logo
Brazil's Supreme Court clears way to hold social media companies liable for user content

Brazil's Supreme Court clears way to hold social media companies liable for user content

Time of India4 hours ago

Academy
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
Brazil's Supreme Court agreed on Thursday on details of a decision to hold social media companies liable for what their users post, clearing the way for it go into effect within weeks.The 8-3 vote in Brazil's top court orders tech giants like Google, Meta and TikTok to actively monitor content that involves hate speech , racism and incitation to violence and act to remove it.The case has unsettled the relationship between the South American nation and the U.S. government. Critics have expressed concern that the move could threaten free speech if platforms preemptively remove content that could be problematic.After Thursday's ruling is published by the court, people will be able to sue social media companies for hosting illegal content if they refuse to remove it after a victim brings it to their attention. The court didn't set out firm rules on what content is illegal, leaving it to be decided on a case-by-case basis.The ruling strengthens a law that requires companies to remove content only after court orders, which were often ignored.It's the product of two cases accepted by the court last year in which social media companies were accused of failed to act against users promoting fraud, child pornography and violence.A majority of the 11 justices voted to approve the change two weeks ago, but it took until today to reach consensus on how to implement it.The justices also agreed that social media companies will not be liable if they can show they took steps to remove illegal content in a timely fashion.Google said in a statement that is analyzing the court's decision."We remain open for dialogue," the company said.Brazil's top court came to the decision after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned of possible visa restrictions against foreign officials involved in censoring American citizens.Thursday's ruling brings Brazil's approach to big tech closer to the European Union's approach, which has sought to rein in the power of social media companies and other digital platforms.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Google Resumes Rollout of AI-Powered 'Ask Photos' with Faster Search for Simpler Queries
Google Resumes Rollout of AI-Powered 'Ask Photos' with Faster Search for Simpler Queries

Hans India

time34 minutes ago

  • Hans India

Google Resumes Rollout of AI-Powered 'Ask Photos' with Faster Search for Simpler Queries

Google is once again expanding access to its AI-powered Ask Photos feature in Google Photos after briefly pausing its rollout earlier this month. The company says it has enhanced the experience, particularly for simple search queries, by making the tool faster and more responsive. Ask Photos, powered by Google's advanced Gemini AI models, allows users to search for specific photos using natural language queries. Whether you're trying to locate a picture from a beach vacation or find all the snapshots of your dog, the AI can analyze image content and metadata to surface results based on your questions. However, the initial rollout faced some challenges. A team member from Google Photos recently acknowledged on X (formerly Twitter) that the feature had some performance issues. 'It isn't where it needs to be, in terms of latency, quality and UX,' they wrote, prompting the company to reassess and refine the tool before expanding it further. Responding to early user feedback, Google has now made changes aimed at speeding up basic search responses. In a blog post shared on Thursday, the company said it 'heard your feedback' about wanting quicker results for straightforward queries. The update allows Ask Photos to provide instant results for simple keywords like 'beach' or 'dogs,' with the more advanced Gemini AI continuing to refine and enhance results in the background for complex questions. 'You'll now see results right away while Gemini models continue to work in the background to find the most relevant photos or information for more complex queries,' Google explained. The change marks a step forward in how users interact with their personal photo libraries. By blending powerful AI with user-centric enhancements, Google aims to make photo searches not only more intelligent but also more intuitive and efficient. In addition to performance improvements, Google announced that Ask Photos is now 'opening up beyond early access,' meaning more users in the United States will soon be able to experience the feature. The rollout is targeted at 'eligible users,' though the company has not specified what criteria determine eligibility. A GIF shared by Google illustrates the updated feature in action—showing how it interprets a user's typed question and quickly pulls relevant images from the user's photo archive. While still evolving, this update demonstrates Google's commitment to integrating AI into everyday tools, making large libraries of personal data more accessible and manageable through conversational search. As AI continues to shape the way we organize digital memories, features like Ask Photos hint at a future where finding a single image in thousands can be as easy as asking a friend. More updates on international availability and feature refinement are expected as Google continues to gather user insights and performance metrics from the ongoing U.S. rollout.

US Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship, voting rights before current term concludes
US Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship, voting rights before current term concludes

New Indian Express

time34 minutes ago

  • New Indian Express

US Supreme Court to rule on birthright citizenship, voting rights before current term concludes

WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump's bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6. The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the US. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. Decisions also are expected in several other important cases. The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools. Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography. Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking.

Israeli Defence Minister admits to Tel Aviv's plan to ‘eliminate' Khamenei during conflict — and why it was ‘unrealistic'
Israeli Defence Minister admits to Tel Aviv's plan to ‘eliminate' Khamenei during conflict — and why it was ‘unrealistic'

Indian Express

timean hour ago

  • Indian Express

Israeli Defence Minister admits to Tel Aviv's plan to ‘eliminate' Khamenei during conflict — and why it was ‘unrealistic'

In a first since the recent escalation in tensions, Israel's Defence Minister Thursday said its military was actively planning to 'eliminate' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei but did not go through with it as the 'opportunity never presented itself'. 'If he had been in our sights, we would have taken him out,' Israeli Defence Minister Israel Katz was quoted as saying by Times of Israel in his interviews with three major Israeli television news programmes — Channel 13, Kan and Channel 12. He was speaking days after the US-backed Israel-Iran ceasefire came into effect following the 12-day conflict. Katz also said that the Israeli military was unable to locate Khamenei once he reportedly went into hiding in a bunker. 'Khamenei understood this, went very deep underground, broke off contact with the commanders… so in the end it wasn't realistic,' Katz told Kan. The latest statement marks Israel's first public admission of having plotted the killing of Tehran's top leadership. So far, they had only disclosed details of their plans of targetted attacks on Iran's nuclear infrastructure. While the offensives from both sides were ongoing, Katz had said Khamenei 'can no longer be allowed to exist,' reacting to one of Iran's wave of retaliatory attacks that hit a hospital in Beersheba. As fragile peace seemed to be holding in the Middle East, Katz, talking to Channel 13, said Israel will not continue with its plan to actively attempt to attack Khamenei now following the ceasefire that took hold two days earlier. 'There's a difference — before the ceasefire, after the ceasefire,' he said. In another interview with Kan, he also said: 'I wouldn't recommend that he stay tranquil.' Katza also made a reference to Hassan Nasrallah, the leader of the Iran-backed Hezbollah terror group whom Israel killed last year, asking Khamenei to continue staying in the bunker. 'He should learn from the late Nasrallah, who sat for a long time deep in the bunker. I recommend that he do the same thing,' he added. In the series of interview, Katz said that Israel did not go into the war knowing the US would join the attack. He added that Tel Aviv was not aware of the exact geographical location of Iran's enriched uranium. 'We don't need permission for these things,' he told Channel 13 on whether Israel had sought American approval over its plan to kill Khamenei. Earlier on June 17, as Iran and Israel traded strikes at each other, US President Donald Trump has warned Tehran and Khamenei that the US knows his location. He said they could eliminate the Supreme Leader but is holding back 'at least for now'. 'He is an easy target, but is safe there – We are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. We're looking for better than a ceasefire…I didn't say I was looking for a ceasefire. I told them, 'Do the deal'.' Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social warning Iran and Khamenei. The Israeli defence minister also said they have a 'green light' from Trump to launch an attack on Iran again if it were to make 'progress' with its nuclear programme. Without naming Israel directly, Khamenei referred to it as a 'fallacious Zionist regime' and congratulated Iran on what he called a 'victory' in a post on his official X account on June 19. 'With all that commotion and all those claims, the Zionist regime was practically knocked out and crushed under the blows of the Islamic Republic,' he said after the ceasefire took hold. Referring to Iran's retaliatory strike on the US base in Qatar, the Supreme Leader clamed it dealt a direct blow to American military infrastructure. 'The Islamic Republic delivered a heavy slap to the US's face. It attacked and inflicted damage on the Al-Udeid Air Base, which is one of the key US bases in the region,' another post on his account read.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store