logo
Hawaii lawmakers wrangle HECO rescue bills as session deadline looms

Hawaii lawmakers wrangle HECO rescue bills as session deadline looms

Hawaiian Electric Co. is making a final legislative push this month, asking lawmakers to help shore up its financial foundation, which crumbled after the 2023 Maui wildfire that killed 102 people and destroyed much of Lahaina.
HECO and its parent company, which were found to have started the Lahaina fire, have made enormous progress since the August 2023 catastrophe. Most notably HECO settled lawsuits brought by more than 2,000 fire victims as part of a global settlement brokered by Gov. Josh Green and blessed by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court in February.
HECO says it still needs the Legislature's help, chiefly in the form of protection from future wildfire lawsuits, in the hopes such a measure can help boost the company's credit rating. The provision limiting the utility's liability is now the most important piece of a wildfire mitigation bill that has gone through various iterations this session, said Jim Kelly, HECO's vice president for government and community relations and corporate communications.
Bond rating agencies slashed the credit rating of HECO's parent, Hawaiian Electric Industries, after the fires, meaning the company must pay high interest rates to borrow money. What Hawaiʻi lawmakers do, Kelly said, will send a message to credit markets, which have seen 14 other western states limit wildfire liability for utilities, including Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Arizona and New Mexico.
'It sends a really strong signal to credit markets that are watching this closely,' Kelly said.
If the utility's bill can't muster the needed votes, he said, 'that raises questions about how much support there is for the local hometown utility.'
The Senate has formally disagreed with House amendments to the wildfire mitigation bill, meaning lawmakers must work out differences during conference committee hearings.
Meanwhile, Senate committees amended a House bill to establish a fund to pay the state's portion of a $4 billion global settlement. If the House disagrees with the amendments, those differences also will have to be worked out in a conference committee including members of both chambers before the session ends May 2.
Bill Gains Unlikely Advocate
The wildfire bill originally called for setting up a wildfire recovery fund, a sort of self-insurance fund HECO could use to pay future wildfire claims. The $1 billion fund was to be financed with a new fee imposed on customers that could be used to secure loans. The bill also contained a limitation on liability.
But lawmakers changed much of that over the course of the session.
The latest version of the bill would also create a fund; however, it would be used not for insurance but rather to pay for utility infrastructure investments to mitigate wildfire risks. That fund also would be financed with a new fee on customers. The bill would also limit liability the utility could face up to $1 billion.
The idea of imposing a new fee on utility customers has generated some opposition, most notably from the Hawaiʻi Regional Council of Carpenters. But even long-time antagonists of the utility company say the current bill creates a good deal for customers.
Among the unlikely supporters is Henry Curtis, vice president of the activist group Life of the Land, who frequently faces off against HECO in cases before the Hawaiʻi Public Utilities Commission. A loan secured by a fee on customers carries a much lower interest rate than other types of loans, which would be passed on to customers through utility rates anyway, Curtis said.
The PUC would help ensure that any such loan carried the lowest possible interest rate, said Curtis, who has testified in favor of the bill.
Other supporters include the Chamber of Commerce Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau, Ulupono Initiative and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1260. The only groups opposing the bill in its current form are the carpenters union and the Hawaiʻi Association for Justice, a trial lawyers association.
Rep. Nicole Lowen has also at times faced off against HECO as chair of the House Energy and Environmental Protection Committee. But Lowen agrees that the securitized fee on utility customers might be the best option.
'The work to implement the wildfire mitigation plan must be done, and the cost of financing that work gets passed on to ratepayers regardless,' she said. 'By authorizing securitization for this purpose specifically, we would be saving ratepayers millions of dollars a year.'
Still, HECO's Kelly acknowledged the company expects challenges during the session's waning days.
'Nobody hates everything about (Senate Bill) 897, but nobody loves everything about it, either,' he said. 'We're just glad it's still moving.'
Among those expected to vet utility bills during the legislative end game is state Sen. Glenn Wakai. He previously held hearings on the utility's proposed bills as chairman of the Senate Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee.
Wakai's philosophy is to put what he calls 'hooks' in Senate Bill 897 and other utility measures, to hold HECO accountable to the public and ratepayers in exchange for the laws to help the utility.
For example, he said, utility executives should be prohibited from receiving bonuses above their base salaries if customers are paying an additional fee.
In March, Civil Beat reported Hawaiian Electric Industries' president and chief executive, Scott Seu, got a one-year compensation increase of $1.7 million, lifting his take-home pay to $3.2 million in 2024. Shelee Kimura, president and chief executive of HEI's utility subsidiary, Hawaiian Electric Co., had a pay jump from $859,000 in 2023 to $1.5 million. The increases came despite HEI reporting a $1.4 billion net loss in 2024.
Seu and Kimura subsequently repaid the incentive compensation they received for 2024, although they still got increases in their base salaries. Seu's base went to $995,000 from $958,000; Kimura's went to $650,000 from $575,000. Seu's 2024 incentive was approximately $1.7 million and Kimura's $606,000.
Wakai said he also wants to see a plan from HECO to reduce rates over the long term.
'There has to be some kind of give on their part,' he said.
Utility Isn't Sure It Can Raise Money To Pay Settlement
Wakai is one of few legislators to take a hard look at another bill that would set up a fund to pay the state's portion of the $4 billion wildfire settlement. Taxpayers are on the hook for $807.5 million.
During a hearing in March, Wakai hauled Seu before the committee and grilled the company CEO on where HECO's portion of the settlement money would come from. The holding company has raised about half of the $1.99 billion it has committed to the settlement. But it has acknowledged it might not be able to raise the rest without dire steps.
'There is no assurance that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts, on a timely basis or on reasonable terms acceptable to us, if at all,' Hawaiian Electric Industries warned its shareholders in late February.
In that case, the company said, the best alternative might be bankruptcy.
Wakai had added a provision to the state settlement bill to make sure HECO pays its share first before the state steps in. He said it was fair since HECO is the party found to have started the fire. Although that provision was removed based on testimony by Hawaiʻi Attorney General Anne Lopez, Wakai may have the chance to add more of his hooks to the settlement funding measure during the conference committee process.
'They have expectations that everyone else is going to save them when they have no idea how they're going to save themselves,' he said of HECO. 'That, I find, is quite concerning.'
Perhaps the biggest question is whether these legislative measures will be enough to shore up the utility's credit rating. HECO's Kelly cautioned that nothing will happen instantly because much depends on the rating agencies.
But Life of the Land's Curtis said if the securitization bill passes, 'There's a reasonable chance that HECO will get a better credit rating.'
And if the bill dies?
'We'll just keep on keeping on,' Kelly said. 'The No. 1 thing is to make sure we don't have another wildfire.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Redistricting Push Would Further Divide a Polarized Congress
Redistricting Push Would Further Divide a Polarized Congress

