O'Connor at No.10 as Wallabies suffer more injury woe
But a plan for the 35-year-old O'Connor, back in the green and gold after three years, to share the No.10 role has had to be shelved after Ben Donaldson went down injured in training on Thursday.
The idea had been for O'Connor to play the first 40 minutes with Donaldson coming on after the break but the injury has left the Wallabies looking at risky alternatives in the playmaking department as they get set to face the world champions in Johannesburg on Saturday (Sunday AEST).
"In the second to last play of the training, 'Donno' kicked the ball and pulled up short so we don't know what the extent of the injury is," coach Joe Schmidt revealed after naming the team.
"We've only been back from training for about an hour so he will get a scan now and we'll have a definitive picture because we need to know for next week as well whether we need more cover.
"Nic White can cover No.10 and is astute enough to do so, Andrew Kellaway has the skill set as well if we go with what we've got at the moment."
The inclusion of the 35-year-old O'Connor at No.10 is the only change to the starting XV that defeated the British & Irish Lions 22-12 in Sydney a fortnight ago, as he comes into the side after Tom Lynagh suffered a concussion in that encouraging victory.
O'Connor, who helped New Zealand outfit Crusaders win the Super Rugby title this season, hasn't played for the Wallabies since 2022 but still looks the safest pair of hands after all the fly-half woes Schmidt has had to contend with, what with first-choice Noah Lolesio also out with neck trouble.
O'Connor's halfback partner will be another veteran, White, who has doubled back on his decision to retire after the Lions series when first choice Jake Gordon got injured.
Your Match Day 23 for the first Test of the @flightcentreau Rugby Championship 🦘NEXT MATCH🆚 Springboks🗓️ Sunday August 17 | 1:10am AEST🏟️ Emirates Airline Park, Johannesburg📺 @stansportau#Wallabies pic.twitter.com/jHt6JOmn82
— Wallabies (@wallabies) August 14, 2025
Donaldson's injury has necessitated a late change to the planned bench with Schmidt having to replace the versatile back with loose forward Nick Champion de Crespigny.
That means Australia will go from a five-three to six-two split between forwards and backs among the replacements.
Yet Schmidt sounded upbeat as he noted: "The group has had a good week of preparation, adjusting pretty well to the time zone and the altitude well here in Johannesburg.
"There's not many bigger Tests than playing South Africa on their home turf and we know we're going to need to be at our best on Saturday night."
Australia are seeking their first win at Ellis Park since 1963, when they beat South Africa 11-9.
Australia team:
15–Tom Wright, 14–Max Jorgensen, 13–Joseph Suaalii, 12–Len Ikitau, 11–Dylan Pietsch, 10–James O'Connor, 9–Nic White, 8–Harry Wilson (captain), 7–Fraser McReight, 6–Tom Hooper, 5–Will Skelton, 4–Nick Frost, 3–Taniela Tupou, 2–Billy Pollard, 1–James Slipper
Replacements: 16–Brandon Paenga-Amosa, 17–Angus Bell, 18–Zane Nonggorr, 19–Jeremy Williams, 20–Langi Gleeson, 21–Nick Champion de Crespigny, 22–Tate McDermott, 23–Andrew Kellaway.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
2 hours ago
- New York Times
Is turbo-nostalgia ruining people's enjoyment of contemporary football?
To anyone who remembers World Cup 2010, the Jabulani football was, by common consent, a major factor in contributing to an underwhelming tournament in South Africa. Its unusual construction, featuring fewer panels than any ball before or since, meant a lack of 'drag', so the ball didn't decelerate properly, and moved unpredictably late. It had long been a cliche for goalkeepers to complain about a new tournament ball, but in 2010 outfielders were appalled too. Advertisement 'It's taken some of the skill out of the game,' complained England midfielder Joe Cole. Brazil's Robinho agreed. 'The guy who designed this ball never played football,' he said. 'But there's nothing we can do.' Yet if you spot the Jabulani mentioned 15 years on, it's often in positive, fond terms. 'Every league in the world should be required to use the Jabulani on a random week of the season,' read one viral tweet last season. 'Every game would be chaos. Goals being scored from everywhere.' But hang on: that was the opposite of what the Jabulani offered. It didn't produce chaos; it contributed to the second-lowest goals-per-game rate of any World Cup (after the 1990 edition that was so tedious that it led to the introduction of the backpass rule to reform the sport). The winners, Spain, triumphed largely because they kept the fly-away ball on the ground, but they scored just eight goals in seven games. As for 'goals being scored from everywhere': there were the same number of goals scored from outside the box in 2010, 26, as at World Cup 2006. And while that was simply one light-hearted tweet, others convey a similar message, suggesting the Jabulani was 'a blessing for spectators', or 'the best ball ever made' or, inevitably, 'the GOAT ball', all of which is the complete opposite of what everyone thought at the time. This about-turn is presumably not because people have reconsidered what they want from a football. It's because they've spent 15 years seeing the same three goals again: Giovanni van Bronkhorst's top corner strike against Uruguay, Keisuke Honda's swerving free kick against Denmark, and one of two Diego Forlan free kicks. And when goals did go in, the unconventional trajectory of the Jabulani was oddly fascinating. But we haven't re-watched all the terrible shots, all the misplaced long-range passes, and all the things that made for a World Cup which was flatter than the bellow of the vuvuzelas. Advertisement Rose-tinted spectacles are nothing new, particularly when it comes to sport. A common pattern is that everyone's favourite World Cup is generally the first they