
Zohran Mamdani followed in dad's footsteps to found SJP
The Democratic mayoral nominee co-founded a branch of Students for Justice for Palestine at Bowdoin College in 2013, two years after his professor father, Mahmood Mamdani, gave the keynote address at the inaugural national conference of the group in October 2011.
'Whereas Apartheid South Africa was reluctant to claim that it was a white state, a white democracy, Israel is not.
Advertisement
6 Zohran Mamdani at a 2014 meeting of Students for Justice in Palestine, a radical anti-Israel group he helped set up at Bowdoin College in Maine.
Bowdoin SJP/ Facebook
'Israel publicly claims it's a Jewish state and it demands that Palestinians acknowledge it as such…Israel was not South Africa. In many ways, it was, and is, worse than South Africa,' said Mamdani Snr., a professor of government and anthropology at Columbia University, in his speech.
The professor, 79, also claimed Israel admired the US for 'dealing' with its indigenous populations after it was settled by Europeans. 'The Zionists think of that particular part of American history as inspirational,' he said.
Advertisement
'Like father, like son,' said Ari Shrage, co-founder of Columbia University's Jewish Alumni Association.
6 Zohran Mamdani was influenced by his father, Mahmood Mamdani (right), who gave the keynote speech at the first national convention of the Students for Justice in Palestine at Columbia. His mother, filmmaker Mira Nair, is pictured left with Zohran and his wife Rama Duwaji center.
Getty Images
'It's not a surprise that he learned from his father who teaches at the epicenter of anti-Israel indoctrination,' he added, referring to Columbia.
The 2011 national conference, titled 'Students Confronting Apartheid Students for Justice in Palestine: First National Conference 2011' drew 350 student activists from across the country to Columbia, according to a report, which also noted participants headed to the Occupy Wall Street encampment in the Financial District to protest corporate greed.
Advertisement
Following Zohran Mamdani's stunning victory in the Democratic primary earlier this month, the spotlight has turned to his family's ties to anti-Israel groups. His father sits on the advisory council of the recently formed London-based Gaza Tribunal, which accuses Israel of committing genocide.
6 Hatem Bazian, a professor at UC Berkeley, is the founder of American Muslims for Palestine and co-founder of Students for Justice in Palestine.
UC Berkeley
Mamdani Sr. also made it on to a list of 'Professors to Avoid' along with AMP founder Hatem Bazian published by Campus Watch, a project of the Middle East Forum, a conservative think tank. The list includes professors across the country who 'are most responsible for the politicization and bias sadly endemic to Middle East Studies,' according to the Campus Watch web site.
After Zohran founded the SJP chapter at Bowdoin, the group had an active Twitter account promoting lectures such as 'The Winter of Arab Discontent' in Nov. 2013 and support for the American Studies Association's boycott of Israel.
Advertisement
That same year the Bowdoin College chapter of SJP invited a radical Lebanese-American academic As'ad AbuKhalil, to speak. Among his rhetoric he has called Israel a bigger threat than Hamas and said that the US had brought the Sept. 11 terrorist strikes on itself.
6 Mahmood Mamdani, a professor of government and anthroplogy at Columbia University, was included on a list of 'Professors to Avoid' in Middle East Studies by Campus Watch.
Robert Miller for NY Post
6 A picture of Zohran Mamdani from the archive of the Bowdoin student newspaper in 2010, which he contributed articles for.
The Bowdoin Orient
6 (L-R) Zohran Mamdani, mother Mira Nair, father Mahmood Mamdani and friend Nishant Tharani at the world premiere of 'Queen of Katwe,' directed by Nair, at the 2016 Toronto Film Festival.
Getty Images for Disney
The Bowdoin SJP's Twitter account remained active until late 2015 after Mamdani graduated, while a Facebook group lasted a few more months, posting until March 2016.
Last year, Students for Justice in Palestine organized student encampments across the country, including a large one at Columbia. Its umbrella group, American Muslims for Palestine has been named in US federal lawsuits brought by victims of the October 7 Hamas attacks, as well as the family of David Boim, the first victim of the terrorist group, who was gunned down at a bus stop in Jerusalem in 1996.
'If Hamas has practiced versions of indiscriminate and aimless violence — which I personally reject on principle – it should be pointed out that Israeli terrorism, in scale and in magnitude, by far exceeds that of Hamas, but nobody has noticed here in the US,' Mamdani Snr. wrote in a blog post in 2006.
Advertisement
He's also come under attack on social media where an excerpt from one of his books recently surfaced. 'Suicide bombing needs to be understood as a feature of modern political violence rather than stigmatized as a mark of barbarism,' the elder Mamdani wrote in his 2004 book 'Good Muslim, Bad Muslim: America, the Cold War, and the Roots of Terror.'
