logo
Hawaii lawmakers wrangle HECO rescue bills as session deadline looms

Hawaii lawmakers wrangle HECO rescue bills as session deadline looms

Hawaiian Electric Co. is making a final legislative push this month, asking lawmakers to help shore up its financial foundation, which crumbled after the 2023 Maui wildfire that killed 102 people and destroyed much of Lahaina.
HECO and its parent company, which were found to have started the Lahaina fire, have made enormous progress since the August 2023 catastrophe. Most notably HECO settled lawsuits brought by more than 2,000 fire victims as part of a global settlement brokered by Gov. Josh Green and blessed by the Hawaiʻi Supreme Court in February.
HECO says it still needs the Legislature's help, chiefly in the form of protection from future wildfire lawsuits, in the hopes such a measure can help boost the company's credit rating. The provision limiting the utility's liability is now the most important piece of a wildfire mitigation bill that has gone through various iterations this session, said Jim Kelly, HECO's vice president for government and community relations and corporate communications.
Bond rating agencies slashed the credit rating of HECO's parent, Hawaiian Electric Industries, after the fires, meaning the company must pay high interest rates to borrow money. What Hawaiʻi lawmakers do, Kelly said, will send a message to credit markets, which have seen 14 other western states limit wildfire liability for utilities, including Utah, Oregon, Nevada, Wyoming, Montana, Idaho, Arizona and New Mexico.
'It sends a really strong signal to credit markets that are watching this closely,' Kelly said.
If the utility's bill can't muster the needed votes, he said, 'that raises questions about how much support there is for the local hometown utility.'
The Senate has formally disagreed with House amendments to the wildfire mitigation bill, meaning lawmakers must work out differences during conference committee hearings.
Meanwhile, Senate committees amended a House bill to establish a fund to pay the state's portion of a $4 billion global settlement. If the House disagrees with the amendments, those differences also will have to be worked out in a conference committee including members of both chambers before the session ends May 2.
Bill Gains Unlikely Advocate
The wildfire bill originally called for setting up a wildfire recovery fund, a sort of self-insurance fund HECO could use to pay future wildfire claims. The $1 billion fund was to be financed with a new fee imposed on customers that could be used to secure loans. The bill also contained a limitation on liability.
But lawmakers changed much of that over the course of the session.
The latest version of the bill would also create a fund; however, it would be used not for insurance but rather to pay for utility infrastructure investments to mitigate wildfire risks. That fund also would be financed with a new fee on customers. The bill would also limit liability the utility could face up to $1 billion.
The idea of imposing a new fee on utility customers has generated some opposition, most notably from the Hawaiʻi Regional Council of Carpenters. But even long-time antagonists of the utility company say the current bill creates a good deal for customers.
Among the unlikely supporters is Henry Curtis, vice president of the activist group Life of the Land, who frequently faces off against HECO in cases before the Hawaiʻi Public Utilities Commission. A loan secured by a fee on customers carries a much lower interest rate than other types of loans, which would be passed on to customers through utility rates anyway, Curtis said.
The PUC would help ensure that any such loan carried the lowest possible interest rate, said Curtis, who has testified in favor of the bill.
Other supporters include the Chamber of Commerce Hawaiʻi, Hawaiʻi Farm Bureau, Ulupono Initiative and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 1260. The only groups opposing the bill in its current form are the carpenters union and the Hawaiʻi Association for Justice, a trial lawyers association.
