Tens of thousands march in Romania demanding LGBTQ equality
The European Union state has so far ignored a 2023 ruling by the European Court of Human Rights, which found Romania had failed to enforce the rights of same-sex couples by refusing to recognise their relationships.
Socially conservative Romania decriminalised homosexuality in 2001, decades later than other parts of the EU, but still bars marriage and civil partnerships for same-sex couples.
"We want legal protection for same-sex couples, an easy legal procedure for transitioning, protection against hate speech and prejudice-based crimes," said Teodora Roseti, president of Romanian LGBTQ rights organisation ACCEPT and Pride's organiser.
In Bucharest, marchers danced and carried the rainbow flag 20 years after the first Pride parade was held, carrying banners such as "Love is the worst feeling you could hate", "Equality in love, equality in inheritance. Civil partnership for all".
Roughly 30,000 people attended the parade, ACCEPT estimated.
The march comes at a fraught moment in Central and Eastern Europe, where far right parties have gained ground. Poles held a similar parade on Saturday.
Hours before the Romanian march, a smaller anti-Pride protest took place, with participants demanding an Orthodox Christian nation and waving flags carrying the Celtic cross, a known far-right symbol.
In Romania, centrist Bucharest mayor Nicusor Dan ultimately won the presidential election against hard-right opposition leader George Simion, a strong opponent of LGBTQ rights.
ACCEPT and LGBTQ rights group Mozaiq warned of a rise in hate speech against the community during the election campaign, and their headquarters were defaced.
In neighbouring Hungary, parliament passed legislation earlier this year that de facto bans holding Pride marches. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
11 hours ago
- CNA
EU push to protect digital rules holds up trade statement with US, FT reports
The European Union is trying to prevent the United States from targeting the bloc's digital rules as both sides work through the final details of a delayed statement to formalise a trade deal reached last month, the Financial Times reported on Sunday. EU officials said disagreements over language relating to "non-tariff barriers", which the U.S. said include the digital rules, are among the reasons for the hold-up of the statement, the newspaper said.
Business Times
3 days ago
- Business Times
Europe's flawed investment strategy
LAST year, former Italian prime minister Mario Draghi produced a landmark report on the future of European competitiveness, in which he recommended that the European Union increase annual investment by more than 800 billion euros (S$1.2 trillion) – the equivalent of more than 4 per cent of its gross domestic product. This report has now become the intellectual foundation for an ambitious strategy to revitalise growth in Europe. But Europe should be careful what it wishes for. As Japan has shown, investment is no panacea. The idea that more investment is the key to economic success is a potent one in Europe. The so-called Lisbon Strategy, launched in 2000, sought to increase investment in research and development (R&D) to 3 per cent of GDP. That target has remained on the official EU agenda for a quarter-century, but has never been reached. In 2015, the European Commission added another investment goal: its Investment Plan for Europe sought to mobilise 315 billion euros in additional investment within three years, in order to increase competitiveness and long-term growth. But investment has not saved Japan from several decades of stagnation. Since 1970, Japan's gross fixed capital formation has averaged – and, often, significantly exceeded – 30 per cent of GDP. That is much higher than not only the EU average, but also the rate in Germany, the EU's strongest economy, where gross fixed capital formation has hovered around 23 per cent of GDP. The four percentage point difference between the most recent values (26 per cent in Japan, and 22 per cent in both Germany and the EU) amounts to about 800 billion euros annually – exactly the amount Draghi recommends adding to total EU investment. Of course, the type of investment matters. Whereas investment in new machinery leads to diminishing returns once a company has enough capacity to serve the market, investing in new ideas should theoretically be bound by no such constraints. But if one singles out R&D investment, Japan performs even better. In 2000, when the EU set its Lisbon Strategy target, Japan was already investing nearly 3 per cent of its GDP in R&D – a rate it has maintained over the last 25 years, compared with the EU's average of 2 per cent. And yet, despite impressive rates of investment in fixed capital and R&D, Japan's economy weakened over the last quarter-century. In the 1980s and 1990s, Japan boasted the world's second-largest economy, powered by a manufacturing sector that seemed unbeatable. Now, Japan is the world's fourth-largest economy, having recently fallen behind Germany despite having a much larger population (120 million, compared with 80 million), owing partly to yen depreciation. One might argue that this is an unfair comparison, because evaluating an economy at current exchange rates, without accounting for inflation differentials, does not adequately reflect quality of life. But if one looks at per capita income at purchasing power parity, Japan was at rough parity with Germany 20 years ago, and is now doing worse than Italy. In any case, exchange rates are not irrelevant, at least politically: Japanese are well aware of their declining purchasing power when they travel abroad, and they undoubtedly notice foreign tourists flaunting their purchasing power in Japan. This may have helped to create fertile ground for the far right. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up So, what explains Japan's economic underperformance? The answer is not unfavourable demographics. In fact, Japan's population is not shrinking nearly as fast as conventional wisdom suggests, having fallen since the turn of the century by only three million, to just under 124 million last year, with employment increasing by 10 percentage points. To explain Japan's struggles requires looking behind the headline investment figures. While investment in R&D is strong, it is happening mostly within large firms, which are primarily interested in delivering incremental improvements to existing products or processes, rather than developing radically new ideas or technologies. True innovation is much more likely to happen in startups, but in Japan – as in the EU – the largest spenders on R&D have remained the same for decades. Large companies have recognised the limitations of their in-house R&D efforts. Some have even created specialised corporate venture capital (CVC) departments, tasked with