Hedge fund billionaire Bill Ackman reposted the excerpt on X earlier this week, noting 'The apple @zohranmamdani doesn't fall far from the tree.'
On Tuesday, Mamdani told a group of business leaders that he would not use the phrase 'globalize the intifada,' adopted by anti-Israel protestors as a rallying cry for violence against Israel, following the October 7, 2023 attacks that left 1,200 Israelis dead.
Columbia Students for Justice in Palestine and Mahmood Mamdani did not return requests for comment Wednesday.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Politico
9 minutes ago
- Politico
Blue State Republicans Helped Win the House Majority. The Redistricting Wars May End Their Careers.
Trump's move may well work. Even if California's new map wipes out five Republicans and shores up some Democratic seats there, more than neutralizing GOP gains in Texas, the president can likely rely on additional red states such as Ohio, Missouri and Indiana to salute him and overhaul their congressional boundaries to squeeze out the few Democrats left in their delegations. And this is to say nothing of how many more majority-minority districts in red states could be wiped out should the Supreme Court effectively gut the Voting Rights Act before next year's elections. Such an endgame will surely wind up in a series of state and federal courts, transforming the early going of the midterms into as much a legal fight as a political one. It would make for a mess. And it wouldn't stop with 2026. New York, for example, is constrained by its voter-approved independent redistricting commission and can't undo the commission and redraw its House maps until the 2028 election. But why would Democrats in Albany not do so if Trump effectively muscles a House majority into existence next year via a series of red states upending their own maps? If New York Democrats do pursue such a redraw, it will likely doom the most politically vulnerable House Republicans still left there after the midterms. Which gets to the cold reality for GOP lawmakers in California and New York: The very Republicans who helped deliver their party's congressional majority by winning in the two mega-states in 2020 and 2022 could be collateral damage to Trump's gambit. That includes House veterans such as Reps. Darrell Issa and Ken Calvert, both of California, but also younger, promising Republican lawmakers such as Kiley, 40, and Rep. Mike Lawler (N.Y.), 38. 'This creates a situation where you're going to lose blue state members, which over the long haul are critical to keeping the majority,' Lawler told me. It's all, Lawler said, 'mutually assured destruction once people go full throttle.' The redistricting threat is especially cruel to Lawler, who was already eager to avoid yet another tough race in his Hudson Valley district by running for governor next year. But Trump made clear he preferred Rep. Elise Stefanik, a born-again MAGA disciple, as the standard-bearer even though running a Trump acolyte statewide may only ensure Stefanik ends next year where she started this year: hoping for a Trump cabinet appointment.

11 minutes ago
'Traditionally, it was a Democrat issue': How RFK Jr. is getting left-leaning food laws into deep-red states
Earlier this month, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. notched one of his biggest wins of the "Make America Healthy Again" movement when West Virginia became the first state in the country to ban artificial food dyes in school lunches. Since then, a handful of other Republican governors have raced to join in, banning certain food colorings from kids' lunches -- sometimes prohibiting other chemical additives, too. Some GOP leaders have gone further, slapping warning labels on certain food additives statewide. Historically the focus of Democrats, including former first lady Michelle Obama -- and derided as "nanny state" politics by anti-regulation conservatives -- food laws have lately had a windfall of support from the other side of the aisle. Kennedy's "Make America Health Again" crusade against food additives, with its strong backing from President Donald Trump, has taken hold in deeply Republican states such as Louisiana, Texas and Oklahoma. "Traditionally, it was a Democratic issue," Kennedy told ABC News at a press conference on Monday, adding that he is hopeful that Democrats will continue pass food laws in their states despite the "partisan brand" the movement brings. West Virginia -- which has the second-lowest life expectancy rate in the nation, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention -- has taken one of the most stringent approaches, intending to further its ban on artificial dyes and other additives to the whole state by 2028. Its law closely mirrors those passed by California Democrat Gov. Gavin Newsom, who signed similar bills into law before Kennedy and Trump took office. The California Food Safety Act passed in 2023, which banned four additives statewide, and a second California law passed in 2024, which banned six specific synthetic food dyes from school lunches. Both take effect in 2027. "Sometimes you find that there are unorthodox partners, but the key is what you're able to accomplish," West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrissey, a Republican, told ABC News. If the changes improve health outcomes for West Virginians, it'll be "a win," he said. West Virginia is one of 10 Republican states that have taken steps to regulate food since Kennedy took office. Just two Democratic governors, Arizona Gov. Katie Hobbs and Delaware Gov. Matt Meyer, have signed similar laws in that same timeframe. At the same time, 11 Republican states have applied to the federal government for waivers to prohibit soda or candy from the food benefits program for low-income Americans, SNAP. The sole Democrat-led state to join in on the SNAP policy change is Colorado. More states are waiting in the wings, said John Hewitt, senior vice president of state affairs for the Consumer Brands Association, which represents major food companies such as Kraft Heinz. There's been at least a tenfold increase in the number of food bills introduced or discussed at the state level, he said, and there's been a "substantial shift" in which states are interested. 