Rep. Nicole Lowen has also at times faced off against HECO as chair of the House Energy and Environmental Protection Committee. But Lowen agrees that the securitized fee on utility customers might be the best option.
'The work to implement the wildfire mitigation plan must be done, and the cost of financing that work gets passed on to ratepayers regardless,' she said. 'By authorizing securitization for this purpose specifically, we would be saving ratepayers millions of dollars a year.'
Still, HECO's Kelly acknowledged the company expects challenges during the session's waning days.
'Nobody hates everything about (Senate Bill) 897, but nobody loves everything about it, either,' he said. 'We're just glad it's still moving.'
Among those expected to vet utility bills during the legislative end game is state Sen. Glenn Wakai. He previously held hearings on the utility's proposed bills as chairman of the Senate Energy and Intergovernmental Affairs Committee.
Wakai's philosophy is to put what he calls 'hooks' in Senate Bill 897 and other utility measures, to hold HECO accountable to the public and ratepayers in exchange for the laws to help the utility.
For example, he said, utility executives should be prohibited from receiving bonuses above their base salaries if customers are paying an additional fee.
In March, Civil Beat reported Hawaiian Electric Industries' president and chief executive, Scott Seu, got a one-year compensation increase of $1.7 million, lifting his take-home pay to $3.2 million in 2024. Shelee Kimura, president and chief executive of HEI's utility subsidiary, Hawaiian Electric Co., had a pay jump from $859,000 in 2023 to $1.5 million. The increases came despite HEI reporting a $1.4 billion net loss in 2024.
Seu and Kimura subsequently repaid the incentive compensation they received for 2024, although they still got increases in their base salaries. Seu's base went to $995,000 from $958,000; Kimura's went to $650,000 from $575,000. Seu's 2024 incentive was approximately $1.7 million and Kimura's $606,000.
Wakai said he also wants to see a plan from HECO to reduce rates over the long term.
'There has to be some kind of give on their part,' he said.
Utility Isn't Sure It Can Raise Money To Pay Settlement
Wakai is one of few legislators to take a hard look at another bill that would set up a fund to pay the state's portion of the $4 billion wildfire settlement. Taxpayers are on the hook for $807.5 million.
During a hearing in March, Wakai hauled Seu before the committee and grilled the company CEO on where HECO's portion of the settlement money would come from. The holding company has raised about half of the $1.99 billion it has committed to the settlement. But it has acknowledged it might not be able to raise the rest without dire steps.
'There is no assurance that future financing will be available in sufficient amounts, on a timely basis or on reasonable terms acceptable to us, if at all,' Hawaiian Electric Industries warned its shareholders in late February.
In that case, the company said, the best alternative might be bankruptcy.
Wakai had added a provision to the state settlement bill to make sure HECO pays its share first before the state steps in. He said it was fair since HECO is the party found to have started the fire. Although that provision was removed based on testimony by Hawaiʻi Attorney General Anne Lopez, Wakai may have the chance to add more of his hooks to the settlement funding measure during the conference committee process.
'They have expectations that everyone else is going to save them when they have no idea how they're going to save themselves,' he said of HECO. 'That, I find, is quite concerning.'
Perhaps the biggest question is whether these legislative measures will be enough to shore up the utility's credit rating. HECO's Kelly cautioned that nothing will happen instantly because much depends on the rating agencies.
But Life of the Land's Curtis said if the securitization bill passes, 'There's a reasonable chance that HECO will get a better credit rating.'
And if the bill dies?
'We'll just keep on keeping on,' Kelly said. 'The No. 1 thing is to make sure we don't have another wildfire.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley eyes GOP Senate run against Jon Ossoff in Georgia