New York Times

time19 minutes ago

  • New York Times

Redistricting Push Would Further Divide a Polarized Congress

President Trump's drive to secure Republican advantage in the House through mid-decade redistricting — and Democrats' move to retaliate with their own efforts to redraw political lines to their advantage — could supercharge the partisan shift in Congress. Should the efforts succeed, they would amplify the trend of one party gaining a stranglehold on state congressional delegations, intensifying the deep polarization that has helped to paralyze Congress in recent years. Even before multiple state legislatures, goaded by Mr. Trump, began to consider redrawing their maps, the number of House delegations represented by a single party was at a 60-year high. Number of states whose House and Senate were controlled by one party Democrats Republicans Source: Smart Politics Notes: Data includes states that had a single-party delegation at some point during the Congress term. The years indicate the beginning of each Congress term. By Lazaro Gamio and Zach Levitt A sudden new round of redistricting would continue a remarkable shift of one party gaining congressional supremacy in a state through gerrymandering and ideological shifts, leaving the opposition barely represented or shut out entirely. The result would have profound implications for Congress. 'The number has been on the rise basically since 2010, when Republicans roared back after Obama's victory,' said Eric Ostermeier, a researcher at the Humphrey School of Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota, who tracks the political makeup of congressional delegations. 'Red states are getting redder, blue states are getting bluer. All this data points to this getting worse.' States whose House and Senate were controlled by one party Democrats Republicans AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY AL AK AZ AR CA CO CT DE FL GA HI ID IL IN IA KS KY LA ME MD MA MI MN MS MO MT NE NV NH NJ NM NY NC ND OH OK OR PA RI SC SD TN TX UT VT VA WA WV WI WY Sources: Smart Politics Notes: Data includes states that had a single-party delegation at some point during the Congress term. The years indicate the beginning of each Congress term. By Lazaro Gamio and Zach Levitt Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Democrats ramp up pressure on Trump, GOP over Epstein files with arcane gambit
Democrats ramp up pressure on Trump, GOP over Epstein files with arcane gambit

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Democrats ramp up pressure on Trump, GOP over Epstein files with arcane gambit

