
Want rid of SNP and Labour? Learn a lesson from England
Labour's wealth-destroying plans mirror the SNP's chaotic record. Net zero dogma risks blackouts and further deindustrialisation. The NHS is in crisis – Labour stalls in England, while Scotland's system teeters on collapse. Labour's £151.9 billion deficit echoes the SNP's fiscal incompetence: billions wasted, nothing fixed.
Both peddle divisive distractions – Labour's identity politics, the SNP's separatism – while wrecking confidence with anti-business policies. From National Insurance raids to punitive Scottish taxes, they drive jobs and investment away. They regulate but do not reform, break but do not build. Neither understands how prosperity is created. Meanwhile, education crumbles and infrastructure decays.
Runcorn proves the tide is turning. Labour is no longer inevitable. The SNP is no longer untouchable.
To end decline, voters must act. In every seat, back whichever candidate – Reform or Conservative – is best placed to defeat Labour or the SNP. That's how we break the cycle of failure and deliver common sense and real change.
Ian Lakin, Aberdeen.
• It will be interesting to see how, if Reform's stunning Runcorn and English council election momentum and estimated 35% vote share reaches Scotland, it will impact next year's Holyrood elections because our PR voting system could produce a three-way Reform, Labour and SNP split.
You can hardly get a fag paper between the SNP and Labour policies these days so it wouldn't surprise me if the "Scottish establishment", as Anas Sarwar called it at John Swinney's summit last week, formed a coalition to keep the "far right" out.
Allan Sutherland, Stonehaven.
Will change come at last?
It appears we are heading for yet another SNP victory in 2026 ("SNP still has strong lead over Labour, new Scottish poll finds", The Herald, May 2). Do polls still influence voters? It is the issues that matter.
John Swinney's party has a huge track record of failures, many of which have caused Scots real problems. Will voters really still pick the SNP, especially since Reform UK is offering an alternative which, going by the results in England, cannot be merely dismissed by Mr Swinney as "the extreme right"?
Fourteen years of the Tories forced a change at Westminster. Eighteen years of the SNP at Holyrood isn't looking that good either.
Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow.
Read more letters
The BBC and fake news
If more evidence was needed to confirm that the BBC has descended into the realm of purveying "fake news" this was provided in its One O' Clock News bulletin on Wednesday (April 30).
In a misguided effort to portray Scotland following England, and not vice versa, the headline was 'FA bans transgender women from women's football' supplemented by the comment, also expressed online, that the Scottish FA was 'set to follow' the FA's ruling. Later in the BBC bulletin it was incorrectly stated that 'the Scottish FA have announced a very similar change in approach today' when in fact the Scottish FA had made its announcement two days previously. It may appear to be a relatively minor "mistake" but this is consistent with the slanted framing and partial context that we have now come to expect from the BBC, especially Reporting Scotland, which persistently seeks to denigrate the SNP, the Scottish Government and even Scotland in general when making comparisons with England or elsewhere.
This degenerating approach to news veracity and presentation of "the facts" seems to be about more than defending the Union and spreading UK Government propaganda; it seems to be about vying with the independent TV channels and most of the UK mainstream media for their common primary target market of viewers and readers in England.
Perhaps before long the once-lauded BBC News coverage will actually become so flawed with misleading anti-Scottish content that it will finally give people in England the confidence to run their own country (possibly under the helpful guidance of President Farage) while allowing Scotland to once more forge its own destiny as an independent nation.
Stan Grodynski, Longniddry.
Growth of the child payment
Rebecca McQuillan chastises the First Minister over the Scottish Child Payment ("Mr Swinney, you could raise the Scottish Child Payment if you wanted to", The Herald, May 1). Be in no doubt, John Swinney would increase it again tomorrow if the country's economy allowed. However, the current cost of living crisis we are all enduring and the strain on our public finances and increasing demands on household budgets have seen the Scottish Government do what it can, and and increase the payment to £27.15 per child per week.
We must remember that when the Scottish Child Payment was first introduced in 2021 it only applied to children under six. This was extended in 2022 to all children under 16, adding an additional 300,000 children to the scheme, an enormous commitment by the Scottish Government. On top of that the SNP introduced the best start for every child with the introduction of the Baby Box, recognising all should start off equal.
