logo
Did the 'cover-up' over Biden's mental decline also conceal the truth about how long he's really been suffering from prostate cancer?

Did the 'cover-up' over Biden's mental decline also conceal the truth about how long he's really been suffering from prostate cancer?

Daily Mail​19-05-2025

Joe Biden had blood in his spinal fluid and a leaking 'balloon-shaped' aneurysm below the base of his brain. His situation was so serious his wife Jill had been told not to enter his hospital room as the devout Catholic was read the Last Rites.
It was February 1988, and only a few months earlier, the then 45-year-old had dramatically pulled out of his first bid for the US presidency. Now he had been rushed to the operating theatre in Wilmington, Delaware, with agonising neck pain.
Thanks to the interventions of his doctors, Biden survived. It later emerged he'd kept quiet about the debilitating headaches he'd been suffering from for the past year, and which had reduced him to carrying around a large bottle of Tylenol [paracetamol] painkiller.
As Jill told him at the time, it was just as well he'd pulled out of the Democratic nomination battle against Michael Dukakis to fight George HW Bush.
Otherwise he might have been campaigning when his aneurysm started bleeding and he would likely have tried to push on regardless, with fatal consequences.
That may be so – but it's also true that, had he been honest about his symptoms, doctors would have been alerted to his life-threatening condition sooner.
Almost 40 years on, Americans are now feverishly speculating whether the ex-president, his formidable wife Jill and his inner circle kept quiet about another life-threatening affliction – after it emerged that Biden, now 82, is suffering with prostate cancer that has spread to his bones.
Biden's illness is rated 9 on the prostate cancer 'Gleason scale', which means it is extremely aggressive, and at stage 4 (there is no stage 5 with this cancer) in general medical terms.
Doctors say that though the cancer cannot be cured, it can be treated.
A statement issued by Biden's office on Sunday claimed that he had been diagnosed just two days earlier after experiencing 'urinary symptoms', with medics finding a small 'nodule' on his prostate.
Yesterday, however, a string of medical experts lined up to express profound scepticism at this version of events.
They insist that the highly experienced doctors attending to a US president, who was subject to a rigorous annual health check, of such advanced years would never have missed such a serious cancer.
Several said they were convinced that Biden must have been ill with the disease – which typically takes longer to progress than other cancers – for years, and that he, his doctors and perhaps his closest family and aides therefore must have known about it.
Dr Zeke Emanuel, a senior oncologist who was a member of Biden's Covid advisory board, said he was sure Biden 'did not develop [prostate cancer] in the last, 100, 200 days', adding: 'He probably had it at the start of his presidency, in 2021… I don't think there's any disagreement about that…
'He's had this for many years, maybe even a decade, growing there and spreading.'
New York urologist and prostate-cancer specialist Dr David Shusterman said patients with Biden's advanced condition who came to see him typically 'hadn't had medical attention in ten years [and] presented to an emergency room with bone pain'.
He added: 'The fact that we just find it at a Gleason 9 is pretty much unheard of in this day and age.'
Fellow cancer expert Dr Stephen Quay was also dubious of the Biden camp's explanation, saying it would constitute medical 'malpractice' for Biden's doctors to have failed to test a serving or former US president periodically for signs of prostate cancer (for example by monitoring so-called 'PSA levels' in his blood).
Dr Quay, a former faculty member of the Stanford University School of Medicine, added: 'It is highly likely he was carrying a diagnosis of prostate cancer throughout his White House tenure and the American people were uninformed.'
Yale University Professor Howie Forman, a radiology and biomedical imaging expert who has worked in the US Senate on health policy, agreed: 'It is inconceivable that this was not being followed before he left the presidency.'
Meanwhile, a 2022 video began recirculating on social media in which Biden had declared during a speech on the environment: 'I – and so damn many other people I grew up with – have cancer.'
At the time, White House staff insisted he was referring to several non-melanoma skin cancers that had been removed before he took office. Yesterday, however, Republicans claimed that he had inadvertently admitted to suffering from a condition he was trying to keep secret.
There is, to be clear, no solid evidence that Biden's cancer has been covered up. However, the debate seems set to continue. After all, Biden's health and fitness for high office were long key concerns for voters, and have been sharply questioned in recent days.
A new book, Original Sin, has revealed the extent to which the Biden White House covered up and misled America about the dramatic mental decline of the oldest president in US history.
Published today, the book – which makes no mention of Biden's prostate cancer – lays out in devastating detail how his administration sought to conceal and lie about the extent of his mental decline during his presidency.
It also makes clear that, as on his brush with death in 1988 and when Biden's son Beau was diagnosed with brain cancer in 2013 before dying two years later, the Bidens have long sought to suppress news of their physical health issues.
The book, written by political journalists Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson, reveals that while Dr Kevin O'Connor, the president's long-standing physician, repeatedly gave him a clean bill of health in public, he privately expressed grave concerns about the toll the presidency was taking on the ageing leader, urging aides to allow him to take more rest.