Democrats on Wednesday ramped up pressure on Republicans over the Jeffrey Epstein files, turning to an arcane rule to attempt to force the release of the documents that have become a significant pain point for the Trump administration and Republicans. Led by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.), they are seeking the documents via the 'rule of five,' which dates to a 1928 law and requires government agencies to hand over information if any five lawmakers on a Senate or House panel — in this case the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee — request them. The rule is relatively untested in the courts, but that isn't stopping Democrats from using it to turn the screws on an issue that has divided the GOP. 'This is not complicated,' Schumer said at a press conference on Wednesday. 'Every single time Trump, his administration [and] Republican leaders have had a chance to be transparent about the Epstein files, they've chosen to hide.' Schumer was not only flanked by Sen. Gary Peters (Mich.), the committee's top Democrat, and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), but also a sizable placard tying President Trump to Epstein, who died in federal prison six years ago while awaiting trial for sex trafficking charges. The picture showed an image of Trump and Epstein at an event, with the president being quoted as saying the disgraced financier was a 'terrific guy,' 'a lot of fun to be with' and 'likes beautiful women as much as I do.' Schumer and all seven Democrats on the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee signed on to a letter to the Department of Justice demanding the files. 'After missteps and failed promises by your Department regarding these files, it is essential that the Trump Administration provide full transparency,' the Democrats wrote to Attorney General Pam Bondi, pointing to promises she and Trump have made. 'We call on you to fulfill those promises of transparency,' they continued. They gave Bondi until Aug. 15 to hand over the relevant documents. The letter marked the latest attempt to put Republicans on the back foot and keep the Epstein issue front and center as lawmakers ready to depart for the August recess. Trump has made a concerted effort to push the discussions surrounding Epstein to the side. He urged his supporters to drop the issue, and in recent weeks the administration released a series of documents related to Hillary Clinton, former President Obama and Martin Luther King Jr. The Epstein issue drove such a wedge in the party that it forced the House to break early for the monthlong August recess after the chamber became paralyzed by an uproar from members over the administration's handling of the Epstein files. 'The evasions, the delays, the excuses — they are not just odd, they're alarming,' Schumer said. 'It begs the question: If there's nothing to hide, why all the evasiveness?' In addition, multiple Republicans on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee's panel on federal law enforcement defied the White House by backing a Democratic-led push to subpoena the Justice Department for its files regarding the Epstein investigation. And Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) moved during a separate Oversight subcommittee hearing to subpoena Ghislaine Maxwell, a longtime Epstein associate who is serving a 20-year sentence for sex trafficking. An attorney for Maxwell said on Tuesday that she would only speak with the committee if granted immunity. The panel flatly rejected that possibility. The issue had been more muted in the Senate, but Democrats are working to change that. Schumer did not rule out the possibility of utilizing amendment votes on the three-bill funding package that could come to the floor before the August break. He said that they are checking in with members as part of the hotline being run on the planned 'minibus.' And Sen. Ruben Gallego (D-Ariz.) has repeatedly tried to pass via unanimous consent a bill requiring the Justice Department to release the Epstein documents, forcing Republicans to object. It's unclear whether the Justice Department will acquiesce to the Democratic 'rule of five' request, and what would happen if they stonewall the effort. 'This is a law,' Schumer told reporters. 'This should be bipartisan, and we're still talking to Republican colleagues about trying to join us and that could help get this public. If not, there's recourse in the courts. This is the law.' 'We have talked to some of our lawyers. This can be challenged in the courts,' he added. A Justice Department spokesperson confirmed receipt of the letter but declined to comment further. How Republicans plan to handle this gambit is also unclear at this point. 'We're looking into it. Obviously, it's a dated law,' Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) said, labeling the rule 'obscure.' 'I don't know how they came up with it. We're having some lawyers look at it.' Despite claims by Schumer, multiple Republicans indicated that they had not been approached by Democrats to back their push to force the release of the documents even though some have echoed similar calls. 'I've long said, I think DOJ should release all the documents, just like they did with MLK, RFK, JFK,' said Sen. Josh Hawley (R-Mo.), a fellow committee member. 'Everything they've got, they should put it out there.' 'I think it's a little bit more of a stunt. They didn't reach out to any Republicans before,' Hawley added. 'They didn't ask me [to sign the letter].' Multiple Homeland Security Committee Republicans also noted that they utilized the 'rule of five' during the Biden administration on multiple occasions to request documents, but were stonewalled repeatedly. Among the items they sought information about were those pertaining to the origins of COVID-19, vaccine safety and the 'burrowing' of Biden-era political appointees to become nonpolitical permanent roles. 'We were stiffed every time,' Hawley said. 'I don't think we ever got anything substantive.' Whether this is the maneuver that gets it done, some Republicans believe that the administration will eventually end up releasing the documents, as the fervor of the MAGA base has shown few signs of letting up over the Epstein files. 'I expect DOJ to get information out, period. I don't think this is what's going to move it out. I think there's plenty of interest in folks to just say, 'Get it out there,'' said Sen. James Lankford (R-Okla.), a Homeland Security Committee member. The Oklahoma Republican added that conspiracy theories will only grow while the files remain behind closed doors. 'The conspiracy theories don't get better with less information,' Lankford continued. 'They just continue ramping up.' Rebecca Beitsch contributed. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes
Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes

Epoch Times

time5 hours ago

  • Epoch Times

Former New Mexico Candidate Gets 80 Years in Shootings at Officials' Homes

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M.— A former political candidate was sentenced to 80 years in federal prison Wednesday for his convictions in a series of drive-by shootings at the homes of state and local lawmakers in the aftermath of the 2020 election. A jury convicted former Republican candidate Solomon Peña earlier this year of conspiracy, weapons and other charges in the shootings in December 2022 and January 2023 on the homes of four Democratic officials in Albuquerque, including the current state House speaker.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store