logo
Looming pay transparency risks stoking tension and resentment

Looming pay transparency risks stoking tension and resentment

Irish Independent20 hours ago
Up until now, this issue has been unlikely to arise, but this is about to change.
On foot of a European directive, pay transparency must become law in Ireland by the middle of 2026 at the latest and when this happens employers will lose the significant information advantage they currently have over employees and job applicants.
The key measures of the EU Pay Transparency Directive are:
Job ads will have to include a salary level or a salary range – information that will be as much of interest to existing employees as it will be to job applicants.
Employees will have the right to proactively request information on pay levels for their positions and to see the effect of career progression on pay.
Gender pay gap reporting will continue for employers with a certain number of employees, but this reporting requirement will be extended to include the valuation of benefits.
Where pay gaps above 5pc exist for any level in an organisation that cannot be justified using objective gender-neutral criteria, employers will be obliged to explain them. They may need to consult with workers' representatives and even potentially undergo joint pay assessments.
Where pay gaps between men and women doing work of equal value exist, employers will need to address them.
Given the level of change involved, these measures are going to have a major impact and create issues for employers that will be complex to manage.
Mercer's global survey on Pay Transparency shows that organisations have an awareness of the expectations when it comes to pay transparency but are not yet prepared to navigate the path ahead.
As it stands, for example, employers regularly assert that the existence of a gender pay gap does not mean that they are engaging in unfair pay practices. This is usually a fair assertion as the level of correlation between gender pay gaps and pay equity is little to none, but employers have rarely been required to prove that their pay practices are fair.
Under the Pay Transparency Directive, the burden of proof on pay equity moves pretty decisively to the employer in the event of claims of unfair practice.
Once the directive takes effect in Ireland, employees will be able to see how their pay compares with that of new hires and peers doing the same work or work of equal value. They will be free to form their own judgments on whether they are being paid fairly or not.
Managerial discretion in setting pay can lead to perceptions of unfairness, especially when employees can compare their salaries with new hires. The common practice, where job markets are hot, of offering new hires premium salaries may produce a hostile reaction from existing employees when greater visibility over pay norms exist. At a minimum, employers will need to be able to justify such distinctions by reference to legitimate factors such as experience or qualifications.
Given the potential for upheaval, it's likely that neither employers nor their people will want new anomalies to come to light every time a job and the accompanying pay range is advertised.
To avoid this happening, employers will need to prepare, and they should start to do so by conducting a comprehensive pay-equity analysis. Under this process, an employer should assess current pay structures, identify any discrepancies, and evaluate the justification for these differences. By understanding the existing pay landscape, they can make informed decisions about necessary adjustments.
Employers should also establish clear pay ranges for all roles within their organisation. This transparency will not only help in aligning salaries with market standards but also provide a framework for future hiring and promotions. Where pay ranges already exist, it should be checked that they reflect the organisational reality. If not, this situation should be addressed.
Clear guidelines on how pay is determined – based on allowable factors such as relevant experience, performance and qualifications – should be communicated to all employees to foster trust and understanding.
Training for hiring managers and HR personnel is crucial. They must be equipped to handle inquiries about pay and understand the implications of the new directive.
Engaging with employees through surveys or focus groups can also provide valuable insights into their perceptions of pay equity and transparency.
Objectively, a world in which pay is transparent may be a better one for both employers and employees.
Arguments over fairness of pay can become toxic in a non-transparent world, with misinformation sometimes playing a very destructive role. This is far less likely to be a factor where pay is transparent, where ranges are visible and where the factors affecting pay have been clearly articulated.
Danny Mansergh is the leader of the Career Practice at Mercer Ireland
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Next fortnight crucial for Ireland amid US tariff threats
Next fortnight crucial for Ireland amid US tariff threats

RTÉ News​

time9 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Next fortnight crucial for Ireland amid US tariff threats