experienced, which might explain why World Cup 2010 seems popular with people who are probably now in their mid-twenties. But football coverage — and, let's be honest, the wider world — still hasn't quite got to grips with how easily-accessible bitesize clips of the past have warped our perception of the present. We are living in an age of turbo-nostalgia. It is simpler than ever, for example, to create a playlist that demonstrates why your favourite year of music (bonus points if this was the same year as your favourite World Cup) was so great. What once involved buying and assembling various records, cassettes or CDs and manually recording the music can be performed on Spotify in a couple of minutes. And, of course, someone's already done it for you anyway, so you can just click on that playlist. And if you subsequently click on the 'best new music' playlist, it just won't be as good. Because, obviously, you're comparing one random week to your favourite-ever year. The effect in football occurs in various forms, but chiefly when comparing individual players. Whenever up-and-coming footballers are asked for their favourite all-time player, the most common answers are Lionel Messi and Cristiano Ronaldo, but an intriguing number select Ronaldo and Zinedine Zidane, even if they were born after those players retired. The era of YouTube means you can watch them as easily as, say, Erling Haaland. And their best bits are better, in part because they have a whole career to select from. Ronaldo and Zidane have become so adored based upon, say, that goal against Compostela or that Champions League winner against Bayer Leverkusen — and various compilations — that there's actually no rational analysis about their careers. People think you've some kind of vendetta if you point out that Ronaldo only won one league title in Europe and never got close to winning the European Cup, or recall that Zidane had a disastrous 18-month period between winning World Cup 1998 and Euro 2000 when he looked completely bereft of confidence, and both Juventus and Real Madrid improved when he left. But if we speak about, say, Kylian Mbappe in those terms, it's only applying the current standard of scrutiny to the past. Advertisement So, George Weah's goal for Milan versus Verona in 1996 was brilliant, and yes, he won that year's Ballon d'Or, but he also only scored seven goals that calendar year. Yes, that scary bloke Duncan Ferguson (who the commentators insist Everton 'could do with out there today!') scored lots of thumping headers, but his best-ever return in a season, from over a decade in the Premier League, was 11 goals, which was one more than Beto scored in 2024-25. But almost any retrospective coverage of anything in football — particularly, it must be said, from the 1990s — is so overwhelmingly positive to the point of delusion. 'When you watch football in the Premier League or other top divisions, it's so robotic,' said David McGoldrick, briefly an enigmatic Premier League forward for Sheffield United, now at Barnsley in League One. 'In my day, there was Ronaldinho, Paul Gascoigne and those kinds of players who were great to watch.' But those two players' careers barely overlapped. They peaked about 15 years apart. They were considered special cases even at the time. And the current era does have, for example, Lamine Yamal. The current vibe amongst football fans is not solely typical nostalgia felt solely by middle-aged people, but an intense level of anemoia — as American writer John Koenig has termed it — essentially, false nostalgia for a time you can't recall. Even teenagers insist they're 'against modern football', and think 'the game has gone', which could conceivably be because modern football truly is rubbish, and the game has actually gone. But they're all still hooked on it, so, to paraphrase Ron Atkinson, it must be not-bad then. All this would basically be fine, and completely unworthy of any comment, if it wasn't compromising people's enjoyment of what's actually happening in their own time. The reaction to Euro 2024 — a perfectly good competition that produced some excellent games and best major tournament winner for well over a decade — was strange. 'Why is Euro 2024 so dull?,' was the headline in The Spectator. 'One of the poorest tournaments we've seen in a long time,' claimed former Sky Sports presenter Richard Keys. But it was surely better than both Euro 2020, which was compromised by geography, Covid-19 and a lack of convincing sides, and Euro 2016, a tournament which never really took off. Again, people were presumably comparing watching 120 minutes of a flat game to a couple of standout, YouTube-aided memories from otherwise dull tournaments. Away from football, this has more serious ramifications. A poll by YouGov last year asked around 2,000 people, grouped by age, when they thought life was best. Those aged 70+ generally thought it was the 1960s, people in their sixties thought it was the 1970s, people in their 50s thought it was the 1980s, and so on. That was, in itself, funny but not surprising — everyone enjoyed being young. A more interesting side story was that people in their twenties were more likely than older generations to point to periods before they were born as the best time to have lived, which surely results in flawed perceptions of the current day. Comparatively, the 'make football great again' vibe is mostly harmless. But for the record, as the new Premier League campaign gets underway, the quality of technical and tactical play is better than ever, the goals-per-game rate has reached incredibly high levels over the last couple of seasons, attendances are at record numbers, and the English top flight is now unquestionably the best around. Let's try to enjoy it. In 2040, some will speak about this as the GOAT season — even if this campaign is as bad as the Jabulani was. Spot the pattern. Connect the terms Find the hidden link between sports terms Play today's puzzle
