Apple rejects Musk claim of App Store bias
Apple on Thursday rejected Elon Musk's claim that its digital App Store favors OpenAI's ChatGPT over his company's Grok and other rival AI assistants.
Musk has accused Apple of giving unfair preference to ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman this week.
"The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias," Apple said in reply to an AFP inquiry. "We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria."
Apple added that its goal at the App Store is to offer "safe discovery" for users and opportunities for developers to get their creations noticed.
But earlier this week, Musk said Apple was "behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," without providing evidence to back his claim.
"xAI will take immediate legal action," he said on his social media network X, referring to his own artificial intelligence company, which is responsible for Grok.
X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India.
DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI.
Altman called Musk's accusation "remarkable" in a response on X, charging that Musk himself is said to "manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like."
Musk called Altman a "liar" in the heated exchange.
OpenAI and xAI recently released new versions of ChatGPT and Grok.
App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free app for iPhones on Thursday, with Grok in seventh place.
Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads.
Grok was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot.
No official explanation was provided for the suspension, which followed multiple accusations of misinformation including the bot's misidentification of war-related images -- such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier.
Last month, Grok triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting.
In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized "for the horrific behavior that many experienced."
A U.S. judge has cleared the way for a trial to consider OpenAI legal claims accusing Musk -- a co-founder of the company -- of waging a "relentless campaign" to damage the organization after it achieved success following his departure.
The litigation is another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI start-up and the world's richest person.
Musk founded xAI in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Japan Today
3 hours ago
- Japan Today
Are you in a mid-career to senior job? Don't fear AI – you could have an important advantage
By Kai Riemer and Sandra Peter Have you ever sat in a meeting where someone half your age casually mentions 'prompting ChatGPT' or 'running this through AI', and felt a familiar knot in your stomach? You're not alone. There's a growing narrative that artificial intelligence (AI) is inherently ageist, that older workers will be disproportionately hit by job displacement and are more reluctant to adopt AI tools. But such assumptions – especially that youth is a built-in advantage when it comes to AI – might not actually hold. While ageism in hiring is a real concern, if you have decades of work experience, your skills, knowledge and judgement could be exactly what's needed to harness AI's power – without falling into its traps. What does the research say? The research on who benefits most from AI at work is surprisingly murky, partly because it's still early days for systematic studies on AI and work. Some research suggests lower-skilled workers might have more to gain than high-skilled workers on certain straightforward tasks. The picture becomes much less clear under real-world conditions, especially for complex work that relies heavily on judgement and experience. Many older workers do experience AI as deeply unsettling. As one U.S.-based CEO of a large multinational corporation told us: "AI can be a form of existential challenge, not only to what you're doing, but how you view yourself." But leaders are also observing an important and unexpected distinction: experienced workers are often much better at judging the quality of AI outputs. This might become one of the most important skills, given that AI occasionally hallucinates or gets things wrong. The CEO of a South American creative agency put it bluntly: "Senior colleagues are using multiple AIs. If they don't have the right solution, they re-prompt, iterate, but the juniors are satisfied with the first answer, they copy, paste and think they're finished. They don't yet know what they are looking for, and the danger is that they will not learn what to look for if they keep working that way." Experience as an AI advantage Experienced workers have a crucial advantage when it comes to prompting AI: They understand context and usually know how to express it clearly. While a junior advertising creative might ask an AI to 'Write copy for a sustainability campaign', a seasoned account director knows to specify 'Write conversational social media copy for a sustainable fashion brand targeting eco-conscious millennials, emphasizing our client's zero-waste manufacturing process and keeping the tone authentic but not preachy'. This skill mirrors what experienced professionals do when briefing junior colleagues or freelancers: providing detailed instructions, accounting for audience, objectives, and constraints. It's a competency developed through years of managing teams and projects. Younger workers, despite their comfort with