logo
Video of drug crackdown in Ghana misrepresented as xenophobic attack on Nigerian shops

Video of drug crackdown in Ghana misrepresented as xenophobic attack on Nigerian shops

Yahoo22-07-2025
A video shared on social media claims to show Ghanaians destroying shops allegedly owned by Nigerians of Igbo descent, fueling tensions surrounding the presence of Igbos in Ghana. However, the claim is false. AFP Fact Check found that local youths destroyed the stalls during a drug crackdown targeting shops allegedly involved in selling illicit drugs in Ghana's capital, Accra.
'Ghanaians destroying Igbo shops saying Igbo must leave their country,' reads the caption of a Facebook reel published on July 14, 2025 and shared in Nigeria.
The Igbo people are primarily from southeastern Nigeria (archived here).
Shared more than 6,000 times, the video shows men pulling down stalls in a market.
The post was published by an account called 'Efos Blog', which appears to share anti-Igbo content regularly.
The video was also posted on X with a similar claim here.
Igbos in Ghana
In recent weeks, Igbo people in Ghana have come under public scrutiny following the activities of Eze Chukwudi Jude Ihenetu, a self-styled monarch.
Ihenetu has referred to himself as the 'Igbo King' and reportedly claimed to have acquired land near the country's capital to build a cultural settlement — a development that triggered sharp backlash from youth groups and the traditional authorities in the West African country, particularly the Ga Traditional Council, which oversees the Greater Accra Region (archived here and here).
In a response, the traditional leader of Ga state, King Tackie Teiko Tsuru II, said the council did not recognise any foreign royal claim within their domain and ordered Ihenetu and his appointed chiefs to stop presenting themselves as traditional rulers (archived here).
While the incident drew widespread attention on social media, there were no reports of violence or targeted attacks on Nigerians of Igbo extraction or their properties as portrayed in the Facebook video reel.
Anti-drug abuse campaign
Using Google Lens to conduct reverse image searches on keyframes from the video, AFP Fact Check was led to a Facebook post dated April 20, 2025 (archived here).
The post, with the caption 'Massive Destruction At Zongo Market', was published by an account in Ghana.
Using the word combinations from the caption to conduct a Google search, AFP Fact Check found a news report by a local website Citi Newsroom, published on the same day as the Facebook video (archived here).
In the piece, the media reported that a group called 'No Drugs in Zongo Movement' launched a major crackdown at the Zongo market in Accra, which resulted in the closure of over 20 shops suspected of selling illicit substances.
The report also stated that the campaigners seized several sacks containing marijuana, codeine, Tramadol, and other illegal drugs.
AFP Fact Check reached out to Manuel Ayamah, the Citi Newsroom journalist who reported the piece. He confirmed that the 'crackdown was not targeted at any Nigerian community'.
'It was a general exercise in the Zongo,' Ayamah added.
The anti-drug abuse movement, in a statement sent to AFP on July 17, 2025, clarified that 'the structures being destroyed [in the video] were makeshift wooden stalls that had been illegally erected by individuals who used them to sell drugs.
'This exercise was conducted in collaboration with local authorities to sanitise the area and protect the well-being of the community.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Boston Marathon bomber seeks full-panel rehearing in fight to remove judge
Boston Marathon bomber seeks full-panel rehearing in fight to remove judge

