State pension to rise in 2026 for people born in these years
State pension to rise in 2026 for people born in these years
The State Pension age in the UK is currently set to start rising from 66 to 67 from 2026, with the increase expected to be fully implemented for men and women by 2028
The State Pension age in the UK is due to rise from 66 to 67 starting next year, with the rise anticipated to be fully realised for both genders by 2028. This change to the official retirement age has been a part of UK legislation since 2014, and a subsequent hike from 67 to 68 is scheduled to occur between 2044 and 2046.
The Pensions Act of 2014 fast-tracked the increase of the State Pension age from 66 to 67 by eight years. The UK Government also adjusted the phasing of the State Pension age elevation, meaning that instead of reaching State Pension age on a specific date, individuals born between March 6, 1961, and April 5, 1977 will qualify to claim the State Pension once they reach 67.
It's vital to stay informed about these forthcoming changes, particularly if you have a retirement plan in place. All those affected by changes to their State Pension age will receive an advance notification letter from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
According to the Pensions Act 2007, the State Pension age for both men and women will undergo another increase from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here .
The Pensions Act 2014 requires a regular review of the State Pension age at least every five years. These reviews will adhere to the principle that individuals should spend a certain proportion of their adult life receiving a State Pension.
The UK's state pension age is due for a review before the end of this decade. Originally, the Conservative government had planned this review for two years post the general election, which would have been in 2026.
Article continues below
The review will consider factors such as life expectancy when deciding on the State Pension age. Following the review, the UK Government may decide to adjust the State Pension age.
However, any proposed changes must be approved by parliament before they can be implemented into law. This is the earliest age at which you can start receiving your State Pension, which may not be the same as the age at which you can access a workplace or personal pension.
In terms of increasing State Pension payments, HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) recently revealed that over 10,000 payments totalling £12.5 million have been made through the new digital service to boost State Pensions since it was launched last year. However, those looking to maximise their retirement income through the contributory benefit only have a few weeks left to fill any gaps in their National Insurance (NI) records dating back to 2006.
Article continues below
The duration for making voluntary National Insurance contributions has been significantly increased beyond the usual six-year limit. The past administration extended the period to allow backdated payments from April 6, 2006, to April 5, 2018, and now, under the new State Pension rules, up to April 5, 2025.
This gives individuals additional time to assess their situation and contribute further if needed. Those eligible for these top-ups include men born from April 6, 1951, and women from April 6, 1953, which can potentially raise their eventual New State Pension sum.
For some people, obtaining National Insurance credits may be a better route than making contributions, so it's important to explore all the options.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Leader Live
7 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Bowie challenges Tories to ‘step up' against Miliband's ‘eco-zealotry'
The Scottish Conservative MP criticised both Labour and the SNP over their opposition to new oil and gas developments in the North Sea. Accusing the UK Government of 'overseeing the wilful deindustrialisation of this nation', Mr Bowie hit out at the 'frankly dangerous eco-zealotry of Ed Miliband', the Energy Secretary. Speaking at the Scottish Conservative conference at Murrayfield in Edinburgh Mr Bowie told his party: 'We must step up. Britain needs us more than ever.' The Tory insisted: 'The future of Scotland and Britain is at stake, our country's security depends on a strong Conservative Party to stand up for what is right.' He recalled how former US president Ronald Reagan had 'once said the first duty of government is to protect' – but added that 'on every front the SNP and Labour are failing to do that'. Attacking both Labour and the SNP, Mr Bowie, who is also his party's shadow Scottish secretary, said: 'They haven't protected everyone's economic security, by raising taxes, or ripping away their winter fuel payment, even if they are now apparently going to hand it back to them. 'They haven't protected our energy security by insisting on no new oil and gas developments.' The Conservative MP continued: 'We can all see what is happening in the world, there is more risk out there, we as a country are more vulnerable. 'That is why the decisions of this Labour Government are so gravely concerning. Their economic incompetence, coupled with their frightening ineptitude when it comes to our energy security is making the United Kingdom more vulnerable.' He attacked the Labour Government over its 'madcap drive to clean power by 2030', as he said ministers were 'actively accelerating the decline of our North Sea'. This, he said, was 'forcing us to become increasingly exposed to over-reliance on imports from overseas, imports that are shipped in diesel-chugging tankers across the Atlantic from America or from Norwegian wells'. The Tory said the opposition to new oil and gas developments meant 'investment is drying up, work is being put on pause, companies are literally shutting up shop and jobs are being lost'. But he added: 'This hostility for our oil and gas workers is not simply the preserve of the zealots in the Labour Party. 'The SNP have their fingerprints all over the job losses, the well closures.' It's Scottish Conservative Conference! 🇬🇧🏴 Hello Murrayfield! @ScotTories @Conservatives — Andrew Bowie (@AndrewBowie_MP) June 13, 2025 Mr Bowie added: 'We need Conservative leadership because we know where the SNP and Labour will take us.' He also used his speech to attack the 'snake oil salesmen' in Reform UK, insisting that Nigel Farage's party do not 'care one jot for Scotland, or for our United Kingdom'. The Tory said: 'Let me be clear. Reform is quite simply not a conservative party, not a unionist party, frankly they are not a serious party.' The Scottish government energy secretary Gillian Martin said: 'The Scottish Government is clear in our support for a just transition for Scotland's valued oil and gas sector, which recognises the maturity of the North Sea basin and is in line with climate change commitments and energy security. 'We are deeply concerned at recent announcements of planned job losses in the North East and have called on the UK Government for the earliest possible end to the Energy Profits Levy (EPL) – which was supposed to be a temporary measure but was extended by the previous Conservative UK Government.'