The book's authors suggest Dr O'Connor was too close to his patient.
In particular, according to Original Sin, a code of omerta appears to have developed around Biden in the final months of his presidency, during which his closest aides and family, slavishly supported by America's Left-leaning media, continued to insist in defiance of all evidence that he was fit to serve – while behind closed doors he was deteriorating fast.
At the weekend, audio was released for the first time of an interview Biden had given in 2023 to Robert Hur, the special counsel who was investigating his handling of certain classified documents. In it, the rambling ex-president failed to recall basic dates and details, at one point asking Hur: 'Am I making any sense to you?'
Later, he asked: 'When did I stop being vice president?'
Hur ultimately declined to recommend charges against Biden in part because, he said, a jury would find him to be a 'sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly man with a poor memory'.
At the time, America's Democrat-leaning media lambasted Hur for political 'bias' – but this was just one of many occasions, according to Original Sin, when Left-wing TV stations and newspapers cravenly collaborated with the Biden camp and 'aggressively disputed' that there was anything wrong with him.
In the end, of course, such machinations proved entirely counterproductive. It was only following his disastrous TV debate performance against Donald Trump in June 2024, during which Biden repeatedly lost his train of thought and babbled incoherently, that he finally announced he wouldn't be running that November.
This left the Democrats stuck with Vice President Kamala Harris, who had just 107 days to campaign against her well-funded opponent.
Many Democrats have still not forgiven Biden – who has hardly helped matters by insisting in subsequent interviews that he could have beaten Trump had he stood against him and that claims of his mental decline were 'wrong'.
For his part, Trump struck a rare conciliatory note yesterday, saying he was 'saddened' to hear of his bitter ex-adversary's illness – while the King, who is still undergoing treatment for his own undisclosed cancer, wrote privately to the ex-president expressing his support.
However, Trump's oldest son Donald Jr went on the attack, insisting the Biden family had covered up Joe's cancer and scornfully asking how it was possible 'Dr Jill' (who has a PhD in education rather than a medical doctorate) didn't know about it.
Authors Thompson and Tapper note that presidents throughout history have hidden their medical ailments from the public – from Franklin Roosevelt's use of a wheelchair following about of polio in his 30s to Ronald Reagan's Alzheimer's – but Biden's suppression of his own cognitive condition, they argue, was 'the most consequential'.
After Biden failed to recognise George Clooney at a glitzy Democrat fundraising party the actor was co-hosting with his fellow Oscar winner Julia Roberts 11 months ago, Clooney, according to the book's authors, reportedly 'felt a knot form in his stomach'.
Finally an aide told Biden who he was talking to and Biden limply replied: 'Oh, yeah! Hi, George!' The following month, Clooney publicly called on Biden to step down from the presidential campaign in an op-ed in the New York Times – and senior Biden aide Steve Ricchetti was furious.
'Internally, he threatened to shut Clooney down – some of his colleagues thought he sounded like a Mob boss,' reports Original Sin.
Ricchetti is identified in the book as one of a clutch of top aides who refused to be honest with Biden about his chances of beating Trump, encouraging him to believe the delusion that he could win.
They found a powerful ally in Jill, who emerges in the book as a ferocious champion of her husband who ignored anyone who brought up his age or suggested he wasn't up to running again.
She'd changed dramatically, note the authors, from the woman who made her opposition to Joe's presidential bid only too clear in 2003, when Democrat grandees visited the Biden home.
The former part-time model, who'd been sitting by the swimming pool in a bikini, scrawled 'NO' in large letters across her stomach in a felt-tip pen and marched silently through the room where the men were meeting.
According to the new book, Jill more than anyone could see her husband's terrible decline – and yet she was the most determined that he run for re-election.
Original Sin reveals how 'Dr Biden' (as she insists on being addressed) increased her power inside the White House by ensuring that senior aides she'd appointed, one of whom was known as her 'Rasputin', enforced loyalty to the Bidens with an iron rod.
On myriad occasions, top Democrat politicians, advisers and backers pleaded with the members of the Biden camp to persuade him not to run again, only to be spurned.
Even acclaimed director Steven Spielberg was brought in at one point, the book reveals, to improve Biden's faltering image.
'They worked on lighting, and a better microphone to amplify his voice when he would oddly speak in barely a whisper,' says the book.
'The E.T. director would also coach the president before speeches like the State of the Union. [Allies] hoped that voters' age concerns about Biden could be assuaged with a little Hollywood magic.'
According to the new book, Biden's decline was never so obvious to the world as during the D-Day commemorations in Normandy last June when he appeared lost at times in photographs with other leaders.
'One House Democrat was shocked,' it reports. 'Biden looked frailer and was shuffling more than many of the World War II veterans who were nearing 100 [years old].'
Biden's cancer may have been missed by mistake, as some doctors claim.
However, the circumstances are undoubtedly odd – even without the medical experts weighing in with their own misgivings.
The questions about whether the Bidens kept silent on more than Joe's mental decline are unlikely to go away.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day
Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day