It is harrowing in such a rich country that food banks have become the normal and with the message from Westminster of more austerity, this is not going to change – to use Labour's buzzword – any time soon.
Catriona C Clark, Falkirk.
• The comments made by John Swinney regarding the Scottish Child Payment and the suggestion that increasing this vital support could disincentivise parents from working deserve critical examination. This perspective seems to dismiss the harsh realities that many families face today.
Our welfare system should be designed to support those who need it most. As Margaret Thatcher once remarked, 'there is no such thing as society. There are individual men and women, and there are families'.
It is crucial to remember that each family's situation is unique, and assistance should reflect this. Many parents strive to provide for their children amidst rising living costs, often battling unemployment, underemployment, or precarious work environments.
The Scottish Government must work towards a compassionate and constructive welfare strategy. The Scottish Child Payment should be viewed as an essential tool for combating child poverty, ensuring that all children in Scotland have the opportunities they need to thrive. Let's redirect our focus towards enhancing this support, fostering an environment that truly prioritises the welfare of our youngest citizens.
Every child deserves the chance to succeed.
Alastair Majury, Dunblane.
Insist on Gaza ceasefire
Keir Starmer and Kemi Badenoch's parties aid the worst international crime of our time – in Gaza. Yet instead of desisting, these two politicians engage in diversion. They want the world to ignore the mass killings in Gaza and those complicit and instead point a finger at those who oppose genocide, for example at a rapper group that opposes the genocide. This is diversion.
Keir Starmer is responsible for sending arms to the Israeli government for international crimes. Blocking food and aid to the Palestinians now (most of whom are women and children) and starving them is also a horrendous international crime and ironically is like the starvation in the Warsaw Ghetto and he and other silent bystanders to this are complicit.
These politicians do not wish the world to understand the politics of the Israeli state (which had close working with apartheid South Africa) and its end game which is basically annihilation of Palestinian culture, institutions and people. As a Gazan doctor in the al-Aqsa Hospital complex, unable to escape, wrote: ' You are here, writing in the darkness, beneath the roar of warplanes, the thunder of bombs and the crackle of fire... to witness the unravelling of everything you hold dear. Your heart, your family, your friends, the people you love and care about – collapsing, lost, afraid and hungry' and 'I saw hundreds of displaced people sitting on the ground, staring at every direction, waiting for an end, either death or life' and 'They are killing us all. There'll be no survivors.'
In the end apartheid loses because it is so evil and dehumanises. But there needs immediate concerted action across the world now. Scotland must urgently insist on a permanent ceasefire and move to independence, so its foreign policy is in line with international laws and decency.
Pol Yates, Edinburgh.
Carry forward Francis's message
Tomorrow is the ninth and last day of mourning for Pope Francis. As a Presbyterian I suggest that we reflect upon the following part of his last Easter Message delivered on Sunday, April 20 and we, ourselves, carry it forward into humanity's future.
He said: 'What a great thirst for death, for killing, we witness each day in the many conflicts raging in different parts of our world! How much violence we see, often even within families, directed at women and children! How much contempt is stirred up at times towards the vulnerable, the marginalised, and migrants!'
But he left us with so much more. For instance his encyclical on climate change and inequality, Laudato si' (On Care for Our Common Home), was 'received right away as a fresh and vital intervention: a sign that the church is 'woke' to issues of climate change; a pulling together of crucial ideas on climate; and a forceful reminder that climate questions are intertwined with questions about the sustainability of human societies and the related issues of wealth and poverty, income and resource inequality, and the worldwide spread of what Francis calls the 'throwaway' culture' (from an article 'Ecological Conversion' by Paul Elie in the Emergence Magazine).
Francis spoke throughout his papacy to and on behalf of us 'woke folk' of all denominations, all faiths and to those of none. He has taught us that a spiritual perspective ought not be excluded from contributing to debates on matters of public concern. Not always a popular view in these times when materialism rules.
John Milne, Uddingston.
Is the BBC biased against Scotland? (Image: PA)
Threats to a lawful vigil
We've always known that the buffer zone law could not be broken while a clinic is closed. Vigil organisers were informed of this by Police Scotland last year, and the wording of the law is clear. Therefore, the Scottish Family Party has held pro-life demonstrations within the buffer zones of clinics outside their operating hours.