timean hour ago

Former Tennessee football coach Derek Dooley eyes GOP Senate run against Jon Ossoff in Georgia

DALTON, Ga. -- Derek Dooley, a former University of Tennessee football coach, said Friday that he is considering a Republican run for U.S. Senate in Georgia in 2026 against Democratic incumbent Jon Ossoff. The trial balloon shows how Gov. Brian Kemp's decision not to run for the seat has left Georgia Republicans looking for other options to face off against Ossoff, considered the most vulnerable Democratic incumbent up for reelection next year. Dooley, 56, said he would decide on a bid in coming weeks. 'Georgia deserves stronger common-sense leadership in the U.S. Senate that represents all Georgians and focuses on results — not headlines,' Dooley said in a statement. 'I believe our state needs a political outsider in Washington — not another career politician — to cut through the noise and partisanship and get back to real problem solving.' The announcement, first reported by The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, came as other declared candidates stumped before the state Republican convention in the northwest Georgia city of Dalton. Among Republicans who have declared their candidacies are U.S. Rep. Buddy Carter, Insurance Commissioner John King and activist Reagan Box. Other Republicans who could run include U.S. Reps. Mike Collins and Rich McCormick, Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger and state Sen. Greg Dolezal. Attacks on Ossoff were among the most reliable applause lines during Friday afternoon speeches at the convention. 'Folks, President Trump needs backup, he needs backup in the Senate,' King said. Dooley has never run for office before. His appeal wouldn't be based on his career 32-41 record at Louisiana Tech and Tennessee, but his status as the son of legendary University Georgia coach Vince Dooley and Kemp's long ties to the Dooley family. As a teenager, Kemp was a frequent guest in the Dooley home, and roomed with Derek's older brother, Daniel Dooley, at the University of Georgia. Kemp has the most effective Republican political organization in Georgia, and he would likely give Dooley a big credibility boost. Kemp and President Donald Trump have been trying to agree on a mutual candidate to back for Senate in 2026, hoping to avoid the conflict that plagued Kelly Loeffler's unsuccessful run, where she lost to Democrat Raphael Warnock in a 2021 runoff. That, along with Republican David Perdue's loss to Ossoff on the same day handed control of the U.S. Senate to Democrats. Trump had preferred then U.S. Rep Doug Collins instead of Loeffler. Then in 2022, Trump anointed Georgia football legend Herschel Walker as the Republican nominee, but Warnock turned back Walker's flawed candidacy in another runoff. Kemp only swung in to help Walker in the runoff. The effort to screen 2026 candidates has already produced some results, with U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene saying she wouldn't bring her right-wing positions to the Senate campaign trail. Dooley would be far from the first sports figure to run for office. His father was frequently discussed as a possible candidate, but never took the plunge. But other coaches have gone far. Former Auburn University football coach Tommy Tuberville was elected to the Senate in 2020 from Alabama and is now running for governor. Former Ohio State University coach Jim Tressel is currently that state's lieutenant governor. And University of Nebraska coaching legend Tom Osborne served three terms in the U.S. House. Dooley walked on in football at the University of Virginia and earned a scholarship as a wide receiver. He earned a law degree from the University of Georgia and briefly practiced law in Atlanta before working his way up the college coaching ladder, becoming head coach for three years at Louisiana Tech and then moving on to Tennessee. Dooley recorded three consecutive losing seasons in Knoxville before he was fired in 2012 after losing to in-state rival Vanderbilt. After that, he has worked as an assistant coach for the NFL's Miami Dolphins and Dallas Cowboys, the University of Missouri and the New York Giants. Most recently, Dooley was an offensive analyst with the University of Alabama.

Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold
Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold

Bloomberg

time2 hours ago

  • Bloomberg

Trump's Patience With Putin Leaves Senate Sanctions Push on Hold

President Donald Trump's suggestion that he may let Russia and Ukraine keep fighting has left US lawmakers in an awkward spot over their plan to force a ceasefire with 'bone-crushing' sanctions against Moscow. The Senate bill has more than 80 co-sponsors, an all-but-unheard-of level of bipartisan support. Yet although that kind of veto-proof backing is enough for the Senate to press ahead without White House backing, supporters show no sign they're ready to challenge the president.