Daily Mail
27 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Elon Musk's role in building Trump's 'Golden Dome' missile shield in doubt after their explosive feud
The White House has tamped down talk of punishing Elon Musk 's billions of government contracts now that he and president Trump have tamped down their epic feud. But a pivotal role floated for his SpaceX company to build Trump's $175 billion Golden Dome could now be under threat. 'No efforts have been made on that front, as far as I'm aware,' is how White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt responded when asked whether the White House was looking at nixing Musk's contracts. That came after the president wrote publicly about terminating his 'governmental subsidies and contracts' and warned of 'serious consequences' if Musk decided to financially support Democrats while he was railing against Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' for after forecasts showed it would tack trillions onto the national debt. That came in the midst of their explosive feud that finally tamped dow n after Musk started posting favorable tweets, phoned Trump, and said he regretted 'some of my posts' in their X war. Musk companies have existing contracts estimated at $38 billion without Golden Dome. Now, the role for his company has come into question, Reuters reported, citing three people familiar with the project. It would be a major conceptual turnaround. abrupt turnaround from when Trump sat next to a graphic poster board showing a protective dome intended to shield the nation from incoming missiles. The White House had been pushing consideration of a plan where Musk's rocket and satellite company – which ferries astronauts and payloads to the International Space Station – would be a key partner in the project. Also involved would be Palantir and drone maker Anduril. And in an indication of how personalities and affiliations could be playing in the ambitious projects, a 'new framework' is now under consideration which would scrap the need for Musk's network of orbiting satellites. It would focus on 'existing ground systems for missile defense instead,' according to the report. It is unclear how this reworked system would counter the growing threat of hypersonic missiles, which can travel up to 10 times the speed of sound and change direction mid-flight. The Pentagon had been considering various plans, including some relying on multiple satellites and even space-based interceptors. A Defense official told Reuters that DOD 'has no announcements regarding future contracts associated with the Golden Dome effort.' The White House said said the administration is 'committed to a rigorous review process for all bids and contracts. Trump announced his Golden Dome to much fanfare from the Oval Office. Republicans put a $25 billion line item for it in the House version of his 'big, beautiful' bill now making its way through the Senate. ''We're going to have it at the highest level,' Trump said. 'Canada has called us and they want to be a part of it,' he said, adding that 'as usual, we help Canada as best we can.' 'We're talking about $175 billion total cost when it's completed,' Trump said. Pressed on whether military brass liked the idea, Trump responded: 'I suggested it and they all said, 'We love the idea sir.' That's the way it's supposed to be, right?' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth called it 'a down payment on President Trump's priority to defend our homeland.' Defense contractors were scrambling this spring to submit more than 300 concept papers. Some doubt Trump's budget estimates as lowballs. Former Pentagon comptroller Dov Zakheim estimated it could cost up to $100 billion each year thorugh 2030/.
Business News Wales
an hour ago
- Business News Wales
OEUK Welcomes £500m Government Investment in Hydrogen Infrastructure
Offshore Energies UK (OEUK) has welcomed the UK Government's announcement of more than £500 million to support the development of the UK's first network for hydrogen transport and storage. It said the investment confirmed in the Spending Review was a major boost to the UK's ambitions to become a clean energy superpower and to support industrial regions including Teesside, Merseyside, the Humber and Scotland. The development of a hydrogen transport and storage network is essential for building a UK-wide market, it said, connecting production with end users such as power stations and industrial clusters. This infrastructure is the foundation for scaling up both hydrogen produced with carbon capture and hydrogen produced with electrolysis, and for repurposing much of the UK's existing natural gas infrastructure. The funding can help unlock long-term secure jobs in manufacturing, engineering, and the wider energy supply chain, OEUK said. OEUK's members are already investing in carbon capture and hydrogen projects that could support thousands of skilled roles across the country, particularly in places where economic renewal is needed most. But to make hydrogen competitive, early investments must be supported by a clear regulatory framework and investable business models, it added. OEUK is now calling on Government to work with industry to ensure this funding has the best possible impact and accelerates enabling policies that reduce costs and de-risk private investment Hydrogen will play a vital role in decarbonising sectors such as steel, glass, ceramics, and refining but it will only succeed if a stable market is created that attracts investors, it said. OEUK's Head of Energy Policy, Enrique Cornejo, said: 'If we are serious about getting to net zero, hydrogen must be a key piece of the puzzle for decarbonising heavy industry, power, and enabling energy storage but it must be made affordable and attractive to the companies that need to bring it to life. 'Because it is expensive the government is right to focus deployment in sectors where it offers most value. For hydrogen to become competitive there must be cost reductions which will only be achieved if we initiate early investments and learn from them. 'Developing a strong hydrogen sector is critical to our industrial future, and the UK's oil and gas supply chain has the skills and capabilities to accelerate progress.'