Gillian McKay MSP, originator of the law, clearly still does not understand what she calls "my law". She has publicly urged the police to arrest us. MSPs should not abuse their position by pressuring the police into arresting political opponents who are not breaking any law.
Police Scotland threatened to arrest us when we informed them of one of our demonstrations, despite knowing that it was legal. The police should not attempt to deter legal political activity that deviates from the Government's viewpoint.
Apologies would be in order.
Richard Lucas, Scottish Family Party, Glasgow.
Inch perfect?
Roy Gardiner (Letters, May 2) complains that a VAR referee disallowed a goal for being a few inches offside. At what distance should it have been disallowed?
After all, it is like being just a little bit pregnant.
Peter Wright, West Kilbride.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


STV News
22 minutes ago
- STV News
Minister ‘hopeful' for ‘positive' announcement on Grangemouth soon
The UK's energy minister has said he is 'hopeful' that an announcement on investment in Grangemouth will come soon. Michael Shanks said more than 80 potential investors had come forward since the UK Government pledged £200m for the site. The UK Government is looking for another £600m from private investment in the area, following the closure of Scotland's last oil refinery there. Mr Shanks said the investment, announced by the Prime Minister at the Scottish Labour conference earlier this year, will help provide a 'long-term, sustainable future' for the site. More than 400 jobs were lost at the oil refinery as owners Petroineos transitioned it to a fuel import terminal. The company said the facility was losing large amounts of money every day. PA Media More than 400 jobs have been lost at the Grangemouth site. Speaking on BBC Scotland's The Sunday Show, the energy minister said his Government was engaging with businesses on new projects for the area. 'We've had some really positive meetings around potential investors,' he said. 'In fact, there's more than 80 potential investors come forward. 'Scottish Enterprise is driving forward due diligence on that. 'There's a number of really credible projects that we're developing at the moment. 'We hope we'll have some really positive announcements to say soon.' Mr Shanks said the 'unprecedented' £200 million investment from the National Wealth Fund would help 'create the jobs of the future' while providing the security of long-term investment. He added: 'I'm hopeful we will have announcements soon. 'I'm not involved in the due diligence, as you wouldn't expect, but there are some really exciting, viable projects coming forward that will deliver jobs in Grangemouth long into the future.' Following the announcement by Petroineos to close the plant, the Scottish and UK governments funded Project Willow, a report which laid out the potential future of the site in areas such as sustainable aviation fuel. Earlier this week, Jan Robertson, Grangemouth director for Scottish Enterprise, said he had received a 'mixture of inquiries' from businesses, including those interested in the site as well as some which 'have a good opportunity to become projects in the relatively near-term'. PA Media Scotland's Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin said the 'door's not closed' on Grangemouth. 'What I mean by that is the next three to four years,' she told Holyrood's Economy and Fair Work Committee. 'Our approach very much at the moment is working with those and working as closely and quickly as we can to make the progress that we want to see in Grangemouth.' Scotland's Net Zero Secretary Gillian Martin said at the committee that the 'door's not closed' to companies and inquiries could still be made about working at Grangemouth, adding that Petroineos had also received approaches. Ms Martin said she was hopeful for the future of Grangemouth. 'We could look back five years and start pointing fingers, but the most important thing is that in the last year – actually the last six months – Project Willow and the task force have moved things along in a way that's been swift, agile, focused,' she said. 'I am feeling so much more confident than I did this time last year in the prospects for that site.' Ms Martin added that she hoped, with approval from the cabinet, a just transition plan for Grangemouth would be published next week. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country

South Wales Argus
27 minutes ago
- South Wales Argus
Plea to help tackle stray sheep roaming around Blaenavon
But Torfaen Borough Council leader Anthony Hunt has said the authority has little power to act when sheep have been crossing private land to wander around Blaenavon. He was asked if the council would take part in discussions over the issue by Nick Horler one of three borough councillors representing the town. The independent councillor said: 'We now have sheep entering the town. This is quite pleasing at times however I am getting an increased number of calls and messages from local residents about the damage these sheep are causing to vegetation in people's gardens and public spaces. 'There are also concerns about sheep leaving mess in gardens and public areas such as parks and play areas causing issues with children using the areas and safety on the main road.' Labour's Cllr Hunt said the 'difficulties experienced are appreciated' and the council had established the World Heritage Site management board which includes a caring for Blaenavon group which he said would be the 'forum for discussion'. He said he and other cabinet members have attended at the group with Cllr Horler. READ MORE: Shepherd to round up stray sheep in Blaenavon idea rejected But Cllr Hunt added: 'Where sheep are able to gain access over private land the council has limited powers to take action and that needs to be taken by the owners of the sheep.' He said the council would continue in discussions with interested groups. In September 2023 the council rejected a plea from Cllr Horler to employ a shepherd to round up stray sheep but did say it would look into the possibility of assisting with a database of animal owners after Cllr Horler reported a ram was terrorising residents in Forgeside.