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Welsh rugby's CEO diagnosed with cancer and stepping away from role
CARDIFF, Wales (AP) — The top official in Welsh rugby is stepping away to undergo treatment after being diagnosed with cancer. Abi Tierney, chief executive of the Welsh Rugby Union, will leave her role temporarily on Aug. 22 'to focus fully on my health and recovery.' 'I am grateful for the support I have already received from my family, friends, and colleagues,' Tierney said, 'and I am confident in the team's ability to continue our work during my absence.' Tierney has just overseen the appointment of Steve Tandy as coach of the men's national team, which went on a record 18-match losing run before a win in Japan last month. ___ AP rugby: The Associated Press
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
NRL world erupts over Dragons obstruction drama as fans make point about Panthers
NRL fans have echoed the outrage from Dragons coach Shane Flanagan after a controversial obstruction incident in Friday night's 14-10 loss to the Warriors. In a moment that had more than a few similarities to the Panthers drama from the previous night, Adam Pompey was awarded a crucial second half try despite claims of obstruction from the Dragons that fell on deaf ears. Penrith's Nathan Cleary accused Harry Grant of 'playing' for the penalty that cost him a winning goal field goal on Thursday night, before the Storm captain snatched victory with a try in golden point. Many fans suggested Grant took a dive when he ran towards Penrith's Moses Leota, who was pinged for blocking the Storm skipper when he tried to put pressure on Cleary's kick. On Friday night, Dragons playmaker Lyhkan King-Togia was similarly accused of play-acting by fans after appealing for an obstruction penalty for contact with Marata Niukore. The Dragons five-eighth was knocked down in the defensive line and Pompey pounced to race through and score a contentious try to help level the scores. The Bunker took a long time to make a judgement on the incident, before awarding the try to the Warriors. And the Dragons frustrations were compounded when Pompey crossed for what turned out to be the match-winning try for the Warriors ten minutes later, prompting Dragons coach Shane Flanagan to hit out over the obstruction call in his post-match press conference and questioning the double standards of decisions from officials. Shane Flanagan and fans lash officials over obstruction drama "I know you haven't asked the question but I am going to give an answer," a clearly irritated Flanagan said after the match. "It was really tough for us that what was an obstruction last week is not an obstruction this week. "The boys asked out on the field numerous times and they just got shooed away, so that is frustrating. I started playing footy when I was four years old... I don't know the rules anymore, I dead set do not know the rules. "It is tough, but we are a tough club and this is a really connected unit. We will fight really hard for the next three weeks." Many fans also pointed to the Panthers incident the night before, and questioned why Grant was awarded a penalty on a blocker call, but Lyhkan King-Togia was denied an obstruction penalty in two seperate incident that had many similarities. Been a no try all year but given a try to hand the Warriors the game… I feel for Shane Flanagan. #nrlwarriorsdragons — Rugby League News (@RugbyLeagueNews) August 15, 2025 Last night milking was ok if the player shouldn't be there anyway. Tonight against the Dragons it's play on?It's not about the obstructed defender making the tackle, it's about his centre having to leave his man. NRL officiating is a mess#nrlwarriorsdragons — Alex Carter (@abbacarter) August 15, 2025 That has been called a no try 100 times this shoulder - made contact.I do not understandooooo #nrlwarriorsdragons — Jack Holdsworth (@jholdsworth93) August 15, 2025 How many more times is this club going to get screwed over by the nrl match officials and especially the bunker? These boys are busting their arses every week and the players are not allowed to decide who proud of the effort tonight #nrlwarriorsdragons #redv — Joe REDV YNWA (@dragons2194) August 15, 2025 So the guy in The Bunker (Klein) who ruled that as ok, was the on-field referee last night who ruled that Leota took out Grant.#NRL #NRLWarriorsDragons — Aaron Eugol (@a_eugol) August 15, 2025 Warriors reclaim top-four spot in drama-filled victory The win for the Warriors saw them leapfrog Penrith into fourth on the ladder and reignite their hopes of securing a crucial top-four finish for the finals series, with three games to play. But the Dragons' slim finals hopes are all but over, despite a gutsy display that saw them jump out to a 10-0 lead after losing three players to concussion in the first half. The Dragons had to activate 18th man Tyrell Sloan after back-rowers Hamish Stewart and Jack De Belin clashed heads and were ruled out of the contest. Both players were ruled as category-one concussions after clashing heads trying to bring down Warriors enforcer James Fisher-Harris, before the Dragons lost a third player when interchange forward Hame Sele failed an HIA following a 29th-minute head knock. The injury-hit Warriors could have slumped to as low as seventh by the end of the round but instead, they extinguished the Dragons' slim finals hopes. Warriors coach Andrew Webster admitted it wasn't a pretty win but was delighted his side secured a crucial two competition points. "Far from perfect. That's pretty clear," Webster said. "But an amazing amount of effort and scramble and working hard for each other and finding a way. When you're not playing the best football, I don't think your first win (after a losing streak) is going to be a 20-point victory. It's going to be a win. That's what we come up with tonight." with AAP