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

time4 hours ago

Democratic states double down on laws resisting Trump's immigration crackdown

As President Donald Trump's administration targets states and local governments for not cooperating with federal immigration authorities, lawmakers in some Democratic-led states are intensifying their resistance by strengthening state laws restricting such cooperation. In California alone, more than a dozen pro-immigrant bills passed either the Assembly or Senate this week, including one prohibiting schools from allowing federal immigration officials into nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant. Other state measures have sought to protect immigrants in housing, employment and police encounters, even as Trump's administration has ramped up arrests as part of his plan for mass deportations. In Connecticut, legislation pending before Democratic Gov. Ned Lamont would expand a law that already limits when law enforcement officers can cooperate with federal requests to detain immigrants. Among other things, it would let 'any aggrieved person' sue municipalities for alleged violations of the state's Trust Act. Two days after lawmakers gave final approval to the measure, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security included Connecticut on a list of hundreds of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' obstructing the enforcement of federal immigration laws. The list later was removed from the department's website after criticism that it errantly included some local governments that support Trump's immigration policies. Since taking office in January, Trump has enlisted hundreds of state and local law enforcement agencies to help identify immigrants in the U.S. illegally and detain them for potential deportation. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement now lists 640 such cooperative agreements, a nearly fivefold increase under Trump. Trump also has lifted longtime rules restricting immigration enforcement near schools, churches and hospitals, and ordered federal prosecutors to investigate state or local officials believed to be interfering with his crackdown on illegal immigration. The Department of Justice sued Colorado, Illinois and New York, as well as several cities in those states and New Jersey, alleging their policies violate the U.S. Constitution or federal immigration laws. Just three weeks after Colorado was sued, Democratic Gov. Jared Polis signed a wide-ranging law expanding the state's protections for immigrants. Among other things, it bars jails from delaying the release of inmates for immigration enforcement and allows penalties of up to $50,000 for public schools, colleges, libraries, child care centers and health care facilities that collect information about people's immigration status, with some exceptions. Polis rejected the administration's description of Colorado as a 'sanctuary state,' asserting that law officers remain 'deeply committed' to working with federal authorities on criminal investigations. 'But to be clear, state and local law enforcement cannot be commandeered to enforce federal civil immigration laws,' Polis said in a bill-signing statement. Illinois also has continued to press pro-immigrant legislation. A bill recently given final approval says no child can be denied a free public education because of immigration status — something already guaranteed nationwide under a 1982 U.S. Supreme Court decision. Supporters say the state legislation provides a backstop in case court precedent is overturned. The bill also requires schools to develop policies on handling requests from federal immigration officials and allows lawsuits for alleged violations of the measure. Democratic-led states are pursuing a wide range of means to protect immigrants. A new Oregon law bars landlords from inquiring about the immigration status of tenants or applicants. New laws in Washington declare it unprofessional conduct for bail bond agents to enforce civil immigration warrants, prohibit employers from using immigration status to threaten workers and let employees use paid sick leave to attend immigration proceedings for themselves or family members. Vermont last month repealed a state law that let law enforcement agencies enter into immigration enforcement agreements with federal authorities during state or national emergencies. They now need special permission from the governor to do so. As passed by the House, Maryland legislation also would have barred local governments from reaching immigration enforcement agreements with the federal government. That provision was removed in the Senate following pushback from some of the seven Maryland counties that currently have agreements. The final version, which took effect as law at the start of June, forbids public schools and libraries from granting federal immigration authorities access to nonpublic areas without a judicial warrant or 'exigent circumstances.' Maryland Del. Nicole Williams said residents' concerns about Trump's immigration policies prompted her to sponsor the legislation. 'We believe that diversity is our strength, and our role as elected officials is to make sure that all of the residents within our community — regardless of their background — feel safe and comfortable,' Williams said. Though legislation advancing in Democratic states may shield against Trump's policies, 'I would say it's more so to send a message to immigrant communities to let them know that they are welcome,' said Juan Avilez, a policy associate at the American Immigration Council, a nonprofit advocacy group. In California, a law that took effect in 2018 already requires public schools to adopt policies 'limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible.' Some schools have readily applied the law. When DHS officers attempted a welfare check on migrant children at two Los Angeles elementary schools in April, they were denied access by both principals. Legislation passed by the state Senate would reinforce such policies by specifically requiring a judicial warrant for public schools to let immigration authorities into nonpublic areas, allow students to be questioned or disclose information about students and their families. 'Having ICE in our schools means that you'll have parents who will not want to send their kids to school at all,' Democratic state Sen. Scott Wiener said in support of the bill. But some Republicans said the measure was 'injecting partisan immigration policies' into schools. 'We have yet to see a case in California where we have scary people in masks entering schools and ripping children away,' said state Sen. Marie Alvarado-Gil. 'Let's stop these fear tactics that do us an injustice.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store