The National
32 minutes ago
- The National
For Women Scotland mull new legal action against Scottish Government
The anti-trans campaign group who took the case over the meaning of biological sex to the UK's highest court, and won, has now claimed the key motivation of the case has been lost amongst a growing debate on toilets. The Supreme Court ruled that under the Equality Act 2010, a woman was defined by biological sex, excluding trans people with a gender recognition certificate (GRC). Following the judgment in April, the Equalities and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) issued interim guidance that banned transgender people from using the toilets of their acquired sex. READ MORE: Ian Murray 'does not understand how devolution works', minister says The contentious guidance was branded as 'cruel', and now a consultation, which has been extended, is now underway before full guidance is published. The fallout from the ruling also saw trans women banned from taking part in women's football and cricket. Speaking at a fringe event at the Scottish Conservative conference in Edinburgh this weekend, For Women Scotland (FWS) co-director Susan Smith claimed there has been 'extraordinary pushback' following the judgment. 'We don't want to go back to court, we really, really don't, but if we don't see some action that may be something we will have to consider,' she told journalists afterward. Smith (below, left) said there were concerns about the lack of action by the Scottish Government on prisons and school guidance. 'We have spoken to the Scottish government and asked them to withdraw some of this guidance, just to say that it's under review – they don't have to re-issue anything at this point – because it's clearly unlawful, we really do need some action,' she said. 'They're telling us they have to wait for the EHRC revised guidance and we don't believe this is true.' The EHRC guidance said that it is 'compulsory' for workplaces to offer single-sex toilets and changing facilities. It said that trans women should not be allowed to use women's facilities and trans men should not be allowed to use men's facilities as 'this will mean that they are no longer single-sex facilities and must be open to all users of the opposite sex'. The guidance then went on to say that trans people 'should not be put in a position where there are no facilities for them to use'. READ MORE: UK jets being sent to the Middle East as Keir Starmer refuses to rule out defending Israel Smith claimed there has been too much focus on the issue of toilets. 'I wish we could stop talking about toilets all the time, because that wasn't really the reason we went to court,' she said. 'We went to court about the prisons, about the rape crisis centres, about the hospitals, where people are uniquely vulnerable.' It comes after Harry Potter author JK Rowling, who donated to FWS crowdfunder to take their case to the Supreme Court, set up a fund to challenge public service providers and employers over the issue. 'We really need people to start challenging where they feel that organisations, local councils are not implementing the law,' Smith said. 'We're very fortunate to have the fighting fund that JK Rowling set up and that will make a massive difference because when people start to realise that there's a cost maybe they will start to apply the law.' Current Scottish Prison Service (SPS) guidance states trans women prisoners cannot be housed on the female estate if they have been convicted of serious offences. A spokesperson for SPS said: 'We have received the supreme court's judgment and are considering any potential impact it may have.' The Scottish Government said it has 'been clear that we accept the supreme court judgment'. 'As the judgment relates specifically to the guidance issued under the Scottish Government's Gender Representation on Public Boards 2018 Act and stated that it was incorrect in relation to the definition referred to of 'woman' under the Equality Act, the guidance has now been removed and will be updated shortly to reflect the judgment,' a spokesperson said. 'The Scottish Government has already begun work on implementation. We have established a Short Life Working Group to ensure support and consistency across Government.'