hunting for promising ideas outside their corporate structures. But, in 2022, the leading spenders on R&D in Japan accounted for only 7.3 per cent of global CVC investment. That is about one-third of EU companies' share (22 per cent), but given that the EU economy is about four times the size of Japan's, these levels are similar, in relative terms. The EU did much better than Japan by another measure, however: more than 40 per cent of European firms' CVC investment went to local startups. In Japan, that share was miniscule – 0.01 per cent – with the rest going mostly to startups in the United States. Furthermore, US and even Japanese companies have delivered substantial CVC funding to EU companies, which attracted a total of about 9 per cent of global CVC funding in 2022. That is much less than the 80 per cent that went to the US, but also significantly more than the tiny share – close to zero – that flowed into Japan. The lesson for the EU is clear: rather than focusing simply on increasing investment, it should seek to nurture and fortify its innovation ecosystem. Only then will it be able to deliver the kinds of game-changing ideas and inventions that underpin global competitiveness in the 21st century. PROJECT SYNDICATE The writer is director of the Institute for European Policymaking at Bocconi University
Straits Times
4 days ago
- Straits Times
As Europe's heat waves intensify, France bickers about air conditioning
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Customers sit near fans at an outdoor restaurant during a heatwave in Palma de Mallorca, Spain, on July 25. PARIS – The culture wars have come for air conditioning, at least in France. In July, as a heat wave broiled much of Europe, feelings about air conditioning suddenly became a political litmus test. Ms Marine Le Pen, the far-right leader in France, declared that she would deploy a 'major air conditioning equipment plan' around the country if her nationalist party eventually came to power. Ms Marine Tondelier, the head of France's Green party, scoffed at Ms Le Pen's idea and, instead, suggested solutions to warming temperatures that included 'greening' cities and making buildings more energy efficient. An opinion essay in Le Figaro, a conservative newspaper, defended air conditioning because 'making our fellow citizens sweat limits learning, reduces working hours and clogs up hospitals'. Liberation, a left-wing daily, countered such arguments, writing that the technology was 'an environmental aberration that must be overcome' because it blows hot air onto streets and guzzles up precious energy. 'Is air conditioning a far-right thing?' one talk show asked provocatively, reflecting how divisive the issue had become. While France's heated discussion of air conditioning cooled along with the temperatures in the weeks that followed, increasingly hot summers in Europe mean that the issue is not going anywhere. Decades ago, bickering over air conditioning might have seemed strange in Europe, where there was historically little need for it and where keeping homes warm is still a top concern. But times are changing fast. An analysis of daily temperature data from Copernicus, part of the European Union's space program, shows that much of Europe is now experiencing longer periods of severe heat than it was just 40 years ago. So while many derided air conditioning for years as an unnecessary – and awfully American – amenity, it is now increasingly seen as a necessity to survive scorching summers. Despite rising temperatures, only about half of homes in Italy today have air conditioning, according to Italy's national statistics institute. In Spain, real estate data indicates the share is roughly 40 per cent. And in France, only an estimated 20 per cent to 25 per cent of households are equipped with air conditioning, according to the country's Agency for Ecological Transition. In 2023, 62.5 per cent of energy consumed by households in the European Union was used to heat homes, versus less than 1 per cent to cool them, according to EU statistics. Energy costs are also usually higher in Europe than in the United States – where almost 90 per cent of homes use some form of air conditioning. The dense architecture of European cities is ill suited to ungainly air conditioning units, and in places such as Paris, securing the necessary approvals for old or historical apartment buildings can be complex. 'Air conditioning still scares some – many still have in mind countries like the United States, where homes and shops are extremely conditioned,' said Mr Baudouin de la Varende, the co-founder of Ithaque, a French consulting firm that helps households with energy-efficient renovations. But even he said that weatherproofing would help only so much in the coming decades. 'I'm a little saddened that the debate is often boiled down to for or against air conditioning,' he added. 'Most people are in the middle: Air conditioning is a useful tool.' Some of the debate is political posturing. Look beyond the sniping on social media, and there is broad agreement in France that air conditioning is necessary in spaces such as retirement homes, hospitals and schools. More than 1,800 schools had to close during the worst of last month's heat wave. Few people are clamoring for a cooling unit in every home. 'Air conditioning is not black or white,' Ms Agnes Pannier-Runacher, France's environment minister, recently told reporters. 'We need air conditioning to give vulnerable people some respite. But we mustn't do it everywhere.' Much of southern Europe now experiences more than two months each year when daily high temperatures exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit (29.4 deg C). Madrid, Spain's capital, has had an average of 63 days above 85 degrees in recent years, up from 29 days per year in the early 1980s. In many places, the heat is not just longer-lasting but also more intense. Forty years ago, temperatures in Madrid rarely climbed above 90 degrees, but in the past five years, a typical summer has included 40 days above 90 degrees. Whether cultural resistance to air conditioning in France will persist in such conditions remains to be seen. Perhaps no one displays that ambivalence better than Mr Christian Meyer, the head of a company near Strasbourg that installs air conditioning units. Despite having a vested interest in promoting air conditioning, he was recently quoted in a local newspaper saying that he wasn't a fan and that he didn't use it himself. 'The best air conditioning is a well-insulated house,' he is quoted as saying. For now, as the arguments continue, the government's official heat-related advice takes a middle road of sorts. Air conditioning is on its list of options to keep a home cool. But the guidelines warn that it is 'a solution that should be considered only after all other options have been exhausted'. NYTIMES