technology, may actually be at a disadvantage here. There's a crucial difference between using technology frequently and using it well. Many young people may become too accustomed to AI assistance. A survey of U.S. teens this year found 72% had used an AI companion app. Some children and teens are turning to chatbots for everyday decisions. Without the professional experience to recognise when something doesn't quite fit, younger workers risk accepting AI responses that feel right – effectively 'vibing' their work – rather than developing the analytical skills to evaluate AI usefulness. So what can you do? First, everyone benefits from learning more about AI. In our time educating everyone from students to senior leaders and CEOs, we find that misunderstandings about how AI works have little to do with age. A good place to start is reading up on what AI is and what it can do for you: If you're not even sure which AI platform to try, we would recommend testing the most prominent ones, OpenAI's ChatGPT, Anthropic's Claude, and Google's Gemini. If you're an experienced worker feeling threatened by AI, lean into your strengths. Your decades of experience with delegation, context-setting, and critical evaluation are exactly what AI tools need. Start small. Pick one regular work task and experiment with AI assistance, using your judgement to evaluate and refine outputs. Practice prompting like you're briefing a junior colleague: be specific about context, constraints, and desired outcomes, and repeat the process as needed. Most importantly, don't feel threatened. In a workplace increasingly filled with AI-generated content, your ability to spot what doesn't quite fit, and to know what questions to ask, has never been more valuable. Kai Riemer is Professor of Information Technology and Organisation, University of Sydney. Sandra Peter is Director of Sydney Executive Plus, Business School, University of Sydney. The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts. External Link © The Conversation
Japan Today
a day ago
- Japan Today
Apple rejects Musk claim of App Store bias
A US judge has cleared the way for a trial in US court over claims that Elon Musk (R) has been on a campaign to damage ChatGPT maker OpenAI, run by co-founder Sam Altman (L) Apple on Thursday rejected Elon Musk's claim that its digital App Store favors OpenAI's ChatGPT over his company's Grok and other rival AI assistants. Musk has accused Apple of giving unfair preference to ChatGPT on its App Store and threatened legal action, triggering a fiery exchange with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman this week. "The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias," Apple said in reply to an AFP inquiry. "We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria." Apple added that its goal at the App Store is to offer "safe discovery" for users and opportunities for developers to get their creations noticed. But earlier this week, Musk said Apple was "behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation," without providing evidence to back his claim. "xAI will take immediate legal action," he said on his social media network X, referring to his own artificial intelligence company, which is responsible for Grok. X users responded by pointing out that China's DeepSeek AI hit the top spot in the App Store early this year, and Perplexity AI recently ranked number one in the App Store in India. DeepSeek and Perplexity compete with OpenAI and Musk's startup xAI. Altman called Musk's accusation "remarkable" in a response on X, charging that Musk himself is said to "manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like." Musk called Altman a "liar" in the heated exchange. OpenAI and xAI recently released new versions of ChatGPT and Grok. App Store rankings listed ChatGPT as the top free app for iPhones on Thursday, with Grok in seventh place. Factors going into App Store rankings include user engagement, reviews and the number of downloads. Grok was temporarily suspended on Monday in the latest controversy surrounding the chatbot. No official explanation was provided for the suspension, which followed multiple accusations of misinformation including the bot's misidentification of war-related images -- such as a false claim that an AFP photo of a starving child in Gaza was taken in Yemen years earlier. Last month, Grok triggered an online storm after inserting antisemitic comments into answers without prompting. In a statement on Grok's X account later that month, the company apologized "for the horrific behavior that many experienced." A U.S. judge has cleared the way for a trial to consider OpenAI legal claims accusing Musk -- a co-founder of the company -- of waging a "relentless campaign" to damage the organization after it achieved success following his departure. The litigation is another round in a bitter feud between the generative AI start-up and the world's richest person. Musk founded xAI in 2023 to compete with OpenAI and the other major AI players. © 2025 AFP
Nikkei Asia
a day ago
- Nikkei Asia
DeepSeek's next AI model delayed by attempt to use Chinese chips
DeepSeek's generative AI chatbot is a direct rival to ChatGPT © Reuters August 14, 2025 21:57 JST BEIJING/HONG KONG (Financial Times) -- Chinese artificial intelligence company DeepSeek delayed the release of its new model after failing to train it using Huawei's chips, highlighting the limits of Beijing's push to replace U.S. technology.