There's no doubt US President Donald Trump's threat of 30% tariffs is a significant blow to both the European Union and Ireland. Earlier this week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin expressed hopes that Brussels and Washington could agree a framework deal which would pause any escalation in trade tensions. But Mr Trump's letter to the EU, dated last Friday, suggests a positive short-term arrangement is less likely. The next two weeks will be crucial for Ireland and the EU. In the immediate term nothing changes - tariffs of 10% are still being imposed by the US on EU goods. The exceptions remain the pharmaceutical and computer chip manufacturing sectors, both enormously important to the Irish economy. Mr Trump's announcement now raises the damaging prospect of 30% tariffs being imposed if a deal is not reached by 1 August. His intervention to make the threat in the middle of EU-US negotiations has sent shockwaves through European capitals. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned of "proportionate countermeasures" if the US hikes its tariffs on imports from the EU. There is no guarantee Mr Trump will follow through on his ultimatum on 1 August - the deadline has already been shifted from 9 July. Nor is there any certainty the rate will be 30%. Previously, he has suggested tariffs of 20% and 50% on EU goods. The EU's position is to remain calm and continue negotiations - while turning up the rhetoric on the likelihood of reciprocal countermeasures. But for Irish exporters, the lack of certainty is now even more pronounced. Businesses don't know when to expect increased tariffs or what the rate might be. This unpredictability undermines the business rationale for making further investments - and further investments equal jobs. In parallel with the threat of 30% tariffs, the US is investigating trading arrangements for the pharmaceutical and computer chip manufacturing sectors. Nobody can presume their escape from tariffs to date will remain the position in future. Tomorrow morning, stock markets and bond markets will reopen - their response to Mr Trump's burst of letter-writing will be crucial. In April, when the markets took fright at the US president's tough talk on tariffs, leading to a jump in the US cost of borrowing, he quickly backed down. Now, however, the political and financial environments may have shifted. His success in having his tax cuts bill approved by Congress may have emboldened him to return to tariff threats on various countries, including EU member states.

John Whelan: Another tariff escape for Ireland's pharma companies
John Whelan: Another tariff escape for Ireland's pharma companies

Irish Examiner

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

John Whelan: Another tariff escape for Ireland's pharma companies

The pharmaceutical industry appears to have once again avoided the US tariff chaos, created by US president Donald Trump's letter addressed to European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen, posted Saturday on his social media platform, Truth Social. His threat to raise tariffs on European products to 30% starting on August 1, is widely seen as a gambit to force the hand of the European Commission who have already responded with a written statement, saying 'we remain ready to continue working towards an agreement by August 1,' adding that 'at the same time, we will take all necessary steps to safeguard EU interests, including the adoption of proportionate countermeasures if required'. This is exclusive subscriber content. Already a subscriber? Sign in Take us with you this summer. Annual €130€65 Best value Monthly €12€6 / month

Ireland's social media regulator gives X extra time to clarify child safety rules
Ireland's social media regulator gives X extra time to clarify child safety rules

Irish Examiner

time12 hours ago

  • Irish Examiner

Ireland's social media regulator gives X extra time to clarify child safety rules

Elon Musk-owned X asked Ireland's media regulator to extend its deadline for the social media giant to clarify how it is keeping children safe on its platform. Coimisiún na Meán confirmed to the Irish Examiner that X had requested extra time to respond to its statutory notice seeking information on how it will comply with specific sections of the Online Safety Code. Having originally been asked to provide this information by July 22 or risk facing 'criminal liability', a new deadline of August 8 has been set. Crucially, this new deadline comes after the High Court is set to rule on a judicial review taken by X challenging what it has called the "regulatory overreach' from Coimisiún na Meán in how it proposes to hold big tech companies to account. X has asked the court to overturn the decision to apply the Online Safety Code to its platform. The decision in that judicial review is set to be delivered on July 25. Elon Musk's X now has until August to clarify how it is keeping children safe online. File picture: AP Photo/Michel Euler The regulator has fully contested the case, and has said the code is aimed at keeping people, especially children, safe online. The Online Safety Code sets binding rules on major platforms that also include Facebook and YouTube to prohibit harmful content like cyberbullying, racism, or incitement to hatred. It also makes it incumbent on platforms to have robust age assurance such as verifying a passport photo to prevent children from seeing pornography or gratuitous violence online, as 'merely asking users whether they are over 18 will not be enough'. Coimisiún na Meán says its code — which fully comes into effect this month — fits in with broader European legislation aimed at protecting people online, with big firms such as Meta, YouTube and TikTok obliged to adhere to its rules. Last month, the regulator wrote to X asking it to explain how it is complying with the code. 'Under Part A of the Code designated platforms must establish and operate age verification systems for users with respect to content which may impair physical, mental, or moral development of minors,' it said. 'For the purposes of Part A, the term 'age verification' includes effective age assurance measures including age estimation. 'Information provided by X so far is not sufficient to assess whether X's current measures are sufficient to protect children using the service. An Coimisiún is therefore using its statutory powers to seek further information.' The regulator said it would review the response from X if it has complied with part A of the code and determine if further action should be taken. Facing criminal liability If X does not respond, it said it could face a 'criminal liability, including a fine of up to €500,000'. If it is eventually found that X has breached its obligations under the Online Safety Code, it can be fined up to €20m or 10% of its turnover. A spokesperson for Coimisiún na Méan said: 'In June, [we] issued a statutory Information Notice to X Internet Unlimited Company, the provider of the platform X, with an obligation to respond by July 22, 2025. 'X have since requested an extension to this deadline and this request has been granted by An Coimisiún with a new deadline of August 8, 2025.' Read More US tariff announcement is deeply regrettable, Simon Harris says

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store