Boston Globe

time33 minutes ago

  • Boston Globe

Boston Marathon bomber seeks full-panel rehearing in fight to remove judge

Tsarnaev, 32, was sentenced to death after he admitted during trial to Advertisement However, during the 2015 trial, U.S. District Judge George A. O'Toole Jr. declined defense requests to investigate two jurors' potentially biased social-media activity. In March 2024, the First Circuit One juror claimed she had not commented on the case, but the defense found she had tweeted or retweeted 22 times about the bombings, including calling Tsarnaev a 'piece of garbage.' Another juror said none of his Facebook friends had discussed the trial, though one friend urged him to 'play the part' so he could get on the jury and send Tsarnaev 'to jail where he will be taken care of.' O'Toole was ordered to go back and investigate the issue. But Tsarnaev's defense argues O'Toole shouldn't be the one to oversee the reinvestigation, arguing that comments he made about the case on a podcast and at public events — praising jurors and defending how they were chosen — raise concerns about his impartiality. Advertisement In Thursday's petition, the lawyers said neither O'Toole's public statements. The attorneys added that a full-court review is needed to 'promote public confidence in the judiciary' given the high-profile nature of the case, and to ensure the remand proceedings are both fair and appear fair. Six of the court's 10 active judges would need to approve the request for an en banc rehearing. Approval of an en banc rehearing is rare and generally allowed only in cases of significant legal importance, conflict, or other compelling reasons. On April 15, 2013, Tsarnaev placed a bomb in a backpack in front of the Forum restaurant on Boylston Street that killed Evidence showed that his older brother, The jury that heard Tsarnaev's trial recommended death, rejecting claims that the then-19-year-old was not responsible because of the influence of his brother. The death sentence was Advertisement Rita Chandler can be reached at

NFL will continue to put social justice message in end zones
NFL will continue to put social justice message in end zones

NBC Sports

time2 hours ago

  • NBC Sports

NFL will continue to put social justice message in end zones

Whether the league will admit it or not, it's currently engaged in a high-wire regarding diversity initiatives, with a desire to do the objectively right thing on one hand and an urgency to placate certain political forces on the other. As it relates to the messages that have been painted on the back lines of end zones since 2020, those will continue. Via the Associated Press, all 32 teams will have one of four messages at the back of one end zone: End Racism, Stop Hate, Choose Love, or Inspire Change. At the back of the other other end one will be the message, 'It Takes All of Us.' Here's the reality. Some messages will invite less scrutiny from anti-DEI types than others. Choose Love, Inspire Change? Fine. End Racism, Stop Hate? Tread lightly. That said, 'End Racism' will be the message for each of the four international games. And the Eagles will rotate through all four messages. Kudos for the NFL to not suspending or postponing or pausing the end-zone messages. Especially if the gesture at some point triggers a social-media attack and/or a suggestion that the effort to acquire 10 percent of ESPN could be scrapped unless the messages are erased.

The Supreme Court lets Mississippi's social media age-verification law go into effect
The Supreme Court lets Mississippi's social media age-verification law go into effect

Engadget

time3 hours ago

  • Engadget

The Supreme Court lets Mississippi's social media age-verification law go into effect

The Supreme Court has decided not to weigh in on one of the many state-level age-verification laws currently being reviewed across the country. Today, the top court chose not to intervene on legislation from Mississippi about checking the ages of social media users, denying an application to vacate stay from NetChoice. The Mississippi law requires all users to verify their ages in order to use social media sites. It also places responsibility on the social networks to prevent children from accessing "harmful materials" and it requires parental consent for minors to use any social media. NetChoice represents several tech companies — including social media platforms Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat and YouTube — and it sued to block the law on grounds that it violates the First Amendment. A district court ruled in favor of NetChoice, but the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals lifted its temporary block. Although Justice Brett Kavanaugh denied the application to vacate stay on the appeals court ruling, he also wrote that "NetChoice has, in my view, demonstrated that it is likely to succeed on the merits—namely, that enforcement of the Mississippi law would likely violate its members' First Amendment rights under this Court's precedents." He denied the application because NetChoice "has not sufficiently demonstrated that the balance of harms and equities favors it at this time." This decision means that, at least for now, Mississippi's law will be allowed to stand. "Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment," said Paul Taske, co-director of the NetChoice Litigation Center. "This is merely an unfortunate procedural delay." There are several other state laws being assessed at various points in the US legal system. Some are centered on adult content providers such as pornography sites , while others are more broadly targeting social media use. Arkansas and Florida have seen federal judges block their laws, while Texas and Nebraska are working toward adopting their own rules about social media for minors. Yahoo, the parent company of Engadget, is a member of NetChoice.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store