Russian firm eyes partnership role in Namibia's first nuclear power plant
A Russian state-backed energy company, Rusatom, is positioning itself to play a central role in the development and operation of Namibia's first nuclear power plant.
Namibia plans to build its first nuclear power plant with Russia's Rosatom as a strategic partner.
Southern Africa currently houses one operational nuclear power plant in South Africa, and Namibia's project marks the region's second.
The plant is intended to leverage Namibia's uranium resources, aiming for energy self-sufficiency and reduced reliance on imports.
Discussions are underway for the construction of a nuclear power plant in Southern Arica as Namibia, working in partnership with a Russian firm, Rosatom moves forward with plans to build its first-ever facility.
As of today, South Africa remains the only country in the Southern African region operating a nuclear power plant located at Koeberg, near Cape Town. The country is also planning to finalize procurement for an additional 2.5GW of nuclear power by 2024, with operations expected to commence by 2030.
Sputnik Africa reports that Namibia's nuclear initiative is being championed by Russia's state-owned nuclear energy corporation, Rosatom, which is positioning itself as a strategic partner in the country's long-term energy development.
Ryan Collyer, CEO of Rosatom Central and Southern Africa, highlighted the country's potential in the nuclear space.
"We see Namibia as a highly promising partner in the field of nuclear energy... not only as a resource-rich nation, but also as a forward-thinking country with the potential to become a regional leader in low-carbon energy," he told Sputnik Africa.
Namibia's nuclear plant journey
Namibian President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah announced during her first State of the Nation Address this year, that the country plans to initiate discussions on developing its first nuclear power plant.
The move is aimed at harnessing Namibia's vast uranium reserves, as it is currently the world's third-largest uranium producer, and reducing the country's heavy reliance on electricity imports from South Africa.
According to the World Nuclear Association, Namibia's uranium mines have the potential to supply up to 10% of global demand for nuclear fuel.
Despite this natural advantage, the country currently imports the majority of its electricity from South Africa and other neighboring countries.
A special agreement between NamPower, Namibia's national utility, and Eskom, South Africa's power utility, allows Namibia to purchase surplus electricity at affordable rates.
However, frequent supply constraints and growing domestic demand have prompted NamPower and the government to explore alternative, more sustainable power generation options.
With the construction of a nuclear power plant, Namibia is aiming for greater energy self-sufficiency, energy security, and a long-term solution to power supply challenges while contributing to the continent's clean energy transition.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Most G7 members ready to lower Russian oil price cap without US
By Julia Payne and John Irish BRUSSELS/PARIS (Reuters) -Most countries in the Group of Seven nations are prepared to go it alone and lower the G7 price cap on Russian oil even if U.S. President Donald Trump decides to opt out, four sources familiar with the matter said. G7 country leaders are due to meet on June 15-17 in Canada where they will discuss the price cap first agreed in late 2022. The cap was designed to allow Russian oil to be sold to third countries using Western insurance services provided the price was no more than $60 a barrel. The European Union and Britain have been pushing to lower the price for weeks after a fall in global oil prices made the current $60 cap nearly irrelevant. The sources, who declined to be named, said the EU and Britain are ready to lead the charge and go it alone, backed by the other European G7 countries and Canada. They said it is still unclear what the U.S. will decide, though the Europeans are pushing for a united decision at the meeting. Japan's position also remains uncertain, they said. "There is a push among European countries to reduce the oil price cap to $45 from $60. There are positive signals from Canada, Britain and possibly the Japanese. We will use the G7 to try to get the U.S. on board," one of the sources said. The White House had no immediate comment. During the G7 finance ministers meeting in the Canadian Rockies last month, U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent remained unconvinced there was a need to lower the cap, according to sources. However some U.S. Senators may endorse the idea, including Lindsay Graham, who in recent weeks told reporters he supports