'Copy and pasting' Democrats' food laws into red states Thomas Galligan, principal scientist for food additives and supplements at the Center for Science in the Public Interest, has worked with states such as California and New York on systemic food reform. And although CSPI has frequently clashed with Kennedy on his policies at HHS, particularly around vaccines, Galligan said on food, "it's fair to give credit where it's due." "I mean, the Trump administration, under RFK Jr., has really elevated this issue on the national stage," he said. But Galligan pushed back on the characterization that it's part of Kennedy's "Make America Health Again" movement, pointing to California's laws, before Kennedy's tenure, as the blueprint. "Most of the bills that we're seeing are really copy and pasting," Galligan said. Six Republican states -- Tennessee, Virginia, Utah, Arizona, Louisiana and Texas -- have passed laws to remove artificial dyes from school lunches, with some states going further and prohibiting additives such as potassium bromate and propylparabens. Texas and Louisiana will also do more -- seeking to warn consumers when they're buying food with additives that are banned in other countries, such as Europe. West Virginia and Arkansas will outright ban certain additives statewide. Some nutritionists and dietitians say that it's best to avoid artificial food dyes, which have been linked in some studies to behavioral changes in children, as well as to cancer in animals, but others say more research needs to be done about the potential negative effects, which are still unclear. Why are food laws different for Republicans this time? For conservatives such as Jeff Singer, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute who studies health policy, the new Republican-led laws around food are a far cry from the days of protesting Obama's "Lets Move!" campaign and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg's attempt to ban Big Gulp soda. "I clearly remember all of the criticism, particularly on right-wing media, of Mayor Bloomberg," Singer said. "All the attacks on Michelle Obama for trying to dictate how people should eat, and dictate what should be in school lunches." "They were basically saying, 'keep your nose out of our private affairs, this is not a role for government, we don't need a nanny state.' But all of a sudden, they're all for a nanny state because it was a very good political move to bring RFK into the MAGA movement," Singer said. The lack of conservative pushback this time around has left the food industry, a powerful lobbying force, as the primary barrier to passing legislation, said Meghan Enslow, policy associate for the Center for Science in the Public Interest. "In all of these states, blue and red, there's been immense lobbying and money spent by the food industry against these bills. And I do wonder if that MAHA narrative is part of what's allowed red states to ignore that money and the voice of the food industry and pass these bills," Enslow said. Kennedy said that a few Democratic governors have told him privately that they intend to get on board. "They don't want to call it MAHA because they think that that's become kind of a partisan brand. I don't care what they call it," Kennedy said. "They want to protect their children. And there's no such thing as Democratic children or Republican children. They're our children, and we should all care about them."


Politico
11 minutes ago
- Politico
Republicans are full steam ahead on redistricting — and not just in Texas
As it stands, Republican state lawmakers nationwide oversee 55 Democratic congressional seats, and Democratic state majorities oversee just 35 held by the GOP, according to an analysis by the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which this week became the first party-aligned group to endorse mid-cycle redistricting. Many Democrats say it's time to fight back, even with limited options. The DLCC, for example, is arguing that 'Democrats must reassess our failed federal-first strategy and get serious about winning state legislatures ahead of redistricting,' according to a recent memo shared with POLITICO. Even with an advantage, it's no sure bet for Republicans. Redrawing maps mid-cycle comes with risks, since the 2020 census data underpinning current maps is outdated. In some cases that creates a so-called dummymander, where a redraw intended to help one party actually favors the other. Democrats already vowed to fight the new map in Texas — and likely elsewhere — in court, and they say Republicans are pushing for redraws because they have steep odds of keeping control of the House next year. 'I can't think of a weaker position for a president to be in than sending his vice president around state to state to beg them to gerrymander and cheat on their behalf,' Bisognano said. 'Being in a position where their legislation and popularity is so low that this is their only option is breathtaking.' Within the GOP, some are still hesitant to take up the issue. Indiana Republican Gov. Mike Braun told POLITICO on Tuesday there are 'no commitments' to redraw the map. But Texas lawmakers, too, were hesitant until the White House got involved. Now, they stand ready to pass a new map once they can get Democratic lawmakers to return. Jordan Wolman and Lisa Kashinsky contributed to this report. Like this reporting? Subscribe to Morning Score.