The Independent

time31 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Tesla shares rebound on news of Musk and Trump talks after explosive feud cost firm $99bn in a day

Tesla shares are poised to jump as much as 5.7 per cent when stock markets open in the US later today after the business took a $99bn (£73bn) hit following an explosive feud between Donald Trump and Elon Musk. The share price of the electric vehicle (EV) manufacturer tanked from more than $322 at the start of Thursday's trading to $284 at the end of the day, more than a 14 per cent drop as a result of a back-and-forth argument between the pair, which covered everything from government contracts to the Epstein files. However, a ceasefire of sorts appears to have been brokered, and the two are due to meet on Friday - resulting in some investors surging back into Tesla stock. Even so, with futures markets showing around a 5.7 per cent rise in pre-trading just before 9am BST, that still means the market capitalisation of Tesla - the measure of its overall value by share price - will have dropped a full $99bn in a day. After-hours trading shows the buying and selling of shares outside of regular stock market opening hours, mostly dominated by big corporate investors. That is reflected in the futures price, which shows the stock price that a company will 'open' at. The large sell-off means Tesla has again lost its status as a $1tn company, though it still ranks in the top ten largest American companies. The one-day cost to Mr Musk's net worth personally was around $34bn (£25bn), according to Bloomberg's Billionaires Index, at the time stock markets closed in the US. He remains the richest person on the planet by a distance. Separate from share price woes, Mr Trump's tax and spending Bill could be set to cost Tesla. Eliminating tax incentives for US buyers purchasing EVs, in addition to a similar scheme in California, could cost Tesla more than $3bn, analysts estimate. Outside of Tesla, Mr Musk's other business interests could be hard-hit too if the US president presses ahead with his threats to cancel government contracts with SpaceX. Other car manufacturers across the UK and Europe have not reacted with notable share price changes after the feud took place outside their trading hours on Thursday. German-listed Volkswagen, BMW and Mercedes were largely flat in early trading, with the UK's Aston Martin Lagonda up 2 per cent. Ferrari is listed in New York and is up 0.4 per cent in pre-trading, with General Motors at 0.5 per cent and Toyota's US listing set to open 0.3 per cent up.

Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein
Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein

Daily Mail​

time42 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Blow by blow, how Elon Musk tore apart friendship with Trump with one bombshell post after another on X, from endorsing his impeachment to wild claims about Jeffrey Epstein

The public feud that unfolded last night between Donald Trump and Elon Musk closely resembles a dispute between two children in the playground. For the first term, they were inseparable. Donald invited Elon to play in his castle with all his classmates, and together they ruled the yard. But after a while, Donald decided he didn't want Elon to stay. Last week, he asked him to leave the castle and hang out with other people for a while. Elon sulked all weekend. When he came back, he told the whole school how stupid Donald and his friends were. He also claimed the only reason Donald got into the castle instead of that older kid in the first place was because of him. Before long, they were both yelling nasty insults and accusing one another of being naughty. Elon agreed with one pupil who said Donald should be kicked out of his castle. Unfortunately, the two participants in this argument are grown men. One is the leader of the free world, and the other is the world's richest man. They wrote their insults on separate social media platforms that they own. And one of the statements made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender. Here's a blow-by-blow account of how the bromance between two titans of American politics and popular culture unfolded. One of the accusations made amid the war of words alleged that the President of the United States was covering up his links to a convicted paedophile and sex offender The Trump-Musk relationship at its height was unprecedented in Washington - a sitting president granting a billionaire tech CEO access and influence inside the White House and throughout his government. Musk spent nearly $300 million backing Trump's presidential campaign and other Republicans last year, and was made a special adviser once Trump returned to the Oval Office. For months, the tech mogul used social media platform X to amplify Trump's messages while attacking the bureaucracy and federal spending through his self-styled Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). Now, not only has the tech giant left the Trump White House - he became its harshest and perhaps most consequential critic overnight The public feud was seemingly initiated by Musk just days after he departed DOGE, with the X CEO taking aim at the GOP's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill' - a tax and spend bill tabled by the Republicans that will also increase the government's debt ceiling. The controversial bill was passed by the House of Representatives last month and is now being scrutinised in the Senate. On Tuesday, Musk posted on his social media platform that the bill was an 'abomination' and went on to urge Senators to 'kill the bill' on Wednesday. 'This spending bill contains the largest increase in the debt ceiling in US history! It is the Debt Slavery Bill,' he wrote. 'Call your Senator, Call your Congressman, Bankrupting America is NOT ok! KILL the BILL.' Musk also declared that the planned additional spending and the debt ceiling hike included in the bill 'more than defeats all the cost savings achieved by the DOGE team '. The blatant attack on the bill raised eyebrows given Musk's deep connections with the Republican party and personal friendship with Trump. Yet, when the US President met privately with White House officials on Wednesday, there was little to suggest that a public spat was in the offing with Musk, whose financial backing and support on social media were instrumental in sealing his second term in the Oval Office. Two White House officials familiar with the matter told a Reuters reporter that Trump expressed confusion and frustration in the meeting about Musk's attacks on his sweeping tax and spending bill. But he held back, the officials said, because he wanted to preserve Musk's political and financial support ahead of the midterm elections. By Thursday afternoon, however, Trump's mood had shifted. He told his team it was time to take the gloves off - and so began a public squabble that caught the world's attention. Trump took to Truth Social to hit back at Musk following criticism of the One Big Beautiful Bill Sitting next to German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed' in his former adviser's criticism of the bill. 'I'm very disappointed with Elon. I've helped him a lot. He knew the inner workings of the bill better than anybody sitting here. He had no problem with it,' he said. 'All of a sudden he had a problem & he only developed the problem when he found out we're going to cut EV mandate,' Trump claimed, in reference to a phasing out of tax credits for purchases of electric vehicles. Musk quickly hit back on social media. 