lowering the cap. Graham is pushing a hard-hitting new set of Russia sanctions that could impose steep tariffs on buyers of Russian oil. The Canadian foreign ministry was not immediately available for comment. The EU has proposed lowering the price to $45 a barrel in its latest 18th package of sanctions. The package must have unanimity from member states in order for it to be adopted, which could take several weeks. Russia's largest export grade, Urals, trades at around a $10 a barrel discount to the Dated Brent benchmark out of Baltic ports. Brent futures have been trading below $70 a barrel since early April. Sources said Washington's buy-in was not essential to lower the cap owing to Britain's dominance in global shipping insurance, and the EU's influence on the Western rules-abiding tanker fleet. The U.S., however, does matter when it comes to dollar-denominated payments for oil and its banking system. The EU and its Western allies have been progressively cracking down on Russia's shadow fleet of tankers and related actors, which work to circumvent the cap. The pressure has started to hurt Moscow's revenues and Western allies hope this will push more of the oil trade back under the cap. Russia's state-owned oil producer Rosneft reported a 14.4% slump in profits last year.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
EU adopts new tariffs on Russian and Belarusian agricultural imports
The European Union has approved fresh tariffs on agricultural goods and fertilizers from Russia and Belarus in an attempt to curb Russian funding for the war in Ukraine. A regulation was adopted on Thursday by a majority of EU countries at a meeting in Luxembourg. The European Parliament has already given its green light. The regulation extends duties to products not covered by existing tariffs, including sugar, vinegar, flour and animal feed. When the legislation enters into force by July 1, all Russian agricultural products will be subject to duties, a statement from EU member states said. The tariffs apply to products that made up around 15% of all agricultural imports from Russia in 2023, the statement said. According to the European Parliament, imports of such products from Russia rose significantly again in 2024. The regulation also provides for a 6.5% tariff on fertilizers imported from Russia and Belarus. In 2023, the EU imported around a quarter of the fertilizers affected by the new duties from Russia, corresponding to a value of €1.28 billion ($1.49 billion), the parliament said. The new duties will be increased gradually over three years, from between €40 and €45 per ton in 2025-26 to between €315 and €430 per ton by 2028.
Yahoo
14 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion - Vladimir Putin has incurred one million casualties in his pointless war
In October 2022, we warned that Russian President Vladmir Putin was willing to exchange more than 300,000 Russian coffins for a modern-day empire in Ukraine. Tragically, we were not wrong. If anything, we underestimated Putin's preparedness to kill and maim as many Russian, Chechen, North Korean, Cuban and Chinese soldiers and conscripts as needed to achieve his Peter the Great-like realm. Today, Russian casualties in Ukraine surpassed one million, according to the Ukrainian Ministry of Defense. No matter how willing Putin is, his meat grinder tactics are not militarily sustainable. In April, Gen. Christopher Cavoli, dual hatted as Commander, United States European Command and NATO Supreme Allied Commander Europe, testified before the U.S. Senate Armed Services Committee that the Russian military can likely only sustain its current operations for about 12 to 24 more months. At the current rate of daily casualties for the Russian and their allies — about 1,200 a day — that translates to another 438,000 to 876,000 Russian casualties. The Kremlin continues to feed the Ukrainian meat-grinder with little regard for its soldiers. As Cavoli would go on and say, 'Russian commanders still emphasize quantity and mass over skill and operational acumen.' Ukrainian defenders have become quite efficient in killing and wounding Russian soldiers — or those dressed for the part — but they come back the next day, along the same avenues of approach, with the same result, gaining just a few meters of territory in exchange for appalling numbers of dead and wounded. Despite President President Trump saying, 'It's time to stop this madness, it's time to halt the killing, it's time to end this senseless war,' Putin continues to attack along the frontlines and with daily bombardments of Ukrainian cities with drones, ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missiles. Meanwhile, Ukraine continues its valiant defense. Putin does not see eye-to-eye with Trump because he does not want to stop the carnage. As Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky told Martha Raddatz of ABC News, 'I feel strongly that Putin does not want to finish this war. Inside his mind, it's impossible to end this war without total defeat of Ukraine.' Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov made that clear in April when he said, 'Russia will accept nothing less than total victory over Ukraine.' There are multiple fights being waged in Ukraine concurrently — deep, close, rear, and interdiction. For now, though, the most important fight is for control of the skies above Ukraine. Ukraine is capable of maintaining its current positions in the close fight; however, success depends on prevailing in interdiction and deep-strike efforts. Concurrently, Ukraine is insufficiently armed to effectively defeat the continuous drone and missile assaults targeting their urban areas. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz described the recent attacks on Ukrainian cities as the 'most serious war crimes' and 'terror against civilians.' Moscow, he said, is escalating the situation and attempting 'to create a bloodbath' instead of negotiating with Ukraine. As Zelensky notes, 'Without the help of the United States, we will have more losses.' The Trump administration, however, has chosen to punt the problem to Europe in order to focus on their 'priority theater.' In his testimony before the Committee on Appropriations of the House of Representatives on Tuesday, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said, 'As we shift our focus to the Pacific, we are counting on our NATO allies to devote more resources to defense to forge a strong shield of deterrence in Europe.' At the most inopportune time of the war, as Russia launches hundreds of drones a day at Ukrainian cities — killing and wounding civilians and first responders with no legitimate military targets in sight — Hegseth announced that the U.S. will reduce funding allocated for military assistance to Ukraine in its upcoming defense budget. This was preceded by the White House announcement last week that they were redirecting key anti-drone technology — 20,000 missiles earmarked earlier for Ukraine — to U.S. Air Force units in the Middle East. Then Israel stepped in to relieve some of the pressure against the ballistic, cruise and hypersonic missile threat. As Zelensky continues to await a response from the White House concerning his request to purchase ten Patriot Air Defense Systems in April, Israeli Ambassador to Ukraine Mykhailo Brodsky announced the transfer of an undetermined number of Patriot systems to Ukraine that were provided to them by the U.S. in the early 1990s. Ukraine reportedly had eight Patriot systems prior to this announcement. This in addition to the ten German air defense missile systems that were sent to Ukraine in May. Following their lead, the United Kingdom approved a deal on Wednesday to secure $2.2 billion in funding for additional air defense and multipurpose missile systems. But defeating the individual missile does not defeat the threat. That requires destroying the weapons systems, and Ukraine is doing just that with its own weapons. Operation 'Spiderweb' on June 2 reportedly destroyed 34 percent of the Russian strategic bomber fleet that is being used to launch cruise missile attacks against Ukrainian cities. Follow-on deep strikes over the weekend against the Kristall oil depot, Engels-2 and Dyagilevo air bases, Savasleyka airfield , Azot chemical plant, Kazan gunpowder plant, and VNIIR-Progress facility targeted the weapon systems, their support networks, munitions production, and funding sources for Russia's terror campaign. Heightened sanctions against Russia will not prevent further carnage — they may actually accelerate it. Sanctions are part of the solution, but they must be parlayed with other instruments of national power to have any effect. The piecemealing of air defense systems in Ukraine will only provide limited results. To control its skies, Ukraine needs a sustained, integrated and layered air defense network, including a No-Fly zone, similar to the one Israel employed to defeat two Iranian missile attacks in April and October of 2024. Merz's message is clear: 'Russia only understands force — so the West must show it.' Eventually, NATO weapons systems, manned by NATO Soldiers, will be needed to provide Ukrainian civilians with security. For now, Putin's killing fields are in Ukraine. If he is left unchecked by Washington, London and Brussels, they might soon find themselves ordering coffins for NATO defenders, beginning with the Baltic States or Poland. Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet served 30 years as an Army intelligence officer. Mark Toth writes on national security and foreign policy. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
