alt News. Read the original article. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.