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' he said. Trump went on to say during his meeting with Merz: 'Musk hasn't said bad about me personally, but I´m sure that will be next.' He was quickly proven right. Musk vented his anger directly at Trump, saying his tariffs 'will cause a recession in the second half of this year' and accusing him of lying. He also said it was 'very unfair' that the legislation would eliminate tax incentives for electric vehicles. The back-and-forth devolved from there. Trump posted again on Truth Social, writing: 'Elon was 'wearing thin', I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Musk immediately retorted on X: 'Such an obvious lie. So sad.' Within minutes, he went on to say that it might be time to create a new political party and shared a poll to his followers asking for their opinion. With each post, the spat became yet more virulent - until Musk dropped a new allegation which could one day prove to be the catalyst leading to the downfall of one - if not both - participants. 'Time to drop the really big bomb: (Donald Trump) is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out!' Trump's commitment to greater transparency in the run up to November's election had many Americans hoping that he would shed light on the deplorable activities of sex offender and disgraced financier Epstein - and the litany of rich and famous figures thought to have been involved with him. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 in a Manhattan jail - though there is widespread speculation he may have been murdered. Before he was elected, Trump said he would have 'no problem' releasing files related to Epstein, but almost six months into his presidency, no more information has been revealed. Following the wild allegation, Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment. Musk endorsed a post on X from Ian Miles Cheong, a right-wing activist and prominent supporter of the tech mogul, calling for Trump's impeachment. Trump retorted on Truth Social by threatening to cut off Elon's companies from various lucrative government contracts. 'The easiest way to save money in our budget, billions and billions of dollars, is to terminate Elon's government subsidies and contracts,' Trump posted. Musk promptly fired back, with the SpaceX chief saying he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft in response. The spacecraft is vital for ferrying NASA astronauts to and from the International Space Station. By Friday morning, it appeared the spat was over. In a statement, the White House played down the war of words, calling it an 'unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted.' Musk late last night appeared to extend an olive branch on social media, replying: 'You're not wrong' to a post from hedge fund manager Bill Ackman that called on the pair to reconcile and urged: 'We're much stronger together than apart'. Trump's aides are reportedly looking to organise a call between the president and his former 'First Buddy' later today to smooth over the fallout. Musk also walked back his statement about decommissioning the Dragon rocket. But the consequences of the spat were immediate. Musk yesterday said he would begin 'decommissioning' his company's Dragon spacecraft use to take astronauts to and from the International Space Station after Trump threatened to terminate government contracts with the tech mogul's companies Tesla's stock price plunged 14% on Thursday - wiping hundreds of billions of dollars off Musk's EV company's valuation. It also drove uncertainty among Trump's allies in Congress, who are working to pass the monumental spending package that Democrats and a small number of vocal Republicans oppose. The breakup could go on to drastically reshape both men's futures. For Trump, losing Musk's backing threatens his growing influence among tech donors, social media audiences and younger male voters - key groups that may now be harder to reach. It could also prove a damaging blow to Republican fundraising efforts ahead of next year's midterm elections. For Musk, however, the stakes are potentially even higher. The spat risks intensified scrutiny of his business practices that could jeopardise government contracts and invite regulatory probes, which might seriously threaten his companies' profits. A termination of government contracts, including for launching rockets and for the use of the Starlink satellite service, would prove devastating.

Legal blow for Trump as judge blocks ban on Harvard's foreign students
Legal blow for Trump as judge blocks ban on Harvard's foreign students

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Legal blow for Trump as judge blocks ban on Harvard's foreign students

A judge has temporarily blocked President Donald Trump from barring international students from entering the US to study at Harvard University over alleged 'national security' concerns. Judge Allison Burroughs issued a temporary restraining order, saying that Trump's directive would cause "immediate and irreparable injury" before the courts could review the case. Trump claimed Harvard refused to provide information about "known illegal activity" on campus allegedly committed by international students. Harvard has filed a claim stating that Trump violated federal law by failing to back up his allegations about national security. University spokesperson Jason Newton says Harvard will continue to protect its international students.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store